| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
REVIEW |
1 Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 1656 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA and 2 Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, Wisconsin 53528, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to M A Beg; Email: mabeg{at}svm.vetmed.wisc.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Cattle and horses have similar follicle characteristics throughout the ovulatory follicular wave, despite an approximately 2.5-fold greater diameter of follicles in horses (Ginther et al. 2003a). Thus, LF in cattle and horses respectively is about 8.5 and 22.5 mm and second LF is 7.2 and 19.0 mm at the beginning of deviation, and the dominant follicle is about 16 and 40 mm on the day before ovulation. In this regard, the relative follicle diameters throughout the ovulatory wave are also similar between mares and women (Ginther et al. 2004a). In addition, the temporal relationships between follicle deviation and the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) profile were similar between mares and women (Ginther et al. 2005a), and on a comparative basis the incorporation of mares into this review is especially appropriate.
The systemic endocrine regulation of folliculogenesis involves the gonadotrophins, but various locally produced hormones and growth factors are involved in regulation of folliculogenesis (Fortune et al. 2004). Before the beginning of diameter deviation, intrafollicular biochemical events ensure future dominance of the selected follicle. The mechanism that triggers the biochemical events is not clear, but it occurs during a progressive decline in circulating FSH concentrations and an early increase in luteinizing hormone (LH). Differences between the two LFs in the concentration of intrafollicular factors at a critical time in the gonadotrophin changes are associated with diameter deviation and apparently underlie a greater responsiveness to the gonadotrophins for the developing dominant follicle than for other follicles (Ginther et al. 2003a, 2004b). The temporal coupling between a change in FSH concentrations and follicular response is close so that the deviation mechanism is established in < 8 h in cattle (Ginther et al. 1999). Thus, after the deviation mechanism is activated, only a short time is needed for interference with the development of the follicles that were selected against.
The intrafollicular factors that are candidates for activation of deviation include those related to the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system, steroids, inhibin-A/activin-A peptides, gonadotrophin receptors, angiogenic factors and several other intrafollicular factors (Armstrong & Webb 1997, Berisha et al. 2003, Ireland et al. 2004). However, the only factors, which have been temporally or functionally implicated in deviation are IGF-I and its associated system, oestradiol and LH receptors. This review considers the basis and status of this conclusion and the comparative differences between cattle and horses. Recent gene-profiling studies germane to follicle selection are also noted.
|
Experimental approaches |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
), primarily of follicular fluid, is the initial and most common approach that has been used to study the mechanism of follicle selection in cattle and horses. Collection of samples has been done using various reference points. These include emergence of a follicular wave at a specified diameter of LF (Evans & Fortune 1997), ovulation (Mihm et al. 2000), oestrus (Austin et al. 2001) and follicle diameter (Rivera & Fortune 2003). Diameters have also been chosen with reference to time of expected deviation (Beg et al. 2001, 2002, Ginther et al. 2002a, 2002b). An approach that has been used in our laboratory is to sample with retrospective reference to the observed beginning of deviation based on a control within each experiment or using a sampling technique that permits continued development of the follicle (Ginther et al. 1997b, Gastal et al. 1999a). The entire amount of follicular fluid has been collected in terminal studies (Beg et al. 2001, 2002, Donadeu & Ginther 2002) or a fraction of the follicular fluid has been sampled in vivo, using transvaginal ultrasound guiding with a small-gauge needle in both cattle (Ginther et al. 1997b) and horses (Gastal et al. 1999a). The in vivo sampling approach seems most appropriate for horses, owing to the large size of the follicles and the internal protective location of the ovarian cortex and therefore the follicle wall. In this species, follicular fluid has been sampled as often as three times from the same follicle at 12 or 24 h intervals (Ginther et al. 2004c, 2004d). In vivo sampling causes a transient reduction in growth rate, but usually with recovery within 24 h. Thereafter, growth is parallel between sampled and nonsampled follicles and follicle status (dominant or subordinate) is maintained, except when a large decrease in diameter occurs as a result of leakage (Gastal et al. 1999a).
|
) involving ablation of LF at an equivalent of the expected beginning of deviation has been used in both cattle (Ko et al. 1991, Adams et al. 1993) and horses (Gastal et al. 1999b, 2004). This approach results in second LF becoming dominant. More detailed studies have shown that this approach induces continued growth and predeviation changes in follicular-fluid factors in second LF (Beg et al. 2002, Ginther et al. 2002a, 2002b). Another approach (Fig. 1C) involves injection of a potential stimulatory factor into second LF to study the effect of the factor on production of other factors and conversion of the second LF to dominant status (Ginther et al. 2004c, 2004d). In cattle IGF-I (Ginther et al. 2004c) and horses (Ginther et al. 2004c, 2004d, 2005b), IGF-I, activin-A, pregnancy-associated plasma protein (PAPP)-A and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been used. An approach (Fig. 1D) involving injection of a potential inhibitory substance into LF at the beginning of expected deviation has been used to study the effect of blocking or interfering with a factor on the deviation process. In horses, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 has been used for this approach (Ginther et al. 2004e). A similar approach in cattle has not been reported. |
IGF system |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Results of many studies are compatible with a role for the IGF system in deviation but seem at least partly equivocal, owing to one or more of the following: (1) the reference point was not readily related to the beginning of deviation (Mihm et al. 1997, Spicer et al. 2005); (2) a differential change between LF and second LF began at the equivalent of the beginning of deviation, rather than before the beginning of deviation (Beg et al. 2001, Ginther et al. 2003b) or (3) total IGF-I rather than free IGF-I was considered (De la Sota et al. 1996, Mihm et al. 1997). In cattle, the concentrations of free IGF-I did not increase in the LF in association with deviation, but began to decrease in the second LF before the beginning of deviation (Figs 2 and 3, Beg et al. 2002). Thus, the differential change between the two follicles involved a decrease in second LF rather than an increase in LF. Presumably, a differential decrease in the second LF would favour the LF. In this regard, an increase in free IGF-I in LF before the equivalent of the beginning of deviation has also been reported (Rivera & Fortune 2003). In horses, the concentrations of free IGF-I differentially increased in the future dominant follicle before the beginning of deviation (Fig. 2, Donadeu & Ginther 2002).
|
|
and 5). When LF was ablated in horses (Ginther et al. 2002b), the concentration of free IGF-I in second LF began to increase 12 h before the beginning of deviation between second and third LF (Figs 4 and 6), whereas concentrations of oestradiol, inhibin-A and activin-A increased after the beginning of deviation between second and third LF.
|
|
|
In cattle, when IGF-I was injected into the stroma of both ovaries 1 day after ovulation, follicular-fluid concentrations of oestradiol increased in small follicles but did not change in large follicles (Spicer et al. 2000); there was no change in follicular dynamics. The role of IGF-I in deviation has been studied by injecting recombinant human (rh)IGF-I into the second LF at the expected beginning of deviation in cattle (Ginther et al. 2004c) and horses (Ginther et al. 2004c, 2004d). In cattle, the exogenous IGF-I increased the follicular-fluid oestradiol concentrations in second LF within 6 h (Fig. 7). The effects on other factors, such as inhibin-A, activin-A or VEGF and on follicle dominance were not studied. In horses, a dose of rhIGF-I that simulated the endogenous concentrations of free IGF-I in the LF was injected into the second LF at the expected beginning of deviation; within 24 h the production of inhibin-A, activin-A and VEGF was stimulated and an increase in androstenedione and IGFBP-2 was prevented. However, oestradiol did not increase until 48 h (Figs 7–9, Ginther et al. 2004d). In addition, intrafollicular injection of a high dose of rhIGF-I into the second LF caused more injected follicles to continue to grow, become dominant, and ovulate than in saline-injected controls (Fig. 10A, Ginther et al. 2004c, 2004d).
|
|
|
|
It has been proposed that IGFBPs exert a pivotal role in the regulation of IGF bioavailability by selectively binding the IGFs and making them unavailable to their receptors (Armstrong & Webb 1997). The IGFBPs are inhibitory to gonadotrophin-induced follicular growth and differentiation and inhibit the actions of IGFs at the level of target cells (Spicer & Echternkamp 1995, Monget et al. 1996). Thus, changes in intrafollicular IGFBPs lead to changes in IGF bioavailability and the up or down regulation of gonadotrophin actions on follicular cells. Four IGFBPs (BP-2, -3, -4 and -5) have been detected in follicular fluid of cattle (Echternkamp et al. 1994, de la Sota et al. 1996, Mihm et al. 2000, Austin et al. 2001) and at least four or five different IGFBPs (BP2, -3, -4, -5 and a high molecular weight complex of 90–135 kDa) in a follicular fluid of horses (Gerard & Monget 1998, Bridges et al. 2002). However, only BP-2, -4 and -5 in cattle (Beg et al. 2001, Rivera & Fortune 2003) and BP-2 in horses (Donadeu & Ginther 2002) have been studied in association with deviation.
In cattle, the levels of BP-4 and -5 were lower in LF apparently before the equivalent of the beginning of deviation (Rivera & Fortune 2003) and thereafter. In horses, free IGF-I concentrations were negatively correlated with BP-2, -4 and -5 levels in follicular and luteal phase small, medium and large follicles (Spicer et al. 2005). In both cattle (Beg et al. 2001) and horses (Donadeu & Ginther 2002), follicular-fluid concentrations of BP-2 were similar between LF and second LF before and at the beginning of deviation (Fig. 2), and concentrations increased in the second LF after the beginning of deviation. Furthermore, ablation of the LF at the expected beginning of deviation was temporally associated with a decrease in BP-2 concentrations in the second LF in cattle (Figs 4 and 5, Beg et al. 2002) but not in horses (Ginther et al. 2002b). In horses, injection of rhIGFBP-3 into the LF at the beginning of expected deviation stopped the growth of LF (Ginther et al. 2004e); the second LF became the dominant follicle (Figs 10B and 11). In addition, the intrafollicular BP-3 injection decreased the follicular-fluid concentrations of free IGF-I, oestradiol, activin-A, inhibin-A and VEGF and increased androstenedione concentrations within 24 h (Figs 8 and 11).
|
The complexity of the IGF system includes IGFBP proteases, such as PAPP-A that have been described in the follicular fluid of cattle and horses (Mazerbourg et al. 2000, Spicer 2004). The proteases degrade the binding proteins and thus increase the bioavailability of IGF-I in follicles. In cattle, a greater proteolytic activity for BP-4 and -5 occurred in the LF than in the second LF apparently before the equivalent of beginning of deviation and was temporally associated with greater concentrations of free IGF-I in the LF and greater BP-4 and -5 in the second LF (Rivera & Fortune 2003). Proteolytic activity for BP-2 (Mazerbourg et al. 2003), BP-4 (Mazerbourg et al. 2000) and BP-5 (Bridges et al. 2002) has also been reported in dominant follicles but well after the beginning of deviation in horses. In addition, a more recent report (Gerard et al. 2004) indicated a greater BP-2 proteolytic activity in early dominant (25 mm) and late dominant (35 mm) follicles than in subordinate follicles; however, differential proteolytic activity of follicles in relation to deviation has not been reported in horses. In this regard, an intrafollicular injection of PAPP-A into the second LF at the beginning of deviation increased the concentration of free IGF-I in horses (Ginther et al. 2005b). The effects and interrelationships of PAPP-A and IGF-I injection on other follicular-fluid factors are illustrated (Fig. 8). It appears that the induction of proteolytic activity in the IGF system is an early event in the selection of a single dominant follicle. As noted above, free IGF-I decreases in the second LF and remains constant or increases in the LF in cattle, and increases in LF and remains constant in second LF in horses, encompassing the beginning of deviation. Therefore, the second LF may acquire lower BP protease activity in cattle and LF may acquire more such activity in horses; that is, the BP protease activity and the resulting changes in BP concentrations reflect the availability of more IGFs.
The studies on temporality and the effect of treatment with BP proteases further confirm that the IGF system plays an initiating role in follicle selection in both species.
|
Steroids |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
In cattle, follicular-fluid concentrations of oestradiol began to increase differentially in LF vs second LF at (Ginther et al. 1997b, Austin et al. 2001, Beg et al. 2001) or shortly before the expected beginning of deviation (Figs 2 and 3; Mihm et al. 2000, Beg et al. 2002, Ginther et al. 2003b). Similarly, in horses, differential oestradiol increase in the LF began before the beginning of deviation (Fig. 2, Gastal et al. 1999a, Donadeu & Ginther 2002). Following ablation of LF in cattle (Figs 4 and 5, Ginther et al. 2002a) or injection of rhIGF-I into the second LF (Fig. 7, Ginther et al. 2004c) at the expected beginning of deviation, oestradiol increased in second LF before the expected beginning of deviation between second LF and third LF. In contrast, the following similar treatments in horses, oestradiol increased after the beginning of deviation between second LF and third LF (Figs 6 and 7, Ginther et al. 2002b, 2004c, 2004d). In cattle, systemic treatment with antiserum against oestradiol decreased the growth rate of the two LFs and delayed the beginning of deviation independent of the effects on FSH (Beg et al. 2003), further implicating oestradiol in deviation in cattle.
The oestradiol increase in LF before the beginning of deviation plays a role in the initiation of deviation in cattle but not in horses.
|
Androgens and progestins |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
) and at the beginning of deviation in both cattle (Beg et al. 2001, 2002) and horses (Donadeu & Ginther 2002). Furthermore, ablation of the LF at the beginning of deviation was not associated with changes in intrafollicular levels of androgens in second LF when it attained the diameter characteristics of beginning of deviation (Fig. 4) in cattle (Beg et al. 2002) and horses (Ginther et al. 2002b). Despite the species similarities associated with the beginning of deviation, a marked species difference occurs after deviation begins; androgen concentrations increase in the dominant follicle and decrease in subordinate follicles in cattle (Stewart et al. 1996, Singh et al. 1998, Beg et al. 2001, 2002), whereas concentrations do not increase in the dominant follicle but do in the subordinate follicles in horses (Donadeu & Ginther 2002). This species difference was further illustrated by the results of intrafollicular injection of IGF-I into the second LF (Fig. 9, Ginther et al. 2004c, 2004d); the concentrations of androgen increased in the treated follicle in cattle but decreased in horses. Androgens enhance the production of progestins in granulosa cell culture (Fortune & Quirk 1988). Oestradiol also stimulates the synthesis of pregnenolone from granulosa cells. That is, both androgens (directly) and progestins (indirectly) serve as substrates for production of oestradiol in the follicle. In cattle, no differential changes in progesterone concentrations were observed in the two LFs before the beginning of deviation (Beg et al. 2001, 2002). When the LF was ablated at the beginning of deviation in cattle, there was an increase in progesterone concentrations in second LF within 12 h in one study (Beg et al. 2002). However, this increase was not confirmed in a subsequent study (Ginther et al. 2002a). In horses, no differential changes in progesterone concentrations were observed in the two LFs before the beginning of deviation (Donadeu & Ginther 2002). In addition, when the LF was ablated at the beginning of deviation, there was no change in the progesterone concentrations in the second LF (Ginther et al. 2002b).
Considering the lack of a differential change in androgens and progesterone in two LFs before or at the beginning of deviation, it seems unlikely that these factors are involved in the deviation mechanism in either species.
|
Inhibin, activin and follistatin |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
and ß subunits, and follistatin is a high affinity activin-binding monomeric glycoprotein. All three hormones are present in follicular fluid of cattle (Knight & Glister 2001) and horses (Donadeu & Ginther 2002). Differences in post-translational processing are responsible for various dimeric and monomeric (free subunits) molecular weight forms of inhibin in follicular fluid. Inhibin enhances the LH-induced androgen production in theca cells of rats and cattle (Hsueh et al. 1987, Wrathal & Knight 1995), and this effect was reduced by activin. Activin induces granulosa cell proliferation; increases FSH receptor expression, granulosa cell steroidogenesis, basal and gonadotrophin-stimulated aromatase activity and oestradiol production; and delays the onset of luteinization and atresia (Knight & Glister 2001). The inhibitory effects of activin on both LH- and oestradiol-induced androgen secretion from theca were reversed by follistatin consistent with its role as an activin-binding protein (Wrathal & Knight 1995). The majority of dimeric forms of inhibins in follicular fluid in cattle are high molecular weight (>160 kDa); the smaller dimeric forms (32–34 kDa) are in low concentrations (Ireland et al. 1994, Austin et al. 2001).
Neither the high molecular weight nor the low molecular weight dimeric forms of inhibin and activin in follicular fluid differentially changed among the three LFs during the selection process in cattle (Austin et al. 2001). Follicular-fluid concentrations of inhibin-A and activin-A in cattle were similar among the three LFs, when LF was a mean of 7.6 mm (Mihm et al. 2000) or when growing from a mean of approximately 5–11 mm (Austin et al. 2001). In a study related to the time of deviation, no differences were found in follicular-fluid concentrations of total inhibin, inhibin-A, activin-A and inhibin-B in the two LFs before the beginning of deviation (Fig. 2; Beg et al. 2002). In another study, ablation of the LF at the beginning of deviation was associated with a transient increase in activin-A in second LF before an increase in oestradiol and IGF-I (Ginther et al. 2002a), but this has not been confirmed. A transient increase in activin-A was not detected in LF or second LF before the beginning of deviation (Ginther et al. 2003b).
In horses, inhibin-A and activin-A concentrations began to increase in the future dominant follicle but not in the future subordinate follicles before the beginning of deviation (Fig. 2), and this difference continued after the beginning of deviation (Donadeu & Ginther 2002). Inhibin-B concentrations did not change before the beginning of deviation. When the LF was ablated at the beginning of deviation, activin-A and inhibin-A concentrations increased in the second LF simultaneously but only after the second LF had attained the diameter characteristic of the beginning of deviation and about 24 h after the increase in IGF-I (Ginther et al. 2002b). In addition, follicular-fluid inhibin-A and activin-A concentrations increased in the second LF and decreased in the LF after an injection of rhIGF-I and rhIGFBP-3 respectively, but not until 24 h after injection (Figs 7, 8 and 11, Ginther et al. 2004d, 2004e). Moreover, an intrafollicular injection of PAPP-A into the second LF at the beginning of deviation increased the concentrations of inhibin-A and follistatin and simultaneously increased the concentrations of free IGF-I within 24 h (Fig. 8, Ginther et al. 2005b).
In conclusion, the experimental results indicate that inhibin-A and activin-A do not play a role in the deviation process in cattle. In horses, despite the differential increase in inhibin-A and activin-A in the LF before the beginning of deviation, the late response in increase in inhibin-A and activin-A in the second LF to ablation of LF and to IGF-I injection into the second LF support a similar conclusion as for cattle.
The intrafollicular ratios of activin:follistatin and activin:inhibin have been suggested to be potentially important parameters regulating folliculogenesis (Glister et al. 2001). Follistatin abolishes the activity of activin-A by binding it and inhibin-A opposes the actions of activin-A. Thus, a ratio of activin-A:follistatin and activin-A:inhibin-A reflects the net amount of unopposed activin (activin tone) likely available for interaction with its receptors. In this respect, FSH and IGF-I increased the activin tone in bovine granulosa cell culture media (Glister et al. 2001). Further, a recent study (Glister et al. 2006) reported a sharp increase in intrafollicular activin tone in 3–6 mm follicles in cattle. Increased activin tone was reflected by a 30-fold increase in activin-A with a concomitant sixfold increase in inhibin-A. Follistatin concentrations exceeded activin-A concentrations until follicles were more than 6 mm. In this regard, a progressive decrease in the follistatin concentrations in cattle was detected in the LF but not others when LF grew from a mean of approximately 5–11 mm (Austin et al. 2001).
Further studies are needed to determine if activin/follistatin plays a role in follicle selection and dominance.
|
VEGF and vascularity |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
, 8 and 11, Ginther et al. 2004d, 2004e). An intrafollicular injection of VEGF into the second LF at the beginning of deviation increased free IGF-I concentrations and decreased androstenedione but did not affect the concentrations of other factors (Fig. 8; Ginther et al. 2005b). Follicle-produced VEGF is a candidate for a role in vascular/follicle interrelationships during diameter deviation, but such a role has not been adequately demonstrated.
An increase in vascularity would give the follicle an advantage to receive preferential supply of growth factors, gonadotrophins, steroid precursors and other nutrients required for its continued development. The relationship of follicle vascularity to the beginning of deviation has been studied directly by Doppler ultrasonography in horses (Acosta et al. 2004). Blood flow area began to increase differentially in the future dominant vs subordinate follicle about 1 day before the beginning of diameter deviation. A similar Doppler study in cattle did not show a difference between the two LFs before the beginning of deviation (Acosta et al. 2005). The cause and effect relationships of follicle vascularity and VEGF and the beginning of deviation are not known.
Early increased vascularity in the future dominant follicle has been reported in horses but not in cattle.
|
Receptors |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Changes in oestradiol and progesterone receptor expression have not been studied with reference to the beginning of diameter deviation.
A study in cattle found no difference in the expression of IGF-I receptor mRNA between small, medium and large follicles (Armstrong et al. 2000). In contrast, another study found that mRNA expression of IGF-I receptor was higher in granulosa cells from follicles 8 to 10 mm than from follicles 5 to 7 mm (Schams et al. 2002). Furthermore, the expression of IGF-I binding sites in cattle increased from primary to large antral follicles (Wandji et al. 1992).
The expression pattern of IGF-I receptors in relation to deviation is not known.
In cattle, LH-receptor mRNA in granulosa cells was detected in follicles >8 mm (Bao et al. 1997), but not in follicles < 8.0 mm or in subordinate follicles; no difference between follicles in the expression of FSH receptor was found. In contrast, another study found that granulosa cell mRNA expression for LH receptor was minimal in three LFs 2 or 3 days after oestrus (Evans & Fortune 1997), although a temporal relationship to the beginning of deviation was not adequately demonstrated. Another study found that LH-receptor protein in the granulosa cells of the LF was greater on the day after the equivalent of expected beginning of deviation than on the day before the beginning of deviation (Bodensteiner et al. 1996). A recent abstract (Luo et al. 2005), reported that the LH-receptor mRNA was about eight times higher in the LF than in the second LF on a day equivalent to the beginning of deviation. In addition, growth of the largest or dominant follicle, primarily after the beginning of the equivalent of deviation, was associated with an increase in granulosa cell LH-receptor mRNA (Mihm et al. 2006). In a study more specifically related to predeviation, an increase in granulosa-cell LH-receptor mRNA expression was found in LF in cattle at an equivalent of 8 h before the expected beginning of deviation (Beg et al. 2001); expression in second LF did not change (Fig. 3). Therefore, the induction of LH receptors in granulosa cells is one of the early events in selection of a single dominant follicle in cattle. In horses, the LH-receptor protein content in granulosa cells was greater when the follicles were 15–19 mm than in smaller follicles (Goudet et al. 1999), but the results were equivocal in regard to the temporality of differential LH receptor acquisition and the beginning of deviation.
In conclusion, granulosa cells of the LF acquire LH receptors in cattle shortly before the beginning of the deviation but further study is needed in horses.
|
Gene profiling and the selection mechanism |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
, activin-A receptor type-I and two apoptotic factors in the granulosa cells. Although the progress in gene profiling is impressive, conclusions from these molecular and genomic studies with regard to follicle selection seem equivocal, owing especially to inadequate reference points for determining the temporal relationships between the genes and the beginning of deviation.
|
Conclusions |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
. In cattle, there is maintenance or an increase in free IGF-I via activation of the IGF system by BP-proteases (PAPP-A) and an increase in oestradiol and LH receptors in LF before the beginning of diameter deviation between LF and second LF. At the same time, the concentrations offree IGF-I decrease in the second LF. In horses, there is a greater increase in several factors in LF than in the second LFat this time, but the IGF system is the only mechanism with a demonstrated positive effect on the beginning of deviation. These conclusions are based on the results of sampling follicles, inducing deviation between second LF and third LF by ablating LF or injecting rhIGF-I into the second LF, or injecting IGFBP-3 into LF. The intrafollicular changes in the future dominant follicle apparently increase the responsiveness of LF to decreasing FSH and increasing LH. The other follicles of the wave have the same capacity for dominance, but do not reach a similar preparatory stage before being negatively affected by the changing gonadotrophin concentrations. Thus, the LF alone continues to grow and becomes dominant.
|
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionExperimental approachesIGF systemSteroidsAndrogens and progestinsInhibin, activin and follistatinVEGF and vascularityReceptorsGene profiling and the...ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Acosta TJ, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Beg MA & Ginther OJ 2004 Differential blood flow changes between the future dominant and subordinate follicles precede diameter changes during follicle selection in mares. Biology of Reproduction 71 502–507.
Acosta TJ, Hayashi KG, Matsui M & Miyamoto A 2005 Changes in the follicular vascularity during first follicular wave in lactating cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development 51 273–280.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Adams GP, Kot K, Smith CA & Ginther OJ 1993 Effect of a dominant follicle on regression of its subordinates in heifers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 73 267–275.[Web of Science]
Armstrong DG & Webb R 1997 Ovarian follicular dominance: the role of intraovarian growth factors and novel proteins. Reviews of Reproduction 2 139–146.[Abstract]
Armstrong DG, Gutierrez CG, Baxter G, Glazyrin AL, Mann GE, Woad KJ, Hogg CO & Webb R 2000 Expression of mRNA encoding IGF-I, IGF-II and type 1 IGF receptor in bovine ovarian follicles. Journal of Endocrinology 165 101–113.[Abstract]
Austin EJ, Mihm M, Evans ACO, Knight PG, Ireland JLH, Ireland JJ & Roche JF 2001 Alterations in intrafollicular regulatory factors and apoptosis during selection of follicles on the first follicular wave of the bovine estrous cycle. Biology of Reproduction 64 839–848.
Bao B, Garverick HA, Smith GW, Smith MF, Salfen BE & Youngquist RS 1997 Changes in messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) encoding luteinizing hormone receptor, cytochrome P450-side chain cleavage, and aromatase are associated with recruitment and selection of bovine ovarian follicles. Biology of Reproduction 56 1158–1168.[Abstract]
Barboni B, Turriani M, Galeati G, Spinaci M, Bacci ML, Forni M & Mattioli M 2000 Vascular endothelial growth factor production in growing pig antral follicles. Biology of Reproduction 63 858–864.
Beg MA, Bergfelt DR, Kot K, Wiltbank MC & Ginther OJ 2001 Follicular fluid factors and granulosa-cell gene expression associated with follicle deviation in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 64 432–441.
Beg MA, Bergfelt DR, Kot K & Ginther OJ 2002 Follicle selection in cattle: dynamics of follicular fluid factors during development of follicle dominance. Biology of Reproduction 66 120–126.
Beg MA, Meira C, Bergfelt DR & Ginther OJ 2003 Role of oestradiol in growth of follicles and follicle deviation in heifers. Reproduction 125 847–854.[Abstract]
Berisha B, Schams D, Kosmann M & Amselgruber W 2000 Expression and localization of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor during final growth of bovine ovarian follicles. Journal of Endocrinology 167 371–382.[Abstract]
Berisha B, Sinowatz F & Schams D 2003 Expression and localization of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family members during the final growth of bovine ovarian follicles. Molecular Reproduction and Development 67 162–171.[Web of Science]
Bodensteiner KJ, Wiltbank MC, Bergfelt DR & Ginther OJ 1996 Alterations in follicular estradiol and gonadotropin receptors during development of bovine antral follicles. Theriogenology 45 499–512.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bridges TS, Davidson TR, Chamberlain CS, Geisert RD & Spicer LJ 2002 Changes in follicular fluid steroids, insulin-like growth factors (IGF) and IGF-binding protein concentration, and proteolytic activity during equine follicular development. Journal of Animal Science 80 179–190.
De la Sota RL, Simmen FA, Diaz T & Thatcher WW 1996 Insulin-like growth factor system in bovine first wave-dominant and subordinate follicles. Biology of Reproduction 55 803–812.[Abstract]
Donadeu FX & Ginther OJ 2002 Changes in concentrations of follicular fluid factors during follicle selection in mares. Biology of Reproduction 66 1111–1118.
Echternkamp SE, Howard HJ, Roberts AJ, Grizzle J & Wise T 1994 Relationships among concentrations of steroids, insulin-like growth factor-I, and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in ovarian follicular fluid of beef cattle. Biology of Reproduction 51 971–981.[Abstract]
Evans ACO & Fortune JE 1997 Selection of the dominant follicle occurs in the absence of the differences in the expression of messenger ribonucleic acid for gonadotropin receptors. Endocrinology 138 2963–2971.
Evans ACO, Ireland JLH, Winn ME, Lonergan P, Smith GW, Coussens PM & Ireland JJ 2004 Identification of genes involved in apoptosis and dominant follicle development during follicular waves in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 70 1475–1484.
Fayad T, Levesque V, Sirois J, Silversides DW & Lussier JG 2004 Gene expression profiling of differentially expressed genes in granulosa cells of bovine dominant follicles using suppression subtractive hybridization. Biology of Reproduction 70 523–533.
Fortune JE & Quirk SM 1988 Regulation of steroidogenesis in bovine preovulatory follicles. Journal of Animal Science 66 (Supplement 2) 1–8.
Fortune JE, Rivera GM & Yang MY 2004 Follicular development: the role of the follicular microenvironment in selection of the dominant follicle. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83 109–126.
Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Wiltbank MC & Ginther OJ 1999a Follicle deviation and intrafollicular and systemic estradiol concentrations in mares. Biology of Reproduction 61 31–39.
Gastal EL, Gastal MO & Ginther OJ 1999b Experimental assumption of dominance by a smaller follicle and associated hormonal changes in mares. Biology of Reproduction 61 724–730.
Gastal EL, Donadeu FX, Gastal MO & Ginther OJ 1999c Echotextural changes in the follicular wall during follicle deviation in mares. Theriogenology 52 803–814.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Beg MA & Ginther OJ 2004 Interrelationships among follicles during the common-growth phase of a follicular wave and capacity of individual follicles for dominance in mares. Reproduction 128 417–422.
Gerard N & Monget P 1998 Intrafollicular insulin-like growth factor-binding protein levels in equine ovarian follicles during preovulatory maturation and regression. Biology of Reproduction 58 1508–1514.
Gerard N, Delpuech C, Oxvig C, Overgaard MT & Monget P 2004 Proteolytic degradation of IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-2 in equine ovarian follicles: involvement of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and association with dominant but not subordinated follicles. Journal of Endocrinology 182 457–466.[Abstract]
Ginther OJ, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM, Gibbons JR & Kot K 1996 Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 55 1187–1194.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ginther OJ, Kot K, Kulick LJ & Wiltbank MC 1997a Emergence and deviation of follicles during development of follicular waves in cattle. Theriogenology 48 75–87.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ginther OJ, Kot K, Kulick LJ & Wiltbank MC 1997b Sampling follicular fluid without altering follicular status in cattle: oestradiol concentrations early in a follicular wave. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 109 181–186.
Ginther OJ, Bergfelt DR, Kulick LJ & Kot K 1999 Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle: establishment of follicle deviation in less than 8 hours through depression of FSH concentrations. Theriogenology 52 1079–1093.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Bergfelt DR & Kot K 2002a Activin A, estradiol and free insulin-like growth factor-I in follicular fluid preceding the experimental assumption of follicle dominance in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 67 14–19.
Ginther OJ, Meira C, Beg MA & Bergfelt DR 2002b Follicle and endocrine dynamics during experimental follicle deviation in mares. Biology of Reproduction 67 862–867.
Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Donadeu FX & Bergfelt DR 2003a Mechanism of follicle deviation in monovular farm species. Animal Reproduction Science 78 239–257.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Kot K, Meira C & Bergfelt DR 2003b Associated and independent comparisons between the two largest follicles preceding follicle deviation in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 68 524–529.
Ginther OJ, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Bergfelt DR, Baerwald AR & Pierson RA 2004a Comparative study of the dynamics of follicular waves in mares and women. Biology of Reproduction 71 1195–1201.
Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Gastal MO & Gastal EL 2004b Follicle dynamics and selection in mares. Animal Reproduction 1 45–63.
Ginther OJ, Bergfelt DR, Beg MA, Meira C & Kot K 2004c In vivo effects of an intrafollicular injection of insulin-like growth factor-1 on the mechanism of follicle deviation in heifers and mares. Biology of Reproduction 70 99–105.
Ginther OJ, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Checura CM & Beg MA 2004d Dose-response study of intrafollicular injection of insulin-like growth factor-1 on follicular-fluid factors and follicle dominance in mares. Biology of Reproduction 70 1063–1069.
Ginther OJ, Gastal EL, Gastal MO & Beg MA 2004e Critical role of insulin-like growth factor system in follicle selection and dominance in mares. Biology of Reproduction 70 1374–1379.
Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Baerwald AR & Pierson RA 2005a Systemic concentrations of hormones during the development of follicular wave in mares and women: a comparative study. Reproduction 130 379–388.
Ginther OJ, Gastal EL, Gastal MO & Beg MA 2005b In vivo effects of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, activin-A and vascular endothelial growth factor on other follicular-fluid factors during follicle deviation in mares. Reproduction 129 489–496.
Glister C, Tannetta DS, Groome NP & Knight PG 2001 Interaction between follicle-stimulating hormone and growth factors in modulating secretion of steroids and inhibin-related peptides by nonluteinized bovine granulosa cells. Biology of Reproduction 65 1020–1028.
Glister C, Groome NP & Knight PG 2006 Bovine follicle development is associated with divergent changes in activin-A, inhibin-A and follistatin and the relative abundance of different follistatin isoforms in follicular fluid. Journal of Endocrinology 188 215–225.
Goudet G, Belin F, Bezard J & Gerard N 1999 Intrafollicular content of luteinizing hormone receptor -inhibin, and aromatase in relation to follicular growth, estrous cycle stage, and oocyte competence for in vitro maturation in the mare. Biology of Reproduction 60 1120–1127.
Hsueh AJW, Dahl KD, Vaughan J, Tucker E, Rivier J & Bardin CW 1987 Heterodimers and homodimers of inhibin subunits have different paracrine action in modulation of luteinizing hormone-stimulated androgen biosynthesis. PNAS 84 5082–5086.
Ireland JLH, Good TEM, Knight PG & Ireland JJ 1994 Alterations in amounts of different forms of inhibin during follicular atresia. Biology of Reproduction 50 1265–1276.[Abstract]
Ireland JLH, Jimenez-Krassel F, Winn ME, Burns DS & Ireland JJ 2004 Evidence for autocrine and paracrine roles of 2-macroglobulin in regulation of estradiol production by granulosa cells and development of dominant follicles. Endocrinology 145 2784–2794.
Jaiswal RS, Singh J & Adams GP 2004 Developmental pattern of small antral follicles in the bovine ovary. Biology of Reproduction 71 1244–1251.
Knight PG & Glister C 2001 Potential local regulatory functions of inhibins, activins and follistatin in the ovary. Reproduction 121 503–512.[Abstract]
Ko JCH, Kastelic JP, Del Campo MR & Ginther OJ 1991 Effects of dominant follicle on ovarian follicular dynamics during oestrus cycle inheifers. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 91 511–519.
Luo W, Gumen A & Wiltbank MC 2005 The role of LH in changing gene expression during selection of a dominant follicle in cattle, Biology of Reproduction Special Issue. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of Society for the Study of Reproduction, pp 92 (abstract).
Martinez-Chequer JC, Stouffer RL, Hazzard TM, Patton PE & Molskness TA 2003 Insulin-like growth factors-1 and -2, but not hypoxia, synergize with gonadotropin hormone to promote vascular endothelial growth factor-A secretion by monkey granulosa cells from preovulatory follicles. Biology of Reproduction 68 1112–1118.
Mazerbourg S, Zapf J, Bar RS, Brigstock DR & Monget P 2000 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 proteolytic degradation in bovine, equine, and porcine preovulatory follicles: regulation by IGFs and heparin-binding domain containing peptides. Biology of Reproduction 63 390–400.
Mazerbourg S, Bondy CA, Zhou J & Monget P 2003 The insulin-like growth factor system: a key determinant role in the growth and selection of ovarian follicles? A comparative species study. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 38 247–258.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mihm M, Good TEM, Ireland JLH, Ireland JJ, Knight PG & Roche JF 1997 Decline in serum follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations alters key intrafollicular growth factors involved in selection of the dominant follicle in heifers. Biology of Reproduction 57 1328–1337.[Abstract]
Mihm M, Austin EJ, Good TEM, Ireland JLH, Knight PG, Roche JF & Ireland JJ 2000 Identification of potential intrafollicular factors involved in selection of dominant follicles in heifers. Biology of Reproduction 63 811–819.
Mihm M, Baker PJ, Ireland JLH, Smith GW, Coussens PM, Evans ACO & Ireland JJ 2006 Molecular evidence that growth of dominant follicle involves a reduction in follicle stimulating hormone-dependence and an increase in luteinizing hormone-dependence in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 74 1051–1059.
Monget P & Monniaux D 1995 Growth factors and control of folliculogenesis. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 49 321–333.
Monget P, Besnard N, Huet C, Pisselet C & Monniaux D 1996 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and ovarian folliculogenesis. Hormone Research 45 211–217.[Web of Science][Medline]
Redmer DA & Reynolds LP 1996 Angiogenesis in the ovary. Reviews in Reproduction 1 182–192.
Rivera GM & Fortune JE 2003 Proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins-4 and -5 in bovine follicular fluid: implications for ovarian follicle selection and dominance. Endocrinology 144 2977–2987.
Rosenfeld CS, Wagner JS, Roberts RM & Lubahn DB 2001a Intraovarian actions of oestrogen. Reproduction 122 215–226.[Abstract]
Rosenfeld CS, Yuan X, Manikkam M, Calder MD & Garverick HA 2001b Cloning, sequencing and localization of bovine estrogen receptor-ß within ovarian follicle. Biology of Reproduction 60 691–697.[CrossRef]
Schams D & Berisha B 2002 Steroids as local regulators of ovarian activity in domestic animals. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 23 53–65.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schams D, Kosmann B, Berisha B, Amselgruber WM & Miyamoto A 2001 Stimulatory and synergistic effects of luteinizing hormone and insulin like growth factor 1 on the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor and progesterone of cultured bovine granulosa cells. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinologyand Diabetes 109 155–162.[CrossRef]
Schams D, Berisha B, Kosmann M & Amselgruber WM 2002 Expression and localization of IGF family members in bovine antral follicles during final growth and in luteal tissue during different stages of estrous cycle and pregnancy. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 22 51–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Singh J, Pierson RA & Adams GP 1998 Ultrasound image attributes of bovine ovarian follicles and endocrine and functional correlates. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 112 19–29.
Sisco B, Hagemann LJ, Shelling AN & Pfeffer PL 2003 Isolation of genes differentially expressed in dominant and subordinate bovine follicles. Endocrinology 144 3904–3913.
Spicer LJ 2004 Proteolytic degradation of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins by ovarian follicles: a control mechanism for selection of dominant follicles. Biology of Reproduction 70 1223–1230.
Spicer LJ & Echternkamp SE 1995 The ovarian insulin and insulin-like growth factor system with emphasis on domestic animals. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 12 223–245.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Spicer LJ & Chamberlain CS 2000 Production of insulin-like growth factor-I by granulosa cells but not theca cells is hormonally responsive in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 78 2919–2926.
Spicer LJ, Alvarez P, Prado TM, Morgan GL & Hamilton TD 2000 Effects of intraovarian infusion of insulin-like growth factor-I on ovarian follicular function in cattle. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 18 265–278.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Spicer LJ, Santiago CA, Davidson TR, Bridges TS & Chamberlain CS 2005 Follicular fluid concentrations of free insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 during follicular development in mares. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 29 573–581.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Stewart RE, Spicer LJ, Hamilton TD & Keefer BE 1995 Effects of insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin on proliferation and on basal and luteinizing hormone-induced steroidogenesis of bovine thecal cells: Involvement of glucose and receptors for insulin-like growth factor I and luteinizing hormone. Journal of Animal Science 73 3719–3731.[Abstract]
Stewart RE, Spicer LJ, Hamilton TD, Keefer BE, Dawson LJ, Morgan GL & Echternkamp SE 1996 Levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding proteins, luteinizing hormone and IGF-I receptors, and steroids in dominant follicles during the first follicular wave in cattle exhibiting regular estrous cycles. Endocrinology 137 2842–2850.[Abstract]
Wandji SA, Pelletier G & Sirard MA 1992 Ontogeny and cellular localization of 125I-labeled insulin-like growth factor-I, 125I-labeled follicle stimulating hormone and 125I-labeled human chorionic gonadotropin binding sites in ovaries from bovine fetuses and neonatal calves. Biology of Reproduction 47 814–822.[Abstract]
Wrathall JHM & Knight PG 1995 Effect of inhibin related peptides and estradiol on androstenedione and progesterone secretion by bovine theca cells in vitro. Journal of Endocrinology 145 491–500.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H F Irving-Rodgers, M L Harland, T R Sullivan, and R J Rodgers Studies of granulosa cell maturation in dominant and subordinate bovine follicles: novel extracellular matrix focimatrix is co-ordinately regulated with cholesterol side-chain cleavage CYP11A1 Reproduction, May 1, 2009; 137(5): 825 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M A Velazquez, J Zaraza, A Oropeza, R Webb, and H Niemann The role of IGF1 in the in vivo production of bovine embryos from superovulated donors Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 161 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L K Doyle, C O Hogg, E D Watson, and F X Donadeu Seasonal effects on the response of ovarian follicles to IGF1 in mares Reproduction, November 1, 2008; 136(5): 589 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V.J. Grant, R.J. Irwin, N.T. Standley, A.N. Shelling, and L.W. Chamley Sex of Bovine Embryos May Be Related to Mothers' Preovulatory Follicular Testosterone Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 812 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. T. Grazul-Bilska, C. Navanukraw, M. L. Johnson, K. A. Vonnahme, S. P. Ford, L. P. Reynolds, and D. A. Redmer Vascularity and expression of angiogenic factors in bovine dominant follicles of the first follicular wave J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1914 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Fayad, R. Lefebvre, J. Nimpf, D. W. Silversides, and J. G. Lussier Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 8 (LRP8) Is Upregulated in Granulosa Cells of Bovine Dominant Follicle: Molecular Characterization and Spatio-Temporal Expression Studies Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 466 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Lucy The bovine dominant ovarian follicle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(13_suppl): E89 - E99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
