| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
REVIEW |
1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health and 2 Department of Biology and CBR/RCMI, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, Alabama 36088, USA and 3 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to H O Goyal; Email: goyalho{at}tuskegee.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(ER
). The resistance of ER
knockout mice to develop these abnormalities implies an unequivocal role for ER
in mediating maldevelopment of the penis. Additionally, the prevention of estrogen-inducible penile abnormalities by ER antagonist ICI 182 780 implies that a functional ER-mediated pathway is essential for inducing penile abnormalities. Likewise, the ability of testosterone or dihydrotestosterone to negate these abnormalities suggests a role for an androgen receptor (AR)-mediated pathway. Taken together, these observations led us to hypothesize that neonatal estrogen exposure, via an ER-mediated pathway (direct action) or an AR-mediated pathway (indirect action through decreased testosterone) or both pathways, up-regulates ER
expression in stromal cells of the penis, which are then reprogrammed such that their differentiation into smooth muscle cells is inhibited and their differentiation into adipocytes is stimulated. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
reduced testosterone metabolite, is critical in development of organs derived from the urogenital sinus, genital tubercle, and genital swelling, including the scrotum, prostate, and penis (Anderson & Clark 1990, George & Wilson 1994, Wilson & Davies 2007). Alterations in androgenic activity during differentiation can cause maldevelopment of internal and external male genitalia, including hypospadias and shorter penis (Gray et al. 2001, Sultan et al. 2001, Kim et al. 2002, Foster & Harris 2005). However, unlike androgens, the role of estrogen in development of male reproductive organs, especially in the penis, remains largely unknown; although both estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or aromatase enzyme have been identified in the developing penis of a number of species, including humans (Crescioli et al. 2003, Schultheiss et al. 2003, Dietrich et al. 2004), rodents (Jesmin et al. 2002, 2004), and rabbits (Srilatha & Adaikan 2004). Epidemiological studies have shown links between inappropriate estrogen exposure and higher frequency of reproductive abnormalities in men and wild animals (Toppari et al. 1996, McLachlan et al. 2001, Safe et al. 2001, Mosconi et al. 2002, Fisher 2004, Vidaeff & Sever 2005, Storgaard et al. 2006, reviews). Male offspring of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol (DES) during pregnancy have higher incidence of epididymal cysts, cryptorchidism, hypospadias, and smaller penis (Gill et al. 1979, Swan 2000, Klip et al. 2002). Laboratory animals exposed neonatally to estrogen develop hypospadias (McLachlan et al. 1975, Kim et al. 2004, Newbold 2004). Neonatal exposure to estrogen at low doses enlarges the prostate gland, while higher doses have the opposite effect (vom Saal et al. 1997, Gupta 2000, Putz et al. 2001, vom Saal & Hughes 2005). Taken together, the above studies suggest that prenatal and/or neonatal exposure to estrogens can have permanent deleterious effects on the development of male reproductive organs; however, the mechanism underlying estrogen-inducible abnormal phenotypes in the male reproductive tract, as well as in the penis, remains unknown.
Recently, we reported permanent dysmorphogenesis of the penis and loss of fertility in adult rats treated neonatally with DES or EV (Goyal et al. 2004a, 2004b, 2005a, 2005b). Importantly, these studies showed replacement of smooth muscle cells and cavernous spaces by fat cells in the corpora cavernosa penis. Additionally, these effects were dose dependent, required a critical window of exposure, and were associated with decreased plasma testosterone and up-regulation of ER
expression in the body of the penis. The objective of this review is to present the above data in a comprehensive manner and discuss the mechanism by which neonatal exposure to estrogen stimulates adipogenesis and inhibits smooth muscle cell differentiation during a critical period of penile development.
Hence, in this review, we will first present a brief description of the rat penis morphology at the gross and histological levels for the purpose of orientation. This will be followed by data that neonatal estrogen exposure results in permanent penile dysmorphogenesis characterized by replacement of cavernous spaces and smooth muscle cells by fat cells in the body of the penis (Goyal et al. 2004a); estrogen-induced penile disorders are dose-dependent (Goyal et al. 2005a), as well as are dependent upon estrogen exposure during a critical period of penile development (Goyal et al. 2005b); neonatal estrogen exposure results in up-regulation of ER
, but without any alteration in ERß or androgen receptor (AR) expression, in the body of the penis (Goyal et al. 2004b); ER
knockout (ER
KO) mice are resistant to estrogen-inducible penile abnormalities (Goyal et al. 2007); neonatal estrogen exposure lowers testosterone secretion at puberty or adulthood (Goyal et al. 2004b) and suppresses neonatal testosterone surge (Goyal et al. 2005b); and the coadministration of ER antagonist or androgen with estrogen mitigates estrogen-inducible developmental penile abnormalities. Finally, we will discuss possible mechanisms by which neonatal estrogen exposure results in penile dysmorphogenesis.
| Morphology of the rat penis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Neonatal exposure to estrogen induces permanent penile dysmorphogenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Penile dysmorphogenesis is dose- and time-dependent |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Penile dysmorphogenesis is associated with ER up-regulation
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
, ERß, and AR expression in the body of the penis. AR-positive cells were ubiquitous and their profile (incidence and staining intensity) did not differ between controls and treated rats in any age group (Fig. 3A and B
-positive cells (mostly stromal), while few and faintly stained in controls, were abundant and intensely stained in all age groups of treated rats, especially at 18 days (Fig. 3C and D
expression was enhanced and AR expression was unaltered, as a result of neonatal DES exposure (Fig. 3E
, ERß expression was high in both control and treated groups (Fig. 3F
up-regulation, but without an alteration in expression for ERß or AR.
|
ER presence is essential in estrogen-inducible penile dysmorphogenesis
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
null allele were crossed to generate ER
KO and wild-type C57BL/6 mice in a continuous breeding scheme at the University of Illinois, Champaign/Urbana. Pups were treated with DES at a dose of 200 ng (0.1 mg/kg same as in the rat) in 25 µl olive oil, per pup, every other day, from postnatal days 2–12. Controls received oil only. Between 8 and 12 days of age, DNA was isolated from tail tissues using Direct PCR Lysis Reagent (Viagen Biotech Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA) and used to determine genotype. Animals were shipped to Tuskegee University at adulthood for further study. Fertility was tested at 90–120 days of age (n=5–7 each group) and tissues were collected at 96–153 days of age.
Penises from the wild-type treated mice only showed abnormalities, which were similar to those observed in the rat penis, including maldevelopment of the os penis (Fig. 3G
) and reductions in the length and weight of the penis (Fig. 3H
). While all wild-type control males sired pups, none did in the wild-type treated or knockout control or knockout treated males. In conclusion, the
ERKO mice are resistant to estrogen-inducible penile abnormalities present in the wild-type littermates implying an unequivocal role for ER
in mediating maldevelopment of the penis.
| Penile dysmorphogenesis is associated with lower plasma and intra-testicular testosterone |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
0.05) different from that of controls (2.78 ng/ml), it was significantly reduced in the 100 ng and higher dose DES and EV groups (Fig. 4B
Effect of the time and length of estrogen exposure
Male pups received EV at a dose of 1 µg per pup, each day on postnatal day (s) 1, 1–3, 4–6, 1–6, 7–12, 13–18, 19–24, or 25–30. Plasma samples were assayed at 140–150 days of age. The mean plasma testosterone concentration was significantly lower in the 1—6 and 4–6 day groups only (Fig. 4C
).
Intra-testicular testosterone
The intra-testicular testosterone concentration was determined in rats treated with EV at a dose of 1 µg per pup, each day on 1–3 postnatal days. Testes were collected and frozen on postnatal days 5, 8, and 12. The rationale was to find out whether estrogen treatment results in suppressing the neonatal intra-testicular testosterone surge that is typical for rodents from late gestation (18.5–19.5 days) to the first week of life (Ward & Weisz 1984, El-Gehani et al. 1998). The reason for treating pups for 1–3 postnatal days was that, among various treatment groups, this was the earliest and the shortest developmental period in which estrogen exposure resulted in abnormal penis and loss of fertility (see above section C, Time of Exposure).
The mean intra-testicular testosterone concentration in control rats at 5 and 8 days of age was 160 and 98 ng/g respectively as opposed to <10% of the control values in the treated rats (Fig. 4D
), implying that neonatal estrogen exposure suppresses the perinatal testosterone surge.
| ER antagonist or androgen coadministration with estrogen mitigates estrogen-induced penile dysmorphogenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Mechanism of estrogen-induced penile dysmorphogenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies aimed at elucidation of mechanisms through which aberrant estrogen exposure affects restructuring of the corpora cavernosa will provide important insights into mechanisms governing early development of the penis. Based upon observations from other studies (Murakami 1986, 1987) that both smooth muscle cells and cavernous spaces were absent in the rat penis at birth and started to differentiate from stromal cells after 5–6 days of age, we hypothesized that the structural changes that we observed in the corpora cavernosa may have resulted from estrogenic effects limited to the early period of penile development. Indeed, this was confirmed in our developmental study in which rats treated prior to 12 days of age, but not after, developed permanent penile abnormalities and loss of fertility, implying postnatal days 1–12 as the period when penis was sensitive to estrogen exposure (Goyal et al. 2005b). Additional observations confirmed that the magnitude of these effects (for example, increase in the number, size and percent area of adipocytes) was higher in the 1–6 day group than in the 7–12 day group determined 1–6 postnatal days as the most sensitive period. It is noteworthy here that the rat penis during this estrogen-sensitive period contains only stromal cells in the corpora cavernosa (lacks smooth muscle cells and cavernous spaces) and thus is similar developmentally to the human penis in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy (Williams-Ashman & Reddi 1991, George & Wilson 1994, Klonisch et al. 2004).
Whether the observed effects of estrogen on penile dysmorphogenesis result from an ER-mediated pathway or an AR-mediated pathway, or both ways remains unclear. Support for an ER-mediated pathway comes from observations that both ER
and ß are present in stromal cells in 1-day-old rat penis (Jesmin et al. 2002, Mowa et al. 2006), estrogens inhibit proliferation of smooth muscle of injured blood vessels (Goyal & Oparil 2001), and the estrogen metabolite, 2-methoxyestradiol, inhibits angiogenesis (Fotsis et al. 1994). Additionally, ER
up-regulation is associated with abnormal development in rodents of the female reproductive tract (Yamashita et al. 1990, Markey et al. 2005), mammary gland (Tekmal et al. 2005), male reproductive tract (Sato et al. 1994), prostate gland (Prins & Birch 1997, Prins et al. 2001), and seminal vesicles (Williams et al. 2001). In addition, ER
overexpression is shown to inhibit growth and angiogenic factors in the endometrial carcinoma cell line Ishikawa (Ali et al. 2004); and ER
is the main regulator of estrogenic effect on adipose tissue, especially that an alteration in estrogen/ER signaling during development results in dramatic changes in adipocyte number (Cooke & Naaz 2004). Thus, evidence in our studies of association between estrogen-inducible penile abnormalities and enhanced ER
expression, mitigation of estrogen-inducible penile deformities by ER antagonist ICI 182 780, and lack of estrogen-inducible abnormalities in the penis of ER
KO mice indicates that a functional ER
pathway is essential in induction of aberrant penile development.
Alternatively, ARs are present throughout the body of the rat penis (Goyal et al. 2004b); AR concentration reaches a peak level at or prior to puberty when stromal cells are differentiating into smooth muscle cells and cavernous spaces (Rajfer et al. 1980, Takane et al. 1990); and neonatal estrogen exposure reduces AR expression in male reproductive organs (Prins & Birch 1995, McKinnell et al. 2001, Williams et al. 2001, Woodham et al. 2003) and lowers plasma testosterone (Sharpe et al. 1998, Atanassova et al. 2000). Additionally, the coadministration of testosterone with DES prevents most of the histopathological abnormalities affecting the male reproductive tract in rats (Rivas et al. 2003). Low androgen in vitro inhibits smooth muscle differentiation and promotes adipocyte differentiation in pluripotent mesenchymal cells (Bhasin et al. 2003, Singh et al. 2003); and castration induces fat deposition and loss of smooth muscle cells in the corpora cavernosa of the rabbit penis (Traish et al. 2005).
Collectively, the above observations suggest a lower testosterone and/or decreased AR activation as factors contributing indirectly to development of estrogen-inducible penile abnormalities. Our observations that coadministration of testosterone or DHT negates estrogen-inducible penile abnormalities and that estrogen exposure for 1–3 postnatal days reduces the perinatal testosterone surge by almost 90% at postnatal day 5 or 8 (Goyal et al. 2005b), the developmental period when stromal cells start differentiation into smooth muscle cells in the rat penis (Murakami 1986, 1987, provide credence to the indirect effect hypothesis. In other words, the perinatal testosterone surge, typical for rodents from late gestation to first week (Ward & Weisz 1984, El-Gehani et al. 1998), may be a natural mechanism of dampening ER
expression in stromal cells and, thereby, safeguarding their normal differentiation into smooth muscle cells and endothelial-lined cavernous spaces at a critical period of penile development.
Hence, our working hypothesis of estrogen-inducible abnormal development of the penis in our rat model is as follows (Fig. 5
): neonatal estrogen exposure inhibits the perinatal testosterone surge by the fetal Leydig cells; the resulting lower androgen action up-regulates ER
in penile stromal cells; ER
overexpressing stromal cells, when exposed to sufficient estrogen, are reprogrammed toward increased adipogenesis (in other words, a mere ER
overexpression may not be adequate for stromal cell reprogramming).
|
in stromal cells, normal stromal cell differentiation); testosterone coadministration will reverse DES effects by acting primarily at the stromal cells (lower testosterone surge, low ER
in stromal cells, and normal stromal cell differentiation); and anti-androgenic action alone, resulting from gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-A) and/or flutamide treatments, will up-regulate ER
in stromal cells, but they may or may not be reprogrammed toward increased adipogenesis because of insufficient estrogen exposure.
In summary, we describe a rat model of permanently abnormally developed penis resulting from neonatal DES exposure for a very short period (as short as for 1–3 postnatal days) and at a moderate dose (0.1 mg/kg body weight; note this dose is miniscule in comparison to a total median dose of 200 mg/kg given to a cohort of women at the Boston Lying-in hospital in 1950–1970, Heinonen 1973). Additional experiments using pharmacological approaches (ER antagonist ICI 182 780, AR agonist DHT, centrally acting anti-androgen GnRH-A, and peripherally acting anti-androgen flutamide) are warranted to further understand mechanisms whereby increased ER
activity or lower AR activity or both reprogram stromal cells such that their differentiation into smooth muscle cells is inhibited and their differentiation into adipocytes is stimulated. These findings will be significant because humans and animals are continuously exposed to environmental estrogens (referred to as endocrine disruptors) and anti-androgens (vinclozolin and phthalates) and thus may be more prone to higher incidence of reproductive disorders.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ali SH, ODonnell AL, Mohamed S, Mousa S & Dandona P 2004 Overexpression of estrogen receptor alpha in the endometrial carcinoma cell line Ishikawa: inhibition of growth and angiogenic factors. Gynecologic Oncology 95 637–645.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Anderson CA & Clark RL 1990 External genitalia of the rat: normal development and the histogenesis of 5
-reductase inhibitor-induced abnormalities. Teratology 42 483–496.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Atanassova N, McKinnell C, Turner KJ, Walker M, Fisher JS, Morley M, Millar MR, Groome NP & Sharpe RM 2000 Comparative effects of neonatal exposure of male rats to potent and weak (environmental) estrogens on spermatogenesis at puberty and the relationships to adult testis size and fertility: evidence for stimulatory effects of low estrogen levels. Endocrinology 141 3898–3907.
Bhasin S, Taylor WE, Singh R, Artaza J, Sinha-Hikim I, Jasuja R, Choi H & Gonzalez-Cadavid NF 2003 The mechanisms of androgen effects on body composition: mesenchymal pluripotent cell as the target of androgen action. Journal of Gerontology 58 1103–1110.[ISI]
Cooke PS & Naaz A 2004 Role of estrogen in adipocyte development and function. Experimental Biology and Medicine 229 1127–1135.
Crescioli C, Maggi M, Vannelli GB, Ferruzzi P, Granchi S, Mancina R, Muratori M, Forti G, Serio M & Luconi M 2003 Expression of functional estrogen receptors in human fetal male external genitalia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 88 1815–1824.
Dietrich W, Haitel A, Huber JC & Reiter WJ 2004 Expression of estrogen receptors in human corpus cavernosum and male urethra. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 52 355–360.
El-Gehani F, Zhang FP, Pakarinen P, Rannikko A & Huhtaniemi I 1998 Gonadotropin-independent regulation of steroidogenesis in the fetal rat testis. Biology of Reproduction 58 116–123.
Fisher JS 2004 Environmental anti-androgens and male reproductive health: focus on phthalates and testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Reproduction 127 305–315.
Foster PMD & Harris MW 2005 Changes in androgen-mediated reproductive development in male rat offspring exposure to a single oral dose of flutamide at different gestational ages. Toxicological Sciences 85 1024–1032.
Fotsis T, Zhang Y, Pepper MS, Adlercreutz H, Montesano R, Nawroth -PP & Schweigerer L 1994 The endogenous oestrogen metabolite 2-methoxyoestradiol inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses tumor growth. Nature 368 237–239.[CrossRef][Medline]
George FW & Wilson JD 1994 Sex determination and differentiation. In The Physiology of Reproduction, pp 3–28. Eds E Knobil & J Neil. New York: Raven Press.
Gill WB, Schumacher GFB, Bibbo M, Straus FH & Schoenberg HW 1979 Association of diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero with cryptorchidism, testicular hypoplasia and semen abnormalities. Journal of Urology 122 36–39.[ISI][Medline]
Goyal MK & Oparil S 2001 Direct estrogen effects on the cardiovascular system. In Contemporary Endocrinology: Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Research and Clinical Applications, pp 99–119. Eds A Manni & MF Verderame. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
Goyal HO, Braden TD, Williams CS, Dalvi P, Williams JW & Srivastava KK 2004a Exposure of neonatal male rats to estrogen induces abnormal morphology of the penis and loss of fertility. Reproductive Toxicology 18 265–274.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Goyal HO, Braden TD, Williams CS, Dalvi P, Mansour MM, Mansour M, Williams JW, Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Birch L et al. 2004b Abnormal morphology of the penis in male rats exposed neonatally to diethylstilbestrol is associated with altered profile of estrogen receptor-
protein, but not of androgen receptor protein: A developmental and immunocytochemical study. Biology of Reproduction 70 284–297.
Goyal HO, Braden TD, Williams CS, Dalvi P, Mansour MM & Williams JW 2005a Permanent induction of morphological abnormalities in the penis and penile skeletal muscles in adult rats treated neonatally with diethylstilbestrol or estradiol valerate: A dose–response study. Journal of Andrology 26 32–43.
Goyal HO, Braden TD, Williams CS, Dalvi P, Mansour M & Williams JW 2005b Estrogen-induced abnormal accumulation of fat cells in the rat penis and associated loss of fertility depends upon estrogen exposure during critical period of penile development. Toxicological Sciences 87 242–254.
Goyal HO, Braden TD, Cooke PS, Szewczykowski MA, Williams CS, Dalvi P & Williams JW 2007 Estrogen receptor-
mediates estrogen-inducible abnormalities in the developing penis. Reproduction 133 1057–1067.
Gray LE Jr, Ostby J, Furr J, Wolf CJ, Lambright C, Parks L, Veeramachaneni DN, Wilson V, Price M, Hotchkiss A et al. 2001 Effects of environmental antiandrogens on reproductive development in experimental animals. Human Reproduction Update 7 248–264.
Gupta C 2000 Reproductive malformation of the male offspring following maternal exposure to estrogenic chemicals. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 224 61–68.[CrossRef]
Heinonen OP 1973 Diethylstilbestrol in pregnancy. Frequency of exposure and usage patterns. Cancer 31 573–577.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jesmin S, Mowa CN, Matsuda N, Salah-Eldin A-E, Togashi H, Sakuma I, Hattori Y & Kitabatake A 2002 Evidence for a potential role of estrogen in the penis: detection of estrogen receptor-
and -ß messenger ribonucleic acid and protein. Endocrinology 143 4764–4774.
Jesmin S, Mowa CN, Sakuma I, Matsuda N, Togashi H, Yoshioka M, Hattori Y & Kitabatake A 2004 Aromatase is abundantly expressed by neonatal rat penis but downregulated in adulthood. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 33 343–359.
Kim KS, Liu W, Cunha GR, Russell DW, Huang H, Shapiro E & Baskin LS 2002 Expression of the androgen receptor and 5 alpha-reductase type 2 in the developing human fetal penis and urethra. Cell and Tissue Research 307 145–153.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kim KS, Torres CR Jr, Yucel S, Raimondo K, Cunha GR & Baskin LS 2004 Induction of hypospadias in a murine model by maternal exposure to synthetic estrogens. Environmental Research 94 267–275.[Medline]
Klip H, Verloop J, van Gool JD, Koster ME, Burger CW & van Leeuwen FE 2002 Hypospadias in sons of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study. Lancet 359 1081–1082.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Klonisch T, Fowler PA & Hombach-Klonisch S 2004 Molecular and genetic regulation of testis descent and external genitalia development. Developmental Biology 270 1–18.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Markey CM, Wadia PR, Rubin BS, Sonnenschein C & Soto AM 2005 Long-term effects of fetal exposure to low doses of the xenoestrogen bisphenol-A in the female mouse genital tract. Biology of Reproduction 72 1344–1351.
McKinnell C, Atanassova N, Williams K, Fisher JS, Walker M, Turner KJ, Saunders PTK & Sharpe RM 2001 Suppression of androgen action and the induction of gross abnormalities of the reproductive tract in male rats treated neonatally with diethylstilbestrol. Journal of Andrology 22 323–338.[Abstract]
McLachlan JA, Newbold RR & Bullock B 1975 Reproductive tract lesions in male mice exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol. Science 190 991–992.
McLachlan JA, Newbold RR, Burow ME & Li SF 2001 From malformations to molecular mechanisms in the male: three decades of research on endocrine disrupters. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica 109 263–272.
Moon DG, Sung DJ, Kim YS, Cheon J & Kim JJ 2001 Bisphenol A inhibits penile erection via alteration of histology in the rabbit. International Journal of Impotence Research 13 309–316.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Moon DG, Lee KC, Kim YW, Park HS, Cho HY & Kim JJ 2004 Effect of TCDD on corpus cavernosum histology and smooth muscle physiology. International Journal of Impotence Research 16 224–230.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Mosconi G, Carnevali O, Franzoni MF, Cottone E, Lutz I, Kloas W, Yamamoto K, Kikuyama S & Polzonetti-Magni AM 2002 Environmental estrogens and reproductive biology in amphibians. General and Comparative Endocrinology 126 125–129.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Mowa CN, Jesmin S & Miyauchi T 2006 The penis: a new target and source of estrogen in male reproduction. Histology and Histopathology 21 53–67.[ISI][Medline]
Murakami R 1986 Development of the os penis in genital tubercles cultured beneath the renal capsule of adult rats. Journal of Anatomy 149 11–20.[ISI][Medline]
Murakami RA 1987 Histological study of the development of the penis of wild-type and androgen-insensitive mice. Journal of Anatomy 153 223–231.[ISI][Medline]
Newbold RR 2004 Lessons learned from perinatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 199 142–150.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Prins GS & Birch L 1995 The developmental pattern of androgen receptor expression in rat prostate lobes is altered after neonatal exposure to estrogen. Endocrinology 136 1303–1314.[Abstract]
Prins GS & Birch L 1997 Neonatal estrogen exposure up-regulates estrogen receptor expression in the developing and adult rat prostate lobes. Endocrinology 138 1801–1809.
Prins GS, Birch L, Couse JF, Choi I, Katzenellenbogen B & Korach KS 2001 Estrogen imprinting of the developing prostate gland is mediated through stromal estrogen receptor : studies with
ERKO and ßERKO mice. Cancer Research 61 6089–6097.
Putz O, Schwartz CB, LeBlanc GA, Cooper RL & Prins GS 2001 Neonatal low- and high-dose exposure to estradiol benzoate in the male rat: II. Effects on male puberty and the male reproductive tract. Biology of Reproduction 65 1506–1517.
Rajfer J, Namkung PC & Petra PH 1980 Identification, partial characterization and age-related changes of a cytoplasmic androgen receptor in the rat penis. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 13 1489–1492.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Rivas A, McKinnell C, Fisher JS, Atanassova N, Williams K & Sharpe RM 2003 Neonatal coadministration of testosterone with diethylstilbestrol prevents induction of most reproductive tract abnormalities in male rats. Journal of Andrology 24 557–567.
vom Saal FS & Hughes C 2005 An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for new risk assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 113 926–933.[ISI][Medline]
vom Saal FS, Timms BG, Montano MM, Palanza P, Thayer KA, Nagel SC, Dhar MD, Ganjam VK, Parmigiani S & Welshons WV 1997 Prostate enlargement in mice due to fetal exposure to low doses of estradiol or diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses. PNAS 94 2056–2061.
Safe SH, Pallaroni L, Yoon K, Gaido K, Ross S, Saville B & McDonnell D 2001 Toxicology of environmental estrogens. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 13 307–315.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sato T, Chiba A, Hayashi S, Okamura H, Okamura H, Ohta Y, Takasugi N & Iguchi T 1994 Induction of estrogen receptor and cell division in genital tracts of male mice by neonatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Reproductive Toxicology 8 145–153.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Schultheiss D, Badalyan R, Pilatz A, Gabouev AI, Schlote N, Wefer J, von Wasielewski R, Mertsching H, Sohn M, Stief CG et al. 2003 Androgen and estrogen receptors in the human corpus cavernosum penis: immunohistochemical and cell culture results. World Journal of Urology 21 320–324.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sharpe RM, Atanassova N, McKinnell C, Parte P, Turner KJ, Fisher JS, Kerr JB, Groome NP, Macpherson S, Millar MR et al. 1998 Abnormalities in functional development of Sertoli cell in rats treated neonatally with diethylstilbestrol: a possible role for estrogens in Sertoli cell development. Biology of Reproduction 59 1084–1094.
Singh R, Artaza JN, Taylor WE, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF & Bhasin S 2003 Androgens stimulate myogenic differentiation and inhibit adipogenesis in C3H 10T1/2 pluripotent cells through an androgen receptor-mediated pathway. Endocrinology 144 5081–5088.
Srilatha B & Adaikan PG 2004 Estrogen and phytoestrogen predispose to erectile dysfunction: Do ER-
and ER-ß in the cavernosum play a role? Urology 63 382–386.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Storgaard L, Bonde JP & Olsen J 2006 Male reproductive disorders in humans and perinatal indicators of estrogen exposure. A review of published epidemiological studies. Reproductive Toxicology 21 4–15.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sultan C, Paris F, Terouanne B, Balaguer P, Georget V, Poujol N, Jeandel C, Lumbroso S & Nicolas J-C 2001 Disorders linked to insufficient androgen action in male children. Human Reproduction Update 7 314–322.
Swan SH 2000 Intrauterine exposure to diethylstilbestrol: long-term effects in humans. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica 108 793–804.
Takane KK, George FW & Wilson JD 1990 Androgen receptor of rat penis is down regulated by androgen. American Journal of Physiology 21 E46–E50.
Tekmal RR, Liu Y-G, Nair HB, Jones J, Perla RP, Lubahn DB, Korach KS & Kirma N 2005 Estrogen receptor alpha is required for mammary development and the induction of mammary hyperplasia and epigenetic alterations in the aromatase transgenic mice. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 95 9–15.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A, Grandjean P, Guillette LJ Jr, Jegou B, Jensen TK, Jouannet P, Keiding N et al. 1996 Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environmental Health Perspectives 104 741–803.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Traish AM, Toselli P, Jeong SJ & Kim NN 2005 Adipocyte accumulation in penile corpus cavernosum of the orchiectomized rabbit: A potential mechanism for veno-occlusive dysfunction in androgen deficiency. Journal of Andrology 26 242–248.
Vidaeff AC & Sever LE 2005 In utero exposure to environmental estrogens and male reproductive health: a systematic review of biological and epidemiologic evidence. Reproductive Toxicology 20 5–20.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Ward IL & Weisz J 1984 Differential effects of maternal stress on circulating levels of corticosterone, progesterone, and testosterone in male and female rat fetuses and their mothers. Endocrinology 114 1635–1644.[Abstract]
Williams K, Fisher JS, Turner KJ, McKinnell C, Saunders PTK & Sharpe RM 2001 Relationship between expression of sex steroid receptors and structure of the seminal vesicles after neonatal treatment of rats with potent or weak estrogens. Environmental Health Perspectives 109 21–29.[ISI][Medline]
Williams-Ashman HG & Reddi AH 1991 Differentiation of mesenchymal tissues during phallic morphogenesis with emphasis on the os penis: Roles of androgens and other regulatory agents. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 39 873–881.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wilson CA & Davies DC 2007 The control of sexual differentiation of the reproductive system and brain. Reproduction 133 331–359.
Woodham C, Birch L & Prins GS 2003 Neonatal estrogen down-regulates prostatic androgen receptor through a proteosome-mediated protein degradation pathway. Endocrinology 144 4841–4850.
Yamashita S, Newbold RR, McLachlan JA & Korach KS 1990 The role of the estrogen receptor in uterine epithelial proliferation and cytodifferentiation in neonatal mice. Endocrinology 127 2456–2463.[Abstract]