Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2006) 132 759-769
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01156
Copyright © 2006 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tharasanit, T
Right arrow Articles by Stout, T A E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tharasanit, T
Right arrow Articles by Stout, T A E

RESEARCH

Effect of cumulus morphology and maturation stage on the cryopreservability of equine oocytes

T Tharasanit, S Colleoni1, G Lazzari1, B Colenbrander, C Galli1,2 and T A E Stout

Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 12, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1 Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione (LTR-CIZ), Istituto sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, Via Porcellasco 7/F, Cremona 26100, Italy and 2 Dipartimento Clinico Veterinario, University of Bologna, V Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to T A E Stout; Email: t.a.e.stout{at}vet.uu.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Oocyte cryopreservation is a potentially valuable way of preserving the female germ line. However, the developmental competence of cryopreserved oocytes is presently poor. This study investigated whether the morphology of the cumulus complex surrounding an immature equine oocyte and/or the oocyte’s stage of maturation affect its cryopreservability. Compact (Cp) and expanded (Ex) cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were vitrified either shortly after recovery (germinal vesicle stage, GV) or after maturation in vitro (IVM); cryoprotectant-treated and -untreated non-frozen oocytes served as controls. In Experiment I, oocytes matured in vitro and then vitrified, or vice versa, were examined for maturation stage and meiotic spindle quality. Cp and Ex COCs vitrified at the GV stage matured at similar rates during subsequent IVM (41 vs 46% MII), but meiotic spindle quality was better for Cp than Ex (63 vs 33% normal spindles). Vitrifying oocytes after IVM resulted in disappointing post-warming spindle quality (32 vs 28% normal for Cp vs Ex). In Experiment II, oocytes from Cp and Ex COCs vitrified at the GV or MII stages were fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and monitored for cleavage and blastocyst formation. Oocytes vitrified prior to IVM yielded higher cleavage rates (34 and 27% for Cp and Ex COCs) than those vitrified after IVM (16 and 4%). However, only one blastocyst was produced from a sperm-injected vitrified–warmed oocyte (0.4 vs 9.3% and 13% blastocysts for cryoprotectant-exposed and -untreated controls). It is concluded that, when vitrification is the chosen method of cryopreservation, Cp equine COCs at the GV stage offer the best chance of an MII oocyte with a normal spindle and the potential for fertilization; however, developmental competence is still reduced dramatically.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Oocyte cryopreservation is an attractive potential means of preserving female germ cells for subsequent use in assisted reproduction (Vajta et al. 1998, Atabay et al. 2004). However, while live offspring have been produced using cryopreserved oocytes in a number of species (e.g. man: Chen 1986; mouse: Sathananthan et al. 1988; cattle: Lim et al. 1991; horse: Maclellan et al. 2002), the overall success in terms of developmental competence is disappointing (Porcu 2001). It appears that the cryopreservability of oocytes is complicated by their structural complexity, low surface area:volume ratio and relatively low plasma membrane permeability to water and/or cryoprotectants (Leibo 1980, Agca et al. 1998). The probable causes of the freezing-induced reduction in oocyte developmental competence include chromosome and cytoskeleton disruption (Park et al. 1997, Saunders & Parks 1999, Chen et al. 2003), zona pellucida hardening (Carroll et al. 1990), damage to mitochondria (Hochi et al. 1996, Rho et al. 2002, Jones et al. 2004), and enzymes necessary for the progression through meiosis (Comizzoli et al. 2004). Nevertheless, freezing technique and the stage of maturation at freezing significantly affect post-thaw oocyte developmental competence. For example, metaphase II (MII) oocytes appear to be less susceptible to freezing damage than immature (GV) oocytes (Lim et al. 1992, Otoi et al. 1995), while cryopreserving bovine oocytes using either the electron microscope grid or open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification techniques has been reported to result in higher in vitro blastocyst formation rates than conventional slow freezing (15–25 vs <5%: Otoi et al. 1995, Martino et al. 1996, Vajta et al. 1998).

At recovery from an ovarian follicle, a normal oocyte is surrounded by a corona radiata and a number of layers of cumulus cells. These ‘cumulus oocyte complexes’ (COCs) are generally classified as being either compact (Cp) or expanded (Ex), depending on the degree of cumulus expansion (Hinrichs et al. 1993). Immature oocytes with an Ex cumulus have already embarked on cytoplasmic maturation and therefore require less time to synthesize the proteins needed to resume meiosis (Alm & Hinrichs 1996); they consequently resume meiosis and reach MII in vitro faster than immature oocytes from Cp COCs (Hinrichs et al. 1993). In cattle, the majority of COCs recovered from slaughterhouse ovaries have a Cp cumulus investment (>80%; Lonergan et al. 1994) and, in most laboratories, only Cp COCs are used for in vitro maturation (IVM)/fertilization because they are a more uniform group with significantly better mean developmental competence (Blondin & Sirard 1995). In horses, a far greater proportion of recovered COCs are Ex or partially Ex (approximately 45%: Hinrichs 1997) and, even though Ex COCs are thought to originate predominantly from atretic follicles (Hinrichs & Williams 1997), their rates of IVM (Hinrichs & Williams 1997) and embryo development following ICSI (Tremoleda et al. 2003a, 2003b, Choi et al. 2004) are similar to or better than Cp COCs.

To date, the few studies conducted on the cryopreservability of equine oocytes have concentrated on Cp GV stage COCs, and the success of subsequent IVM has been disappointing (16–30% MII; Hochi et al. 1994, 1996, Hurtt et al. 2000). Nevertheless, two foals were produced following oocyte-transfer of 26 oocytes vitrified after maturation in vivo (Maclellan et al. 2002), thereby demonstrating that in optimal conditions (maturation, fertilization, and embryo development in vivo) equine oocytes can retain developmental competence after vitrification. In a recent study to investigate whether equine oocytes survive freezing better at the GV or at the MII stage, we found that controlled-rate freezing (CF) at the MII stage yielded a higher percentage of MII oocytes with a normal spindle (67%) than CF at the GV stage (1%) or vitrification at either the GV (52%) or the MII stage (37%: Tharasanit et al. 2006). However, the cleavage rate for oocytes fertilized by ICSI after CF at the MII stage was poor (8%), while the ability of vitrified oocytes to support fertilization was not examined. Given the poor developmental competence of CF MII oocytes, it seems logical to investigate now whether vitrifying equine oocytes allows them to maintain developmental competence despite a higher incidence of spindle damage. In addition, since cumulus cells are thought to protect the oocyte against cell damage during cryopreservation (Imoedemhe & Sigue 1992, Pellicer et al. 1988), it is relevant to examine whether Cp or Ex equine COCs are more suited to cryopreservation. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the effect of maturation stage (GV vs MII) and cumulus morphology at collection (Cp vs Ex) on the ability of equine oocytes to withstand vitrification, in terms of post-thaw maturation rates and MII spindle quality, and via cleavage and embryo development rates following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Collection and culture of cumulus oocyte complexes
COCs were collected and cultured using the techniques described by Tremoleda et al.(2001), with minor modifications. Horse ovaries were collected immediately after the slaughter of mares at an abattoir, in Belgium during March–April and in Italy during May, and transported to the laboratory at 30 °C in a thermos flask. Upon arrival 3–4 h later, the ovaries were dissected free from connective tissue, rinsed with 30 °C tap water and transferred to 0.9% (w/v) saline supplemented with 0.1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco BRL, Life technologies, Paisley, UK). The COCs were recovered by aspirating the contents of 5–30 mm follicles using a 16-gauge needle connected via an infusion set to a vacuum pump. To increase the likelihood of oocyte recovery, the follicle wall was scraped using the bevel of the needle and the follicle lumen was flushed 2–3 times with 0.9% saline supplemented with 25 IU/ml heparin (Leo Pharmaceutical, Weesp, The Netherlands) and 0.1% (w/v) BSA (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV, Zwijn-drecht, The Netherlands). The fluid containing the COCs was collected into 250 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes (Corning Inc., Acton, MA, USA) and allowed to settle for 5–10 min. Next, the sediment containing the COCs was washed twice in HEPES buffered Tyrode’s medium supplemented with 0.1% PVA (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV). COCs with at least 3–5 layers of cumulus investment were classified as either Cp or Ex depending on the degree of cumulus expansion (Hinrichs et al. 1993; Fig. 1A and BGo); COCs with fewer cumulus cell layers were discarded. The COC classification was performed using a dissecting stereomicroscope by a single observer to ensure the uniformity of COC types throughout the experiments. They were then maintained at 37 °C in HEPES buffered M199 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) supplemented with 0.014% (w/v) BSA (holding medium, HM).


Figure 1
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Photomicrographs of equine cumulus oocyte complexes ((A) and (B)), oocytes ((C)–(E)), and a blastocyst produced from a vitrified–thawed oocyte (F). (A) and (B) Light photomicrographs of cumulus oocyte complexes with typical Cp (A) and Ex (B) cumulus masses. (C)–(E) Confocal microscope images to demonstrate meiotic spindle quality. (C) shows a normal MII oocyte with its typical barrel-shaped metaphase II spindle, the chromatin distributed evenly on either side of the spindle equator and an extruded first polar body (PB). (D) Shows a severely damaged meiotic spindle (arrow) with abnormally distributed chromatin, and (E) shows an oocyte positioned such that its spindle morphology is uninterpretable/unidentifiable. (F) A blastocyst produced from an equine oocyte that had a Cp cumulus at recovery and was vitrified and warmed prior to in vitro maturation, ICSI and in vitro embryo culture. The blastocyst has been stained with TUNEL (green; to identify DNA fragmented nuclei), Ethidium homodimer-1 (red; to identify dead cells) and DAPI (blue; to label cell nuclei and allow counting of total cell number and identification of fragmented nuclei); the cells appear in two masses because the blastocyst has partially herniated through the zona pellucida. The micrograph was produced using a multiphoton microscope to allow simultaneous demonstration of all three colors. Examples of cells with fragmented DNA (arrow) or a fragmented nucleus (arrow head) are marked. Scale bars represent 100 µm ((A) and (B)), 25 µm ((C)–(E)) and 50 µm (E).

 
For IVM, groups of 25–30 COCs were cultured for 26–30 h in 500 µl maturation medium consisting of M199 supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco BRL), 0.01 units/ml of porcine follicle stimulating hormone and 0.01 units/ml of equine luteinizing hormone and 100 mM cysteamine (all from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV), in four-well plates (Nunc A/S, Roskilde, Denmark) at 38.7 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.

Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification of COCs
OPS vitrification was performed essentially as described by Vajta et al.(1998). OPS straws were produced from 0.25 ml polyvinyl chloride straws (IMV technologies; L’Aigle, France) by heating them over a 100 °C hot plate and then stretching until their outer diameter was approximately halved. In preparation for vitrification, groups of ten oocytes were first immersed for 30 s in a 100 µl droplet of HM supplemented with 10% (v/v) ethylene glycol (EG) and 10% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; both Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV). Next, the oocytes were immersed in a 100 µl droplet of vitrification solution; HM containing 20% EG, 20% DMSO, and 0.5 M sucrose. After 15 s incubation, the COCs were transferred to a 2 µl droplet of fresh vitrification solution and loaded into a modified straw by capillary action. In total, oocytes were exposed to vitrification solution for 20–25 s prior to immersion in liquid nitrogen.

After 3–6 weeks of storage, oocytes were warmed by immersion in a 37 °C ‘warming solution’ consisting of 0.3 M sucrose in HM. The oocytes were then expelled into the warming solution and the cryoprotectant (CPA) was removed by equilibrating the oocytes in this solution for 5 min. Thereafter, the oocytes were washed once and maintained in HM until further examination.

To examine whether CPA was harmful to oocytes, control immature and in vitro matured COCs (both Cp and Ex) were exposed to the vitrification and warming solutions without intervening vitrification.

Experiment I: Effect of cumulus morphology at recovery and maturation stage at vitrification on maturation rate and meiotic spindle quality
COCs classified at recovery as Cp or Ex were vitrified by OPS either immediately (GV stage; n = 63 Cp, 59 Ex) or after 24 h IVM (MII: n = 79 Cp, 83 Ex). Subsequently, COCs vitrified at the GV stage were warmed and incubated in vitro for 30 h, while those vitrified after 24 h IVM were warmed and incubated for a further 6 h, prior to fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde. A further 80 Cp and 83 Ex COCs were used to investigate whether exposure to CPA without vitrification also affected the ability of GV oocytes to resume meiosis, or the quality of the cytoskeleton at the MII stage. Of these, 40 Cp and 42 Ex COCs were exposed to CPA prior to IVM, and the remaining 40 Cp and 41 Ex COCs were first matured in vitro and then treated with CPA. A final 80 Cp and 80 Ex COCs were used as untreated controls. Stage of maturation and cytoskeleton quality of all oocytes were examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) after staining with fluorescent labels for actin microfilaments, microtubules, and chromatin.

Staining the meiotic spindle and chromatin
Prior to staining, cumulus cells were removed from matured oocytes by vortexing the COCs in calcium and magnesium free Earle’s balanced salt solution (EBSS: Gibco BRL, Paisley, UK) containing 0.1% (w/v) hyaluronidase and 0.25% (v/v) trypsin EDTA (both Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) at 37 °C. The denuded oocytes were then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in a glycerol-based microtubule stabilizing solution containing 25% (v/v) glycerol, 50 mM KCL, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM imidazol, 4% Triton-X-100, and 25 µM phenylmethyl-sulfonyl fluoride (all Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) at pH 6.7 (Simerly & Schatten 1993). After a subsequent wash with PBS supplemented with 0.1% BSA, the oocytes were fixed and stored for 1–2 weeks in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS. To stain the microtubules, oocytes were first incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a 1:100 solution of a monoclonal anti-{alpha}-tubulin antibody (clone B1-5-1-2: Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) in PBS–BSA. After a further wash with PBS–BSA, the oocytes were incubated for 1 h with a 1:100 solution of a goat anti-mouse secondary antibody conjugated to tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) in PBS supplemented with 2% (v/v) goat serum (both Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV). Next, the oocytes were incubated in a solution of 0.165 µM Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (Molecular Probes Europe BV, Leiden, The Netherlands) in PBS–BSA for 30 min to label the actin microfilaments and, finally, they were incubated for 15 min in 20 µM TO-PRO3 (Molecular Probes) to stain the chromatin.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)
To assess oocyte quality, fluorescently labeled oocytes were mounted on glass microscope slides in a 2 µl droplet of antifade medium (Vectashield, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) to retard photobeaching, and sealed under a coverslip using nail polish. Examination was performed using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica TSC MP, Heidelberg, Germany) mounted on an inverted microscope (Leica DM IRBE). Three laser sources (Argon-ion 514 nm, Krypton 563 nm and HeNe 633 nm) were used to simultaneously excite the fluorescent signals from the Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (microfilaments), TRITC (microtubules), and TO-PRO3 (DNA) via 488/568/650 nm excitation/barrier filter combinations. Oocytes were examined using the sequential scanning mode so that the spindle could be examined in three dimensions (including the Z plane); digital micrographs produced for the three separate colors were then merged into single panels using Leica confocal software (version 2.61: Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany). The resulting multi-color micrographs were subsequently examined using Adobe Photoshop 7 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), and oocytes were classified by the normality of their cytoskeleton, as described earlier by Saunders & Parks (1999). In short, an oocyte’s actin cytoskeleton was classified as normal if the microfilaments were distributed evenly throughout the tranzonal channels and ooplasm, except for a slight intensification just inside the oolema. The microtubulin meiotic spindle was classified as normal if it was symmetrically barrel-shaped with two anastral poles and two equal sets of chromosomes aligned at its center (Fig. 1CGo), as described by Tremoleda et al.(2001). Any changes in the distribution of the actin or in the appearance of the meiotic spindle were classified as minor or severe abnormalities; these included clumping of the actin microfilaments and disorganization or dispersal of microtubules and/or chromatin from the spindle (Fig. 1DGo). In some cases, oocytes lacked any visible microtubular structures around their sets of chromatin and were therefore recorded to have lost their meiotic spindle. Occasionally, the meiotic spindle was aligned in such a way that it was not possible to properly evaluate its normality; in such cases spindle morphology was classified as unidentifiable (Fig. 1EGo).

Experiment II: The effect of cumulus morphology at recovery and maturation stage at vitrification on developmental competence of oocytes fertilized by ICSI
After recovery, 685 COCs classified as either Cp or Ex were vitrified by OPS immediately (GV stage: n = 229 Cp, 153 Ex) or after 28–30 h of IVM (MII stage: n = 150 Cp, 153 Ex). To control the possible toxic effects of CPA, additional COCs were exposed to the vitrification media either before (n = 48 Cp, 37 Ex) or after (n = 48 Cp, 47 Ex) IVM, without vitrification. A final 158 Cp and 130 Ex COCs were used as non-treated/non-frozen controls. After warming and CPA removal, oocytes vitrified at the GV stage were matured in vitro for 28 h. For all treatment groups, oocytes that reached MII were fertilized by ICSI and then cultured in vitro, as described later. The cleavage and blastocyst formation rates were recorded 2 and 9 days later respectively. On day 9, the embryos were stained for 10 min at 37 °C with 2 µM Ethidium homodimer-1 (Ethd-1; Molecular Probes) to identify dead cells before being fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in preparation for further staining.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
Matured oocytes designated for fertilization were partially denuded of cumulus cells by incubation in HEPES-buffered synthetic oviductal fluid (H-SOF: Lazzari et al. 2002) containing 25 µg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) followed by aspiration through a pipette tip. Remaining cumulus cells were removed by incubating the oocytes for 1.5 min in a 0.25% (w/v) solution of trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) in H-SOF before transfer to H-SOF supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) and repeated aspiration through a fine glass pipette. Oocytes with a normal MII appearance, including an extruded first polar body (PB), were considered suitable for ICSI with frozen–thawed sperm from a single fertile stallion.

After thawing, the sperm was rinsed free of cryoprotectant by centrifugation at 750 g through a discontinuous 45:90% Percoll density gradient (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) at room temperature. Next, the sperm pellet was resuspended in 2 ml Ca2+ free Tyrode’s albumen lactate pyruvate (TALP) (Parrish et al. 1988) and centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min before further resuspension at a concentration of 4 million sperm/ml in SOF supplemented with 6 mg/ml fatty-acid-free BSA (FAF-BSA; Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV), modified Eagle’s medium (MEM) amino acids, 1 µg/ml heparin, 20 µM penicillamine, 1 µM epinephrine, and 10 µM hypothaurine (SOF-IVF: Lazzari et al. 2002: all ingredients from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV). Finally, the sperm suspension was diluted 1:1 (v/v) with a 12% solution of polyvinylpyrolidone (PVP; Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) in H-SOF-medium.

Sperm injection was performed as described by Kimura & Yanagimachi (1995). Pipettes produced using a glass micropipette puller (Model P-87, Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA) and with inner diameters of 30 and 5 µm were used for holding oocytes and for sperm injection respectively. ICSI was performed at 37 °C using a micromanipulator (Narishige Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Piezo micropipette-driving unit (Prima Tech, Ibaraki, Japan) and mounted on an inverted microscope (Nikon TE 300: Nikon, Kawasaki, Japan). A motile sperm was immobilized by applying two or three piezo-pulses to its tail-midpiece region, and it was then aspirated into the tip of the injection needle. The oocyte for injection was immobilized using the holding pipette and orientated with its PB at 0600 or 1200 h. The ICSI needle was then advanced through the zona pellucida and oolema at 1500 h using the piezo-drilling motion, and the sperm was released into the ooplasm.

In vitro zygote/embryo culture
Following ICSI, groups of ten sperm-injected oocytes were cultured in 20 µl droplets of SOF-IVC supplemented with MEM amino acids and 16 mg/ml FAF-BSA (SOF-BSA-aa; Galli et al. 2001) under mineral oil at 38.7 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2. On day 2 after ICSI, the presumptive zygotes were examined for cleavage; cleaved embryos were cultured for a further 7 days, during which the culture medium (SOF-BSA-aa) was refreshed on day 4 with SOF by adding 20 µl of new medium and removing 20 µl of the mix. On day 6, the media was again refreshed, this time with DMEM/F-12 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) supplemented with 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum and 5% (v/v) serum replacement (SR: Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA). Finally, on day 9 dead cells in developing embryos were stained with Ethd-1 before fixing the embryo in 4% paraformaldehyde. The labeled embryos were then stored in fixative in the dark at 4 °C for approximately 2–3 weeks until embryo quality was examined.

Assessing the quality of in vitro produced blastocysts
Blastocyst quality was quantified in terms of the percentages of dead cells and of cells with fragmented nuclei or fragmented DNA, as described by Pomar et al.(2005). To identify fragmented DNA, blastocysts previously stained with Ethd-1 were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min at 4 °C, then washed in PBS–BSA and stained for 1 h at 37 °C with fluorescent-conjugated dUTP and TdT (TUNEL reagent; Boehringer Mannheim, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). To visualize intact and fragmented cell nuclei and enable calculation of the percentages of dead or TUNEL-positive cells, the blastocysts’ nuclear DNA was stained for 15 min with 4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals BV) in PBS–BSA. Once labeled, embryos were mounted in a 2 µl droplet of antifade medium on a glass microscope slide and examined using a conventional fluorescent microscope (BH2-RFCA; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using 488, 568, and 350 nm filters for TUNEL, Ethd-1, and DAPI respectively. Counting of blastocyst nuclei was facilitated using an eyepiece counting grid, and representative images were recorded using a digital camera (Coolpix 990, Nikon, Melville, NY, USA).

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and logistic regression analysis (MaCullagh & Nelder 1989). Differences between experimental groups in maturation rates, meiotic spindle quality (Experiment I), cleavage, and blastocyst formation rates (Experiment II) were compared using the model: ln {pi}/(1–{pi}) = {alpha} + treatment, where {pi} = frequency of positive outcome, and {alpha} = the intercept. The total numbers of nuclei per blastocyst (Experiment II) were compared using one-way ANOVA. In all cases, differences were considered significant when P<0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In Experiment I, similar percentages of oocytes from Cp and Ex COCs vitrified at the GV stage reached MII after subsequent IVM (41 and 46% respectively; Table 1Go). For Cp COCs, this maturation percentage did not differ significantly to that for control non-frozen oocytes (58%). By contrast, the maturation rate for vitrified Ex COCs was lower than for non-frozen oocytes (68%), and the reduced success appeared to be due predominantly to a greater incidence of oocytes that resumed meiosis but subsequently arrested in MI (22 vs 4% for vitrified vs control Ex COCs). The salient factor with regard to the reduced ability of Ex COCs to successfully complete meiosis appeared to be vitrification per se, since exposure to CPA without vitrification resulted in maturation rates comparable with non-frozen controls (62%; Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 The effect of vitrification or cryoprotectant (CPA) exposure at the GV stage on the progression of meiosis in compact (Cp) or expanded (Ex) equine cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) subsequently matured in vitro for 30 h.
 
While the overall effect of cumulus morphology on the success of maturation after vitrification and warming was therefore limited, initial cumulus morphology did significantly affect post-maturation spindle quality; 63% of MII oocytes derived from Cp COCs vitrified at the GV stage were classified as having a normal (or negligibly damaged) MII spindle compared with only 33% of those from similarly treated Ex COCs (P<0.05; Table 2Go). By contrast, when Cp and Ex COCs were first matured in vitro and then vitrified, there was no discernible effect of initial cumulus morphology on meiotic spindle quality, which was poor in both groups (32 and 28% normal spindles for Cp and Ex COCs respectively). In all cases, the average meiotic spindle quality of vitrified–warmed oocytes was worse than in non-frozen controls (95% normal; P<0.05; Table 2Go), while exposure to CPA had no apparent effect on meiotic spindle quality for either type of COC at either stage of maturation (93–100% normal; Table 2Go). Although a number of vitrified–warmed oocytes also showed changes from the normal pattern of actin microfilament staining (Tremoleda et al. 2001), such as clumping or very weak staining, these changes were difficult to quantify. Overall, vitrification of Cp COCs followed by IVM yielded a higher percentage of ‘normal’ MII oocytes (product of percentage achieving MII and percentage of the MII oocytes with a normal spindle: 26%) than similar handling of Ex COCs (15%), or IVM followed by vitrification of either type of COC (both 19%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 The effect of cumulus morphology at recovery (compact (Cp) vs expanded (Ex)) and stage of maturation (pre- or post-IVM) at vitrification on eventual meiotic spindle quality and chromatin dispersal in metaphase II equine oocytes.
 
In Experiment II, there was no effect of vitrifying GV stage oocytes on the success of IVM for either Cp or Ex COCs (% MII: 42 and 54% for vitrified Cp and Ex COCs compared with 54 and 62% for non-frozen controls; Table 3Go). Of the MII oocytes deemed suitable for ICSI, the percentages that had cleaved by day 2 after sperm-injection also did not differ between Cp and Ex oocytes vitrified at the GV stage (34 vs 27% respectively; P>0.05). By contrast, oocytes vitrified after IVM had a lower mean cleavage rate, and Cp COCs fared better than Ex (16 vs 4% cleavage). In all cases except Cp GV, cleavage rates for vitrified COCs were lower than for control oocytes (48 and 66% for control Cp and Ex). Again, the freezing process per se appeared to be the most damaging part of vitrification since cleavage rates for oocytes exposed to CPA either before or after maturation (60–75%; Table 3Go) were not lower than controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 The effect of cumulus morphology at recovery (compact (Cp) vs expanded (Ex)) and maturation stage (GV vs MII) at vitrification on the developmental competence of equine oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
 
The percentages of sperm-injected oocytes that had reached the blastocyst stage by day 9 of culture were affected markedly by vitrification (0.4, 9.3, and 13.1% for vitrified–warmed, CPA-treated, and control oocytes respectively). In fact, only one blastocyst was obtained from a vitrified–warmed oocyte, and this was from a Cp COC that had been cryopreserved at the GV stage. By contrast, the percentages of sperm-injected or cleaved oocytes that developed to the blastocyst stage did not differ significantly between control and CPA-treated oocytes (Table 3Go). With regard to blastocyst quality, the mean number of nuclei per blastocyst was 240 ± 18 and neither total cell number nor the percentages of cells that were dead, DNA fragmented or had a fragmented nucleus differed between groups (Table 4Go; Fig. 1FGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Quality of day 9 equine blastocysts produced in vitro, in terms of total cell number and mean percentages of dead cells, DNA fragmented (TUNEL positive) cells and cells with fragmented nuclei.
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In most instances, vitrifying equine oocytes at the GV stage did not significantly reduce their ability to reach MII during post-warming IVM. Moreover, the mean percentages of vitrified–warmed GV oocytes that reached MII during the two experiments were promising (41 and 42% of those from Cp; 46 and 54% from Ex COCs), and considerably higher than that reported earlier for equine oocytes matured in vitro after cryopreservation by either slow freezing (<16%: Hochi et al. 1994) or vitrification (<17%, Hochi et al. 1996; 30%, Hurtt et al. 2000; 28%, Tharasanit et al. 2006). In this study, there was no significant effect of cumulus morphology at recovery (Cp vs Ex) on the ability of oocytes to reach MII during IVM, irrespective of whether they had previously been vitrified or not. While a number of earlier studies have similarly reported roughly equal meiotic competence of equine oocytes irrespective of initial cumulus morphology (Del Campo et al. 1995, Dell’Aquila et al. 1997, 2001), others have reported better MII rates for Ex than for Cp COCs (e.g. 72 vs 25%: Choi et al. 2004). The differences between studies in the effect of cumulus morphology probably relate to differences in the handling of ovaries prior to oocyte recovery (e.g. time from slaughter to oocyte recovery), method of oocyte recovery (aspiration vs scraping of follicles: Dell’Aquila et al. 2001), the size range of follicles from which oocytes were recovered (Hinrichs & Schmidt 2000), and subtle differences in the classification of Cp and Ex COCs (Choi et al. 2004).

Although initial cumulus morphology did not affect the proportion of vitrified GV oocytes that reached MII during IVM, it did markedly affect the quality of the MII spindle; fewer oocytes derived from Cp than Ex COCs displayed significant meiotic spindle disruption and chromatin dispersal (37 vs 67% damaged spindles for Cp vs Ex). That oocytes from Ex COCs suffered more spindle disruption than those from Cp COCs may simply be because a tightly compacted cumulus more effectively buffers the oocyte against osmotic damage during vitrification and warming than an Ex cumulus with fewer, or less effective, protective cell layers; Pellicer et al.(1988) earlier reported that oocytes with fewer surrounding cumulus layers were less likely to survive cryopreservation. Moreover, abnormalities of spindle morphology in oocytes matured in vitro after freezing are common (e.g. in man: Van Blerkom & Davis 1994, Park et al. 1997; mouse: Isachenko & Nayudu 1999), and probably relate to freezing-induced impairment of factors critical to the assembly of the meiotic spindle. In this respect, it is also likely that oocytes with an Ex cumulus are more susceptible to damage during vitrification because they are at a more advanced stage of cytoplasmic maturation than those with a Cp cumulus (Alm & Hinrichs 1996). Oocytes with an Ex cumulus at recovery have probably synthesized more of the proteins necessary for completing meiosis and assembling the meiotic spindle (e.g. mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase: Verlhac et al. 1994), and the mechanisms for spindle assembly and repair may therefore be more susceptible to cryodamage than in oocytes with a Cp cumulus that have yet to embark on synthesis of these crucial proteins.

The alternative to cryopreserving oocytes at the GV stage and maturing them after warming is to mature them first and vitrify them once they have reached MII. Indeed, in an earlier experiment, we achieved the highest proportion of ‘normal’ MII oocytes after CF at the MII stage (35% of oocytes subjected to initial IVM; Tharasanit et al. 2006). Similarly, bovine oocytes have been reported to tolerate chilling and cryopreservation better at the MII than the GV stage (Lim et al. 1992, Parks & Ruffing 1992). Although the reasons for the differences in susceptibility to freezing damage are not known, they probably include factors such as the oolema of MII oocytes being more permeable to water (Ruffing et al. 1993) and cryoprotectants (e.g. DMSO, EG: Agca et al. 1998) and better able to maintain plasma membrane lipid fluidity at low temperatures (Arav et al. 1996). However, in the current study, vitrifying equine oocytes after IVM led to considerable spindle damage (only 28–32% normal spindles), despite a 6 h post-warming incubation to allow spindle repair; in human oocytes, the meiotic spindle disappears completely during freezing but repolymerizes during post-thaw incubation (Rienzi et al. 2004). As a result of the poor spindle quality of oocytes vitrified at the MII stage, the overall proportion of Cp COCs that yielded an MII oocyte with a normal spindle after vitrification tended to be better if they were vitrified at the GV than at the MII stage (26 vs 19%); for Ex COCs, the final percentage of normal MIIs tended to be lower for oocytes vitrified at both the GV and MII stages (15 and 19% respectively). These values are similar to those reported earlier for equine oocytes vitrified at the GV (15%) or MII (20%) stages but, despite an improvement in the percentage of vitrified GV oocytes reaching MII, are still lower than the 35% normal MIIs recorded after CF at the MII stage (Tharasanit et al. 2006). In the latter and the present studies, and in studies on human oocytes (Park et al. 1997, Boiso et al. 2002, Rienzi et al. 2004), the bulk of the damage to meiotic resumption and spindle assembly or morphology during vitrification of horse oocytes was caused by freezing per se, since exposure to CPA without vitrification did not significantly affect either process.

While extensive irreversible damage to the meiotic spindle would severely compromise an oocyte’s ability to be fertilized and give rise to a normal embryo, MII spindle normality alone is not a good indicator of developmental competence because it gives no indication of the state of numerous cytoplasmic factors critical to cell activation during fertilization, and subsequent cell division, fertilization. In this respect, the enzyme cascade that inactivates maturation-promoting factor (MPF) is critical for releasing the oocyte from MII arrest, while inactivation of MAP kinase appears to be involved in pronucleus formation (Sun & Nagai 2003, Fan & Sun 2004). In addition, functional mitochondria are essential for the continuous, active microtubule disassembly and reassembly that is critical to sperm aster formation and syngamy, and mitochondrial damage is a common feature of vitrified–warmed horse oocytes (Hochi et al. 1996). Disruption of mitochondria, enzymes, and structural proteins during vitrification almost certainly explains why the blastocyst formation rate for vitrified–warmed oocytes in the present study was so low (0.4% of injected oocytes compared with 10–17% for controls). Furthermore, since exposure to CPA without freezing had no significant effect on cleavage, blastocyst formation rate (8–12%), or blastocyst quality, freezing per se appears to be the primary cause of reduced developmental competence.

Although it was not possible to compare blastocyst formation rates and quality between groups of vitrified oocytes, there was a marked effect of maturation stage at vitrification on the cleavage rate; oocytes vitrified prior to IVM yielded higher cleavage rates at day 2 after ICSI (34 and 28% of injected oocytes for Cp and Ex respectively) than those vitrified after IVM (16 and 4%); these values were also much higher than for oocytes subjected to CF at the MII stage (8%; Tharasanit et al. 2006). By contrast, while there was no difference in cleavage rates between bovine oocytes vitrified at the GV or MII stage, blastocyst rates were better if maturation had already been initiated (Hochi et al. 1998) or completed (Men et al. 2002, Diez et al. 2005). Therefore, cleavage rate is not a sufficiently reliable indicator of developmental potential. Indeed, while Ex COCs vitrified at the GV stage yielded similar cleavage rates to Cp COCs in the present study, it is likely that their higher incidence of spindle abnormalities would lead to chromosomally abnormal cells and therefore compromise subsequent embryo development; many more blastocysts are needed to test this hypothesis. Although we produced only one blastocyst in the present study (from a Cp COC vitrified at the GV stage), (Maclellan et al. 2002) described the production of three pregnancies from 26 oocytes (12%) matured in vivo, recovered by transvaginal follicle aspiration, vitrified, and subsequently transferred to the oviduct of recipient mares. The superior developmental competence in Maclellan et al.(2002) study was undoubtedly a factor of the superiority of the mare’s follicle and oviduct over in vitro culture systems for oocyte maturation and embryo development. In this respect, oocytes matured in vivo give rise to much better pregnancy rates after transfer to the oviduct of a recipient mare than those matured in vitro (e.g. 82 vs 9%; Scott et al. 2001), while the blastocyst formation rates for equine oocytes matured in vitro and fertilized by ICSI are much better if the presumptive zygotes are transferred to the oviduct of a mare than if they are cultured in vitro (36 vs 0–20%: Choi et al. 2004). Transfer of vitrified–warmed oocytes to the oviduct of recipient mares, after ICSI or insemination of the recipient, would probably therefore have yielded better embryo development rates, and may have offered more information about the effects of cumulus morphology and maturation stage at vitrification on oocyte developmental competence. Nevertheless, from a practical and animal welfare perspective, improving in vitro culture systems is preferable to surgical transfer of oocytes or zygotes to the oviduct.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that equine oocytes vitrified at the GV stage can reach MII at respectable rates during post-warming IVM (41–54%). And, while the cumulus morphology at recovery (Cp vs Ex) did not affect the cleavage rates after ICSI (approximately 30% of injected oocytes), it did significantly affect the quality of the meiotic spindle in MII oocytes (63 vs 33% normal spindles for Cp vs Ex COCs). Vitrifying equine oocytes after IVM led to relatively poor rates of both spindle normality (28–32%) and cleavage (4–16%). While CF of MII oocytes may offer an even higher likelihood of a normal looking MII oocyte (Tharasanit et al. 2006), overall it appears that vitrifying equine oocytes with a Cp cumulus at the GV stage probably offers the best prospect for a fertilizable, developmentally competent oocyte. However, since only one blastocyst was produced from 257 sperm-injected vitrified–warmed oocytes, it can presently only be concluded that vitrifying equine oocytes at either stage of maturation leads to a dramatic drop in developmental competence. Further studies are needed to address why vitrified–warmed oocytes that cleaved failed to progress to the blastocyst stage.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors would like to thank the staff at the Cell Biological Laboratory of Utrecht University’s Department of Farm Animal Health for their help with oocyte recovery in the Netherlands. In addition, they would like to express their gratitude to Massimo Iazzi for collecting ovaries, and Gabriella Crotti, Roberto Duchi, and Paola Turini for helping with oocyte recovery in Italy. This work was, in part, supported by FIRB (project number RBNE01HPMX), MIUR and the Fondazione Cariplo. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.


    Footnotes
 
Received 24 February 2006
First decision 21 March 2006
Revised manuscript received 26 July 2006
Accepted 4 August 2006


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

Agca Y, Liu J, Peter AT, Critser ES & Critser JK 1998 Effect of developmental stage on bovine oocyte plasma membrane water and cryoprotectant permeability characteristics. Molecular Reproduction and Development 49 408–415.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Alm H & Hinrichs K 1996 Effect of cycloheximide on nuclear maturation of horse oocytes and its relation to initial cumulus morphology. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 107 215–220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arav A, Zeron Y, Leslie SB, Behboodi E, Anderson GB & Crowe JH 1996 Phase transition temperature and chilling sensitivity of bovine oocytes. Cryobiology 33 589–599.[CrossRef][Medline]

Atabay EC, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Nagano M, Koga A & Kanai Y 2004 Vitrification of bovine oocytes and its application to intergeneric somatic cell nucleus transfer. Theriogenology 61 15–23.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Blondin P & Sirard MA 1995 Oocyte and follicular morphology as determining characteristics for developmental competence in bovine oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 41 54–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Boiso I, Marti M, Santalo J, Ponsa M, Barri PN & Veiga A 2002 A confocal microscopy analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes cryopreserved at the germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage. Human Reproduction 17 1885–1891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carroll J, Depypere H & Matthews CD 1990 Freeze–thaw-induced changes of the zona pellucida explains decreased rates of fertilization in frozen–thawed mouse oocytes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 90 547–553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen C 1986 Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1 884–886.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chen SU, Lien YR, Chao KH, Ho HN, Yang YS & Lee TY 2003 Effects of cryopreservation on meiotic spindles of oocytes and its dynamics after thawing: clinical implications in oocyte freezing – a review article. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 202 101–107.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Choi YH, Love LB, Varner DD & Hinrichs K 2004 Factors affecting developmental competence of equine oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reproduction 127 187–194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Comizzoli P, Wildt DE & Pukazhenthi BS 2004 Effect of 1,2-propanediol versus 1,2-ethanediol on subsequent oocyte maturation, spindle integrity, fertilization, and embryo development in vitro in the domestic cat. Biology of Reproduction 71 598–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Del Campo MR, Donoso X, Parrish JJ & Ginther OJ 1995 Selection of follicles, preculture oocyte evaluation, and duration of culture for in vitro maturation of equine oocytes. Theriogenology 43 1141–1153.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dell’Aquila ME, Cho YS, Minoia P, Traina V, Lacalandra GM & Maritato F 1997 Effects of follicular fluid supplementation of in vitro maturation medium on the fertilization and development of equine oocytes after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction 12 2766–2772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dell’Aquila ME, Masterson M, Maritato F & Hinrichs K 2001 Influence of oocyte collection technique on initial chromatin configuration, meiotic competence, and male pronucleus formation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of equine oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 60 79–88.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Diez C, Duque P, Gomez E, Hidalgo CO, Tamargo C, Rodriguez A, Fernandez L, Varga Sde L, Fernandez A, Facal N, et al. 2005 Bovine oocyte vitrification before or after meiotic arrest: effects on ultrastructure and developmental ability. Theriogenology 64 317–333.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fan HY & Sun QY 2004 Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade during oocyte maturation and fertilization in mammals. Biology of Reproduction 70 535–547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Galli C, Crotti G, Notari C, Turini P, Duchi R & Lazzari G 2001 Embryo production by ovum pick up from live donors. Theriogenology 55 1341–1357.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hinrichs K 1997 Cumulus expansion, chromatin configuration and meiotic competence in horse oocytes: a new hypothesis. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 43–46.

Hinrichs K & Williams KA 1997 Relationships among oocyte-cumulus morphology, follicular atresia, initial chromatin configuration, and oocyte meiotic competence in the horse. Biology of Reproduction 57 377–384.[Abstract]

Hinrichs K & Schmidt AL 2000 Meiotic competence in horse oocytes: interactions among chromatin configuration, follicle size, cumulus morphology, and season. Biology of Reproduction 62 1402–1408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hinrichs K, Schmidt AL, Friedman PP, Selgrath JP & Martin MG 1993 In vitro maturation of horse oocytes: characterization of chromatin configuration using fluorescence microscopy. Biology of Reproduction 48 363–370.[Abstract]

Hochi S, Fujimoto T, Choi YH, Braun J & Oguri N 1994 Cryopreservation of equine oocytes by 2-step freezing. Theriogenology 42 1085–1094.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hochi S, Kozawa M, Fujimoto T, Hondo E, Yamada J & Oguri N 1996 In vitro maturation and transmission electron microscopic observation of horse oocytes after vitrification. Cryobiology 33 300–310.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hochi S, Ito K, Hirabayashi M, Ueda M, Kimura K & Hanada A 1998 Effect of nuclear stages during IVM on the survival of vitrified–warmed bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 49 787–796.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hurtt AE, Landim-Alvarenga F, Seidel Jr GE & Squires EL 2000 Vitrification of immature and mature equine and bovine oocytes in an ethylene glycol, ficoll and sucrose solution using open–pulled straws. Theriogenology 54 119–128.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Imoedemhe DG & Sigue AB 1992 Survival of human oocytes cryopreserved with or without the cumulus in 1,2-propanediol. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 9 323–327.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Isachenko EF & Nayudu PL 1999 Vitrification of mouse germinal vesicle oocytes: effect of treatment temperature and egg yolk on chromatin and spindle normality and cumulus integrity. Human Reproduction 14 400–408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jones A, Van Blerkom J, Davis P & Toledo AA 2004 Cryopreservation of metaphase II human oocytes effects mitochondrial membrane potential: implications for developmental competence. Human Reproduction 19 1861–1866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kimura Y & Yanagimachi R 1995 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biology of Reproduction 52 709–720.[Abstract]

Lazzari G, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Duchi R, Kruip T, Niemann H & Galli C 2002 Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biology of Reproduction 67 767–775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leibo SP 1980 Water permeability and its activation energy of fertilized and unfertilized mouse ova. Journal of Membrane Biology 53 179–188.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lim JM, Fukui Y & Ono H 1991 The post-thaw developmental capacity of frozen bovine oocytes following in vitro maturation and fertilization. Theriogenology 35 1225–1235.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Lim JM, Fukui Y & Ono H 1992 Developmental competence of bovine oocytes frozen at various maturation stages followed by in vitro maturation and fertilization. Theriogenology 37 351–361.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Lonergan P, Monaghan P, Rizos D, Boland MP & Gordon I 1994 Effect of follicle size on bovine oocyte quality and developmental competence following maturation, fertilization, and culture in vitro. Molecular Reproduction and Development 37 48–53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maclellan LJ, Carnevale EM, Coutinho da Silva MA, Scoggin CF, Bruemmer JE & Squires EL 2002 Pregnancies from vitrified equine oocytes collected from super-stimulated and non-stimulated mares. Theriogenology 58 911–919.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

MaCullagh P & Nelder JA 1989 Binary Data, London: Chapman & Hall, pp 98–135.

Martino A, Songsasen N & Leibo S 1996 Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biology of Reproduction 54 1059–1069.[Abstract]

Men H, Monson RL & Rutledge JJ 2002 Effect of meiotic stages and maturation protocols on bovine oocyte’s resistance to cryopreservation. Theriogenology 57 1095–1103.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Otoi T, Yamamoto K, Koyama N & Suzuki T 1995 In vitro fertilization and development of immature and mature bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ethylene glycol with sucrose. Cryobiology 32 455–460.[CrossRef][Medline]

Park SE, Son WY, Lee SH, Lee KA, Ko JJ & Cha KY 1997 Chromosome and spindle configurations of human oocytes matured in vitro after cryopreservation at the germinal vesicle stage. Fertility and Sterility 68 920–926.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Parks JE & Ruffing NA 1992 Factors affecting low temperature survival of mammalian oocytes. Theriogenology 37 59–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish J, Winer MA & First NL 1988 Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biology of Reproduction 38 1171–1180.[Abstract]

Pellicer A, Lightman A, Parmer TG, Behrman HR & De Cherney AH 1988 Morphologic and functional studies of immature rat oocyte–cumulus complexes after cryopreservation. Fertility and Sterility 50 805–810.[Web of Science][Medline]

Pomar FJR, Teerds KJ, Kidson A, Colenbrander B, Tharasanit T, Aguilar B & Roelen BAJ 2005 Differences in the incidence of apoptosis between in vivo and in vitro produced blastocysts of farm animal species: a comparative study. Theriogenology 63 2254–2268.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Porcu E 2001 Oocyte freezing. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 19 221–230.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rho GJ, Kim S, Yoo JG, Balasubramanian S, Lee HJ & Choe SY 2002 Microtubulin configuration and mitochondrial distribution after ultra-rapid cooling of bovine oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 63 464–470.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rienzi L, Martinez F, Ubaldi F, Minasi MG, Iacobelli M, Tesarik J & Greco E 2004 Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures. Human Reproduction 19 655–659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ruffing NA, Steponkus PL, Pitt RE & Parks JE 1993 Osmometric behavior, hydraulic conductivity, and incidence of intracellular ice formation in bovine oocytes at different developmental stages. Cryobiology 30 562–580.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sathananthan AH, Ng SC, Trounson AO, Bongso A, Ratnam SS, Ho J, Mok H & Lee MN 1988 The effects of ultrarapid freezing on meiotic and mitotic spindles of mouse oocytes and embryos. Gamete Research 21 385–401.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Saunders KM & Parks JE 1999 Effects of cryopreservation procedures on the cytology and fertilization rate of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 61 178–187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scott TJ, Carnevale EM, Maclellan LJ, Scoggin CF & Squires EL 2001 Embryo development rates after transfer of oocytes matured in vivo, in vitro, or within oviducts of mares. Theriogenology 55 705–715.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Simerly C & Schatten H 1993 Techniques for localization of specific molecules in oocytes and embryos. In Methods in Enzymology, pp 516–552. Eds PM Wassarman & ML DePamphilis. New York: Academic Press.

Sun QY & Nagai T 2003 Molecular mechanisms underlying pig oocyte maturation and fertilization. Journal of Reproduction and Development 49 347–359.

Tharasanit T, Colenbrander B & Stout TAE 2006 Effect of maturation stage at cryopreservation on post-thaw cytoskeleton quality and fertilizability of equine oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 73 627–637.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tremoleda JL, Schoevers EJ, Stout TA, Colenbrander B & Bevers MM 2001 Organisation of the cytoskeleton during in vitro maturation of horse oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 60 260–269.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tremoleda JL, Van Haeften T, Stout TA, Colenbrander B & Bevers MM 2003a Cytoskeleton and chromatin reorganization in horse oocytes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: patterns associated with normal and defective fertilization. Biology of Reproduction 69 186–194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tremoleda JL, Stout TA, Lagutina I, Lazzari G, Bevers MM, Colenbrander B & Galli C 2003b Effects of in vitro production on horse embryo morphology, cytoskeletal characteristics, and blastocyst capsule formation. Biology of Reproduction 69 1895–1906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vajta G, Holm P, Kuwayama M, Booth PJ, Jacobsen H, Greve T & Callesen H 1998 Open Pulled Straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 51 53–58.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Van Blerkom J & Davis PW 1994 Cytogenetic, cellular, and developmental consequences of cryopreservation of immature and mature mouse and human oocytes. Microscopy Research and Technique 27 165–193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Verlhac MH, Kubiak JZ, Clarke HJ & Maro B 1994 Microtubule and chromatin behavior follow MAP kinase activity but not MPF activity during meiosis in mouse oocytes. Development 120 1017–1025.[Abstract]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T Tharasanit, S Colleoni, C Galli, B Colenbrander, and T A E Stout
Protective effects of the cumulus-corona radiata complex during vitrification of horse oocytes
Reproduction, March 1, 2009; 137(3): 391 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tharasanit, T
Right arrow Articles by Stout, T A E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tharasanit, T
Right arrow Articles by Stout, T A E


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS