| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Division of Cell Sciences, Institute of Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK and1 Hull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, The University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Correspondence should be addressed to P J O'Shaughnessy; Email: p.j.oshaughnessy{at}vet.gla.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite isolation of the Leydig cell stem cells, the identity of the precursor cells that give rise to the adult Leydig cells remains uncertain and controversial. A number of studies have indicated that Leydig cell precursor cells are predominantly peritubular, based on morphological and immunohistochemical evidence (Haider et al. 1995, Russell et al. 1995, Haider & Sevros 1998, Ariyaratne et al. 2000a, 2000b). A recent study, however, has reported that the progenitor cells are vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes, based on the apparent neuronal and glial properties of these cells (Davidoff et al. 2004). Before an understanding of adult Leydig cell differentiation and development can be achieved, the origin of the cells needs to be established and further studies are needed.
A convenient model for the investigation of adult Leydig cell development is the ethane dimethane sulfonate (EDS)-treated rat. In the adult animal, a single injection of EDS leads to rapid ablation of the existing adult Leydig cells followed by Leydig cell repopulation in a manner that appears to recapitulate the normal developmental process (Teerds 1996, Ariyaratne et al. 2003). This model, therefore, offers the possibility for studying Leydig cell differentiation in a relatively stable environment without the other ongoing background developmental processes that occur naturally as the animal grows through puberty. A potential problem of the EDS model, however, is that loss of Leydig cells and, therefore, androgen secretion is rapidly followed by atrophy of the androgen-dependent spermatogenic epithelium, which repopulates as the Leydig cells re-appear (Sharpe et al. 1990). This, of itself, is likely to have a marked effect on sertoli cell activity, which will confound studies on Leydig cell re-generation. In an attempt to circumvent this problem, we have adapted a model of EDS-induced Leydig cell depletion which used germ cell-free animals (Molenaar et al. 1986). Clearly, this will avoid problems of germ cell depletion and re-generation following EDS. In addition, Leydig cell repopulation occurs more rapidly in rats in which the spermatogenic epithelium is absent either experimentally (Molenaar et al. 1986) or developmentally (Edwards et al. 1988a). This shortening of the re-generation process is likely to increase the chances that transient changes in gene expression will be detected. We report here on the characteristics of Leydig cell depletion and re-generation and the expression of cell signaling molecules following EDS treatment in germ cell-depleted testes.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Testicular mRNA expression levels following EDS
Leydig cell-specific genes
Levels of mRNA encoding the three steroidogenic enzymes CYP11A1, cytochrome P450 17a1 (CYP17A1) and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (HSD3B1), and the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) showed an expression profile after EDS which closely resembled changes in intratesticular testosterone (Fig. 3). There was a rapid fall in expression 24 h after treatment reaching a nadir around 3–5 days with recovery starting on day 8. The notable difference to testosterone levels is that expression of these genes returned to normal by 20 days whereas testosterone was still reduced by 75% at 20 days. The other major steroidogenic enzyme specific to the Leydig cells is 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD17B3), and levels of Hsd17b3 mRNA declined rapidly after EDS to become undetectable by 3 days. Unlike the other steroidogenic enzymes, however, levels of Hsd17b3 showed no recovery of expression up to day 20. The levels of Pdgfra mRNA declined about 75% after EDS and remained low up to 20 days.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Following EDS treatment, changes in the levels of mRNA species known to be specific to the Leydig cells followed, in the most part, changes in testosterone levels. The clear exception was Hsd17b3 mRNA which declined at the same rate as other steroidogenic enzymes but did not show any recovery and remained un-detectable up to 20 days. Failure of Hsd17b3 expression to recover at the same rate as other enzymes may explain why testosterone levels remained relatively low at day 20. In an earlier study we showed that 17-ketoreductase activity (enzyme activity catalyzed by HSD17B3) declined more slowly after EDS than other steroidogenic enzyme activities and remained detectable at all times (O'Shaughnessy & Murphy 1991). This apparent discrepancy is probably due to the presence of other members of the 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase family in the testis (Sha et al. 1996).
In the first study of EDS action on the germ cell-free testis it was reported that Leydig cell repopulation after EDS was faster than in normal rats (Molenaar et al. 1986). This is confirmed by our current study which shows that levels of testosterone and most Leydig cell mRNA markers began to recover by 8 days after EDS treatment. This contrasts with normal rats in which testosterone levels begin to recover between 14 and 21 days after EDS (Molenaar et al. 1986, Edwards et al. 1988b, Sharpe et al. 1990, Ariyaratne et al. 2003). It is known that germ cell depletion affects Sertoli cell function (McKinnell & Sharpe 1997, Guitton et al. 2000, O'Shaughnessy et al. 2008) and so the accelerated re-generation of active Leydig cells in germ cell-depleted testes may be due to altered Sertoli cell activity. Alternatively, LH is required for re-generation of Leydig cells after EDS treatment (Molenaar et al. 1986, Teerds et al. 1989) and levels of LH are higher in germ cell-free animals treated with EDS compared with normal EDS-treated animals (Morris & Jackson 1978, Molenaar et al. 1986). The more rapid Leydig cell re-generation in germ cell-free animals may, therefore, reflect increased tropic stimulation of the developing precursor cells.
Previous studies of adult Leydig cell differentiation, either during normal development or following EDS in the adult, have identified peritubular, spindle-shaped/mesenchymal cells as the immediate precursor cells (Haider et al. 1995, Russell et al. 1995, Ariyaratne et al. 2000a, 2000b). In addition, spindle-shaped peritubular cells have been described recently as Leydig cell stem cells (Ge et al. 2006). In contrast, it has recently been proposed that adult Leydig cells differentiate from perivascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes (Davidoff et al. 2004). This is based on the hypothesis that Leydig cells show neural characteristics and that cells expressing Nes, which is a stem cell marker in the nervous system, appear to differentiate from the perivascular region of the testis after EDS and may then go on to form adult Leydig cells (Davidoff et al. 2004). In addition, expression of Nefh, an intermediate filament protein expressed in the neuronal/glial lineage subsequent to Nes, also increases transiently in perivascular cells. Our studies agree that there is an increase in testicular Nefh expression following EDS although no significant change in Nes was seen. More crucially, however, we saw no evidence of perivascular development of Leydig cells. All cells expressing CYP11A1 during the initial phases of differentiation (around 8 days) were peritubular. From this evidence we cannot rule out a perivascular origin for Leydig cells, and there are other studies suggesting a minor contribution from this source (Haider et al. 1995, Haider & Servos 1998), but it is unlikely to be the major site of Leydig cell precursor differentiation.
PDGF is a major mitogen for mesenchymal cells and there is a growing body of evidence that links PDGF signaling with Leydig cell differentiation and development. In Pdgfa-null mice, for example, adult Leydig cells fail to develop, possibly because of a failure of precursor proliferation (Gnessi et al. 2000). Consistent with this hypothesis, the putative Leydig cell stem cells express Pdgfra and PDGFA stimulates stem cell proliferation (Ge et al. 2006). The early, transient rise in Pdgfa mRNA levels after EDS treatment is, therefore, of considerable interest and would be consistent with a role for PDGFA in Leydig cell precursor proliferation and differentiation. In addition to PDGFA, the myoid cell factor LIF also stimulates Leydig cell stem cell proliferation (Ge et al. 2006). Levels of Lif mRNA increased in the testis 24 h after EDS treatment and then returned to basal levels within 3–5 days. In embryonic stem cells LIF withdrawal is a stimulus for differentiation (Ward et al. 2004) and it is possible that the transient change in levels of Lif after EDS acts both to enhance stem cell proliferation and then to permit Leydig cell differentiation.
DHH is a cell signaling molecule produced by the sertoli cells and essential for normal differentiation of the fetal and adult Leydig cell populations (Clark et al. 2000, Yao et al. 2002). In DHH-null mice, there is failure of adult Leydig cell differentiation although this may be through failure of precursor proliferation or development (Clark et al. 2000). Following EDS treatment levels of mRNA encoding, DHH declined transiently but significantly at 24 h. It is not clear whether this may be related to subsequent Leydig cell re-generation or is simply a response to declining testosterone levels. Levels of Igf1 mRNA also declined after EDS although, unlike Dhh, levels remained significantly reduced up to 8 days. The pattern of Igf1 expression after EDS is consistent with partial expression in the Leydig cells as reported previously (Moore et al. 1993).
This study characterizes a model system with which to study Leydig cell degeneration and re-generation without marked changes in the germ cell population. Leydig cell re-generation is also more rapid in this system, which may make it simpler to identify changes in gene expression associated with these changes. Our results also provide further support for a peritubular origin of adult Leydig cells and suggest that increasing levels of PDGFA and LIF following Leydig cell ablation may contribute to precursor proliferation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gene expression studies
Total RNA was extracted from one testis of each animal by homogenization in TRizol (Invitrogen Ltd). At the start of the extraction process, luciferase mRNA (5 ng) was added to each sample to act as an external standard for real-time PCR (Baker & O'Shaughnessy 2001). Extracted RNA was reverse transcribed using random hexamers and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Superscript II, Invitrogen Ltd) as described previously (O'Shaughnessy & Murphy 1993, O'Shaughnessy et al. 1994). Levels of mRNA were measured by real-time PCR using the SYBR green method with a Stratagene MX3000 cycler. Reactions contained 5 µl 2xSYBR mastermix (Stratagene, Amsterdam), primers (100 nM), and template in a total volume of 10 µl. The thermal profile used for amplification was 95 °C for 8 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 25 s, 63 °C for 25 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. At the end of the amplification phase a melting curve analysis was carried out on the products formed. All primers were designed by Primer Express 2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) using parameters previously described (Czechowski et al. 2004). The primers used are described in Table 1.
|
RIA
To measure total intratesticular testosterone, steroids were extracted from the testes with ethanol and measured by RIA as previously described (Sheffield & O'Shaughnessy 1989).
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by single-factor ANOVA followed by Fisher's multiple comparison test (Minitab, Minitab Ltd, Coventry, UK). Where necessary, data were log-transformed before analysis to avoid heterogeneity of variance.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received 23 November 2007
First decision 7 January 2008
Accepted 13 February 2008
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ariyaratne HB & Chamindrani Mendis-Handagama S 2000 Changes in the testis interstitium of Sprague–Dawley rats from birth to sexual maturity. Biology of Reproduction 62 680–690.
Ariyaratne HB, Mendis-Handagama SM, Hales DB & Mason JI 2000a Studies of the onset of Leydig precursor cell differentiation in the prepubertal rat testis. Biology of Reproduction 63 165–171.
Ariyaratne HB, Mills N, Mason JI & Mendis-Handagama SM 2000b Effects of thyroid hormone on Leydig cell regeneration in the adult rat following ethane dimethane sulphonate treatment. Biology of Reproduction 63 1115–1123.
Ariyaratne S, Kim I, Mills N, Mason I & Mendis-Handagama C 2003 Effects of ethane dimethane sulfonate on the functional structure of the adult rat testis. Archives of Andrology 49 313–326.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Baker PJ & O'Shaughnessy PJ 2001 Expression of prostaglandin D synthetase during development in the mouse testis. Reproduction 122 553–559.[Abstract]
Brennan J, Tilmann C & Capel B 2003 Pdgfr-alpha mediates testis cord organization and fetal Leydig cell development in the XY gonad. Genes and Development 17 800–810.
Clark AM, Garland KK & Russell LD 2000 Desert hedgehog (Dhh) gene is required in the mouse testis for formation of adult-type Leydig cells and normal development of peritubular cells and seminiferous tubules. Biology of Reproduction 63 1825–1838.
Czechowski T, Bari RP, Stitt M, Scheible WR & Udvardi MK 2004 Real-time RT-PCR profiling of over 1400 Arabidopsis transcription factors: unprecedented sensitivity reveals novel root- and shoot-specific genes. Plant Journal 38 366–379.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Davidoff MS, Middendorff R, Enikolopov G, Riethmacher D, Holstein AF & Muller D 2004 Progenitor cells of the testosterone-producing Leydig cells revealed. Journal of Cell Biology 167 935–944.
Edwards G, Lendon RG & Morris ID 1988a Accelerated recovery of Leydig cells of the immature rat testis after administration of the cytotoxic ethylene dimethanesulphonate. Journal of Endocrinology 119 475–482.
Edwards G, Robertson WR & Morris ID 1988b Characterization of the regenerated Leydig cell population of the rat after destruction by ethylene-1,2-dimethanesulphonate. Journal of Endocrinology 117 11–18.
Ge RS, Dong Q, Sottas CM, Papadopoulos V, Zirkin BR & Hardy MP 2006 In search of rat stem Leydig cells: identification, isolation, and lineage-specific development. PNAS 103 2719–2724.
Gnessi L, Basciani S, Mariani S, Arizzi M, Spera G, Wang C, Bondjers C, Karlsson L & Betsholtz C 2000 Leydig cell loss and spermatogenic arrest in platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A-deficient mice. Journal of Cell Biology 149 1019–1026.
Guitton N, Touzalin AM, Sharpe RM, Cheng CY, Pinon-Lataillade G, Meritte H, Chenal C & Jegou B 2000 Regulatory influence of germ cells on sertoli cell function in the pre-pubertal rat after acute irradiation of the testis. International Journal of Andrology 23 332–339.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Haider SG & Servos G 1998 Ultracytochemistry of 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in Leydig cell precursors and vascular endothelial cells of the postnatal rat testis. Anatomy and Embryology 198 101–110.[CrossRef][Medline]
Haider SG, Laue D, Schwochau G & Hilscher B 1995 Morphological studies on the origin of adult-type Leydig cells in rat testis. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology 100 535–541.
Jackson JA, Partington M & Fox BW 1962 Effect of busulphan (Myleran) on the spermatogenic cell population of the rat testis. Nature 194 1184–1185.[Medline]
Jiang FX 1998 Behaviour of spermatogonia following recovery from busulfan treatment in the rat. Anatomy and Embryology 198 53–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kitamura K, Yanazawa M, Sugiyama N, Miura H, Iizuka-Kogo A, Kusaka M, Omichi K, Suzuki R, Kato-Fukui Y, Kamiirisa K et al. 2002 Mutation of ARX causes abnormal development of forebrain and testes in mice and X-linked lissencephaly with abnormal genitalia in humans. Nature Genetics 32 359–369.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Klonisch T, Fowler PA & Hombach-Klonisch S 2004 Molecular and genetic regulation of testis descent and external genitalia development. Developmental Biology 270 1–18.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Majdic G, Saunders PK & Teerds KJ 1998 Immunoexpression of the steroidogenic enzymes 3-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 17 alpha-hydroxylase, C17,20 lyase and the receptor for luteinizing hormone (LH) in the fetal rat testis suggests that the onset of Leydig cell steroid production is independent of LH action. Biology of Reproduction 58 520–525.
McKinnell C & Sharpe RM 1997 Regulation of the secretion and synthesis of rat Sertoli cell SGP-1, SGP-2 and CP-2 by elongate spermatids. International Journal of Andrology 20 171–179.[Web of Science][Medline]
Molenaar R, de Rooij DG, Rommerts FFG & van der Molen HJ 1986 Repopulation of Leydig cells in mature rats after selective destruction of the existent Leydig cells with ethylene dimethane sulfonate is dependent on luteinizing hormone and not follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 118 2546–2554.
Moore A, Chen CL, Davis JR & Morris ID 1993 Insulin-like growth factor-I mRNA expression in the interstitial cells of the rat testis. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 11 319–324.
Morris ID & Jackson CM 1978 Gondadotrophin response after castration and selective destruction of the testicular interstitium in the normal and aspermatogenic rat. Acta Endocrinologica 88 38–47.
O'Shaughnessy PJ & Murphy L 1991 Steroidogenic enzyme-activity in the rat testis following leydig-cell destruction by ethylene-1,2-dimethanesulfonate and during subsequent leydig-cell regeneration. Journal of Endocrinology 131 451–457.
O'Shaughnessy PJ & Murphy L 1993 Cytochrome P-450 17
-hydroxylase protein and mRNA in the testis of the testicular feminized (Tfm) mouse. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 11 77–82.
O'Shaughnessy PJ, Marsh P & Dudley K 1994 Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor mRNA in the mouse ovary during post-natal development in the normal mouse and in the adult hypogonadal (hpg) mouse: structure of alternate transcripts. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 101 197–201.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
O'Shaughnessy PJ, Hu L & Baker PJ 2008 Effect of germ cell depletion on levels of specific mRNA transcripts in mouse Sertoli cells and Leydig cells. Reproduction 135 839–850.
Russell LD, De Franca LR, Hess R & Cooke P 1995 Characteristics of mitotic cells in developing and adult testes with observations on cell lineages. Tissue & Cell 27 105–128.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sha J, Baker P & O'Shaughnessy PJ 1996 Both reductive forms of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrigenase (types 1 and 3) are expressed during development in the mouse testis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 222 90–94.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sharpe RM, Maddocks S & Kerr JB 1990 Cell–cell interactions in the control of spermatogenesis as studied using Leydig cell destruction and testosterone replacement. American Journal of Anatomy 188 3–20.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sheffield JW & O'Shaughnessy PJ 1989 Effect of injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on testicular steroidogenesis in the hypogonadal (hpg) mouse. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 86 609–617.
Teerds KJ 1996 Regeneration of Leydig cells after depletion by EDS: a model for postnatal Leydig cell renewalAH Payne, MP Hardy & LD RussellIn The Leydig Cell Vienna: Cache River Press: 203–220.
Teerds KJ, de Rooij DG, Rommerts FFG, van den Hurk R & Wensing CJG 1989 Proliferation and differentiation of possible Leydig cell precursors after destruction of the existing Leydig cells with ethane dimethane sulphonate: the role of LH/human chorionic gonadotrophin. Journal of Endocrinology 122 689–696.
Ward CM, Barrow KM & Stern PL 2004 Significant variations in differentiation properties between independent mouse ES cell lines cultured under defined conditions. Experimental Cell Research 293 229–238.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yao HH, Whoriskey W & Capel B 2002 Desert Hedgehog/Patched 1 signaling specifies fetal Leydig cell fate in testis organogenesis. Genes and Development 16 1433–1440.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Lim, M. Robson, J. Spaliviero, K. J. McTavish, M. Jimenez, J. D. Zajac, D. J. Handelsman, and C. M. Allan Sertoli Cell Androgen Receptor DNA Binding Domain Is Essential for the Completion of Spermatogenesis Endocrinology, October 1, 2009; 150(10): 4755 - 4765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |