| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH |
1 Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Center for Research in Reproductive Physiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3500 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA2 Institute of Reproductive and Regenerative Biology, Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Domagkstraße 11, 48149 Münster, Germany
Correspondence should be addressed to S Schlatt; Email: stefan.schlatt{at}ukmuenster.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The family of neurotrophic growth factors has been proposed to be involved in testicular development (Wheeler & Bothwell 1992, Levine et al. 2000). Nerve growth factor (NGF) was the first member of the family to be found, followed by neurotrophin 3 (NTF3), neurotrophin 5 (NTF5), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF; Reichardt 2006). The factors act through the specific high-affinity neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptors NTRK1 (for NGF, formerly known as trkA), NTRK2 (for NTF5 and BDNF, formerly known as trkB), and NTRK3 (for NTF3, formerly known as trkC). Additionally, all factors share the common low-affinity neurotrophic growth factor receptor p75/LNGFR. Recently, neurotrophic growths factors were reported to participate in the development of various non-neural organs, such as the dermatome, kidney, and ovary (Sainio et al. 1994, Brill et al. 1995, Dissen et al. 1995). In the testis, Ngf mRNA was first detected in spermatocytes and early spermatids in the adult rodent testis where it acts as a survival factor for maturing spermatozoa (Olson et al. 1987, Ayer-LeLievre et al. 1988). At the onset of meiosis, DNA synthesis in stage VIII and IX preleptotene spermatocytes is thought to be under autocrine control through NGF (Parvinen et al. 1992). By contrast, stage-dependent secretion of androgen-binding protein by Sertoli cells is also regulated by NGF (Lönnerberg et al. 1992), suggesting a paracrine role of neurotrophins in the testis. Neurotrophin receptors were localized to Sertoli cells in the prepubertal testis (Djakiew et al. 1994), whereas transient p75/LNGFR receptor expression in late-meiotic spermatocytes and early spermatids was found in the adult testis (Seidl et al. 1996). NGF was also found in the embryoinc testis and it was suggested that neurotrophins might be involved in mesenchymal–epithelial transitions that occur during morphogenesis (Wheeler & Bothwell 1992, Russo et al. 1995). On the other hand, NTF3 secreted by Sertoli cells was suggested to act as a paracrine factor that stimulates mesonephric cell migration at this stage of gonad development (Levine et al. 2000). This is in contrast to reports that show NTF3 expression exclusive to peritubular cells during embryonic development and early postnatal life (Russo et al. 1995).
Members of the transforming growth factor β 1 (TGFB1) superfamily of morphogens have been shown to orchestrate testicular development (for review, see Itman et al. 2006). Members of the superfamily include the TGFB1 subfamily, the activin subfamily, the bone morphogenetic proteins subfamily, and the more distantly related superfamily members, glial-derived neurotrophic factor and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), which act as key factors during testicular development (Griswold 1998, Buageaw et al. 2005, Fouchecourt et al. 2006). In particular, activin stimulates Sertoli cell proliferation during early postnatal life (Boitani et al. 1995, Schlatt et al. 1999). Activin action in the reproductive system is modulated by its antagonist follistatin, which is known to be present in the rat testis at this age (Buzzard et al. 2004). Activin thereby contributes to the establishment of the proper testicular size that is directly depending on Sertoli cell proliferation (Atanassova et al. 2005). In turn, Sertoli cell mitotic activity is modulated by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-mediated contact inhibition (Schlatt et al. 1996). Thus, the regulatory network of activin, follistatin and FSH is a center piece of testicular development and function. At the cellular level, FSH activates different signal transduction cascades in Sertoli cells, including cAMP-mediated activation of protein kinase A (PRKACA), the MAP kinase pathway, and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, C2 domain containing,
polypeptide (PIK3C2A) pathway (Walker & Cheng 2005).
During postnatal testis development, Sertoli cells proliferate and maintain a general undifferentiated state. Up to postnatal day 10, these immature Sertoli cells retain their potential to reorganize into testis cords in vitro (Hadley et al. 1985, 1990), and to partially mature when cultured on extracellular matrix components (Suarez-Quian et al. 1984, Tung & Fritz 1987). We recently showed that three-dimensional extracellular matrix gel in combination with xenografting stimulates in vitro morphogenesis of seminiferous tubule-like structures from immature Sertoli cells (Gassei et al. 2006). Using this novel approach to mimic testicular morphogenesis, we conducted preliminary investigations to explore the relevance of neurotrophins, FSH and activin on aggregation of early postnatal Sertoli cells. We then focused our investigations on neurotrophin signaling as a key element of Sertoli–Sertoli cell contact and tubulogenesis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Overall, the three-dimensional culture system and the applied computer-based analysis of Sertoli cell clusters proved to be applicable to assess reliable parameters. Small areas of the micrograph were out of focus due to the concave meniscus of the three-dimensional Matrigel and were excluded from analysis.
Data derived for both parameters were statistically tested in order to evaluate the validity and the repeatability of the assay. The coefficient of variation (CV) for data derived from five independent control experiments (no treatment) ranged from 5.5 to 7.9% (diameter) and 0.5 to 5.4% (distance). The low CV values obtained from this experiment showed that the assay could be repeated with high reliability and validity with only little dispersion of data.
Antagonizing neurotrophin signaling, but not activin or FSH action, disturbs Sertoli cell aggregation
In qualitative preliminary experiments inhibition of NTRK signaling caused interruption of the morphological cascade of Sertoli cells. In addition to complete cell aggregation in control experiments, two different patterns of Sertoli cell aggregation were observed in this experiment. Partially inhibited Sertoli cell aggregation led to the formation of loose Sertoli clusters that were smaller than spherical aggregates but still showed some degree of organization (Fig. 3C). By contrast, high doses of inhibitor completely disturbed Sertoli cell aggregation. Sertoli cells attached to the Matrigel but remained as single cells throughout the culture period (Fig. 3D).
|
|
|
|
Recent studies have suggested a role of NTF3 in testicular cord formation in organ cultures (Levine, Cupp et al. 2000). We therefore tested whether the effect of K252a in vitro was due to the suppression of neurotrophin 3 signaling. We investigated the influence of exogenous NTF3 in the cultures and the effects of neutralizing anti-NTF3 antibodies on Sertoli cell aggregation in vitro. To attempt a higher degree of Sertoli cell aggregation, the cultures were supplemented with 10, 50, or 100 ng/ml neurotrophin 3 (NTF3). We did not find a stimulating effect of NTF3 on Sertoli cell aggregation, and the appearance of spherical aggregates was similar to no-treatment controls. Furthermore, exogenous NTF3 was not able to rescue Sertoli cell aggregation upon treatment with K252a (Fig. 4B). In addition, incubating cell cultures with a neutralizing anti-NTF3 antibody or neutralizing anti-NTRK3 antibody did not affect cell migration and aggregation (Fig. 4C and D).
NTRK1 signaling is ivolved in Sertoli cell aggregation
Although K252a is a competent inhibitor of high-affinity neurotrophin receptors, it acts in a non-specific manner and has been shown to inhibit NTRK3 as well as NTRK1 and NTRK2. In a second set of experiments, we therefore examined the action of NGF on Sertoli cell aggregation. Similar to the results obtained for exogenous NTF3, supplementation of cultures with NGF did not stimulate Sertoli cell aggregation (Fig. 5B). However, when Sertoli cells were cultured in the presence of the specific NTRK1 antagonist tyrphostin AG879, the same dose-dependent effect on Sertoli cell inhibition was observed as described for K252a (Fig. 3E and F). Quantitative analysis revealed a highly significant decrease in spherical aggregate size by 46.69% (32.21 µm±2.86 vs 60.42 µm±3.62; P<0.001) in cultures treated with 5 µM AG879 (Fig. 5A). In addition, the cultures appeared increasingly unorganized and distances between cell clusters were reduced from 318.10 µm±17.87 in controls to 116.56 µm±11.45 after treatment with the inhibitor (P<0.001). These results present a significant decrease in cell cluster distance by 63.36%. In cultures treated with concentrations equal or above the IC50 value (10 µM) of tyrphostin AG879 (10 µM and 20 µM), single Sertoli cells were mainly present as a result of a complete inhibition of Sertoli cell migration and aggregation (Table 2). Although these results point to the involvement of NTRK1 in Sertoli cell aggregation, experiments using neutralizing anti-NGF antibody surprisingly did not affect Sertoli cell aggregation in this assay (Fig. 5B).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results indicate a regulatory role of high-affinity neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptors during Sertoli cell aggregation. Recent studies on explants of the undifferentiated gonadal primordium have suggested a potential role of neurotrophin-mediated signaling during testicular development (Levine et al. 2000). In accordance with this, we observed a compelling dose-dependent anti-aggregation effect on Sertoli cells of neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors (K252a and AG879), indicating that Sertoli cell aggregation underlies regulation via NTRK signaling.
By contrast, Sertoli cell aggregation could not be inhibited by follistatin, the naturally occuring binding protein for activin. From this result, we conclude that signaling through activin-specific receptor subunits does not contribute to Sertoli cell aggregation. Similarly, addition of FSH or blocking of FSH receptor binding did not interfere with Sertoli cell aggregation in vitro, indicating that Sertoli cells aggregate independent of FSH signaling via cAMP and PRKACA. This result is surprising because of the known regulatory effects of activin and FSH on postnatal Sertoli cell proliferation and tubular outgrowth. One possible explanation could be our preliminary observation that Sertoli cells do not proliferate in three-dimensional Matrigel culture and only resume mitosis upon xenografting.
On the contrary, we show that NTRK-mediated aggregation of immature Sertoli cells is crucial for subsequent differentiation of Sertoli cells and tubule formation in xenografts. Sertoli cells that were prevented from aggregating in vitro by K252a supplementation did not develop into seminiferous tubule-like structures in xenografts. As previously shown, although three-dimensional culture does support Sertoli cell in vitro morphogenesis, differentiation is arrested after short-term culture. However, Sertoli cells resume maturation upon xenografting to an immunodeficient host, leading to the formation of seminiferous tubule-like structures (Gassei et al. 2006). Similarly, Sertoli cell aggregates from control groups showed a mature phenotype in xenografts and were arranged in tubule-like structures. By contrast, tubule-like structures were absent in xenografts after exposure of Sertoli cells to NTRK inhibitors. We conclude from these results that Sertoli–Sertoli cell adhesive contacts within aggregates are mandatory for subsequent testis cord formation and tubulogenesis.
K252a and AG879 have been used in previous studies reporting a role of NTF3 in testis cord formation (Levine et al. 2000, Cupp et al. 2003). To examine whether NTF3 could be accounted for the inhibition of in vitro Sertoli cell aggregation by K252a, some Sertoli cell cultures were supplemented with a combination of K252a and NTF3 at the time of plating. NTF3 did not rescue the inhibitory effect of K252a. This is in correspondence to the lack of a stimulatory effect of NTF3 alone. To more specifically inhibit NTF3 action, we then used neutralizing antibodies against NTF3 and NTRK3 to inhibit Sertoli cells in culture. In these experiments, we did not see an inhibitory effect, and no differences in aggregation patterns could be observed between treated cells and untreated controls. However, since K252a and AG879 also have been suggested to exert inhibitory effects on NTRK1, we tested NGF and neutralizing anti-NGF antibody in our cultures, but did not detect a measurable effect on Sertoli cell behavior.
K252a has been shown to act as a competitive inhibitor for PRKACA and PRKCC, and thereby might inhibit Sertoli cell aggregation via various signaling pathways. To rule out the inhibitory effects other than those on NTRKs, we used K252a at concentrations lower than the Ki values of 18–24 nM for PRKACA, PRKCC, and PKG inhibition. In addition, previous studies using organ cultures to investigate the chemotactic role of neurotrophins during testis cord formation were performed with 100 nM K252a, and in these studies, no inhibitory effect on PRKACA by K252a was observed (Levine et al. 2000). K252a and AG879 had strikingly similar, dose-dependent inhibitory effects on Sertoli cell aggregation when using two different concentrations close to the respective IC50 values (3 nM for K252a and 10 µM for AG879). Partial inhibition of Sertoli cell aggregation was observed at concentrations below this threshold, whereas higher concentrations completely inhibited Sertoli cell aggregation. This implies that the morphological effects observed for K252a and AG879 are due to the inhibition of NTRKs.
In summary, the combined in vitro/in situ strategy to recapitulate testicular tubulogenesis allows for the detailed study of the morphogenesis of the somatic component of the testis in a reliable and quantifiable fashion. We demonstrate that neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinases NTRK1 and NTRK3 are important for the in vitro aggregation of immature rat Sertoli cells, which occurs in a manner similar to that observed in E13–E13.5 embryonic gonads (Magre & Jost 1991). It remains unclear whether this action is mediated by NGF or NTF3 specifically or independent of the ligands.
In conclusion, we have shown that Sertoli cell aggregation is a crucial event during early testicular development and an indespensable prerequisite for subsequent testis cord formation and testicular development. Failure of Sertoli cells to make contact with one another results in the disturbance of testis cord formation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A sequential enzymatic digestion protocol was used to obtain testicular single-cell suspensions enriched for Sertoli cells (Schlatt et al. 1996). Upon dissection of the testes, the tunica albuginea was removed and the tissue digested to small tubule fragments with 1 mg/ml collagenase I (no. C2674; Sigma) and 5 µg/ml DNAse (15 U/ml, no. 104132; Roche Applied Science) in digestion medium. Digestion medium consisted of Dulbecco's Minimum Essential Medium (DMEM, 4.5 g glucose/ml) mixed 1:1 with Ham's F12 (Sigma N6658) and supplemented with 1% MEM non-essential amino acids (100x; BioWhittaker 13-114E), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (100x; Cellgro 30-002-CI). To remove interstitial and peritubular cells, tubule fragments were allowed to settle by unit gravity for 5 min before discarding the supernatant. A second digestion step was performed similarly by incubating tubule fragments with 1 mg/ml collagenase I and 5 µg/ml DNAse in combination with 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma H-3506). The resulting cell suspension was centrifuged at 200 g for 10 min and the pellet was resuspended in culture medium consisting of low-glucose DMEM (1 g/ml), 1% MEM nonessential amino acids, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin solution. Cell numbers were determined using a Bright-Line hematocytometer (Hausser Scientific no. 3100).
Identification of different cell types in the cell suspension was assessed by immunocytochemistry. The cells were plated onto poly-L-lysine-coated cover slips for 15 min and formalin fixed (4% in DPBS) for 15 min. After washing with 1x DPBS, the cells were incubated with 10% goat serum diluted in dilution buffer (1x TBS with 0.1% BSA) for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were immunostained with antibodies raised against AMH (Sertoli cell specific; cat. no. sc-6886; 1:50 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA),
- immunoglobulin mu-binding protein 2 (IGHMBP2; peritubular myoid cell marker; Sigma no. A2547; 1:2000 dilution), cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (CYP11A1, Leydig cell marker; Chemicon no. AB1244; 1:500; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 4 (DDX4; germ cell marker; Abcam no. ab-13840; 1:100; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). Antibodies were incubated over night at 4 °C. For the anti-DDX4 antibody, heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6) prior to antibody incubation was necessary to obtain optimal immunostaining. Negative controls were performed in all experiments by omitting primary antibodies to ensure antibody specificity. The cover slips were washed thoroughly with 1x TBS (3x5 min) and incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG (for IGHMBP2 detection), goat anti-rabbit IgG (DDX4 and CYP11A1 detection), or chicken anti-goat IgG (for AMH detection) at a 1:100 dilution for 60 min at room temperature. Secondary antibodies were conjugated to AlexaFlour488 chromophor. Cover slips were then washed thrice for 5 min with TBS and nuclei were stained with 0.5 µg/ml DAPI stain for 5 min. After washing, cover slips were mounted with Vectashield medium for fluorescence microscopy. For each marker,
1000 cells from three independent experiments were counted to determine the percentage of positively stained cells.
Three-dimensional cell culture
Approximately, 1x106 cells were plated onto 300 µl reconstituted extracellular matrix gel (Matrigel, BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA; no. 354234, diluted 1:1 with culture medium) on 24-well culture plates. The cells were cultivated in a humidified incubator at 35 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. In pilot experiments, growth factor-reduced Matrigel (BD Biosciences) was used to test whether growth factors that naturally occur in Matrigel might influence Sertoli cell behavior in vitro.
Qualitative and quantitative experiments using a variety of supplements were performed as depicted in Table 1. The cells were treated at the time of plating. Compounds used in this study included human recombinant neurotrophin-3 (Sigma no. N1905), neutralizing anti-NTRK3 antibody (Sigma no. T2450), anti-neurotrophin 3 antibody (Chemicon AB1532), receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors K252a (Sigma no. K1639), tyrphostin AG879 (Sigma T2067), recombinant NGF (Sigma no. N6009), and neutralizing anti-NGF antibody (Sigma no. N6655). For control experiments, the cells were either cultured with culture medium alone (no-treatment control) or DMSO was added to the medium in comparable concentrations to the treatment groups (vehicle control). Additionally, cultures were also supplemented with recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, from the National Hormone Program; kindly provided by Dr A F Parlow, Torrance, CA, USA), anti-FSHR antibody (clone H-90), and activin-antagonizing follistatin (Sigma no. F2177) to control whether signaling via cAMP second messenger (through FSH) or through activin specific TGFB1 receptor subunits might interfere with Sertoli cell migration and aggregation. All compounds were used at concentrations recommended by the supplier or as suggested by data from previous research to ensure optimal stimulation of Sertoli cells in culture. For clarity reasons, amounts of growth factors, reagents, and gonadotrophins are compiled in Table 1.
Live imaging of cell cultures in Matrigel and quantitative analysis
Phase contrast micrographs of spherical Sertoli cell aggregates in Matrigel were captured with an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope equipped with a Retiga 4000R digital camera (QImaging, Surrey BC, Canada) and Northern Eclipse imaging software (MVIA Inc., Monaca, PA, USA).
The spatial arrangement of spherical cell aggregates was analyzed after 72 h of culture. Phase contrast micrographs were taken at 16x magnification of four to six randomly selected fields from each culture. In samples that showed few clearly defined aggregates, all structures were analyzed. For samples with a more scattered appearance, cell clusters were randomly selected using a grid overlay. Ten grid points in the center of the micrograph were used for analysis and clusters at these grid points were assigned to measurements.
Data were collected for two qualitative parameters. First, we determined the diameters of spherical aggregates and clusters. The diameter was measured using the straight line measurement of the Northern Eclipse software at the largest point of the aggregate. The second parameter that was quantitatively evaluated was the distance from each aggregate subjected for diameter determination to the nearest, similarly identified spherical aggregate. The straight line measurement tool was used by measuring the distance between the midpoints of the neighboring aggregates. All absolute values obtained for each parameter were combined and averaged for each culture (see Table 1 for treatment groups and repeats). Data were expressed as means±S.E.M., and data sets were statistically analyzed with SigmaStat software using one-way ANOVA and, if applicable, a subsequent pairwise multiple comparison post hoc test. The CV was determined for both parameters (diameter of aggregates and distance between aggregates) in the case of negative controls (no treatment) as a measure of dispersion and to validate the cell culture-based assay.
Xenografting
Adult male nude mice (strain: nu/nu) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories and served as hosts for cell culture grafts. Castration was performed at the time of grafting to assess androgen levels in hosts upon graft development by means of seminal vesicle weights. Sertoli cells were prepared as described above and three treatment groups were defined. As vehicle controls, the cells were incubated with 0.25% DMSO. The low-concentration group was supplemented with 1 nM K252a inhibitor, in contrast to the high-concentration group that was treated with 5 nM K252a at the time of cell plating. Sertoli cells were cultured for 9 days in extracellular matrix gel and were then injected s.c. in the back of hosts using an 18 G injection needle. Each host received six injections of 250 µl extracellular matrix gel. For each treatment group, three hosts were grafted (18 grafts total per treatment group). The grafts were allowed to develop for 4 weeks. Hosts were killed by exsanguinations under deep anesthesia and the grafts were removed from the inner surface of the back skin. Grafts were fixed in Bouin's fixative overnight and then transferred to 70% ethanol for resin embedding. Body weights, seminal vesicle weights, as well as graft numbers and weights were recorded for each animal.
Histology
Xenografts were embedded in resin (Technovit 7100; Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) and 4 µm semi-thin sections were prepared. The sections were stained with the periodic acid/Schiff's reagent method followed by hematoxylin counterstaining for histological evaluation.
| Declaration of interest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Funding |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received 22 February 2008
First decision 27 March 2008
Revised manuscript received 2 June 2008
Accepted 24 July 2008
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Atanassova NN, Walker M, McKinnell C, Fisher JS & Sharpe RM 2005 Evidence that androgens and oestrogens, as well as follicle-stimulating hormone, can alter Sertoli cell number in the neonatal rat. Journal of Endocrinology 184 107–117.
Ayer-LeLievre C, Olson L, Ebendal T, Hallböök F & Persson H 1988 Nerve growth factor mRNA and protein in the testis and epididymis of mouse and rat. PNAS 85 2628–2632.
Boitani C, Stefanini M, Fragale A & Morena AR 1995 Activin stimulates Sertoli cell proliferation in a defined period of rat testis development. Endocrinology 136 5438–5444.[Abstract]
Brill G, Kahane N, Carmeli C, von Schack D, Barde YA & Kalcheim C 1995 Epithelial-mesenchymal conversion of dermatome progenitors requires neural tube-derived signals: characterization of the role of neurotrophin-3. Development 121 2583–2594.[Abstract]
Buageaw A, Sukhwani M, Ben-Yehudah A, Ehmcke J, Rawe VY, Pholpramool C, Orwig KE & Schlatt S 2005 GDNF Family receptor alpha1 phenotype of spermatogonial stem cells in immature mouse testes. Biology of Reproduction 73 1011–1016.
Buehr M, Gu S & McLaren A 1993 Mesonephric contribution to testis differentiation in the fetal mouse. Development 117 273–281.
Buzzard JJ, Loveland KL, O'Bryan MK, O'Connor AE, Bakker M, Hayashi T, Wreford NG, Morrison JR & de Kretser DM 2004 Changes in circulating and testicular levels of inhibin A and B and activin A during postnatal development in the rat. Endocrinology 145 3532–3541.
Capel B 2000 The battle of the sexes. Mechanisms of Development 92 89–103.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cupp AS, Kim GH & Skinner MK 2000 Expression and action of neurotropin-3 and nerve growth factor in embryonic and early postnatal rat testis development. Biology of Reproduction 63 1617–1628.
Cupp AS, Uzumcu M & Skinner MK 2003 Chemotactic role of neurotropin 3 in the embryonic testis that facilitates male sex determination. Biology of Reproduction 68 2033–2037.
Dissen GA, Hirshfield AN, Malamed S & Ojeda SR 1995 Expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in the mammalian ovary is developmentally regulated: changes at the time of folliculogenesis. Endocrinology 136 4681–4692.[Abstract]
Djakiew D, Pflug B, Dionne C & Onoda M 1994 Postnatal expression of nerve growth factor receptors in the rat testis. Biology of Reproduction 51 214–221.[Abstract]
Fouchecourt S, Godet M, Sabido O & Durand P 2006 Glial cell-line-derived neurotropic factor and its receptors are expressed by germinal and somatic cells of the rat testis. Journal of Endocrinology 190 59–71.
Gassei K, Schlatt S & Ehmcke J 2006 De novo morphogenesis of seminiferous tubules from dissociated immature rat testicular cells in xenografts. Journal of Andrology 27 611–618.
Griswold MD 1998 The central role of Sertoli cells in spermatogenesis. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 9 411–416.[CrossRef]
Gubbay J, Collignon J, Koopman P, Capel B, Economou A, Münsterberg A, Vician N, Goodfellow P & Lovell-Badge R 1990 A gene mapping to the sex-determining region of the mouse Y chromosome is a member of a novel family of embryonically expressed genes. Nature 346 245–250.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hadley MA, Byers SW, Suarez-Quian CA, Kleinman HK & Dym M 1985 Extracellular matrix regulates Sertoli cell differentiation, testicular cord formation, and germ cell development in vitro. Journal of Cell Biology 101 1511–1522.
Hadley MA, Weeks BS, Kleinman HK & Dym M 1990 Laminin promotes formation of cord-like structures by Sertoli cells in vitro. Developmental Biology 140 318–327.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Itman C, Mendis S, Barakat B & Loveland KL 2006 All in the family: TGF-beta family action in testis development. Reproduction 132 233–246.
Levine E, Cupp AS & Skinner MK 2000 Role of neurotropins in rat embryonic testis morphogenesis (cord formation). Biology of Reproduction 62 132–142.
Lönnerberg P, Söder O, Parvinen M, Ritzen EM & Persson H 1992 Beta-nerve growth factor influences the expression of androgen-binding protein messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat testis. Biology of Reproduction 47 381–388.[Abstract]
Magre S & Jost A 1991 Sertoli cells and testicular differentiation in the rat fetus. Journal of Electron Microscopy Technique 19 172–188.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Merchant-Larios H & Taketo T 1991 Testicular differentiation in mammals under normal and experimental conditions. Journal of Electron Microscopy Technique 19 158–171.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Olson L, Ayer-LeLievre C, Ebendal T & Seiger A 1987 Nerve growth factor-like immunoreactivities in rodent salivary glands and testis. Cell and Tissue Research 248 275–286.[Web of Science][Medline]
Parvinen M, Pelto-Huikko M, Söder O, Schultz R, Kaipia A, Mali P, Toppari J, Hakovirta H, Lönnerberg P, Ritzen EM et al. 1992 Expression of beta-nerve growth factor and its receptor in rat seminiferous epithelium: specific function at the onset of meiosis. Journal of Cell Biology 117 629–641.
Reichardt LF 2006 Neurotrophin-regulated signalling pathways. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 361 1545–1564.[CrossRef]
Russo MA, Giustizieri ML, Farini D & Siracusa GExpression of neurotrophin receptors in the developing and adult testisItalian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology 100 (Supplement_1) 1995 543–551.
Sainio K, Saarma M, Nonclerq D, Paulin L & Sariola H 1994 Antisense inhibition of low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor in kidney cultures: power and pitfalls. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology 14 439–457.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schlatt S, de Kretser DM & Loveland KL 1996 Discriminative analysis of rat Sertoli and peritubular cells and their proliferation in vitro: evidence for follicle-stimulating hormone-mediated contact inhibition of Sertoli cell mitosis. Biology of Reproduction 55 227–235.[Abstract]
Schlatt S, Zhengwei Y, Meehan T, de Kretser DM & Loveland KL 1999 Application of morphometric techniques to postnatal rat testes in organ culture: insights into testis growth. Cell and Tissue Research 298 335–343.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Seidl K, Buchberger A & Erck C 1996 Expression of nerve growth factor and neurotrophin receptors in testicular cells suggest novel roles for neurotrophins outside the nervous system. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 8 1075–1087.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sinclair AH, Berta P, Palmer MS, Hawkins JR, Griffiths BL, Smith MJ, Foster JW, Frischauf AM, Lovell-Badge R & Goodfellow PN 1990 A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature 346 240–244.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Suarez-Quian CA, Hadley MA & Dym M 1984 Effect of substrate on the shape of Sertoli cells in vitro. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 438 417–434.[Web of Science][Medline]
Tung PS & Fritz IB 1987 Morphogenetic restructuring and formation of basement membranes by Sertoli cells and testis peritubular cells in co-culture: inhibition of the morphogenetic cascade by cyclic AMP derivatives and by blocking direct cell contact. Developmental Biology 120 139–153.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Walker WH & Cheng J 2005 FSH and testosterone signaling in Sertoli cells. Reproduction 130 15–28.
Wheeler EF & Bothwell M 1992 Spatiotemporal patterns of expression of NGF and the low-affinity NGF receptor in rat embryos suggest functional roles in tissue morphogenesis and myogenesis. Journal of Neuroscience 12 930–945.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Gassei, J. Ehmcke, M.A. Wood, W.H. Walker, and S. Schlatt Immature rat seminiferous tubules reconstructed in vitro express markers of Sertoli cell maturation after xenografting into nude mouse hosts Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2010; 16(2): 97 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R Rodriguez-Sosa and I. Dobrinski Recent developments in testis tissue xenografting Reproduction, August 1, 2009; 138(2): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |