| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Department of Histology and Medical Embriology, La Sapienza University of Rome, Via A. Scarpa, 14, Rome 00161, Italy and 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, University of LAquila, L Aquila 67010, Italy
Correspondence should be addressed to R Canipari; Email: rita.canipari{at}uniroma1.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PACAPs, VIP and their receptors are believed to play a role not only in the central nervous system, but also in various organs and peripheral tissues such as lung, testis, adrenal gland and ovary (Gottschall et al. 1990, Arimura 1992a, 1992b, 1998, Sherwood et al. 2000).
There is growing evidence that PACAP plays an important role in the female (Scaldaferri et al. 1996) reproductive system by acting as a potential local regulator of ovarian physiology. In the rat ovary, where PACAP and PAC1-R (Gras et al. 1996, Scaldaferri et al. 1996, Koh et al. 2000, Park et al. 2000, Vaccari et al. 2006) are transiently produced by gonadotrophin-stimulated preovulatory follicles, PACAP stimulates various ovarian functions, including cAMP accumulation, steroidogenesis and plasminogen activator (PA) production in cultured granulosa cells (Zhong & Kasson 1994, Gras et al. 1999, Apa et al. 2002). In addition, it accelerates meiotic maturation in rat cumulus-enclosed oocytes (Apa et al. 1997) and inhibits apoptosis in preovulatory follicles (Lee et al. 1999, Vaccari et al. 2006).
To further characterise the PACAP/receptor system in mouse ovary, this study aimed to verify the presence of this peptide and its receptor transcripts in mouse preovulatory follicles at the mRNA and protein levels and to demonstrate the presence of functional receptors on granulosa cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tissue and cell isolation
Ovaries were removed aseptically and freed from adherent tissues in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS, Gibco, Invitrogen). Whole ovaries were processed immediately for RNA or protein isolation.
Granulosa cells (GC) were obtained as described previously (Vaccari et al. 2006). Briefly, the largest follicles from each ovary were punctured with a 25-gauge needle and gently pressed to release GC. Cells were centrifuged at 250 g for 5 min and either resuspended in lysis buffer for RNA extraction or cultured at a density of 1.5 x 105/200 µl in Dulbeccos modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA, 2 mM glutamine and antibiotics (100 mM penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin). The residual ovarian tissue, mainly theca/interstitial cells and granulosa cells from small preantral follicles, was homogenised in lysis buffer for RNA extraction.
Preovulatory follicles were isolated from ovaries collected 46–48 h after eCG injection in HBSS supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA and cultured as described previously (Lee et al. 1999). Briefly, four follicles were cultured in polypropylene culture tubes containing 500 µl DMEM supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin) and 1 mg/ml BSA in the absence or presence of 100 ng/ml luteinising hormone (LH), or increasing concentrations of PACAP or VIP (10–9–10–7 M; Calbiochem/Merck Darmstadt).
In additional experiments, follicles were incubated with 10–7 M PACAP or VIP in the presence of 5 x 10–7 M PACAP and VIP antagonists, which were PACAP-38 (6–38) trifluoroacetate salt, the hybrid of neurotensin (6–11) and VIP (7–28; Bachem AG, Bubendorf, Switzerland), and the VIP receptor antagonist (D-P-chloro-Phe6,Leu17)-VIP (Sigma–Aldrich).
Morphological analysis of granulosa cell apoptosis
To evaluate the effect of PACAP and VIP on granulosa cell apoptosis, follicles were mechanically dissected from eCG-treated mice and GCs were released in the medium immediately before or after 24 h of follicle culture. Cells from single follicles were fixed for 15 min in 3% (w/v) paraformaldehyde/PBS and cytocentrifuged onto a glass slide at 200 g for 10 min. The samples were washed thrice with PBS and the chromatin was stained using the TUNEL (TdT-mediated dUTP-X nick end labelling) method according to the manufacturers instructions (Mebstain Apoptosis Kit Direct, MBL International, Woburn, MA, USA). Apoptotic cells were identified and counted in three or more randomly selected fields with at least 100 cells each.
RNA extraction and RT
Total RNA from whole ovaries, GC and residual ovarian tissue was isolated by a silica gel-based membrane spin column (RNeasy Kit, Qiagen S.p.A.). The purity and integrity of the RNA was checked spectroscopically and by gel electrophoresis. Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse-transcribed in a final volume of 20 µl, using the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Multiplex PCR
To determine the presence of PACAP and its receptor transcripts, a duplex-touchdown-PCR was performed. The reactions were carried out using a Multiplex PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturers instruction, with the housekeeping gene ß-actin as internal control. To increase the specificity and the quality of target products, a touchdown PCR was performed. The initially high annealing temperature (Ta, 67 °C for PACAP and all the receptors, and 62 °C for VIP) was lowered by 1 °C per cycle to a touchdown temperature of 59 °C for PACAP and all the receptors and 55 °C for VIP. This touchdown temperature remained the same for the remaining 22 cycles. The primer sequences chosen are shown in Table 1
. Each primer pair was previously tested alone for specific amplification. Primers for PAC1-R were chosen in a region that allowed the detection of all splice variants. For each sample, 10 µl PCR product was then subjected to electrophoresis on 2% (w/v) agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The densitometric evaluation of the bands was performed with AIDA software (Advanced Image Data Analyzer 2.11 raytest GmbH, Straubenhartd, Germany). The relative mRNA levels were normalised against the expression of the housekeeping gene. The ß-actin primer set 1 was used for the normalisation of PACAP, VIP, PAC1-R and VPAC2-R mRNA levels, while the ß-actin primer set 2 was used for VPAC1-R. DNA contamination controls were performed using gene-specific primers on RNA without reverse transcriptase treatment. PCR products were sequenced to verify the specificity of amplified DNA.
|
|
In situ hybridisation histochemistry
Freshly isolated ovaries from eCG- and hCG-stimulated mice were fixed in Bouins fluid for 48 h at room temperature. Fixed ovarian tissue was embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 7 µm. Paraffin sections were mounted on microscope polylysine slides (Menzel-Glaser, Braunschweig, Germany), deparaffined and rehydrated. Slides were then post-fixed in 4% para-formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, and treated with 10 µg/ml proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics S.p.A.). Hybridisation was carried out overnight at 55 °C in a humidified chamber in a mixture containing 50% (v/v) formamide, 1 x standard sodium citrate (SSC), 1 x Denhardts solution, 10% (w/v) dextran sulphate, 200 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA and 300 ng/ml digoxigenin-labelled DNA PACAP probe. The probe was labelled by direct incorporation of DIG-dUTP (Roche Diagnostics) during PCR amplification performed with the same primers as those used to amplify PACAP in multiplex RT-PCR (PAC1-R, see Table 1
). After hybridisation, washings were performed under stringent conditions to a final concentration of 0.1% (v/v) SSC. Sections were then incubated in blocking solution (100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1% (w/v) BSA) and in 1:300 alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche Diagnostics) diluted in blocking solution. Colorimetric detection was developed with a chromogen substrate (NBT, BCIP; Roche Diagnostics). The sections were observed by light microscopy and not counterstained.
A digoxigenin-labelled ß-actin DNA probe was used as a positive control, whereas an unlabelled PACAP DNA probe, as well as competing hybridisations, with different mixtures (1:5 and 1:10) of digoxigenin-labelled/-unlabelled PACAP DNA probes, were used as negative and specificity control reactions.
Western blot analysis
Ovaries from untreated 22-day-old immature mice or from eCG-treated mice were lysed with RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris (pH 7.2), 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 5 mM EDTA) containing protease inhibitors (Sigma–Aldrich) and sonicated on ice. The sonicated tissue was centrifuged for 2 min at 15 000 g at 4 °C and the supernatant was stored at –20 °C until use. Protein concentration was measured by BCA protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). ~50 µg proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE under denaturing conditions on a 12% (w/v) acrylamide gel (Laemmli 1970) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Whatman GmbH, Dassel, Germany). Non-specific binding was blocked by incubation with 5% (w/v) low-fat dry milk and 0.3% (v/v) tween-20 in PBS calcium-magnesium-free (CMF). The membrane was then incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-VPAC1-R polyclonal antibody (1:200, sc-30019; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) and with a mouse monoclonal antibody anti-tubulin (1:1000, T5168, Sigma–Aldrich) in CMF added with 5% (w/v) low-fat dry milk. The membrane was washed thrice with CMF for 20 min at room temperature and then incubated with the AP-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit antibody (1:2000, Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature or anti-mouse biotinilated antibody (1:5000; Dako Italia S.p.A. Milano, Italy) followed by incubation with streptavidin–AP complex (1:1000, Dako) at room temperature for 1 h. After washing with washing buffer (0.1 M Tris (pH 9.5), 0.1 M NaCl), immunocomplexes were detected by western blot chemiluminescence reagent (CDP-star; NEN, Boston, MA, USA), following the manufacturers instructions. Molecular masses were measured by prestained molecular markers (Gibco).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by the Tukey–Kramer test for comparisons of multiple groups. Values with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data did not show PACAP expression in 14-day-old ovaries (data not shown), in untreated (22d) or eCG-treated whole ovaries from 22-day-old animals; PACAP expression was transiently induced by hCG treatment, when it became detectable after 1 h, reached a maximum level after 3–6 h, and decreased to unstimulated levels after 9 h (Fig. 2A
). VIP transcripts were never observed at the time points considered (data not shown).
|
Localisation of PACAP
To determine the cell type that expresses PACAP mRNA, in situ hybridisation histochemistry was performed on ovarian sections obtained from mice before and 6 h after hCG injection. The PACAP signal was absent in ovaries of eCG-treated mice (Fig. 3B
); it was instead detected mainly in GCs of large preovulatory follicles after gonadotrophin stimulation (Fig. 3C
). PACAP immuno-reactivity was very low in the ovaries of eCG-treated animals (Fig. 4A
), whereas was observed in GCs and cumulus cells of preovulatory follicles 6 h after hCG stimulation (Fig. 4B
).
|
|
|
|
|
In order to distinguish between the hop1 and 2 isoforms, we exploited the nucleotide triplet insertion at the 5'-end of the hop1 exon, which generates a recognition site for the restriction enzyme PvuII. After complete digestion of the PCR products obtained with the hip/hop primers, the 181 bp band remained unchanged, while we observed digestion of the 265 bp band, accompanied by the appearance of two shorter fragments (Fig. 7
, lanes e and g) of 117 and 148 bp, which thus confirmed the presence of the hop1 isoform. The incomplete digestion of the 265 bp band suggested the contemporary presence of the hop2 isoform. Similar conclusions were drawn when the product obtained with the hip/hop-Fw and hop-Rv primers was digested with PvuII. The 148 bp band was partially digested and a 117 bp band appeared (Fig. 7
, lanes f and h).
Expression of VIP receptors
Analysis of VPAC1-R mRNA in whole ovary showed that the transcripts were present in untreated 22-day-old immature animals (22d) and were significantly down-regulated after gonadotrophin stimulation. VPAC1-R mRNA decreased after eCG stimulation and almost disappeared after hCG stimulation (Fig. 8
). VPAC1-R was predominantly expressed in the residual ovarian tissue, in which it decreased markedly after gonadotrophin stimulation, whereas in GCs it was constantly present at very low levels (Fig. 9
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we demonstrate stimulation of PACAP mRNA in whole mouse ovaries after the LH surge, thus confirming the results by Park et al.(2003). In addition, we show that PACAP expression increases predominantly in GCs of preovulatory follicles up to 6 h after hCG injection, while PACAP mRNA levels in the residual ovarian tissue are significantly lower.
With regard to the PACAP/VIP receptors, we have previously shown, in ovaries from juvenile mice, that VPAC1-R is the most abundant receptor, that VPAC2-R levels are lower and that those of PAC1-R are very low (Cecconi et al. 2004). Here, we show that these three receptors are also present in the ovary of untreated 22-day-old immature animals. Upregulation by gonadotrophin stimulation is significant in PAC1-R in the GC compartment, and mild in VPAC2-R in both cell populations. By contrast, VPAC1-R is prevalently expressed in residual ovarian tissues, and is significantly downregulated by gonadotrophin. The localisation of VPAC1-R in this study is in keeping with that observed in rat ovary in which this receptor is observed above all in theca cells and in the proximity of blood vessels (Vaccari et al. 2006).
PAC1-R has been described to have many spliced variants arising from differences in the splicing of the PAC1-hnRNA. Knowing which isoforms are expressed in the different cell populations is of interest because these isoforms display differences in ligand affinity, coupling efficiency and activation of signal transduction pathways (Spengler et al. 1993, Pantaloni et al. 1996). We therefore investigated, in more detail, the presence of the different splice variants in mouse ovary. We found that the short and the hop1/hop2 variants are predominantly expressed in this organ, and that these variants do not appear to be modulated by hCG, while the hip isoform is not detectable in mouse ovary or brain.
This expression pattern is in agreement with results obtained in rat ovary by Gras et al.(2000), though the presence of the other PAC1-R isoforms has been shown by Scaldaferri et al.(1996). The presence of the short and the hop1/hop2 variants give GCs the ability to activate both AC and PLC (Spengler et al. 1993).
The finding that PACAP and VIP are equipotent in inhibiting GC apoptosis in follicles cultured in the absence of serum is consistent with the presence of functional PACAP and VIP receptors. These results were confirmed by the use of PACAP/VIP receptor antagonists. As expected, the RT-PCR data showed that PACAP (6–38) inhibited PACAP action on apoptosis, though not that of VIP, and that the VPAC2-R antagonist inhibited both PACAP and VIP. Unexpectedly, we also observed an inhibitory effect with the VPAC1-R antagonist despite very low VPAC1-R mRNA levels. However, western blot analysis revealed that the VPAC1-R protein was indeed still present, thus explaining the data obtained on GC apoptosis.
The transient, gonadotrophin-dependent production of PACAP and PAC1-R in the preovulatory follicles suggests that PACAP may play a significant role around the time of ovulation. Indeed, we have previously shown that rat oocyte meiotic maturation and the production of enzymes correlated with ovulation, such as tPA and uPA are dependent on PACAP stimulation (Apa et al. 2002); moreover, we have unpublished observations showing a beneficial effect of PACAP on mouse oocyte maturation and cumulus mucification (manuscript in preparation).
Although VIP immunoreactivity has been found to be located in interstitial tissue and to be associated with blood vessels and theca layers of follicles in several species (Ahmed et al. 1986, Kannisto et al. 1986, Jorgensen et al. 1991, Hulshof et al. 1994), and VIP mRNA has been detected in rat ovary (Gozes & Tsafriri 1986), we did not detect mRNA for VIP at any of the times considered. Therefore, our data are in agreement with the fact that this peptide has been shown to originate in extrinsic innervations. In fact, the lack of radioimmunoassayable VIP levels following the transection of the ovarian nerves indicates that ovarian VIP derives mostly from extrinsic innervation of the gland (Dees et al. 1986, Advis et al. 1989).
The presence of VPAC1-R and VPAC2-R in both mouse GCs and residual ovarian tissue combined with the fact that VIP has been shown to prevent GC apoptosis in rat and mouse ovary as efficiently as PACAP (Flaws et al. 1995, Cecconi et al. 2004) suggests that this peptide also plays a role in the preovulatory follicle. However, the different localisation of PACAP and VIP suggests that these two peptides play different, though synergistic, roles in the preovulatory follicle. It is noteworthy that VPAC2-Rs have been described in the smooth muscles of male and female reproductive tracts and blood vessels (Usdin et al. 1994, Vaccari et al. 2006), and that VIP has been detected mainly outside the follicles, where it exerts a relaxant effect on the ovarian arteries (Jorgensen 1991). We can therefore hypothesise that VIP contributes to the increase in blood flow around preovulatory follicles observed after the LH surge (Acosta et al. 2003). This increased ovarian stromal blood flow may, in turn, lead to a greater delivery of gonadotrophins to the granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles (Redmer & Reynolds 1996). The gonadotrophin would consequently stimulate the production of PACAP in the preovulatory follicle. The fact that PACAP induces genes related to ovulation and luteinisation, and mediates some of the effects of LH on granulosa cell differentiation at the time of ovulation (Gras et al. 1999, Lee et al. 1999, Park et al. 2000), suggests that PACAP may serve as an ovarian physiological mediator of gonadotrophins in the ovulatory process.
Further studies are warranted to evaluate the respective roles of PACAP and VIP in ovarian physiology.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acosta TJ, Hayashi KG, Ohtani M & Miyamoto A 2003 Local changes in blood flow within the preovulatory follicle wall and early corpus luteum in cows. Reproduction 125 759–767.[Abstract]
Advis JP, Ahmed CE & Ojeda SR 1989 Direct hypothalamic control of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) levels in the developing rat ovary. Brain Research Bulletin 22 605–610.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Ahmed CE, Dees WL & Ojeda SR 1986 The immature rat ovary is innervated by vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-containing fibers and responds to VIP with steroid secretion. Endocrinology 118 1682–1689.[Abstract]
Apa R, Lanzone A, Mastrandrea M, Miceli F, Macchione E, Fulghesu AM, Caruso A & Canipari R 1997 Effect of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide on meiotic maturation in follicle-enclosed, cumulus-enclosed, and denuded rat oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 57 1074–1079.[Abstract]
Apa R, Lanzone A, Miceli F, Vaccari S, Macchione E, Stefanini M & Canipari R 2002 Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide modulates plasminogen activator expression in rat granulosa cell. Biology of Reproduction 66 830–835.
Arimura A. 1992a Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP): discovery and current status of research. Regulatory Peptides 37 287–302.[ISI][Medline]
Arimura A. 1992b Receptors for pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 3 288–294.[Medline]
Arimura A. 1998 Perspectives on pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) in the neuroendocrine, endocrine, and nervous systems. Japanese Journal of Physiology 48 301–331.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bajo AM, Juarranz MG, Valenzuela P, Martinez P, Prieto JC & Guijarro LG 2000 Expression of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) receptors in human uterus. Peptides 21 1383–1388.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cecconi S, Rossi G, Barberi M, Scaldaferri L & Canipari R 2004 Effect of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide on mouse preantral follicle development in vitro. Endocrinology 145 2071–2079.
Dees WL, Ahmed CE & Ojeda SR 1986 Substance P-, and vasoactive intestinal peptide-containing fibers reach the ovary by independent routes. Endocrinology 119 638–641.[Abstract]
Dickinson T, Fleetwood-Walker SM, Mitchell R & Lutz EM 1997 Evidence for roles of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptors in modulating the responses of rat dorsal horn neurons to sensory inputs. Neuropeptides 31 175–185.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Flaws JA, DeSanti A, Tilly KI, Javid RO, Kugu K, Johnson AL, Hirshfield AN & Tilly JL 1995 Vasoactive intestinal peptide-mediated suppression of apoptosis in the ovary: potential mechanisms of action and evidence of a conserved antiatretogenic role through evolution. Endocrinology 136 4351–4359.[Abstract]
Gottschall PE, Tatsuno I, Miyata A & Arimura A 1990 Characterization and distribution of binding sites for the hypothalamic peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. Endocrinology 127 272–277.[Abstract]
Gozes I & Tsafriri A 1986 Detection of vasoactive intestinal peptide-encoding messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat ovaries. Endocrinology 119 2606–2610.[Abstract]
Gras S, Hannibal J, Georg B & Fahrenkrug J 1996 Transient periovulatory expression of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide in rat ovarian cells. Endocrinology 137 4779–4785.[Abstract]
Gras S, Hannibal J & Fahrenkrug J 1999 Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide is an auto/paracrine stimulator of acute progesterone accumulation and subsequent luteinization in cultured periovulatory granulosa/lutein cells. Endocrinology 140 2199–2205.
Gras S, Hedetoft C, Pedersen SH & Fahrenkrug J 2000 Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide stimulates acute progesterone production in rat granulosa/Lutein cells via two receptor subtypes. Biology of Reproduction 63 206–212.
Hulshof SC, Dijkstra G, Van der Beek EM, Bevers MM, Figueiredo JR, Beckers JF & van den HR 1994 Immunocytochemical localization of vasoactive intestinal peptide and neuropeptide Y in the bovine ovary. Biology of Reproduction 50 553–560.[Abstract]
Jorgensen JC 1991 Interaction between norepinephrine, NPY and VIP in the ovarian artery. Peptides 12 831–837.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jorgensen JC, Kannisto P, Liedberg F, Ottesen B, Owman C & Schmidt G 1991 The influence of neuropeptide Y and norepinephrine on ovulation in the rat ovary. Peptides 12 975–982.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kannisto P, Ekblad E, Helm G, Owman C, Sjoberg NO, Stjernquist M, Sundler F & Walles B 1986 Existence and coexistence of peptides in nerves of the mammalian ovary and oviduct demonstrated by immunocytochemistry. Histochemistry 86 25–34.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kimura C, Ohkubo S, Ogi K, Hosoya M, Itoh Y, Onda H, Miyata A, Jiang L, Dahl RR & Stibbs HH 1990 A novel peptide which stimulates adenylate cyclase: molecular cloning and characterization of the ovine and human cDNAs. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 166 81–89.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Koh PO, Kwak SD, Kang SS, Cho GJ, Chun SY, Kwon HB & Choi WS 2000 Expression of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) and PACAP type I A receptor mRNAs in granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles of the rat ovary. Molecular Reproduction and Development 55 379–386.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Koves K, Gottschall PE, Gorcs T, Scammell JG & Arimura A 1990 Presence of immunoreactive vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in anterior pituitary of normal male and long term estrogen-treated female rats: a light microscopic immunohistochemical study. Endocrinology 126 1756–1763.[Abstract]
Laemmli UK 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227 680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee J, Park HJ, Choi HS, Kwon HB, Arimura A, Lee BJ, Choi WS & Chun SY 1999 Gonadotropin stimulation of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat ovary and the role of PACAP as a follicle survival factor. Endocrinology 140 818–826.
Lutz EM, Sheward WJ, West KM, Morrow JA, Fink G & Harmar AJ 1993 The VIP2 receptor: molecular characterisation of a cDNA encoding a novel receptor for vasoactive intestinal peptide. FEBS Letters 334 3–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Miyata A, Arimura A, Dahl RR, Minamino N, Uehara A, Jiang L, Culler MD & Coy DH 1989 Isolation of a novel 38 residue-hypothalamic polypeptide which stimulates adenylate cyclase in pituitary cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 164 567–574.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Pantaloni C, Brabet P, Bilanges B, Dumuis A, Houssami S, Spengler D, Bockaert J & Journot L 1996 Alternative splicing in the N-terminal extracellular domain of the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptor modulates receptor selectivity and relative potencies of PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 in phospholipase C activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271 22146–22151.
Park HJ, Lee J, Wang L, Park JH, Kwon HB, Arimura A & Chun SY 2000 Stage-specific expression of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide type I receptor messenger ribonucleic acid during ovarian follicle development in the rat. Endocrinology 141 702–709.
Park JY, Richard F, Chun SY, Park JH, Law E, Horner K, Jin SL & Conti M 2003 Phosphodiesterase regulation is critical for the differentiation and pattern of gene expression in granulosa cells of the ovarian follicle. Molecular Endocrinolgy 17 1117–1130.[CrossRef]
Redmer DA & Reynolds LP 1996 Angiogenesis in the ovary. Reviews of Reproduction 1 182–192.[Abstract]
Scaldaferri L, Arora K, Lee SH, Catt KJ & Moretti C 1996 Expression of PACAP and its type-I receptor isoforms in the rat ovary. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 117 227–232.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sherwood NM, Krueckl SL & McRory JE 2000 The origin and function of the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP)/glucagon superfamily. Endocrine Reviews 21 619–670.
Spengler D, Waeber C, Pantaloni C, Holsboer F, Bockaert J, Seeburg PH & Journot L 1993 Differential signal transduction by five splice variants of the PACAP receptor. Nature 365 170–175.[CrossRef][Medline]
Usdin TB, Bonner TI & Mezey E 1994 Two receptors for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide with similar specificity and complementary distributions. Endocrinology 135 2662–2680.[Abstract]
Vaccari S, Latini S, Barberi M, Teti A, Stefanini M & Canipari R 2006 Characterization and expression of different pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide/vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptors in rat ovarian follicles. Journal of Endocrinology 191 287–299.
Zhong Y & Kasson BG 1994 Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide stimulates steroidogenesis and adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate accumulation in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 135 207–213.[Abstract]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |