| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH |
Departement des Sciences Animales, Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Centre de Recherche en Biologie de la Reproduction, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1K 7P4
Correspondence should be addressed to M-A Sirard; Email: marc-andre.sirard{at}crbr.ulaval.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
According to previous studies, the major embryonic transcriptional activation corresponding to the MET in bovine occurs around the 8- to 16-cell-stage embryos (Camous et al. 1986, King et al. 1988, Frei et al. 1989, Kopecny et al. 1989, Telford et al. 1990). However, subsequent studies have shown that some transcription also occurs in earlier stages, in the two- or four-cell embryos (Barnes & First 1991, Plante et al. 1994, Hyttel et al. 1996, Viuff et al. 1996, Lavoir et al. 1997, Memili et al. 1998, Natale et al. 2000). However, this early transcription is slighter and the major activation of transcription still appears to occur in the eight-cell-stage embryos.
One reason explaining the transcriptional silencing in pre-MET embryos is the presence of an inhibitive state of chromatin in these stages (Newport & Kirschner 1982, Majumder et al. 1993, Wiekowski et al. 1993). One major modification inducing remodeling of this silent chromatin is the acetylation of the histone tails from the nucleosome, which results in a relaxed chromatin structure, and therefore allows the binding of the transcriptional machinery and transcription activation (reviewed, Hassig & Schreiber 1997). However, even in the presence of a permissive chromatin, the cell needs a functional transcriptional machinery to recruit the RNA polymerase II to the transcription initiation sites.
At least in Xenopus laevis, deficient basal transcriptional machinery is a limitative aspect for transcriptional activation pre-MET. Indeed, the injection of exogenous TATA box-binding protein (TBP) in early embryos in permissive conditions results in a premature activation of transcription, prior to the normal timing of MET (Almouzni & Wolffe 1995). TBP is a general transcription factor that has a key role in the RNA polymerase II recruitment, and its absence in Xenopus pre-MET embryos (Veenstra et al. 1999) confirms the hypothesis that pre-MET embryos are deficient in some key factors necessary for proper transcriptional activity. This regulation of transcription by TBP in early embryos seems evolutionarily conserved since mouse pre-MET embryos show a nuclear presence of TBP, which increases substantially at MET (Worrad et al. 1994, Gazdag et al. 2007), and the knock down of TBP in zebra fish affects the expression of a subset of genes at the MET (Muller et al. 2001).
The maternal contribution of the oocyte in mRNA coding for transcription factors like TBP is crucial to the embryo. These stockpiles of mRNA are masked in messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes (mRNPs) that protect it from premature translation and degradation (reviewed, Weston & Sommerville 2006). Y-box protein 2 (YBX2) is a major component of the mRNPs found in oocytes (Bouvet & Wolffe 1994, Yu et al. 2001) and plays an essential role in the storage of maternal mRNA for the normal subsequent embryonic development (Yu et al. 2004).
Recent studies have shown that the maternal mRNA levels of stockpiled genes exhibit a rapid decrease in the first cleavage stages in early bovine embryos (Vigneault et al. 2004, McGraw et al. 2007). However, TBP and YBX2 display an mRNA profile, in which the mRNA levels are nearly constant until the four-cell stage and do not increase significantly at the blastocyst stage (Vigneault et al. 2004). This implies that these factors are conserved until their presumptive role in the MET at the 8- to 16-cell stage.
Another transcription factor, activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2), involved in the transcription of a wide selection of genes (reviewed Bhoumik et al. 2007), is present and active in MET embryos in Xenopus, which propose a transcriptional regulatory role for ATF2 in pluripotent embryos (Villarreal & Richter 1995). However, ATF2 presence and expression in mammalian embryos were never investigated.
The objective of this paper was to reveal the temporal expression and localization patterns of YBX2, TBP, and ATF2 in bovine early development and to establish their relationship with the timing of the MET. These genes were chosen for their known involvement in the MET of other species and for their particular mRNA profile in early embryo development. Besides identifying factors potentially implicated in MET, we also report a particular relationship between mRNA levels and protein expression during bovine pre-MET development.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because the bovine embryos are transcriptionally silent until MET that occurs at the 8- to 16-cell stage, various mechanisms have to be present to protect the stocked maternal mRNAs from degradation until their translation. In mouse embryos, it is recognized that YBX2 performs such functions (Yu et al. 2001, 2003). This protein is a member of the Y-box family, which binds mRNAs in order to prevent their degradation and also suppresses their translation (Yu et al. 2002). YBX2 mRNA is also present in the bovine and we have previously characterized its expression during early embryo development (Vigneault et al. 2004). The present study demonstrates that the protein expression of YBX2 is similar to the mouse, in that it is more abundant in the early cleavage stages, and decreases after MET (Yu et al. 2001). Our results also showed a prevalence of YBX2 in the cortex of oocytes and early embryos, as previously showed by Yu et al. (2001) in mouse, where it is associated with the cytoskeleton. According to its expression pattern, YBX2 would avoid the premature translation of mRNA in early embryos and keep specific mRNAs intact until they are recruited for specific needs in the developing embryo. Because 16-cell-stage embryos are able to transcribe their own mRNAs, the assistance of RNA-binding proteins like YBX2 is no longer required, and thus offers an explanation to the disappearance of YBX2 protein after MET and implies a role for this protein until the onset of embryonic transcription.
Because high amounts of TBP mRNA are present in the bovine GV oocytes (Vigneault et al. 2004), it was proposed that it could have a potential role in the activation of transcription in the developing embryo. TBP is a core protein that forms the TFIID complex, with other TBP-associated factors (TAFs), which organizes the initiation of transcription. It binds to the TATA box motif in the promoter regions and recruits the basal transcription factors and RNA polymerase II to initiate gene transcription (reviewed, Thomas & Chiang 2006). In the mouse and X. laevis, low levels of TBP protein are detected in fully grown and matured oocytes; however, the levels subsequently increase during development up to the embryonic genome activation (Worrad et al. 1994, Veenstra et al. 1999, Jallow et al. 2004, Yang et al. 2006, Gazdag et al. 2007). Our results also show a similar pattern of TBP protein expression in bovine early development; where protein levels remain low until the eight-cell stage, and then increase through to the blastocyst stage. Thus, this TBP protein accumulation could occur as a result of the translation of maternal TBP mRNA stored in oocytes as observed in mouse embryos (Worrad et al. 1994). Further evidence suggests that TBP is implicated in embryonic transcription, since its early translation directly activates the basal transcription of Xenopus embryos before MET (Veenstra et al. 1999) and its knock down reduces transcription at MET in zebra fish (Muller et al. 2001). The translocation of the TBP protein into the nucleus of embryos approaching MET suggests an active role for this protein in transcriptional activation in both the mouse (Worrad et al. 1994, Wang et al. 2006, Gazdag et al. 2007) and Drosophila embryos (Wang & Lindquist 1998). The present study also provides evidence for nuclear localization of TBP protein during bovine embryo development just prior to MET, suggesting its involvement in MET in the bovine species as well. However, a low amount of TBP protein was detected in the nucleus of earlier stage embryos, which could be related to the faint transcription detected in these stages (Barnes & First 1991, Plante et al. 1994, Hyttel et al. 1996, Viuff et al. 1996, Lavoir et al. 1997, Memili et al. 1998, Natale et al. 2000). Therefore, the intensifying signal of TBP in the nucleus of late 8- and 16-cell embryos concomitant with the disappearance of YBX2 provides evidence in support of the major genome activation in the bovine occurring at the 8- to 16-cell stage.
Our findings also characterized the mRNA and protein expression and localization of ATF2, also known as the CRE-binding protein 1 (CRE-BP1), a member of the large ATF/CREB transcription factor family. This protein induces transcription by binding to cyclic AMP CRE motifs present in many promoters. Our results were surprising as ATF2 protein levels remained constant throughout embryo development, while mRNA levels decreased significantly at the eight-cell stage, just prior to MET. A similar discrepancy between mRNA and protein levels in bovine embryos exists for the gene NLRP5 (Pennetier et al. 2006). The half-life of the protein could explain such patterns. Another possible explanation for our results could be that the proteins present in oocytes and early embryos came from the oocyte and would be replaced by ATF2 proteins translated de novo in early embryos, which would cause the depletion of ATF2 mRNA observed at MET. Moreover, even if the level of ATF2 mRNA detected in blastocysts was quite low compared with the level found in oocytes, this level was not nil and could be at the source of the ATF2 protein detected in this stage. GV oocytes displayed higher amounts of mRNA, but it must be kept in mind that oocytes need to store very high amounts of mRNA for the first embryonic stages, which is not the case for the blastocyst embryos. In contrast to our results, a study in X. laevis showed a different expression pattern for ATF2 mRNA and proteins where low amounts were detected in the oocyte and increased at MET (Villarreal & Richter 1995). This inconsistency between the two species could be explained by minor transcription observed in bovine pre-MET embryos and the duration of the pre-MET period. The period from the resumption of meiosis to the MET in the bovine lasts 90 h, whereas in the pre-MET phase in X. laevis, the 12 cleavages occur in only 6 h where transcription begins (Kimelman et al. 1987). Thus, since this interval is very short in X. laevis, it could be considered that these embryos are less reliant on minor transcription before MET. Further studies need to be conducted to understand the role of ATF2 in early embryo development; however, the presence of high levels of ATF2 in embryonic cells suggests that this transcription factor could be implicated among other things in the expression of genes involved in proliferation and/or maintenance of pluripotency in early embryos.
The present study clearly demonstrates the discrepancy between mRNA and protein profiles in bovine early embryo development, especially pre-MET. Frequently, gene activity is examined by gene expression; however, although there is a strong relationship between mRNA and protein levels in somatic tissues, the situation is drastically distinct in early embryos. Higher mRNA levels of a specific gene in GV oocytes is not reflective of high protein levels at that stage. For some genes, GV oocytes need to stock large amounts of mRNAs to reach MET several days later, at which time embryos become transcriptionally active. For example, TBP is a classic maternally inherited gene that is stored in oocytes as mRNA and later translated in embryos when required. However, YBX2 demonstrates a significant role in the pre-MET period and in the activation of the embryonic genome as both mRNA and protein are elevated in early developmental stages and disappear together after MET. Finally, a distinct situation applies to ATF2, where protein levels remained stable in early embryonic development while ATF2 mRNA levels decreased around MET.
By examining the protein expression and localization of several factors implicated in MET, this study brings forward molecular evidence that strengthens the hypothesis for the timing of the MET at the 8- to 16-cell stage in bovine in vitro embryogenesis. First, expression of the YBX2 protein is in agreement with the period of maternal mRNA masking in bovine embryogenesis, which is a very important period prior to the MET. Secondly, the transcription regulator ATF2 becomes visible in the nucleus of early bovine embryos prior to the MET, and thirdly, TBP accumulates in the nucleus at an appropriate time during the 8- to 16-cell stage. This study also established for the first time the expression and localization of ATF2 in early mammalian embryogenesis. Further investigations such as knock-down experiments using RNA interference could reveal functional details on the implication of these factors, especially ATF2, in the genome activation of early embryos.
Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of characterizing both mRNA and protein levels of specific genes during early embryo development in the understanding of the roles of these genes in early embryo development, as mRNA and protein levels are not always related. By focusing on only three genes, three distinct relationships between mRNA and protein levels in pre-MET bovine embryos were demonstrated.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA extraction and reverse transcription
RNA extraction was performed using the Absolutely RNA Microprep kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. One picogram of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in vitro-transcribed RNA was added before extraction as a technical external control for RNA extraction and RT. The measured amounts of GFP in each pool at the end of the real-time PCR validate and measure the efficiency of the extraction and RT for each pool extracted, and this quantitative value is used to correct the levels of the other genes measured in these pools. Three pools of 20 oocytes and embryos of each stage were used for extraction. In brief, the RNA extracted from each pool with the Absolutely RNA Microprep kit was precipitated with isopropanol and linear acrylamide and the pellets were washed with 75% ethanol. These dried pellets were resuspended in water containing oligo-dT primers, heated for 5 min at 65 °C to destabilize RNA secondary structures, and chilled on ice before the addition of the Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase (Qiagen) components. The RT reactions were performed at 37 °C for 2 h. For a detailed procedure, see Vigneault et al. (2004). Oligo-dT primers were used instead of random hexamers to measure the polyadenylated form of the mRNA studied, which are related to the population of mRNA susceptible to be translated in the corresponding protein.
Real-time PCR
The primers for ATF2 amplification were designed using Primer3 web (Rozen & Skaletsky 2000) and from consensus sequences generally derived from human and mouse sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Primers used are 5'-GTAATCACCCAGGCACCATC-3' and 5'-GGATTCCTGGAACACTAGGC-3'. An annealing temperature of 58°C was used. For detailed LightCycler procedure and quantification, refer to Vigneault et al. (2004).
Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting was performed on bovine oocytes and embryos with each antibody to ensure their specificity for studies, as well as to examine protein expression across the different stages of development. For the antibody specificity testing, 30 GV-stage oocytes were used for YBX2, 100 GV-stage oocytes were used for ATF2, and 80 blastocysts were used for testing with TBP antibody. For temporal protein expression immunoblots, 75 oocytes and embryos of each stage were directly lysed in 2x SDS-PAGE sample buffer, resolved on standard 10% SDS-PAGE gels, and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Osmonics, Minnetonka, MN, USA) using a semi-dry transfer apparatus following the Tris/CAPS discontinuous buffer protocol from Bio-Rad (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The transfer was performed at 1.5 mAMP/cm2 for 45 min at room temperature. Membrane blotting was performed as followed: the membrane was blocked in blocking solution for 90 min at room temperature and then incubated with the first antibody overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were washed three times for 15 min with TBS-Tween (0.05%), and incubated with secondary antibody, goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), HRP conjugate (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen), and diluted 1:300 000 in 2% non-fat dry milk in TBS-Tween (0.05%). The membranes were washed three times with TBS-Tween (0.05%) and revealed with ECL Advance Western Blotting Detection kit from Amersham (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA). Blocking solution contained 5% non-fat dry milk for YBX2 and ATF2, 10% goat serum/3% milk for TBP, and 2% ECL advance blocking reagent for β-actin. For incubations, antibodies were diluted in their corresponding blocking solutions diluted 1:1 with TBS-T. Antibody dilutions were 1:10 000, 1:500, 1:1000, and 1:1000 for YBX2, ATF2, TBP, and β-actin respectively. ATF2 (#sc-187) and TBP (#sc-204) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), β-Actin (#4967) antibody was bought from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA), and YBX2 was a kind gift from Dr Richard Schultz from the University of Pennsylvania. The same membrane was used for all four antibodies. To ensure the validity of these results, the complete immunoblotting was repeated two more times with new membranes created with new oocytes (50) and embryos (50) of each stage for each replicate. Therefore, immunoblot experiments were performed three times and equivalent results were obtained with each replicate. Protein expression was quantified with the software ImageJ (Rasband 1997–2007) developed by the National Institutes of Health, and the relative expression level was expressed with respect to the stage with the higher level detected.
Immunofluorescence
GV- and MII-stage oocytes; 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-cell embryos, morulae, and blastocysts were attached onto poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips; fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 30 min at room temperature; and then permeabilized in PBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 for 30 min. Samples were washed three times for 15 min before blocking for 2 h at room temperature. Blocking solution contained 5% non-fat dry milk for YBX2 and ATF2 and 10% goat serum/3% milk for TBP. The samples were then incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The antibodies used for immunofluorescence were the same as those used for immunoblotting and they were diluted in their corresponding blocking solutions diluted 1:1 with TBS-T. The dilutions used were 1:5000, 1:300, and 1:500 for YBX2, ATF2, and TBP respectively. The samples were washed three times for 15 min with TBS-T (0.05%) and were incubated for 45 min in the secondary antibody solution containing the Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG diluted 1:1000 (Invitrogen) in a solution of TBS-T containing 2% non-fat dry milk. Three washes of 15 min each with TBS-T were performed prior to incubation for 10 min in propidium iodide (10 µg/ml) in PBS for nuclear staining. Negative controls were prepared with either no primary antibody or normal rabbit serum (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicates, and at least five oocytes or embryos were observed each time on a Nikon TE2000 confocal microscope (Nikon, Mississauga, ON, Canada).
Statistical analysis
The levels of mRNA were normalized using the GFP external control, as described previously (Vigneault et al. 2004, McGraw et al. 2006). Statistically significant differences in the mRNA levels for ATF2 and protein levels for ATF2, YBX2, and TBP between each developmental stage were calculated by ANOVA followed by a Newman–Keuls test. Replicates were included in the statistical model. Differences were considered statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (P<0.05). Data are presented as mean±S.E.M.
| Declaration of interest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Funding |
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received February 19, 2008
First decision September 2, 2008
Revised manuscript received March 18, 2008
Accepted September 19, 2008
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Almouzni G & Wolffe AP 1995 Constraints on transcriptional activator function contribute to transcriptional quiescence during early Xenopus embryogenesis. EMBO Journal 14 1752–1765.[Web of Science][Medline]
Barnes FL & First NL 1991 Embryonic transcription in in vitro cultured bovine embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 29 117–123.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bhoumik A, Lopez-Bergami P & Ronai Z 2007 ATF2 on the double – activating transcription factor and DNA damage response protein. Pigment Cell Research 20 498–506.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bouvet P & Wolffe AP 1994 A role for transcription and FRGY2 in masking maternal mRNA within Xenopus oocytes. Cell 77 931–941.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Camous S, Kopecny V & Flechon JE 1986 Autoradiographic detection of the earliest stage of [3H]-uridine incorporation into the cow embryo. Biologie Cellulaire 58 195–200.
Frei RE, Schultz GA & Church RB 1989 Qualitative and quantitative changes in protein synthesis occur at the 8–16-cell stage of embryogenesis in the cow. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 86 637–641.
Gazdag E, Rajkovic A, Torres-Padilla ME & Tora L 2007 Analysis of TATA-binding protein 2 (TBP2) and TBP expression suggests different roles for the two proteins in regulation of gene expression during oogenesis and early mouse development. Reproduction 134 51–62.
Hassig CA & Schreiber SL 1997 Nuclear histone acetylases and deacetylases and transcriptional regulation: HATs off to HDACs. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 1 300–308.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hyttel P, Viuff D, Avery B, Laurincik J & Greve T 1996 Transcription and cell cycle-dependent development of intranuclear bodies and granules in two-cell bovine embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 108 263–270.
Jallow Z, Jacobi UG, Weeks DL, Dawid IB & Veenstra GJ 2004 Specialized and redundant roles of TBP and a vertebrate-specific TBP paralog in embryonic gene regulation in Xenopus. PNAS 101 13525–13530.
Kimelman D, Kirschner M & Scherson T 1987 The events of the midblastula transition in Xenopus are regulated by changes in the cell cycle. Cell 48 399–407.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
King WA, Niar A, Chartrain I, Betteridge KJ & Guay P 1988 Nucleolus organizer regions and nucleoli in preattachment bovine embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 82 87–95.
Kopecny V, Flechon JE, Camous S & Fulka J Jr 1989 Nucleologenesis and the onset of transcription in the eight-cell bovine embryo: fine-structural autoradiographic study. Molecular Reproduction and Development 1 79–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lavoir MC, Kelk D, Rumph N, Barnes F, Betteridge KJ & King WA 1997 Transcription and translation in bovine nuclear transfer embryos. Biology of Reproduction 57 204–213.[Abstract]
Majumder S, Miranda M & DePamphilis ML 1993 Analysis of gene expression in mouse preimplantation embryos demonstrates that the primary role of enhancers is to relieve repression of promoters. EMBO Journal 12 1131–1140.[Web of Science][Medline]
McGraw S, Vigneault C, Tremblay K & Sirard MA 2006 Characterization of linker histone H1FOO during bovine in vitro embryo development. Molecular Reproduction and Development 73 692–699.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
McGraw S, Vigneault C & Sirard MA 2007 Temporal expression of factors involved in chromatin remodeling and in gene regulation during early bovine in vitro embryo development. Reproduction 133 597–608.
Memili E, Dominko T & First NL 1998 Onset of transcription in bovine oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 51 36–41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Muller F, Lakatos L, Dantonel J, Strahle U & Tora L 2001 TBP is not universally required for zygotic RNA polymerase II transcription in zebrafish. Current Biology 11 282–287.[CrossRef][Medline]
Natale DR, Kidder GM, Westhusin ME & Watson AJ 2000 Assessment by differential display-RT-PCR of mRNA transcript transitions and alpha-amanitin sensitivity during bovine preattachment development. Molecular Reproduction and Development 55 152–163.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Newport J & Kirschner M 1982 A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 30 687–696.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pennetier S, Perreau C, Uzbekova S, Thelie A, Delaleu B, Mermillod P & Dalbies-Tran R 2006 MATER protein expression and intracellular localization throughout folliculogenesis and preimplantation embryo development in the bovine. BMC Developmental Biology 6 26.[CrossRef][Medline]
Plante L, Plante C, Shepherd DL & King WA 1994 Cleavage and 3H-uridine incorporation in bovine embryos of high in vitro developmental potential. Molecular Reproduction and Development 39 375–383.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rasband WS 1997–2007 ImageJ. US National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.
Rozen S & Skaletsky HJ 2000 Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology, pp 365–386. Eds S Krawetz & S Misener. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. (Code available at http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/genome_software/other/primer3.html).
Schultz RM 2002 The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Human Reproduction Update 8 323–331.
Telford NA, Watson AJ & Schultz GA 1990 Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: a comparison of several species. Molecular Reproduction and Development 26 90–100.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Thomas MC & Chiang CM 2006 The general transcription machinery and general cofactors. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 41 105–178.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Veenstra GJ, Destree OH & Wolffe AP 1999 Translation of maternal TATA-binding protein mRNA potentiates basal but not activated transcription in Xenopus embryos at the midblastula transition. Molecular and Cellular Biology 19 7972–7982.
Vigneault C, McGraw S, Massicotte L & Sirard MA 2004 Transcription factor expression patterns in bovine in vitro-derived embryos prior to maternal–zygotic transition. Biology of Reproduction 70 1701–1709.
Villarreal XC & Richter JD 1995 Analysis of ATF2 gene expression during early Xenopus laevis development. Gene 153 225–229.[CrossRef][Medline]
Viuff D, Avery B, Greve T, King WA & Hyttel P 1996 Transcriptional activity in in vitro produced bovine two- and four-cell embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 43 171–179.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang Z & Lindquist S 1998 Developmentally regulated nuclear transport of transcription factors in Drosophila embryos enable the heat shock response. Development 125 4841–4850.[Abstract]
Wang K, Sun F & Sheng HZ 2006 Regulated expression of TAF1 in 1-cell mouse embryos. Zygote 14 209–215.[Medline]
Weston A & Sommerville J 2006 Xp54 and related (DDX6-like) RNA helicases: roles in messenger RNP assembly, translation regulation and RNA degradation. Nucleic Acids Research 34 3082–3094.
Wiekowski M, Miranda M & DePamphilis ML 1993 Requirements for promoter activity in mouse oocytes and embryos distinguish paternal pronuclei from maternal and zygotic nuclei. Developmental Biology 159 366–378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Worrad DM, Ram PT & Schultz RM 1994 Regulation of gene expression in the mouse oocyte and early preimplantation embryo: developmental changes in Sp1 and TATA box-binding protein, TBP. Development 120 2347–2357.[Abstract]
Yang Y, Cao J, Huang L, Fang HY & Sheng HZ 2006 Regulated expression of TATA-binding protein-related factor 3 (TRF3) during early embryogenesis. Cell Research 16 610–621.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yu J, Hecht NB & Schultz RM 2001 Expression of MSY2 in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Biology of Reproduction 65 1260–1270.
Yu J, Hecht NB & Schultz RM 2002 RNA-binding properties and translation repression in vitro by germ cell-specific MSY2 protein. Biology of Reproduction 67 1093–1098.
Yu J, Hecht NB & Schultz RM 2003 Requirement for RNA-binding activity of MSY2 for cytoplasmic localization and retention in mouse oocytes. Developmental Biology 255 249–262.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yu J, Deng M, Medvedev S, Yang J, Hecht NB & Schultz RM 2004 Transgenic RNAi-mediated reduction of MSY2 in mouse oocytes results in reduced fertility. Developmental Biology 268 195–206.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |