| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Laboratory of Veterinary Physiology, Kitasato University School of Veterinary Medicine, Towada, Aomori 034-8628, Japan
Correspondence should be addressed to S Kurusu; Email: kurusu{at}vmas.kitasato-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
to ovarian corpus luteum) manners (Funk 2001). Roles of the COX pathway in ovulation are well established. The inducible type PTGS2 and PGE2-EP2 receptor signaling play crucial roles in proper follicle rupture and cumulus expansion in a murine model of induced ovulation (Hizaki et al. 1999, Matsumoto et al. 2001, Ochsner et al. 2003, Sirois et al. 2004b). Pharmacological or genetical inhibition of PTGS2 activity results in potential suppression of ovulation (Espey et al. 1986, Tanaka et al. 1991, Lim et al. 1997, Mikuni et al. 1998a). On the other hand, the involvement of the alternative LOX pathway in ovulation process was first suggested by Reich et al. (1983) who demonstrated that chemical inhibition of LOX blunted ovulatory response in gonadotropins-primed immature rats. Since then, several following studies using a LOX inhibitor (Yoshimura et al. 1991, Downey et al. 1998, Mikuni et al. 1998b) have supported this notion, but others (Carvalho et al. 1989, Hellberg et al. 1990) did not. These discrepancies appear to have arisen from differences in the dose and the route of drug administration, experimental systems, and animal species examined. In all of the studies with a significant impact of LOX inhibition, the action mechanism of the inhibitor on ovulatory process has been virtually obscure. The specificity of the widely used inhibitor nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) against LOX is somewhat doubted (Van Wauwe & Goossens 1983, Miyazawa et al. 1985). The effect of timing of drug administration relative to that of LH/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulus has not been taken into consideration. Furthermore, while actual preovulatory changes of the LOX pathway eicosanoids in rat ovarian tissues in vivo or isolated perfused system have been intensively studied (Espey et al. 1989, 1991, Tanaka et al. 1991, Higuchi et al. 1995, Mikuni et al. 1998b), the information on the identity of LOX enzymes present in the preovulatory follicle (Pridham et al. 1990) and their possible regulation by LH/hCG stimulus (Reich et al. 1985) is still limited.
To address these issues, this study further defines the effects of LOX pathway inhibition on ovulation by means of two different drugs and implicates LOX activity in the early phase of hCG-initiated follicular signaling in induction of PTGS2 activity. Supplementary to this is the immunohistochemical demonstration of LOX isoforms in rat preovulatory follicles.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of two different inhibitors and time dependency of their administration were examined. In the first series of experiment, one side of ovary was treated with vehicle or increasing doses of NDGA and the contralateral intact ovary served as control. Vehicle treatment at hCG0h resulted in a subtle, insignificant decline in ovulation rate compared with that of control group (Fig. 1A). NDGA treatment at hCG0h caused a dose-dependent inhibition of ovulation. The least dose tested (0.01 mg per ovary) was found to be effective (P<0.01) and the largest dose (1.0 mg) gave a 95.0% inhibition of that of control ovaries. When NDGA treatment was delayed as late as hCG6h, it also reduced ovulation rate but the inhibitory effect was modest compared with those of the same doses of administration at hCG0h.
|
Ovulatory impairment by DPE (0.1 mg) treatment at hCG0h was significantly (P<0.01) reversed by systemic administration of PGE2 at hCG6h (Fig. 1B). NDGA-treated ovary was also rescued by this PG supplementation. The counts of proper ovum release into the oviduct ampulla in both groups were comparable with those of vehicle-treated and intact groups.
Effects of LOX inhibitors on ovarian PTGS2 expression, PGE2 content, and progesterone secretion
Based on the established role of PGE2 (Davis et al. 1999, Matsumoto et al. 2001, Ochsner et al. 2003) and the current data of a possible rescue effect of PGE2 on the LOX inhibitors-treated ovaries, the authors analyzed whether tissue PGE2 synthetic response was impaired in the drug-treated ovaries. PGE2 content in vehicle-treated ovaries showed a 7.1-fold increase (P<0.01) at hCG8h (Fig. 2). NDGA (0.1 mg)-treated ovaries also showed a significant (P<0.05, versus hCG0h value) increase, but the PGE2 synthetic response was modest (P=0.10, versus vehicle-treated ovaries). In DPE (0.1 mg)-treated ovaries, no significant increase was elicited following hCG and there was a significant (P<0.05) reduction in tissue PG level compared with that of temporarily matched control.
|
|
|
Distribution of immunoreactive LOX isoforms in the preovulatory follicle
The final experiment of this study examined cellular distribution of immunoreactivity of LOX isoforms in preovulatory follicles. Preliminary experiments checked the cross-reactivity of the used antibodies against respective LOX antigens with lung (ALOX5 and -12) and spleen (ALOX12) positive controls. As was consistent with the previously reported results (Maruyama et al. 1989, Covin et al. 1998, Kawajiri et al. 2000), alveolar epithelial cells in the lung and white pulp in the spleen of adult rats showed positive immunoreaction for respective antigen (data not shown).
Moderately positive immunoreactivity of ALOX5 was present in both the thecal and granulosa layers of only equine CG (eCG)-treated mature follicles (at hCG0h; Fig. 4A). Upon subsequent hCG stimulation, the thecal layer showed augmented immunoreactivity at hCG8h (Fig. 4B). Granulosa cells also exhibited increased positive reactions but with less intensity than that of the thecal layer. Immunoreactivity of ALOX12 was also present in preovulatory ovaries prior to hCG stimulation (Fig. 4C). At hCG8h, thecal layer showed increased ALOX12 immunoreaction and scattered signals appeared in some, but not all, of the mature follicles (Fig. 4D). Replacement of the primary antibody with non-immune IgG produced no immunoreaction in the ovary at hCG0h (Fig. 4E).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current use of a novel specific inhibitor DPE has further established a definitive role of the LOX pathway in ovulation, at least in rats. Comparing its effects and those of the classical inhibitor NDGA has revealed common and somewhat different features. As inhibition of ovulation as well as PTGS2 induction were commonly seen following both inhibitor treatments at the early phase, it is very likely that those alterations occurred as results of specific inhibition of LOX activity. It is also notable that the effect on ovulation of acute and probably transient LOX inhibition tends to differ between the early (hCG0h
) and the late (hCG6h
) phases of hCG signaling. More marked inhibition of ovulation by NDGA might be ascribed to two additional effects of this inhibitor. One is an antioxidant property (Carlson et al. 1995, Takami et al. 1999) since oxidative stress contributes to the ovulation process (Riley & Behrman 1991), and another is some cross-reactivity with COX that becomes expressed at the high dose (Van Wauwe & Goossens 1983, Miyazawa et al. 1985).
The primary result of this study is to link the early phase LOX activity to following induction of PTGS2 activity. Pretreatment with NDGA or DPE tended to attenuate or did prevent PGE2 synthetic response to hCG respectively. This is consistent with a previously reported result that NDGA inhibition of ovulation was accompanied with reduced PGE2 and PGF2
production (Mikuni et al. 1998b). Importantly, the present finding of attenuated PTGS2 expression after inhibitors treatment has implicated the reduced PTGS2 activity in decreased PGE2 response. As DPE does not inhibit, and may actually enhance, COX activity (Kohyama et al. 1997), attenuated PGE2 response by this drug must have occurred as a result of the specific direct inhibition of LOX and subsequent indirect inhibition of COX. Furthermore, the inhibitors-induced impaired follicular rupture would have been mediated, at least partly, by the reduction in PGE2 synthesis, as their anti-ovulatory effects were significantly restored by PGE2 supplementation. Taken together, it is very likely that PTGS2/PGE2 pathway functions downstream of the LOX pathway in the ovulatory cascade. There appear to be some little inconsistencies among alterations in PTGS2 immunoreactivity, PGE2 level, and ovulation rate in NDGA versus DPE treatment groups. There are several possibilities for these causes that 1) PGE2 content in whole ovarian tissues was determined, 2) AA availability and/or PGE2 synthase activity might be altered, 3) granulosa PTGS2 immunoreactivity and ovarian PGE2 level were assayed at only one time point, and 4) factor(s) other than PTGS2/PGE2 pathway might also be responsible for determining ovulatory outcome.
Thecal and granulosa layers of preovulatory follicles are identified as the probable sites of ALOX5 and ALOX12 expression that is sensitive to hCG stimulus. The localization of LOXs is temporarily and spatially associated with that of group IVA PLA2 (Kurusu et al. 1998; this study). This AA-selective PLA2 isoform and ALOX5 are subject to common post-translational regulations, which are phosphorylation by MAP kinase and the rise in cytosolic Ca2+ (Radmark et al. 2007). Another line of evidence has shown that the basal activity of group IVA PLA2 is important for determining the level of PTGS2 induction in a murine model (S Kurusu, A Sapirstein, E O'Leary, X Sun, M Kawaminami and J V Bonventre, unpublished observation). Combined findings of these histological, biochemical, and functional studies suggest that group IVA PLA2–ALOX5 pathway regulates the tone of granulosa cell Ptgs2 gene expression in the early phase of LH-initiated signaling.
The role of the late phase LOX pathway is still undefined. Rat preovulatory follicles responded to hCG stimulus in vivo with a fivefold increase in ALOX5 enzymatic activity (Reich et al. 1985) and the increased immunoreactivity of ALOX5 and ALOX12 (this study) during 6–8 h. In fact, ovarian contents of 12- and 15-HETEs and LTC4S/CYSLTR1/E4 change in a temporal pattern similar to those of COX metabolites PGE2 and PGF2
, starting to increase around 6 h after hCG and remaining elevated until 12–14 h when follicular rupture occurs (Espey et al. 1989, 1991, Higuchi et al. 1995). Impacts on ovulation of a bolus LOX inhibitor treatment at hCG6h were reduced or absent. It is also notable that the LOX inhibitor is not so potential as the COX inhibitor indomethacin when the drug is administered to block activated production of eicosanoids during the latter preovulatory phase (Espey et al. 1986, 1989, Tanaka et al. 1991). These facts suggest that the role of the LOX pathway in ovulatory process is minor than that of the COX pathway and relatively dispensable. They, however, do not exclude out the possibility that the LOX metabolites are with some effects during the period. In the circumstance of ovulatory cascade, which is considered analogous to inflammatory response (Espey 1980, Richards et al. 2002), several pathways would function in concerted, overlapped, or redundant manners. It is possible that the drastically induced PTGS2 activity is workable to compensate for the loss of LOX activity.
Preferential localization of ALOX5 and ALOX12 immunoreactivity in thecal layers at hCG8h suggests that this pathway is affected by follicular microvasculature and vice versa. Evident appearance of intense immunoreactivities for ALOX5 and/or ALOX12 is likely elicited by mast or basophilic cells that are shown to accumulate in the preovulatory follicle wall (Richards et al. 2002, Espey & Richards 2006). The induced LOX may be involved in follicular microcirculation and hemodynamics such as chemotaxis, vasodilation, and extravasation. To date, only leukotriene B4 is shown to be a putative effecter of the LOX pathway eicosanoid because anti-ovulatory effect of NDGA could be reversed by this eicosanoid (Yoshimura et al. 1991, Mikuni et al. 1998b) and was mimicked by its receptor antagonist (Matousek et al. 2001). Many important issues, however, remain to be answered such as the identification of the effecter metabolite(s), the spatial and temporal pattern of their synthesis, and action mechanism for the proper induction of PTGS2 protein and other possible activities including tissue degradation/remodeling processes.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated the expression of ALOX5 and ALOX12 in the preovulatory follicle and that inhibiting the early phase LOX activity led to reduction in preovulatory PTGS2 induction and PGE2 production and thus defective ovulation. These findings may help to understand the mechanism for the involvement of the LOX pathway in LH-triggered ovulatory response, at least the induction of PTGS2 activity, in rats.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and ovulation induction
Rats of Wistar–Imamichi strain were used in the present study. They were originally introduced from Imamichi Institute of Animal Reproduction (Saitama, Japan) and had been bred in our laboratory. They were housed in light (light on 0500–1900)- and temperature (23±3 °C)-controlled rooms and water and food pellets were always available. Female rats of 25–27 day old and weighing 50–70 g were treated with a single dose of eCG (i.p., 0.2 iu/g of body weight) and followed 48 h later by hCG (5 iu/rat) to induce ovulation. Ovulation rate (= the number of released eggs) was determined at 24 h after hCG (depicted as hCG24h in this paper) as reported previously (Kurusu et al. 1998). Briefly, rats were killed by cervical dislocation under light diethyl ether anesthesia. The ovaries and oviducts were sampled. The eggs present in the ampulla of the oviduct were counted under a light microscope. For immunohistochemical study, three adult rats were also killed and lung and spleen were sampled.
All procedures employed in this study were carried out following the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Kitasato University.
Experiments
In a pilot experiment, 10 mg NDGA dissolved in 0.1 ml dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was injected intraperitoneally with an ovulatory hCG. As this systemic treatment had no significant effect on ovulation but side effects on gastrointestinal system (described in the Result section), the local (intra-ovarian bursa) treatment was adopted to achieve the localized and more effective actions of the drug in all of the following experiments. As rats in the similar gonadotropins-priming protocol started to ovulate at about 12 h after hCG administration (Espey et al. 1989, 1991), the preovulatory period after hCG administration was divided into the early (the first half, hCG0h to hCG6h) and the latter (the second half, after hCG6h) phases and a bolus of the drug was treated at hCG0h or hCG6h to examine the time dependency of the effect.
Experiment 1
To examine the effects of NDGA, the drug (0.01, 0.1, or 1.0 mg) dissolved in 50 µl of 20% (v/v) DMSO in physiological saline was administered into the left ovarian bursa at hCG0h or hCG6h. The contralateral intact ovary served as each control group. In a separate group the vehicle was challenged. In this series of experiments, the value of ovulation rate was transformed to a percentage of that of the contralateral ovary. As shown in Fig. 1A, 6–10 rats were used for each experimental group.
Experiment 2
To examine the effects of DPE, the drug (0.02 or 0.1 mg) dissolved in the vehicle described above was administered into both ovarian bursa of the same animal at hCG0h or hCG6h. The group of NDGA (0.1 mg) treatment at hCG0h was prepared as well. Vehicle treatment group served as control groups. To test the possible compensatory effect of PGE2, some rats that had received local DPE or NDGA (both, 0.1 mg) at hCG0h subsequently received systemic challenge with 80 µg PGE2 at hCG6h.
For evaluation of ovulation rates, rats were killed by cervical dislocation after blood sampling by heart puncture and ovaries sampled at hCG24h. Ovarian PTGS2 activity and steroid synthesis at the preovulatory period was evaluated at hCG8h. For their biochemical analyses, rats that were treated locally with vehicle, NDGA (0.1 mg), or DPE (0.1 mg) at hCG0h were killed and ovaries sampled at hCG8h. Intact ovaries at hCG0h were also sampled. Aliquots of ovaries were stored frozen (–80 °C) until the analysis of tissue PGE2 level, and the other ones were instantly processed for tissue fixation for PTGS2 and LOXs immunohistochemistry. For LOX immunohistochemistry, lungs and spleen were sampled from adult rats. Blood plasma samples were stored frozen (–20 °C) until the steroid assay.
Assay of PGE2 and progesterone
Ovarian PGE2 was determined according to a previously published method (Higuchi et al. 1995, Kurusu et al. 1998) using a commercial EIA kit. Briefly, the ovary was homogenized in 0.05 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.4) containing 0.9% NaCl, 0.01% Triton X100, and 0.0057% thimerosal and then centrifuged at 10 000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was assayed directly without any extraction or separation from other eicosanoids and lipids. PGE2 values were standardized by protein amount that was determined using a protein assay kit (Bio Rad).
Blood samples in experimental rats collected at hCG8h and at hCG24h were assayed for plasma progesterone levels. Progesterone was extracted by n-hexane and assayed by RIA as reported previously (Kurusu et al. 2007).
Immunohistochemistry
Preovulatory follicular expression of PTGS2 and LOX isoforms (ALOX5 and ALOX12) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry as reported previously (Kurusu et al. 1998). Ovarian tissues obtained at hCG0h, hCG3h, and hCG8h were fixed in Bouin's fixative, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Samples of three to four individual rats in each group were collected and examined. Tissues were serially sectioned (6 µm in thickness), deparaffinized, and examined immunochemically. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by pretreatment with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min. Tissue sections were incubated with anti-PTGS2 (used at 1:500), anti-ALOX5 (used at 1:200), or anti-ALOX12 (used at 1:200) at 4 °C overnight. Antigen/antibody complexes were visualized with the Vectastain Elite ABC staining kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and DAB as peroxidase substrate. Controls were performed with normal (non-immunized) mouse IgG. All slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin.
The first immunohistochemical experiment was undertaken to evaluate PTGS2 expression in hCG8h ovaries that had been treated with vehicle, NDGA or DPE at hCG0h. Ovarian sample at hCG0h served as negative control for PTGS2 immunohistochemistry. More than 30 mature follicles whose largest diameter was over 500 µm from three to four different ovarian specimens in each experimental group at hCG8h were evaluated for comparison of expression of immunoreactive PTGS2. The relative intensity of the immunoreactivity in granulosa tissue was evaluated on a scale grading from negative (0), faintly positive (1), moderately positive (2), to strongly positive (3) and statistically analyzed. The second experiment was to examine the presence of immunoreactivity of ALOX5 and ALOX12 in the preovulatory ovaries just before (at hCG0h) and 8 h after hCG treatment (hCG8h). This experiment was also carried out for three different samples at each time point. Sections of lung and spleen of adult rats served as positive controls for ALOX5 (lung) and ALOX12 (lung and spleen) immunohistochemistry (Maruyama et al. 1989, Covin et al. 1998, Kawajiri et al. 2000).
Statistical analysis
Data were presented as mean with S.E.M. The means among different groups were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Student's paired t-test or Tukey–Kramer's multiple comparison test, or Mann–Whitney U test as appropriate. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
| Declaration of interest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Funding |
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received June 9, 2008
First decision September 10, 2008
Revised manuscript received July 22, 2008
Accepted October 17, 2008
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carlson JC, Sawada M, Boone DL & Stauffer JM 1995 Stimulation of progesterone secretion in dispersed cells of rat corpora lutea by antioxidants. Steroids 60 272–276.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Carvalho CB, Yeik BS & Murdoch WJ 1989 Significance of follicular cyclooxygenase and lipooxygenase pathways of metabolism of arachidonate in sheep. Prostaglandins 37 553–558.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Covin RB, Brock TG, Bailie MB & Peters-Golden M 1998 Altered expression and localization of 5-lipoxygenase accompany macrophage differentiation in the lung. American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 275 L303–L310.
Davis BJ, Lennard DE, Lee CA, Tiano HF, Morham SG, Wetsel WC & Langenbach R 1999 Anovulation in cyclooxygenase-2-deficient mice is restored by prostaglandin E2 and interleukin-1β. Endocrinology 140 2685–2695.
Downey BR, Mootoo JE & Doyle SE 1998 A role for lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid in porcine ovulation. Animal Reproduction Science 49 269–279.[CrossRef][Medline]
Espey LL 1980 Ovulation as an inflammatory reaction: a hypothesis. Biology of Reproduction 22 73–106.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Espey LL & Richards JS2006OvulationE Knobil & JD NeillIn The Physiology of Reproduction 5New York:Raven Press:425–500.
Espey LL, Norris C & Saphire D 1986 Effect of time and dose of indomethacin on follicular prostaglandins and ovulation in the rabbit. Endocrinology 119 746–754.
Espey LL, Tanaka N, Adams RF & Okamura H 1989 Increase in ovarian leukotrienes during hormonally induced ovulation in the rat. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 256 E753–E759.
Espey LL, Tanaka N, Adams RF & Okamura H 1991 Ovarian hydroxyeicosatetraenoid acid compared with prostanoids and steroids during ovulation in rats. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 260 E163–E169.
Funk CD 2001 Prostaglandins and leukotrienes: advances in eicosanoid biology. Science 294 1871–1875.
Gaytan M, Bellido C, Morales C, Sanchez-Criado JE & Gaytan F 2006 Effects of selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways in follicle rupture and ovulation in the rat. Reproduction 132 571–577.
Hellberg P, Holmes PV, Brannstrom M, Olofsson J & Janson PO 1990 Inhibition of lipoxygenase increases the ovulation rate in the in vitro perfused luteinizing hormone-stimulated rabbit ovary. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 138 557–564.[Web of Science][Medline]
Higuchi Y, Yoshimura T, Tanaka N, Ogino H, Sumiyama M & Kawakami S 1995 Different time-course production of peptidic and nonpeptidic leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 and F2
in the ovary during ovulation in gonadtropin-primed immature rats. Prostaglandins 49 131–140.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hizaki H, Segi E, Sugimoto Y, Hirose M, Saji T, Ushikubi F, Matsuoka T, Noda Y, Tanaka T, Yoshida N et al. 1999 Abortive expansion of the cumulus and impaired fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP2. PNAS 96 10501–10506.
Kawajiri H, Zhuang D, Qiao N, Yoshimoto T, Yamamoto M, Iseki S & Hamaguchi M 2000 Expression of arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase in rat tissues: a possible role in glucagon secretion. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 48 1411–1420.
Kohyama N, Nagata T, Fujimoto S & Sekiya K 1997 Inhibition of arachidonate lipoxygenase activities by 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)ethanol, a phenolic compound from Olives. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 61 347–350.[Medline]
Kurusu S, Iwao M, Kawaminami M & Hashimoto I 1998 Involvement of cytosolic phospholipase A2 in the ovulatory process in gonadotropin-primed immature rats. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes, and Essential Fatty Acids 58 405–411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kurusu S, Ohkawa M & Kawaminami M 2007 Effects of arachidonate cascade inhibitors on basal and human chorionic gonadotropin-stimulated progesterone secretion in rat dispersed luteal cells in vitro. Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators 83 139–145.[Medline]
Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM & Dey SK 1997 Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase-2 deficient mice. Cell 91 197–208.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Maruyama H, Ueda N, Yoshimoto T, Yamamoto S, Komatsu N & Watanabe K 1989 Immunohistocheemical study of arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase in porcine tissues. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 37 1125–1131.[Abstract]
Matousek M, Mitsube K, Mikuni M & Brannstrom M 2001 Inhibition of ovulation in the rat by a leukotriene B4 receptor antagonist. Molecular Human Reproduction 7 35–42.
Matsumoto H, Ma W, Smalley W, Trzaskos J, Breyer R & Dey SK 2001 Diversification of cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandins in ovulation and implantation. Biology of Reproduction 64 1557–1565.
Mikuni M, Pall M, Peterson CM, Peterson CA, Hellberg P, Brannstrom M, Richards JS & Hedin L 1998a The selective prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 inhibitor, NS-398, reduces prostaglandin production and ovulation in vivo and in vitro in the rat. Biology of Reproduction 59 1077–1083.
Mikuni M, Yoshida M, Hellberg P, Peterson CA, Pall M, Edwin SS & Peterson CM 1998b The lipoxygenase inhibitor, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, inhibits ovulation and reduces leukotriene and prostaglandin levels in the rat ovary. Biology of Reproduction 58 1211–1216.
Miyazawa K, Iimori Y, Makino M, Mikami T & Miyasaka K 1985 Effects of some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other agents on cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase activities in some enzyme preparation. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 38 199–205.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ochsner SA, Russel DL & Richards JS 2003 Decreased expression of tumor necrosis factor-
-stimulated gene 6 in cumulus cells of the cyclooxygenase-2 and EP2 null mice. Endocrinology 144 1008–1019.
Pridham D, Lei ZM, Chegini ZM, Rao ChV, Yussman MA & Cook CL 1990 Light and electron microscope immunocytochemical localization of 5- and 12-lipoxygenases and cyclooxygenase enzymes in human granulosa cells from preovulatory follicles. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes, and Essential Fatty Acids 39 231–238.[Medline]
Radmark O, Werz O, Steinhilber D & Samuelsson B 2007 5-Lipoxygenase: regulation of expression and enzyme activity. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 32 332–341.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Reich R, Kohen F, Naor Z & Tsafriri A 1983 Possible involvement of lipoxygenase products of arachidonic acid pathway in ovulation. Prostaglandins 26 1011–1020.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Reich R, Kohen F, Slager R & Tsafriri A 1985 Ovarian lipoxygenase activity and its regulation by gonadotropin in the rat. Prostaglandins 30 581–590.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Richards JS, Russel DL, Ochsner S & Espey LL 2002 Ovulation: new dimensions and new regulators of the inflammatory-like reaction. Annual Review of Physiology 64 69–92.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Riley JC & Behrman HR 1991 Oxygen radicals and reactive oxygen species in reproduction. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 198 781–791.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shimizu T & Wolfe LS 1990 Arachidnoic acid cascade and signal transduction. Journal of Neurochemistry 55 1–15.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sirois J, Boerboom D & Sayasith KProstaglandin biosynthesis and action in the ovaryPCK Leung & EY AdashiIn The Ovary 22004aSan Diego:Elsevier Academic Press:233–247.
Sirois J, Sayasith K, Brown KA, Stock AE, Bouchard N & Dore M 2004b Cyclooxygenase-2 and its role in ovulation: a 2004 account. Human Reproduction Update 10 373–385.
Takami M, Preston SL, Toyloy VA & Behrman HR 1999 Anti-oxidants reversibly inhibit the spontaneous resumption of meiosis. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 276 684–688.
Tanaka N, Espey LL, Kawano T & Okamura H 1991 Comparison of inhibitory actions of indomethacin and epostane on ovulation in rats. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 260 E170–E174.
Van Wauwe J & Goossens J 1983 Effects of antioxidants on cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase activity in intact human platelets: comparison with indomethacin and ETYA. Prostaglandins 26 725–730.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yoshimura Y, Nakamura Y, Shiraki M, Hirota Y, Yamada H, Ando M, Ubukata Y & Suzuki M 1991 Involvement of leukotriene B4 in ovulation in the rabbit. Endocrinology 129 193–199.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |