Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2008) 136 649-655
DOI: 10.1530/REP-08-0134
Copyright © 2008 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
136/5/649    most recent
REP-08-0134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Newnham, J. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Newnham, J. P

RESEARCH

Disrupted secretory activation of the mammary gland after antenatal glucocorticoid treatment in sheep

Jennifer J Henderson, Peter E Hartmann1, Timothy J M Moss2, Dorota A Doherty and John P Newnham1

School of Women's and Infants' Health, M550, King Edward Memorial Hospital, The University of Western Australia, 374 Bagot Road, SUBIACO, Perth, Western Australia 6008, Australia1 School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia2 Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to J J Henderson; Email: jhenderson{at}meddent.uwa.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Antenatal glucocorticoids are administered to women at risk of preterm delivery to prevent neonatal respiratory morbidity. The effects of exogenous glucocorticoids on the development of lactation are unknown. This study investigated the effects of a single dose of antenatal glucocorticoids on secretory activation in sheep before and after parturition. Pregnant ewes (N=36) were randomised to receive either medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) at 118 days of pregnancy and betamethasone at 125 days (BETA group), MPA at 118 days and saline at 125 days (MPA group) or saline at 118 and 125 days (SALINE group). The concentration of lactose, progesterone, cortisol and prolactin in maternal plasma was measured during pregnancy. After term parturition, the concentration of lactose in milk and maternal plasma was measured daily for 5 days. Lambs were weighed at birth and at 5 days of age; milk volume was measured on day 5. The concentration of lactose in maternal plasma increased significantly after betamethasone administration, corresponding to a fall in plasma progesterone. No changes in lactose were observed in MPA or SALINE ewes. Transient decreases in cortisol and increases in prolactin were observed in the BETA group, but not in either the MPA or SALINE group. After parturition, BETA ewes experienced reduced milk yield and lamb weight gain, and delayed increases in milk lactose levels compared with MPA and saline controls. This study demonstrated that, in sheep, antenatal glucocorticoid administration disrupted secretory activation, causing precocious mammary secretion before parturition and compromising postpartum milk production and lamb growth.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Since Liggins' first report in 1969 of effective respiration in lambs born prematurely after maternal administration of glucocorticoids (Liggins 1969), the administration of a single course of either betamethasone or dexamethasone to women at risk of preterm delivery has become accepted clinical practice to induce fetal lung maturation (Liggins & Howie 1972, Roberts & Dalziel 2006). Numerous reviews have concluded that there are no adverse consequences of a single course of glucocorticoid treatment on the preterm infant (NIH Consensus Conference 1995, Roberts & Dalziel 2006), but no published studies of which we are aware have investigated possible effects on maternal lactation. We previously observed a high rate of neonatal mortality after repeated treatment of pregnant sheep with betamethasone and subsequent delivery at term, which was attributed to a reduction in milk production (Moss et al. 2001).

High circulating progesterone levels inhibit milk production during pregnancy (Kuhn 1969). The withdrawal of progesterone at the end of pregnancy in the presence of high levels of prolactin and cortisol triggers the onset of copious milk secretion (secretory activation) (Neville et al. 2002, Pang & Hartmann 2007). Secretory activation occurs normally at parturition in sheep and within 2 days after birth in most women but is delayed when the postnatal withdrawal of progesterone is incomplete or absent (Hartmann et al. 1973, Neifert et al. 1981). In women, delay has also been attributed to excessive activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis occurring during stressful labour and delivery (Chen et al. 1998, Grajeda & Pérez-Escamilla 2002). Furthermore, experiments in mice have suggested that premature secretory activation impacts adversely on subsequent mammary secretion (Gorska et al. 2003). We hypothesised that antenatal treatment with exogenous glucocorticoids causes premature secretory activation during pregnancy and that this precocious lactation results in impaired milk secretion after parturition.

The objective of this study was to investigate, in sheep, the effects of a single dose of antenatal glucocorticoids on secretory activation before and after parturition.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The concentration of lactose in maternal plasma increased within 2 days of treatment in the BETA group, peaking at day 5 (42.4 µM, range 11.6–74.0 µM) and decreasing to baseline levels by 9 days after treatment (Fig. 1, P<0.001).


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 Concentration of lactose in sheep plasma after treatment at 125 days of pregnancy. BETA (filled squares, solid line), MPA (filled triangles, dotted line) or SALINE (filled circles, dashed line). Values represent median (IQR) lactose (µM). There was a significant effect of betamethasone treatment on plasma lactose during pregnancy (P<0.001, adjusted for gestational age) and post partum (P<0.001, adjusted for length of pregnancy and postpartum day) but not MPA when compared with SALINE.

 
Maternal plasma progesterone concentrations in all groups were significantly different over time (Fig. 2, P<0.001). After treatment, progesterone concentration was significantly reduced in the BETA group compared with the medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or SALINE group at all time points with the lowest value occurring 2 days after betamethasone treatment (1.4 ng/ml, range 0.7–3.7 ng/ml; P<0.001). Maternal plasma lactose concentration was significantly associated with progesterone concentration (P<0.001), with lactose concentration increasing with reduced progesterone concentration.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 Concentration of progesterone in sheep plasma after MPA or saline treatment at 118 days of pregnancy and betamethasone or saline treatment at 125 days of pregnancy. BETA (filled squares, solid line), MPA (filled triangles, dotted line) or SALINE (filled circles, dashed line). Values represent median (IQR) progesterone (ng/ml). There were significant reductions in progesterone concentration after day 125 in the BETA group (P<0.001, adjusted for gestational age) but not the MPA group when compared with the SALINE group.

 
In the BETA group, 2 days after treatment, there was a significant transient reduction in the concentration of cortisol (6.5 ng/ml, range 2.6–10.4 ng/ml; Fig. 3, P<0.001), and a significant transient increase in the concentration of prolactin in maternal plasma (95.6 ng/ml, range 7.4–381.4 ng/ml; Fig. 4, P<0.001). Prolactin concentration was significantly reduced at gestational age 143 days in all groups (2.6 ng/ml, range 1.2–26.1 ng/ml, P<0.001). Increasing prolactin levels were significantly associated with increasing lactose concentration (P<0.001) and decreasing progesterone concentration (P=0.029) in maternal plasma.


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3 Concentration of cortisol in sheep plasma after betamethasone or saline treatment at 125 days of pregnancy. BETA (filled squares, solid line), MPA (filled triangles, dotted line) or SALINE (filled circles, dashed line). Values represent median (IQR) cortisol (ng/ml). There were significant reductions in cortisol concentration at gestational age 127 days in the BETA group (P<0.001) but not the MPA or SALINE group.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4 Concentration of prolactin in sheep plasma after betamethasone or saline treatment at 125 days of pregnancy. BETA (filled squares, solid line), MPA (filled triangles, dotted line) or SALINE (filled circles, dashed line). Values represent median (IQR) prolactin (ng/ml). There were significant increases in prolactin concentration at gestational age 127 days in the BETA group (P<0.001) but not the MPA or SALINE group. There were also significant reductions in prolactin concentration in all groups at gestational age 143 days (P<0.001).

 
There was no significant difference between groups in the changes in ewe weight between 118 and 132 days of pregnancy (P=0.174). There were more fetal and early neonatal lamb losses in the BETA group than in the MPA and SALINE groups (Table 1). Two BETA fetuses died in utero and three lambs died at or soon after birth. The median pregnancy length was longer in the BETA group (154 days) than in the MPA group (151 days) and the SALINE group (150 days). After adjustment for pregnancy length, lamb birth weights were significantly lower in the BETA group (P=0.011) but not the MPA group (P=0.329) when compared with the SALINE group (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Delivery and postnatal characteristics of sheep after treatment at 125 days of pregnancy.

 
There were marked effects of betamethasone treatment on milk production after parturition (Table 1). Milk volume on day 5 was significantly lower in the BETA group than in the MPA and SALINE groups. Lamb weight gain between birth and the fifth postnatal day reflected this observation, with significantly reduced weight gains in the BETA group. Three surviving BETA lambs lost weight after birth.

Postnatal increases in the concentration of lactose in milk (indicating the onset of mammary secretion) tended to be delayed in both the BETA and MPA groups (Table 2). Milk lactose levels on the first and second postnatal days were lower in the BETA and MPA groups than in the SALINE group and a wide range of milk lactose concentration was found in the BETA group on all five postnatal days. After adjustment for pregnancy length and postnatal day, this difference approached statistical significance (P=0.076). Postnatal lactose concentration in maternal plasma was also significantly reduced, after statistical adjustment for pregnancy length and postnatal day, in the BETA group (P=0.001) but not the MPA group (P=0.826) when compared with the SALINE group (Fig. 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Concentration of lactose in milk.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Precocious secretory activation occurred before parturition in sheep that received betamethasone treatment at 125 days of gestation. This resolved in the absence of milk removal, but, after parturition, milk production was significantly reduced, compromising neonatal lamb growth. MPA treatment alone did not alter the onset of secretion during pregnancy but was associated with a slight delay in the onset of secretory activation after parturition. This delay did not have an impact on subsequent lamb growth.

The onset of copious milk secretion is inhibited during pregnancy and normally occurs after the withdrawal of progesterone close to parturition (Hartmann et al. 1973, Neville et al. 2002). We observed rapid increases in maternal plasma lactose levels, indicating premature onset of mammary secretion (Arthur et al. 1991, McNeill et al. 1998), soon after treatment at 125 days of pregnancy with betamethasone, but not in sheep treated with either saline or MPA alone. The rise in lactose was preceded by a sudden decrease in progesterone concentration, suggesting that the precocious onset of secretion was caused by the removal of the normal progesterone inhibition of lactation.

The administration of glucocorticoids to pregnant ewes has been found to induce premature parturition (Nathanielsz et al. 1988, Jobe et al. 2003). This is prevented by the prior administration of the progestagen MPA, which is assumed to compensate for the rapid withdrawal of progesterone that follows glucocorticoid administration (Liggins et al. 1972). Glucocorticoid administration in sheep causes a fall in progesterone levels by inducing the up-regulation in the placenta of 17{alpha}-hydroxylase and shifting placental steroidogenesis in favour of increased oestradiol secretion at the expense of progesterone secretion (Challis et al. 2000).

While there are differences in the origin and function of progesterone during pregnancy and parturition between rats, ewes and women, progesterone withdrawal is a common trigger for secretory activation in all three species (Kuhn 1969, Turkington & Hill 1969, Hartmann et al. 1973). Our finding that MPA pretreatment did not prevent the premature stimulation of secretory activation, although glucocorticoid-induced premature parturition was inhibited, suggests that there are differences in function between placental and mammary progesterone receptors in sheep.

In primates such as humans, where 17{alpha}-hydroxylase is not present in the placenta, glucocorticoids do not exert the same function during parturition. There is evidence, however, of a functional withdrawal of progesterone prior to parturition caused by a change in the dominance of specific progesterone receptor isoforms in myometrium and fetal membrane tissues (Haluska et al. 2002). It is unclear whether the differences in response to progesterone observed between placental and mammary tissues also occur in humans. In a parallel study, we observed a slight delay in secretory activation in the mothers of very preterm infants who had received antenatal glucocorticoids at least 3 days before delivery (Henderson et al. 2008). The findings from the present sheep study are consistent with the changes observed in women suggesting that further research using a sheep model of secretory activation is warranted. Future research is indicated to investigate possible changes in intracellular signalling, including the role of activated glucocorticoid receptor, in lactocytes that have been prematurely stimulated by antenatal glucocorticoid treatment.

We cannot explain why the progesterone concentration decreased on day 130 in the MPA and SALINE groups. However, the fall in these groups was not sufficient to induce a lactogenic effect in the mammary gland (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the ewes treated with betamethasone had a significantly greater and sustained depression of progesterone up until term.

Elevated levels of endogenous glucocorticoids are required for the onset of secretory activation after parturition. Our finding of a transient suppression of maternal plasma cortisol concentration immediately after betamethasone administration is consistent with previous reports (Kutzler et al. 2004a, 2004b). This reduction was not sufficient to inhibit the onset of secretory activation probably because of the presence of high levels of synthetic glucocorticoids.

Maternal plasma prolactin concentration was generally low at all gestational ages in saline and MPA-treated sheep and the decrease in all groups at 143 days was consistent with previous findings (Cowie et al. 1980). Prolactin normally has a seasonal variation in pregnant sheep and tends to have very low levels until a few days before parturition (Cowie et al. 1980). The finding of a transient surge soon after betamethasone administration has not been observed previously but supports our speculation that betamethasone treatment caused a temporary withdrawal of the progesterone inhibition of secretory activation, allowing other lactogenic hormones to up-regulate temporarily. Prolactin is essential for the expression of milk protein genes and has a synergistic action with activated glucocorticoid receptor (Rosen et al. 1999). Glucocorticoids have been reported to stimulate prolactin up-regulation in vitro and the glucocorticoid receptor is involved in this process (Fu & Porter 2004).

The variation in the concentration of lactose in milk in the first 2 days post partum indicates that change from colostrum to copious milk secretion was delayed in BETA sheep. This may be explained by the differences in the timing of parturition. In addition, decreased levels of lactose in milk and increased levels of lactose in maternal plasma in the MPA group on the first day post partum suggest a delay in the onset of copious milk secretion in these sheep. We speculate that the delay in the MPA sheep is caused by a delayed closure of the tight junctions between lactocytes under the influence of the long-acting progestagen (Nguyen & Neville 1998).

Increased rates of pregnancy loss and longer lengths of pregnancy in betamethasone-treated sheep are consistent with previous reports and fetal growth restriction has also been reported previously after betamethasone treatment (Newnham et al. 1999, Moss et al. 2001, Jobe et al. 2003). The present study is the first to show an adverse effect of maternal glucocorticoid treatment on postnatal weight gain, although high neonatal lamb mortality rates after antenatal treatment with repeated doses of betamethasone have been reported previously (Moss et al. 2001). Our findings of adverse effects on postnatal weight gain contrast with those of a study in which no effect on postnatal growth was observed after multiple courses of low-dose maternal dexamethasone (Kutzler et al. 2004a, 2004b). This difference may be explained by our use of a higher dose of synthetic glucocorticoids. We used a betamethasone dose of 0.5 mg/kg maternal weight, which is the minimal dose that causes clinically relevant improvement in neonatal pulmonary function in sheep (Moss et al. 2001). No persistent improvement in postnatal lung function has been found with lower maternal doses of betamethasone (0.2 mg/kg; Rebello et al. 1996).

Our findings do not exclude the possibility that the effect of betamethasone on postnatal secretory activation was moderated by its indirect effects on the lambs. Morbidity associated with the relatively low birth weights may have resulted in inadequate suckling, possibly influencing supply. Cross-fostering, used in rodents to eliminate such neonatal confounding (Wlodek et al. 2003), is not feasible in sheep. However, the onset of copious milk secretion occurs independently of milk removal in all species (Kulski et al. 1978, Neville et al. 2001), and our finding of reduced concentration of lactose in milk and postpartum maternal plasma in the BETA group supports the conclusion that secretory activation was delayed in these sheep.

We did not find a difference in mammary gland weight after milk was removed on day 5 post partum, suggesting that the structural development of the gland is near completion at 125 days of pregnancy when betamethasone was administered, and that the changes we observed during pregnancy and after parturition were solely due to functional and not structural changes. We suggest that the premature stimulation of secretion by the lactocytes was followed by loss of function in the absence of milk removal during pregnancy. Mammary gland involution has been shown to commence within 4 days of cessation of milk removal when lactation is established (Tatarczuch et al. 1997, Neville & Morton 2001). This process, which is triggered by milk stasis (Marti et al. 1977), results in rapid reductions in the synthesis of major milk components such as lactose (Neville et al. 1991). Our findings of a return to baseline levels of lactose in the BETA maternal plasma 9 days after treatment suggest that involution commenced in these sheep during pregnancy and that this was followed by impaired secretory activation at parturition. This finding confirms studies using mice, which show that premature secretory activation disrupts subsequent milk secretion after parturition (Gorska et al. 2003).

Our ewes received betamethasone treatment at 80% of pregnancy in accordance with our study treatment protocols. Anticipated preterm delivery in women is treated clinically with glucocorticoids as early as 24-week gestational age (60% of pregnancy). It remains to be investigated whether the effects we have observed would be so great after treatment at earlier gestational ages.

There is recent evidence that neonatal benefits of antenatal glucocorticoid therapy may not persist if delivery occurs more than 7 days after treatment (McLaughlin et al. 2003). An increase in perinatal mortality has been reported in studies that investigated the effects of betamethasone after prolonged intervals between treatment and delivery in preterm infants (Liggins & Howie 1972, McLaughlin et al. 2003) and sheep (Moss et al. 2001). This is supported by our finding that lactation is also compromised when delivery is delayed after glucocorticoid treatment in sheep.

Since own mother's milk confers considerable nutritional and immunological advantages to the preterm infant (Gartner et al. 2005), these findings indicate that the effect of glucocorticoid treatment on secretory activation requires further research in both sheep and women.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The experiment was conducted in accordance with Western Australian Animal Welfare Regulations (2003) and was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Western Australia Department of Agriculture.

Sheep management and sample collection
Pregnant merino ewes carrying single fetuses of known gestational age were maintained in open pasture and allowed to feed ad libitum. To minimise transport-induced stress, injections and procedures were performed in an adjacent facility. The ewes were randomised to receive a single i.m. injection of either betamethasone (Celestone Chronodose; Schering Plough, North Ryde, NSW, Australia; 0.5 mg/kg; BETA group; n=12) or physiological saline (SALINE group; n=12) at 125 days of pregnancy. To prevent glucocorticoid-induced pregnancy loss, an i.m. injection of a progesterone derivative, (MPA, 150 mg, Pharmacia & Upjohn), was given to BETA ewes at 118 days (Nathanielsz et al. 1988, Jobe et al. 2003). SALINE ewes received i.m. saline at 118 days. Because the effects of MPA on lactation are unknown, a third group was given MPA at 118 days and saline at 125 days (MPA group; n=12). We included the MPA group to control for the potential of the progestational activity of MPA to independently disrupt the timing of secretory activation (Jeppsson 1981).

Maternal blood samples (10 ml) were collected into heparinised tubes by jugular venipuncture before treatment and at 126, 127, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136 and 143 days of pregnancy and 1, 2 and 5 days after parturition. Plasma was separated and stored at –20 °C. The ewes were transferred to individual pens at 143 days of pregnancy where they had unlimited access to water and chaff; pellets (Econosheep; Milne Feeds, Perth, Western Australia, Australia) were fed daily. The normal length of pregnancy in Western Australian merino sheep is ~150 days.

After spontaneous delivery, lambs were housed with their mothers and were able to suckle ad libitum. Samples of mammary secretions (5 ml) were collected in the early morning (0900 h) from all the ewes daily from birth until day 5 and stored at –20 °C. Lamb weights were measured at birth and on postnatal day 5. Milk volume was measured on day 5 by hand milking after a 4-h separation of the ewes from the lambs (McCance 1959). To minimise variation, only one person milked the ewes (J J H) and the method was the same for all the ewes. Mammary glands were milked until no further milk could be obtained (10–15 min). The ewes were then killed by lethal injection of pentobarbitone (75–100 mg/kg) and the mammary glands were removed and weighed.

Concentration of lactose in maternal plasma
Secretory activation was determined by assaying the concentration of lactose in both milk and maternal plasma. Lactose is the principal carbohydrate in milk and the onset of mammary secretion is accompanied by rapid increases in the concentration of lactose in milk and maternal plasma (Hartmann et al. 1973, McNeill et al. 1998). Plasma samples were deproteinised and the bioluminescence technique of Arthur et al. (1989) was used to measure lactose concentration. Lactose was hydrolysed with β-galactosidase (Boehringer Mannheim, North Ryde, NSW, Australia) to galactose and glucose; NADH was produced by incubating galactose with the enzyme β-galactose dehydrogenase (Boehringer Mannheim). NaOH solution was used to stop the reaction and stabilise NADH. The bioluminescence was then measured on a plate luminometer (Microlite ML 2250 Microtiter Plate Luminometer; Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA, USA) using a luciferase reagent as described previously (Arthur et al. 1989). We did not correct for galactose that was present in the plasma as the concentration was consistently below 2 µM. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were respectively 6% and 10% and the detection limit was 1.62 µM.

Concentration of lactose in milk
The concentration of lactose in milk was measured using a modification of a method described previously (Kuhn & Lowenstein 1967). Milk samples were thawed at 37 °C, mixed and centrifuged in microcentrifuge tubes at 10 000 g for 5 min and the fat layer was removed by slicing the tube below the layer. Lactose was hydrolysed with β-galactosidase using the method described above. Glucose was then measured by incubating at room temperature for 45 min with a glucose reagent containing glucose oxidase (Sigma), peroxidase (Sigma) and reduced ABTS (2,2'-azino-di-(3-ethyl-benzthiazolinsulphonate)-6-sulphonate; Boehringer Mannheim) in a phosphate buffer. The resulting absorbance was read at 405 nm using a Titertek Multiscan MCC/340 (Flow Laboratories, McLean, VA, USA). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were respectively 2% and 6% and the detection limit was 3.17 mM.

Concentration of progesterone in maternal plasma
Progesterone concentration in maternal plasma was measured in duplicate using a double-antibody RIA, described previously, with tracer containing 1,2,6,7-3[H]progesterone (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; Gales et al. 1997). All samples were processed in a single assay with a minimum detection limit of 0.13 ng/ml and a mean intra-assay coefficient of variation of 6.17%.

Concentration of cortisol in maternal plasma
Cortisol concentration in maternal plasma was measured using Gamma Coat Cortisol 125I RIA Kit (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN, USA; Kerzner et al. 2002). Duplicates of standards and samples were incubated with cortisol tracer in antibody-coated tubes (rabbit anti-cortisol serum-coated tubes). After incubation at 37 °C for 45 min, the contents of each tube were decanted and the tubes were counted on a gamma counter. The antiserum had 100% cross-reactivity to cortisol, 0.2% to dexamethasone and <0.1% to progesterone. The mean intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 5.7% and 3.7% respectively.

Concentration of prolactin in maternal plasma
Prolactin concentration in maternal plasma was measured with a homologous double-antibody RIA as described previously (Miller et al. 1995). Standard (NIADDK-oPrl-I-2) and antiserum (R160) were kindly donated by Mr Avenell (CSIRO Division of Animal Production, Prospect, NSW, Australia). Samples were assayed in duplicates of 10 µl aliquots and the limit of detection was 0.12 ng/ml. The assay included six replicates of three control samples containing 9.75, 4.95 and 1.11 ng/ml, which were used to estimate the intra-assay coefficients of variation (4%, 2.5% and 4.6%).

Statistical analysis
The primary outcome was concentration of lactose in maternal plasma during pregnancy. Based on an estimated plasma concentration of 6 µM during pregnancy (McNeill et al. 1998), a sample size of 12 sheep per group was selected to detect a difference between group means of plasma lactose concentration of 1 S.D. with a power of 80% and a type 1 error rate of 5%. Plasma lactose, progesterone, cortisol and prolactin values were log transformed and ANOVA for repeated measures was performed. Lamb weight gain, milk volume and concentration of milk lactose were summarised using non-parametric methods (median, range). Postnatal outcomes were compared after adjustment for pregnancy length, birth weight and day of measurement where appropriate. All analyses were performed with the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) statistical software package (SAS Version 8, Cary, NC, USA).


    Declaration of interest
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This work was supported by grants from the Women and Infants Research Foundation, Perth, Australia; Medela A G, Switzerland and National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (J J H, T J M M).


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We thank Dr I Nitsos, Dr D Sloboda and A Jonker for their assistance with the sheep experiment, Dr L Mitoulas and C T Lai for their advice on the biochemical analysis and M Blackberry of the School of Animal Sciences, The University of Western Australia for assistance with the radioimmunoassays.

Received 24 March 2008
First decision 14 May 2008
Revised manuscript received 25 June 2008
Accepted 28 July 2008

    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

Arthur PG, Kent JC & Hartmann PE 1989 Microanalysis of the metabolic intermediates of lactose synthesis in human milk and plasma using bioluminescent methods. Analytical Biochemistry 176 449–456.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Arthur PG, Kent JC, Potter JM & Hartmann PE 1991 Lactose in blood in nonpregnant, pregnant, and lactating women. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 13 254–259.[Web of Science][Medline]

Challis JRG, Matthews SG, Gibb W & Lye SJ 2000 Endocrine and paracrine regulation of birth at term and preterm. Endocrine Reviews 21 514–550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen DC, Nommsen-Rivers L, Dewey KG & Lönnerdal B 1998 Stress during labor and delivery and early lactation performance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 68 335–344.[Abstract]

Cowie AT, Forsyth IA & Hart ICIn Hormonal Control of Lactation 1980Berlin:Springer-Verlag:.

Fu X & Porter TE 2004 Glucocorticoid induction of lactotrophs and prolactin gene expression in chicken embryonic pituitary cells: a delayed response relative to stimulated growth hormone production. Endocrinology 145 1322–1330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gales NJ, Williamson P, Higgins LV, Blackberry MA & James I 1997 Evidence for a prolonged postimplantation period in the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 111 159–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gartner L, Morton J, Lawrence R & Naylor A 2005 Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 115 496–506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gorska AE, Jensen RA, Shyr Y, Aakre ME, Bhowmick NA & Moses HL 2003 Transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative mutant type II transforming growth factor-b receptor exhibit impaired mammary development and enhanced mammary tumor formation. American Journal of Pathology 163 1539–1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grajeda R & Pérez-Escamilla R 2002 Stress during labor and delivery is associated with delayed onset of lactation among urban Guatemalan women. Journal of Nutrition 132 3055–3060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haluska GJ, Wells TR, Hirst JJ, Brenner RM, Sadowsky DW & Novy MJ 2002 Progesterone receptor localization and isoforms in myometrium, decidua, and fetal membranes from rhesus macaques: evidence for functional progesterone withdrawal at parturition. Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 9 125–136.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hartmann PE, Trevethan P & Shelton JN 1973 Progesterone and oestrogen and the initiation of lactation in ewes. Journal of Endocrinology 59 249–259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Henderson JJ, Hartmann PE, Newnham JP & Simmer K 2008 Effect of antenatal corticosteroid treatment and preterm birth on lactogenesis II in women. Pediatrics 121 e92–e100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jeppsson S 1981 Background, development and properties of progestagens, with special reference to medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Supplement 101 7–10.[Medline]

Jobe AH, Newnham JP, Moss TJM & Ikegami M 2003 Differential effects of maternal betamethasone and cortisol on lung maturation and growth in fetal sheep. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188 22–28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kerzner LS, Stonestreet BS, Wu K-Y, Sadowska G & Malee MP 2002 Antenatal dexamethasone: effect on ovine placental 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 expression and fetal growth. Pediatric Research 5 706–712.

Kuhn NJ 1969 Progesterone withdrawal as the lactogenic trigger in the rat. Journal of Endocrinology 44 39–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuhn NJ & Lowenstein JM 1967 Lactogenesis II in the rat. Journal of Biochemistry 105 995–1002.

Kulski JK, Hartmann PE, Martin JD & Smith M 1978 Effects of bromocriptine mesylate on the composition of the mammary secretion in non-breast-feeding women. Obstetrics and Gynecology 52 38–42.[Web of Science][Medline]

Kutzler MA, Coksaygan T, Ferguson AD, Vincent SE & Nathanielsz P 2004a Maternally administered dexamethasone at 0.7 of gestation suppresses maternal and fetal pituitary and adrenal responses to hypoxemia in sheep. Pediatric Research 55 755–763.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kutzler MA, Ruane EK, Coksaygan T, Vincent SE & Nathanielsz P 2004b Effects of three courses of maternally administered dexamethasone at 0.7, 0.75, and 0.8 of gestation on prenatal and postnatal growth in sheep. Pediatrics 113 313–319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liggins GC 1969 Premature delivery of foetal lambs infused with glucocorticoids. Journal of Endocrinology 45 515–523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liggins GC & Howie RN 1972 A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 50 515–525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liggins GC, Grieves SA, Kendall JZ & Knox BS 1972 The physiological roles of progesterone, oestradiol-17b and prostaglandin F2a in the control of ovine parturition. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 16 85–103.

Marti A, Feng Z, Altermatt HJ & Jaggi R 1977 Milk accumulation triggers apoptosis of mammary epithelial cells. European Journal of Cell Biology 73 158–165.

McCance I 1959 The determination of milk yield in the merino ewe. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10 839–853.[CrossRef]

McLaughlin KJ, Crowther CA, Walker N & Harding JE 2003 Effects of a single course of corticosteroids given more than 7 days before birth: a systematic review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 43 101–106.[CrossRef]

McNeill DM, Murphy PM & Lindsay DR 1998 Blood lactose v. milk lactose as a monitor of lactogenesis and colostrum production in Merino ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49 581–587.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Miller D, Blache D & Martin G 1995 The role of intracerebral insulin in the effect of nutrition on gonadotrophin secretion in mature male sheep. Journal of Endocrinology 147 321–329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moss TJ, Sloboda DM, Gurrin LC, Harding R, Challis JRG & Newnham JP 2001 Programming effects in sheep of prenatal growth restriction and glucocorticoid exposure. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 281 R960–R970.[Web of Science]

Nathanielsz P, Buster J, Jenkin G, Jorgensen G & Thorburn G 1988 Induction of premature delivery in sheep following infusion of cortisol to the fetus: the effect of maternal progestagen treatment on the C21-steroid-17a-hydroxylase, C-17,20 lyase and aromatase pathways. Journal of Developmental Physiology 10 257–270.[Web of Science][Medline]

Neifert MR, McDonough SL & Neville MC 1981 Failure of lactogenesis associated with placental retention. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 140 477–478.[Web of Science][Medline]

Neville MC & Morton J 2001 Physiology and endocrine changes underlying human lactogenesis II. Journal of Nutrition 131 3005S–3008S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neville MC, Allen JC, Archer PC, Casey CE, Seacat J, Keller RP, Lutes V, Rasbach J & Neifert M 1991 Studies in human lactation: milk volume and nutrient composition during weaning and lactogenesis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 54 81–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neville MC, Morton J & Umemura S 2001 Lactogenesis. The transition from pregnancy to lactation. Pediatric Clinics of North America 48 35–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Neville MC, McFaddin TB & Forsyth I 2002 Hormonal regulation of mammary differentiation and milk secretion. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 7 49–66.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Newnham JP, Evans SF, Godfrey M, Huang W, Ikegami M & Jobe A 1999 Maternal, but not fetal, administration of corticosteroids restricts fetal growth. Journal of Maternal–Fetal Medicine 8 81–87.

Nguyen D-A & Neville MC 1998 Tight junction regulation in the mammary gland. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 3 233–246.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

NIH Consensus ConferenceEffect of corticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomesJournal of the American Medical Association 273 1995 413–418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pang WW & Hartmann PE 2007 Initiation of human lactation: secretory differentiation and secretory activation. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 12 211–221.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rebello CM, Ikegami M, Polk DH & Jobe AH 1996 Postnatal lung responses and surfactant function after fetal or maternal corticosteroid treatment of preterm lambs. Journal of Applied Physiology 80 1674–1680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Roberts D & Dalziel S 2006 Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3, Art. No. CD004454. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2.

Rosen JM, Wyszomierski SL & Hadsell D 1999 Regulation of milk protein gene expression. Annuals Review of Nutrition 19 407–436.[CrossRef]

Tatarczuch L, Philip C & Lee CS 1997 Involution of the sheep mammary gland. Journal of Anatomy 190 405–416.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Turkington RW & Hill RL 1969 Lactose synthetase: progesterone inhibition of the induction of a-lactalbumin. Science 163 1458–1460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wlodek ME, Westcott KT, Serruto A, O'Dowd R, Wassef L, Ho PWM & Moseley JM 2003 Impaired mammary function and parathyroid hormone-related protein during lactation in growth-restricted spontaneously hypertensive rats. Journal of Endocrinology 178 233–245.[Abstract]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
136/5/649    most recent
REP-08-0134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Newnham, J. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Newnham, J. P


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS