| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH |
School of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-4231, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to M K Skinner; Email: skinner{at}wsu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 (GFR
1) staining was localized to oocyte cytoplasm of primordial and primary follicles, and at reduced levels in the oocytes of antral follicles. GFR
1 was present in mural granulosa cells of antral follicles, theca cells, and ovarian surface epithelium. The localization studies were confirmed with molecular analysis. Microarray analysis was used to identify changes in the ovarian transcriptome and further elucidate the signaling network regulating early follicle development. Observations indicate that GDNF promotes primordial follicle development and mediates autocrine and paracrine cell–cell interactions required during folliculogenesis. In contrast to the testis, ovarian GDNF is predominantly produced by germ cells (oocytes) rather than somatic cells. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GDNF has previously been shown to exhibit neurorestorative and neuroprotective actions for dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway of the brain (Gash et al. 1998, Kordower et al. 2000, Kirik et al. 2004, Wissel et al. 2006). It also mediates tube formation in mammary glands via the MAP kinase pathway (Karihaloo et al. 2005). GDNF signaling occurs via a protein complex. The receptor GDNF family receptor
1 (GFR
1) preferentially binds GDNF, and the ligand–receptor complex activates the ubiquitous tyrosine kinase receptor RET (Amoresano et al. 2005, Carmillo et al. 2005, Pozas & Ibanez 2005, Vargas-Leal et al. 2005). Activation of RET by this complex leads to activation of intracellular signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and differentiation (Naughton et al. 2006).
Testicular GDNF is expressed in the Sertoli cells while its receptors, GFR
1 and RET, are expressed in the spermatogonial cells (Dettin et al. 2003). Signaling from the GDNF–GFR
1–RET complex is necessary for spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and proliferation in neonatal mice (Widenfalk et al. 2000, Wu et al. 2005, Naughton et al. 2006). GDNF expression in the testis decreases as males reach maturity. By contrast, GDNF expression in the ovary increases with maturity especially in follicles close to ovulation (Golden et al. 1999). Gdnf mRNA is expressed at lower levels in developing follicles (Golden et al. 1999, Widenfalk et al. 2000) and localized to oocytes (Aravindakshan et al. 2006). Microarray experiments by the current investigators suggested that RET receptor expression in ovaries changed with AMH treatment (Nilsson et al. 2007). This observation, coupled with the results of the previous studies on GDNF, led to the hypothesis that GDNF signaling may regulate the primordial to primary follicle transition. The current study investigates the role of GDNF in promoting primordial to primary follicle transition and characterizes GDNF and GFR
1 expression in neonatal and adult ovaries.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
1 in postnatal day 4 (P4) rat ovaries after 10 days of organ culture. Dark-colored GDNF-specific staining was localized to oocyte cytoplasm in primordial and primary follicles of P4 sections (Fig. 4A and B). GFR
1 protein in neonatal ovaries was also localized to the oocyte cytoplasm of primordial and primary follicles (Fig. 4C and D). Non-specific staining throughout the tissue is determined by comparison with sections stained with a non-specific primary antibody (Fig. 4E and F).
|
1 in freshly isolated adult female ovaries. In primordial and primary follicles, GDNF and GFR
1 are both present in the oocyte (Fig. 5A and C). This confirms the results seen in cultured ovaries. In pre-antral follicles, GDNF localization expands to include oocytes, nearby granulosa cells, and theca (Fig. 5E). GFR
1 localization in pre-antral follicles remains at low levels in the oocyte and expands to the granulosa cells and theca (Fig. 5G). GDNF localization in antral follicles remains in the oocytes and nearby cumulus granulosa cells (Fig. 5I). GDNF is also present in the theca throughout adult sections (Fig. 5M and N). In antral follicles, GFR
1 is present at low levels in the oocytes and mural granulosa cells (Fig. 5K). In some antral follicle oocytes, GFR
1 is detectable at levels no higher than those of the background staining seen in the negative controls (data not shown), suggesting that GFR
1 protein may not be present in these oocytes. GFR
1 is also present in the theca and ovarian surface epithelium of adult rat ovaries (Fig. 5O and P). These findings are summarized in Table 1. Corresponding negative control sections developed according to matched GDNF and GFR
1 protocols represent non-specific background staining at each follicular stage (Fig. 5B, D, F, H, J and L).
|
|
1 is expressed by the oocyte and mural granulosa (Fig. 5K and O). GDNF expression in the antral follicle is in the oocyte and in cells most proximal to the oocyte (Fig. 6A and B). GDNF expression is also observed in the theca cells (Figs 5M and N and 6). Therefore, GDNF transitions from an autocrine factor in the primordial follicle to a factor with autocrine and paracrine abilities in the antral follicle (Fig. 6C and D; Table 1).
|
1) mRNA. RNA was extracted separately from isolated oocytes and granulosa cells of rat antral follicles. Negative control samples (created by omitting MMLV enzyme from the RT reaction) did not produce a significant PCR product (Fig. 7). Gfra1 mRNA was localized to granulosa cells of antral follicles, whereas Gdnf mRNA was present in the oocytes and granulosa cells of antral follicles (Fig. 7). Ribosomal gene S2 was amplified as a constitutively expressed gene reference standard. Observations confirm the expression of Gdnf by the oocyte and demonstrated decreased Gfra1 expression in antral follicle oocytes.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 to oocyte cytoplasm of primordial and primary follicles, and to oocytes and mural granulosa cells of antral follicles. However, in some antral follicles, non-specific oocyte staining was quite prominent, raising the possibility that GFR
1 levels are low in some oocytes. GFR
1 was also present in the theca and ovarian surface epithelium. GFR
1 expression was the strongest in the mural granulosa cells (Fig. 5O and P) and theca interna layer of cells (Fig. 5G, O and P). Additional studies are needed to confirm the localization of GFR
1 to subpopulations of granulosa and theca cells. Western blot analysis was used to verify the specificity of the GFR
1 antibody (data not shown), which confirms observations from previous studies (Wang et al. 2004, Serra et al. 2005). Localization of GDNF and GFR
1 in primordial and primary follicles was the same in both cultured neonatal ovaries and adult uncultured ovaries. This suggests that culture conditions did not affect Gdnf and GFR
1 expression patterns in neonatal ovaries. To confirm the immunohistochemical observations, RT-PCR procedure localized Gdnf mRNA to antral oocytes and granulosa cells, and GFR
1 (Gfra1) mRNA to antral granulosa cells, but not to antral follicle oocytes. Oocytes from antral follicles have some non-specific immunohistochemical staining, so it is possible some antral follicle oocytes have very low levels of GFR
1 protein. Therefore, the immunohistochemical studies suggest that GFR
1 is still expressed in antral oocytes, although possibly decreasing in the largest preovulatory follicles. This expression decrease may also explain why GFR
1 is not detected in the antral oocyte samples by RT-PCR. Faint GFR
1 bands are amplified from antral oocyte samples, although it is not clear whether these bands reflect low oocyte expression or granulosa cell contamination. Another possibility is that antral oocytes do not themselves produce GFR
1 protein, but instead GFR
1 expressed by surrounding granulosa cells is cleaved free of its GPI membrane anchor and taken up by oocytes, so no oocyte Gfra1 mRNA is detectable. Further studies are needed to confirm the cellular expression pattern for GFR
1.
Combined observations suggest endogenous ovarian GDNF promotes the primordial to primary follicle transition through autocrine cell–cell signaling to GFR
1 receptors on oocytes. In late-stage antral follicles, the expression of GDNF changes to include cumulus granulosa cells, while the receptor GFR
1 expression decreases in the oocytes. This shift in ligand and receptor expression alters the physiological function of GDNF to a signaling factor with both autocrine and paracrine roles in developing antral follicles (Fig. 6D; Table 1). GDNF may also have an autocrine function for the antral follicle theca cells. Localization of GDNF and its receptor GFR
1 to oocyte cytoplasm presents one of the first examples of autocrine signaling to regulate primordial follicle development (Fig. 6C). The mechanism by which GDNF promotes follicle development remains to be fully elucidated.
Interestingly, GDNF expression in the ovary is the opposite of GDNF expression in analogous tissues in the testes. Often paracrine or endocrine signaling ligands have similar localization patterns in the gonads of males and females, such that a particular growth factor is expressed by the germ cells (oocytes and spermatogonia) in both sexes, or in the epithelial cells (Sertoli and granulosa) of both sexes. However, there is a difference between male and female GDNF localization. In males, GDNF is expressed by the Sertoli cells and GFR
1 is in the germ cells. GDNF signaling to spermatogonia stimulates proliferation and self-renewal after division (Widenfalk et al. 2000, Wu et al. 2005, Naughton et al. 2006). A similar function in females is not possible, as postnatal oocytes are arrested in meiosis and do not undergo cell division. This may explain why the site of GDNF production is different in females. Ovarian GDNF and GFR
1 are both present in the germ cell (i.e., oocyte). It is possible that over the course of evolution, GDNF's role diverged from spermatogonial self-renewal in the male to autocrine signaling that promotes the primordial to primary follicle transition in the female. Autocrine signaling loops have been shown to promote cell viability in neural, immune, and tumor cells, and to regulate estradiol production by granulosa cells (Meerschaert et al. 1999, Ireland et al. 2004, Schumacher et al. 2004, Datta & Datta 2006). Preserving oocyte viability may be an important aspect of autocrine GDNF signaling in the oocytes of early-stage follicles. Therefore, GDNF is likely essential for germ cell survival in both the testis and ovary, but the sites of expression are distinct.
Other possible mechanisms for GDNF action in the neonatal rat ovary include interactions with other extracellular signaling factors, thus indirectly promoting follicle development. The known network of extracellular signaling factors involved in primordial to primary follicle transition includes LIF (Nilsson et al. 2002), BMP4 (Nilsson & Skinner 2003), PDGF (Nilsson et al. 2006), nerve growth factor (Dissen et al. 2002), bFGF (Nilsson & Skinner 2004), and KL (Parrott & Skinner 1999, Nilsson & Skinner 2004), all of which promote development (Skinner 2005). KL may be expressed as either free (KL-1) or membrane bound (KL-2) isoforms. There is evidence that KL-2 is the necessary isoform for oocyte growth and formation of germ cells (Flanagan et al. 1991, Thomas et al. 2007). However, soluble KL-1 can promote primordial follicle transition (Parrott & Skinner 1999). AMH and SDF1 inhibit primordial to primary follicle transition (Ikeda et al. 2002, Skinner 2005, Holt et al. 2006, Nilsson et al. 2006). It was hypothesized that GDNF participated in this network by up-regulating KL or other factors that promote primordial to primary follicle transition. However, data from real-time PCR indicate that exogenous GDNF does not influence KL expression. This observation indicates that GDNF acts in a signaling pathway that is not dependent on changing KL expression.
The microarray analysis suggests that GDNF activity affects a variety of secreted growth factors, including AMH, CTGF, FGF8, GDF9, and STC1. AMH performs many functions in the ovary, the most relevant being that it inhibits the primordial to primary follicle transition in rat, mouse, and humans (Durlinger et al. 2002, Carlsson et al. 2006, Nilsson et al. 2007). Similarly, GDF9 is also critical for normal follicle development. GDF9 is an oocyte-secreted factor necessary for follicle development from the primary follicle stage through ovulation (Dong et al. 1996, Elvin et al. 1999). The other factors flagged by the microarray analysis have less documented function in early follicle development. FGF8 is expressed in antral follicles in rat and cow. It may also play a role in the development of ovarian and breast tumors (Valve et al. 1997, 2000, Daphna-Iken et al. 1998, Zammit et al. 2002, Buratini et al. 2005). STC1 was originally shown to have high expression levels in the ovary (Varghese et al. 1998). Further studies described an increase in STC1 expression during pregnancy and lactation, and a possible function in luteinization inhibition (Ishibashi & Imai 2002, Luo et al. 2004). STC1 knockout mice develop as phenotypically and reproductively normal (Chang et al. 2005). CTGF is a matrix-associated protein with many possible roles in development and differentiation processes (Leask & Abraham 2003). CTGF is regulated by gonadotropins and is expressed in antral follicles and corpus lutea (Landis 2002, Harlow et al. 2007). Early follicle development is a vital process for female fertility, and GDNF participates in a network of compensatory factors that act as checks and balances. Therefore, GDNF alone only modestly alters the ovarian transcriptome. Manipulation of the primordial to primary follicle transition for potential therapeutic purposes will likely need to target many factors congruently.
In males, GDNF promotes spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal by signaling through src family kinases (Braydich-Stolle et al. 2007, Oatley et al. 2007). Interestingly, src signaling is necessary in females for antral follicle development (Roby et al. 2005), and in primordial germ cells src kinase activation is vital for migration to the gonad and is a part of the KL signaling cascade (De Miguel et al. 2002, Farini et al. 2007). This leads to the speculation that GDNF may signal through src family kinases to promote primordial to primary follicle transition. The study of GDNF and GFR
1 knockout animals is difficult as these animals die prior to the onset of primordial to primary follicle transition due to kidney agenesis (Pichel et al. 1996, Sanchez et al. 1996, Cacalano et al. 1998). Further studies are necessary to fully characterize GDNF interactions in other extracellular signaling pathways in primordial follicle development. Since GDNF appears to act in an autocrine manner on the oocyte, other oocyte factors such as bFGF may be involved.
In summary, experiments using postnatal day 4 cultured rat ovaries were performed to explore how GDNF influences primordial to primary follicle transition. Observations from organ cultures, combined with immunohistochemical and RT-PCR localization, indicate that GDNF does promote the primordial to primary follicle transition, and GDNF and GFR
1 are present specifically in the oocyte cytoplasm of the primordial follicle. Combined data indicate GDNF is a part of the network of extracellular signaling factors that regulate primordial to primary follicle transition. Understanding the regulation of this process may lead to the development of therapies for reproductive ailments such as premature ovarian failure, or to methods to control the transition into menopause. The ability to regulate the primordial follicle pool size will directly influence female reproductive potential and associated endocrine abnormalities.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Morphological analysis
The number of follicles at each developmental stage was counted and averaged in two serial sections from the largest cross section through the center of the ovary and averaged. Studies by Bucci et al. (1997) have shown that ovarian follicle counts from a representative sample of as few as 1% of sections gives the same results as counting every fifth section (i.e., 20%). Previously, the data obtained from this analysis of two mid-diameter cross sections have been shown to provide similar results as the analysis of compiled data from all serial sections (data not shown; Parrott & Skinner 1999, Nilsson & Skinner 2003). In addition, total follicle number per section does not change between treatment groups as shown with a number of previous studies (Nilsson et al. 2001, 2006, 2007, Kezele et al. 2005a). Rather, only the percentage of follicles at each developmental stage changes with treatment (Nilsson et al. 2001, 2002). Follicles in ovarian cross sections were classified as primordial (stage 0) or developing (stages 1–4: early primary, primary, transitional, and pre-antral) as described previously (Oktay et al. 1995). Primordial follicles consist of an oocyte arrested in prophase I of meiosis that is partially or completely encapsulated by flattened squamous pre-granulosa cells. Early primary follicles have initiated development (i.e., undergone primordial to primary follicle transition) and contain at least two cuboidal granulosa cells. Primary, transitional, and pre-antral follicles exhibit one or more complete layers of cuboidal granulosa cells. Four-day-old ovaries contain predominantly primordial follicles (Parrott & Skinner 1999). Hematoxylin/eosin-stained ovarian sections were analyzed at 400x magnification using a light microscope. The populations of follicles were determined by the analysis of follicle morphology, rather than oocyte counts, to assess follicle developmental stages.
Immunohistochemistry
Ovary sections from freshly isolated adult or cultured postnatal day 4 (P4) ovaries (cultured for 10 days) were immunostained as described previously (Nilsson et al. 2002), for the presence of GDNF using anti-GDNF primary antibody (anti-GDNF rabbit IgG, 5 µg/ml; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Briefly, 3 µm sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated through a graded ethanol series, boiled in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer, quenched in 3% hydrogen peroxide/20% methanol and 0.1% Triton-X solution, and then blocked with 10% goat serum (normal goat serum; Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) for 20 min prior to incubation with 5 µg/ml primary antibody for 12 h. The sections were then washed with PBS and incubated with 1:300 diluted biotinylated secondary antibody for 45 min (goat anti-rabbit IgG; Vector Laboratories Inc.), washed again, and incubated with streptavidin peroxidase (Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA) prior to color development with a DAB peroxidase substrate kit (Vector Laboratories Inc). Following development, the sections were dehydrated, coverslips mounted with xylene-based medium (Cytoseal-XYL; Richard Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and analyzed at 200x, 400x, and 1000x magnification using light microscope. Negative control experiments were performed using a non-specific primary antibody at 5 µg/ml (rabbit IgG; Sigma). Non-cultured adult rat ovaries were also stained for the presence of GDNF with the same antibody (anti-GDNF rabbit IgG, 5–10 µg/ml; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using the protocol described below for GFR
1 localization.
Neonatal cultured and freshly isolated adult rat ovaries were stained for GFR
1 localization using anti-GFR
1 primary antibody (anti-GFR
1 rabbit IgG, 5–10 µg/ml; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The protocol for GFR
1 immunohistochemistry excluded the boiling step and introduced a second wash with 0.1% Triton-X solution following incubation with primary antibody. Negative control experiments were performed using a non-specific primary antibody at 5–10 µg/ml (rabbit IgG; Sigma). The protocol was otherwise identical to that used for GDNF staining.
Antral follicle cell preparation
Female 24-day-old rats were injected with 10 IU pregnant mares serum gonadotrophin subcutaneously to induce follicle development. Forty-eight-hour post-injection ovaries were extracted, bursae and fat trimmed away, and ovaries placed in the plates of F12/DMEM media (1:1, vol/vol; Life Technologies Inc.) supplemented with a final concentration of 5 µg/ml gentamicin, 3.25 µg/ml streptomycin, and 3.25 U/ml penicillin to prevent bacterial contamination. Ovaries were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in EGTA (6 mM; Sigma), transferred to a sucrose solution (0.5 M; Life Technologies Inc.), and incubated for another 30 min (both solutions made in media above). Following incubation, ovaries were again placed in F12/DMEM+antibiotics medium, where large follicles were lanced open to extrude granulosa cells and oocytes. Oocytes were aspirated into a separate tube creating two cell preparations, each enriched for either oocytes or granulosa cells from antral follicles. The oocyte preparation was further subjected to gentle aspiration through a 100 µl pipette tip and the resulting supernatant, containing dislodged granulosa cells, was discarded. This created oocyte preparations in which some granulosa cells would still adhere to many oocytes, and so a small amount of granulosa cell contamination is expected. All other cell types remain associated with the ovarian connective tissue. The isolated cell populations were placed in Trizol reagent at –75° (Sigma) for storage until RNA isolation.
RT-PCR
Granulosa cells and oocytes were extracted from antral rat follicles or microdissected as described above. The cells were immersed in Trizol reagent (Sigma) and RNA extracted according to the manufacturer's protocols. RNA samples were DNase treated with the TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) prior to reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA according to the standard oligo-dT RT protocol in a reaction volume of 25 µl. Negative controls for each sample were created at this step by omitting MMLV enzyme in the RT reaction. All PCR primer sets span intron–exon boundaries. PCR used the following primers for Gdnf (NCBI: NM_019139
[GenBank]
), forward: 5'-CTGGAAGATTCCCCGTATGA-3' and reverse: 5'-TCTTCGGGCATATTGGAGTC-3'. A second PCR for GFR
1 (Gfra1) used 2 µl of the first PCR product as template, and the previous reverse primer was used in conjunction with a nested forward primer: 5'-CTGTCTGCCTGGTGTTGCT-3'. Gdnf thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 4 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 60 s, 72 °C for 30 s, followed by 72 °C for 5 min. Second Gdnf PCR required 20 cycles. Primers for Gfra1 (NCBI: NM_012959
[GenBank]
.1) were forward: 5'-GGCAGTCCCGTTCATATCAG-3' and reverse: 5'-AGCAGAAGAGCATCCCGTAG-3'. Second PCR for Gdnf used 1 µl of the first PCR product as template and identical primers. The protocol for Gfra1 amplification was as follows: 95 °C for 4 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 60 s, 72 °C for 30 s, followed by 72 °C for 5 min. Second Gfra1 PCR required 20 cycles. Gdnf and Gfra1 PCR products were electrophoretically analyzed and sequenced to confirm identity. Amplification of the ribosomal protein S2 was used as a reference standard. The S2 reference gene primers (NCBI: NM_031838
[GenBank]
) were rS2-F, 5'-CTGCTCCTGTGCCCAA-GAAG-3' and rS2-R, 5'-AAGGTGGCCTTGGCAAAGTT-3'. Ribosomal S2 mRNA expression does not change in ovarian cells regardless of treatment (Kezele et al. 2005a).
Real-time PCR
Ovaries from 4-day-old female rat pups were maintained in the organ culture system described above for 2 days with GDNF treatment (r-metHu GDNF, 50 ng/ml; Amgen), or were left untreated as controls. Two ovaries from each culture well were combined to make each RNA sample. After 2 days of culture, ovaries were homogenized in Trizol reagent (Sigma) and RNA extracted according to the manufacturer's protocols. RNA samples were DNase treated with TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion) prior to reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA according to the standard oligo-dT RT protocol in a reaction volume of 25 µl. Negative controls for each sample were created at this step by omitting MMLV enzyme in the RT reaction. Five microliters of each 1:10 diluted cDNA sample, as well as each 1:10 diluted negative control sample, were used as template for real-time PCR analysis. Each sample was run in triplicate. The Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix kit (Invitrogen) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions for detection of KL (Kitl). The Kitl primers (NCBI: NM_021843
[GenBank]
) were rKitl-720: 5'-ATTTATGTTACCCCCTGTTGCAGCC-3' and rKitl-859: 5'-CAATTACAAGCGAAATGAGAGCCG-3'. SYBR Green was also used to detect the ribosomal protein gene S2, which was used as the reference standard for real-time PCR. Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI-7000 real-time machine with the following protocol: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 2 min, then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 66 °C for 30 s. Fluorescent detection data were analyzed for KL mRNA levels and normalized to S2 mRNA levels, and then GDNF-treated sample KL levels were normalized to untreated control KL mRNA levels.
Microarray and bioinformatics
Postnatal day 4 rat ovaries were cultured for 2 days in the presence or absence of GDNF (r-metHu GDNF, 50 ng/ml; Amgen). Culture conditions were identical to those described for 10-day organ culture experiments. Each sample contained six to ten pooled ovaries, and no two ovaries from the same animal were placed into the same treatment group. For each control and treated sample, two biological replicates were produced using different sets of ovaries. After culture ovaries were placed into Trizol reagent for RNA extraction as per the manufacturer's protocols.
RNA was hybridized to the Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA, USA) Rat 230 2.0 gene chip. One chip was used for each biological replicate (i.e., four chips total: two for control and two for treated). The number of chips required for specific experiments has been previously reviewed (Chen et al. 2004). The Genomics Core in the Center for Reproductive Biology at the Washington State University performed the analysis as described previously (McLean et al. 2002, Shima et al. 2004). Briefly, RNA from control and treated cultured ovaries were reverse transcribed into cDNA, which was transcribed into biotin-labeled RNA. Biotin-labeled RNA was then hybridized to the Affymetrix Rat 230 2.0 gene chips. Biotinylated RNA was then visualized by labeling with phycoerythrin-coupled avidin. The microarray chip was scanned on an Affymetrix Gene Chip Scanner 3000 (Affymetrix). The microarray image data were converted to numerical data with GeneChip Operating Software (GCOS version 1.2; Affymetrix) using a probe set target signal of 125. An analysis was performed with GCOS to assess the relative abundance of the transcripts based on signal and detection calls (present, absent, or marginal). The 11 perfect match and 11 mismatch oligonucleotides for a specific gene were used to statistically determine present/absent calls using a one-sided Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.
In GCOS, the Excel files were generated with expression signals and absent/present calls for each probe set. Using the Excel files, R2 for control or treated sample replicates were calculated (>0.98), indicating negligible total variability between chips, experiments, and samples. The Excel files from GCOS were imported into GeneSpring software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA, USA) and normalized using the recommended defaults. This includes setting signal values below 0.01 to a value of 0.01, total chip normalization to the 50th percentile, and per gene normalization to the median. Unless otherwise indicated, in order for a transcript to be considered present, it had to be both tagged as present in the GCOS present/absent call, and have an expression level >75. In order for a transcript to be considered changed between treatment groups, it had to exhibit at least a 1.5-fold change between the means of the treatments and have a Student's t-test P value of <0.05 between control and treatment samples. Therefore, the data presented are for genes that were determined to be statistically present and found to be statistically different from control with a given treatment.
Previous studies have demonstrated that microarray data are validated with quantitative PCR data (Shima et al. 2004, Kezele et al. 2005b). Due to the presence of 11 different oligonucleotide sets for each specific gene being used on the microarray versus only a single primer set for a gene in a quantitative PCR, the microarray is more effective at eliminating false-positive or -negative data and provides a more robust quantitation of changes in gene expression. However, validation of microarray data was performed with the KL gene using a real-time PCR procedure, as described in the Materials and Methods section. As presented in the Results section, similar data were obtained with the real-time PCR analysis as with the microarray analysis.
Statistical analysis
Organ culture treatment groups were compared using one-way ANOVA. Following a significant result with ANOVA, treated groups were compared with the control using Dunnet's multiple comparison post hoc test. Real-time PCR treatment groups were compared using a one-sample t-test. All statistics were calculated with the help of GraphPad Prism version 4.0b software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received 5 September 2007
First decision 17 October 2007
Revised manuscript received 4 February 2008
Accepted 8 February 2008
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amoresano A, Incoronato M, Monti G, Pucci P, de Franciscis V & Cerchia L 2005 Direct interactions among Ret, GDNF and GFRalpha1 molecules reveal new insights into the assembly of a functional three-protein complex. Cellular Signalling 17 717–727.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Aravindakshan J, Chen XL & Sairam MR 2006 Age-dependent bimodal GDNF regulation during ovarian tumorigenesis in follitropin receptor mutant mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 351 507–513.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Braydich-Stolle L, Kostereva N, Dym M & Hofmann MC 2007 Role of Src family kinases and N-Myc in spermatogonial stem cell proliferation. Developmental Biology 304 34–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bucci TJ, Bolon B, Warbritton AR, Chen JJ & Heindel JJ 1997 Influence of sampling on the reproducibility of ovarian follicle counts in mouse toxicity studies. Reproductive Toxicology 11 689–696.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Buratini J Jr, Teixeira AB, Costa IB, Glapinski VF, Pinto MG, Giometti IC, Barros CM, Cao M, Nicola ES & Price CA 2005 Expression of fibroblast growth factor-8 and regulation of cognate receptors, fibroblast growth factor receptor-3c and -4, in bovine antral follicles. Reproduction 130 343–350.
Cacalano G, Farinas I, Wang LC, Hagler K, Forgie A, Moore M, Armanini M, Phillips H, Ryan AM, Reichardt LF et al. 1998 GFRalpha1 is an essential receptor component for GDNF in the developing nervous system and kidney. Neuron 21 53–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Carlsson IB, Scott JE, Visser JA, Ritvos O, Themmen AP & Hovatta O 2006 Anti-Mullerian hormone inhibits initiation of growth of human primordial ovarian follicles in vitro. Human Reproduction 21 2223–2227.
Carmillo P, Dago L, Day ES, Worley DS, Rossomando A, Walus L, Orozco O, Buckley C, Miller S, Tse A et al. 2005 Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) receptor alpha-1 (GFR alpha 1) is highly selective for GDNF versus artemin. Biochemistry 44 2545–2554.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Chang AC, Cha J, Koentgen F & Reddel RR 2005 The murine stanniocalcin 1 gene is not essential for growth and development. Molecular and Cellular Biology 25 10604–10610.
Chen JJ, Delongchamp RR, Tsai CA, Hsueh HM, Sistare F, Thompson KL, Desai VG & Fuscoe JC 2004 Analysis of variance components in gene expression data. Bioinformatics 20 1436–1446.
Daphna-Iken D, Shankar DB, Lawshe A, Ornitz DM, Shackleford GM & MacArthur CA 1998 MMTV-Fgf8 transgenic mice develop mammary and salivary gland neoplasia and ovarian stromal hyperplasia. Oncogene 17 2711–2717.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Datta S & Datta MW 2006 Sonic Hedgehog signaling in advanced prostate cancer. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 63 435–448.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Dettin L, Ravindranath N, Hofmann MC & Dym M 2003 Morphological characterization of the spermatogonial subtypes in the neonatal mouse testis. Biology of Reproduction 69 1565–1571.
Dissen GA, Romero C, Paredes A & Ojeda SR 2002 Neurotrophic control of ovarian development. Microscopy and Research Technique 59 509–515.[CrossRef]
Dong J, Albertini DF, Nishimori K, Kumar TR, Lu N & Matzuk MM 1996 Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis. Nature 383 531–535.[CrossRef][Medline]
Durlinger AL, Gruijters MJ, Kramer P, Karels B, Ingraham HA, Nachtigal MW, Uilenbroek JT, Grootegoed JA & Themmen AP 2002 Anti-Mullerian hormone inhibits initiation of primordial follicle growth in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 143 1076–1084.
Elvin JA, Yan C, Wang P, Nishimori K & Matzuk MM 1999 Molecular characterization of the follicle defects in the growth differentiation factor 9-deficient ovary. Molecular Endocrinology 13 1018–1034.
Farini D, La Sala G, Tedesco M & De Felici M 2007 Chemoattractant action and molecular signaling pathways of Kit ligand on mouse primordial germ cells. Developmental Biology 306 572–583.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Flanagan JG, Chan DC & Leder P 1991 Transmembrane form of the kit ligand growth factor is determined by alternative splicing and is missing in the Sld mutant. Cell 64 1025–1035.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gash DM, Zhang Z & Gerhardt G 1998 Neuroprotective and neurorestorative properties of GDNF. Annals of Neurology 44 S121–S125.[Web of Science][Medline]
Golden JP, DeMaro JA, Osborne PA, Milbrandt J & Johnson EM Jr 1999 Expression of neurturin, GDNF, and GDNF family-receptor mRNA in the developing and mature mouse. Experimental Neurology 158 504–528.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Harlow CR, Bradshaw AC, Rae MT, Shearer KD & Hillier SG 2007 Oestrogen formation and connective tissue growth factor expression in rat granulosa cells. Journal of Endocrinology 192 41–52.
Hirshfield AN 1991 Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. International Review of Cytology 124 43–101.[Web of Science][Medline]
Holt JE, Jackson A, Roman SD, Aitken RJ, Koopman P & McLaughlin EA 2006 CXCR4/SDF1 interaction inhibits the primordial to primary follicle transition in the neonatal mouse ovary. Developmental Biology 293 449–460.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ikeda Y, Nagai A, Ikeda MA & Hayashi S 2002 Increased expression of Mullerian-inhibiting substance correlates with inhibition of follicular growth in the developing ovary of rats treated with E2 benzoate. Endocrinology 143 304–312.
Ireland JL, Jimenez-Krassel F, Winn ME, Burns DS & Ireland JJ 2004 Evidence for autocrine or paracrine roles of alpha2-macroglobulin in regulation of estradiol production by granulosa cells and development of dominant follicles. Endocrinology 145 2784–2794.
Ishibashi K & Imai M 2002 Prospect of a stanniocalcin endocrine/paracrine system in mammals. American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology 282 F367–F375.
Karihaloo A, Nickel C & Cantley LG 2005 Signals which build a tubule. Nephron. Experimental Nephrology 100 e40–e45.[CrossRef]
Kezele P, Nilsson E & Skinner MK 2002 Cell–cell interactions in primordial follicle assembly and development. Frontiers in Bioscience 7 d1990–d1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kezele P, Nilsson EE & Skinner MK 2005a Keratinocyte growth factor acts as a mesenchymal factor that promotes ovarian primordial to primary follicle transition. Biology of Reproduction 73 967–973.
Kezele PR, Ague JM, Nilsson E & Skinner MK 2005b Alterations in the ovarian transcriptome during primordial follicle assembly and development. Biology of Reproduction 72 241–255.
Kirik D, Georgievska B & Bjorklund A 2004 Localized striatal delivery of GDNF as a treatment for Parkinson disease. Nature Neuroscience 7 105–110.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kordower JH, Emborg ME, Bloch J, Ma SY, Chu Y, Leventhal L, McBride J, Chen EY, Palfi S, Roitberg BZ et al. 2000 Neurodegeneration prevented by lentiviral vector delivery of GDNF in primate models of Parkinson's disease. Science 290 767–773.
Landis SE 2002 Buncombe County Medical Society Project Access. Expanding access to care at the local level. North Carolina Medical Journal 63 23–29.[Medline]
Leask A & Abraham DJ 2003 The role of connective tissue growth factor, a multifunctional matricellular protein, in fibroblast biology. Biochemistry and Cell Biology 81 355–363.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lee WS, Yoon SJ, Yoon TK, Cha KY, Lee SH, Shimasaki S, Lee S & Lee KA 2004 Effects of bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) on primordial follicular growth in the mouse ovary. Molecular Reproduction and Development 69 159–163.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Linher K, Wu D & Li J 2007 Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor: an intraovarian factor that enhances oocyte developmental competence in vitro. Endocrinology 148 4292–4301.
Luo CW, Kawamura K, Klein C & Hsueh AJ 2004 Paracrine regulation of ovarian granulosa cell differentiation by stanniocalcin (STC) 1: mediation through specific STC1 receptors. Molecular Endocrinology 18 2085–2096.
McLean DJ, Friel PJ, Pouchnik D & Griswold MD 2002 Oligonucleotide microarray analysis of gene expression in follicle-stimulating hormone-treated rat Sertoli cells. Molecular Endocrinology 16 2780–2792.
Meerschaert J, Vrtis RF, Shikama Y, Sedgwick JB, Busse WW & Mosher DF 1999 Engagement of alpha4beta7 integrins by monoclonal antibodies or ligands enhances survival of human eosinophils in vitro. Journal of Immunology 163 6217–6227.
De Miguel MP, Cheng L, Holland EC, Federspiel MJ & Donovan PJ 2002 Dissection of the c-Kit signaling pathway in mouse primordial germ cells by retroviral-mediated gene transfer. PNAS 99 10458–10463.
Naughton CK, Jain S, Strickland AM, Gupta A & Milbrandt J 2006 Glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor-mediated RET signaling regulates spermatogonial stem cell fate. Biology of Reproduction 74 314–321.
Nilsson EE & Skinner MK 2003 Bone morphogenetic protein-4 acts as an ovarian follicle survival factor and promotes primordial follicle development. Biology of Reproduction 69 1265–1272.
Nilsson EE & Skinner MK 2004 Kit ligand and basic fibroblast growth factor interactions in the induction of ovarian primordial to primary follicle transition. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 214 19–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nilsson E, Parrott JA & Skinner MK 2001 Basic fibroblast growth factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 175 123–130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nilsson EE, Kezele P & Skinner MK 2002 Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) promotes the primordial to primary follicle transition in rat ovaries. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 188 65–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nilsson EE, Detzel C & Skinner MK 2006 Platelet-derived growth factor modulates the primordial to primary follicle transition. Reproduction 131 1007–1015.
Nilsson E, Rogers N & Skinner MK 2007 Actions of anti-Mullerian hormone on the ovarian transcriptome to inhibit primordial to primary follicle transition. Reproduction 134 209–221.
Oatley JM, Avarbock MR & Brinster RL 2007 Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor regulation of genes essential for self-renewal of mouse spermatogonial stem cells is dependent on Src family kinase signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282 25842–25851.
Oktay K, Schenken RS & Nelson JF 1995 Proliferating cell nuclear antigen marks the initiation of follicular growth in the rat. Biology of Reproduction 53 295–301.[Abstract]
Parrott JA & Skinner MK 1999 Kit-ligand/stem cell factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Endocrinology 140 4262–4271.
Pichel JG, Shen L, Sheng HZ, Granholm AC, Drago J, Grinberg A, Lee EJ, Huang SP, Saarma M, Hoffer BJ et al. 1996 Defects in enteric innervation and kidney development in mice lacking GDNF. Nature 382 73–76.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pozas E & Ibanez CF 2005 GDNF and GFRalpha1 promote differentiation and tangential migration of cortical GABAergic neurons. Neuron 45 701–713.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Richardson SJ, Senikas V & Nelson JF 1987 Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 65 1231–1237.
Roby KF, Son DS, Taylor CC, Montgomery-Rice V, Kirchoff J, Tang S & Terranova PF 2005 Alterations in reproductive function in SRC tyrosine kinase knockout mice. Endocrine 26 169–176.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sanchez MP, Silos-Santiago I, Frisen J, He B, Lira SA & Barbacid M 1996 Renal agenesis and the absence of enteric neurons in mice lacking GDNF. Nature 382 70–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
Santoro N 2001 Research on the mechanisms of premature ovarian failure. Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 8 S10–S12.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schumacher M, Guennoun R, Robert F, Carelli C, Gago N, Ghoumari A, Gonzalez Deniselle MC, Gonzalez SL, Ibanez C, Labombarda F et al. Local synthesis and dual actions of progesterone in the nervous system: neuroprotection and myelination Growth Hormone and IGF Research 14 Suppl_A 2004 S18–S33.[CrossRef]
Serra MP, Quartu M, Mascia F, Manca A, Boi M, Pisu MG, Lai ML & Del Fiacco M 2005 Ret, GFRalpha-1, GFRalpha-2 and GFRalpha-3 receptors in the human hippocampus and fascia dentata. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 23 425–438.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Shima JE, McLean DJ, McCarrey JR & Griswold MD 2004 The murine testicular transcriptome: characterizing gene expression in the testis during the progression of spermatogenesis. Biology of Reproduction 71 319–330.
Skinner MK 2005 Regulation of primordial follicle assembly and development. Human Reproduction Update 11 461–471.
Thomas FH, Ismail RS, Jiang JY & Vanderhyden BC 2007 Kit ligand 2 promotes murine oocyte growth in vitro. Biology of Reproduction 78 167–175.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Valve E, Penttila TL, Paranko J & Harkonen P 1997 FGF-8 is expressed during specific phases of rodent oocyte and spermatogonium development. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 232 173–177.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Valve E, Martikainen P, Seppanen J, Oksjoki S, Hinkka S, Anttila L, Grenman S, Klemi P & Härkönen P 2000 Expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-8 isoforms and FGF receptors in human ovarian tumors. International Journal of Cancer 88 718–725.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vargas-Leal V, Bruno R, Derfuss T, Krumbholz M, Hohlfeld R & Meinl E 2005 Expression and function of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family ligands and their receptors on human immune cells. Journal of Immunology 175 2301–2308.
Varghese R, Wong CK, Deol H, Wagner GF & DiMattia GE 1998 Comparative analysis of mammalian stanniocalcin genes. Endocrinology 139 4714–4725.
Wang LM, Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Zhu W, He C, Lu CL, Ding DF & Chen ZY 2004 Identification of the key amino acids of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor alpha1 involved in its biological function. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279 109–116.
Widenfalk J, Parvinen M, Lindqvist E & Olson L 2000 Neurturin, RET, GFRalpha-1 and GFRalpha-2, but not GFRalpha-3, mRNA are expressed in mice gonads. Cell and Tissue Research 299 409–415.[Web of Science][Medline]
Wissel K, Wefstaedt P, Rieger H, Miller JM, Lenarz T & Stover T 2006 Upregulation of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and artemin mRNA in the auditory nerve of deafened rats. Neuroreport 17 875–878.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wu Z, Templeman JL, Smith RA & Mackay S 2005 Effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on isolated developing mouse Sertoli cells in vitro. Journal of Anatomy 206 175–184.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Zammit C, Coope R, Gomm JJ, Shousha S, Johnston CL & Coombes RC 2002 Fibroblast growth factor 8 is expressed at higher levels in lactating human breast and in breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer 86 1097–1103.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A McLaughlin and S. C McIver Awakening the oocyte: controlling primordial follicle development Reproduction, January 1, 2009; 137(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |