| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Animal Physiology, and 1 Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2350, Australia
Correspondence should be addressed to M Herrid CSIRO Livestock Industries, Locked Bag 1, Post Office, Armidale NSW 2350, Australia; Email: muren.herrid{at}csiro.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Leptin (Bennett et al. 1996) and leptin receptors (Chen et al. 2000) have been identified in a number of foetal tissues at different stages of development, indicating that leptin may be important in foetal growth, a role which is distinct from its activity as a satiety factor. A leptin surge has been detected in mice during the early post-natal period, which is independent of fat mass and not acutely regulated by food restriction (Devaskar et al. 1997). In addition, leptin is ineffective in regulating food intake and energy expenditure in the neonatal mouse (Mistry et al. 1999). Taken together, these studies have provided evidence that leptin has a developmental role. Indeed, the ob/ob mouse exhibits numerous reproductive abnormalities including unusually small ovarian weight in females and a small amount of interstitial tissue in males (Jones & Ainsworth-Harrisson 1957). Treatment of ob/ob mice with leptin results in the normalization of testicular and ovarian weight and function (Chehab et al. 1996, Mounzih et al. 1997), thus suggesting that leptin may be required for normal growth and development of reproductive organs.
The restoration of fertility in the female ob/ob mouse by the exogenous administration of leptin has demonstrated that leptin is essential for normal pre-implantation and/or implantation processes (Malik et al. 2001). As recently reviewed by Cervero et al.(2005), leptin has been detected by immunofluorescence in meiotically mature mouse, human, pig and bovine oocytes, and early cleavage embryos (Antczak & Vanblerkom 1997, Cioffi et al. 1997, Madeja et al. 2005, Kim et al. 2005). Moreover, leptin mRNA and protein have been identified in human and mouse blastocysts and hatched blastocysts (Gonzalez et al. 2000, Kawamura et al. 2002, Kawamura et al. 2003), and leptin appears to be regulated in a paracrine manner when blastocysts are co-cultured with human endometrial cells (Gonzalez et al. 2000).
Supplementation of culture medium with leptin significantly enhanced the formation of blastocyst and hatched blastocysts in mice and pigs (Kawamura et al. 2002, Kawamura et al. 2003, Craig et al. 2005). Conversely, Swain et al.(2004) reported that increasing concentrations of murine leptin had no effect on one-cell embryo development, while the study by Fedorcsak & Storeng (2003) showed that even low concentrations of leptin inhibited the proportion of embryos reaching the hatched blastocyst stage as the result of induced DNA fragmentation. These conflicting results may have reflected the differences in the strain or species of experimental animal, the culture conditions of the embryos at different developmental stages or the type of exogenous leptin used.
Therefore, in the present study, we used mice and sheep embryos in an in vitro culture system to examine the effects of leptin on pre-implantation embryonic development and to determine if there were any difference in sensitivities to leptin among embryos at different stages of development or embryos from different breeds of animal. To eliminate environmental effects on an embryos gene expression, mouse embryos that were fertilized and developed in vivo were collected at different developmental stages. Leptin and its receptor expression in pre-implantation embryos were then investigated to provide molecular evidence for the leptin effect on embryo development.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sheep embryos were collected from fine wool Merino ewes (UNE rural properties, NSW, Australia). The oestrous cycle of ewes was synchronized by the insertion of controlled internal drug release pessaries (CIDR, containing 0.3 g progesterone; Horizon Pty Ltd, Vic., Australia) for a 13-day period with a renewal on the sixth day of treatment. To induce superovulation, a combination of both PMSG and ovine FSH (in-house preparation) was administrated intramuscularly during the last 3 days before the removal of CIDR. Two rams of proven fertility harnessed with marking crayons were placed with a group of 5 ewes 1 day after CIDR removal. Embryos were surgically collected 48 h after the ewes had been marked. Ewes were deprived of food and water 12 h prior to the surgery. On the day of surgery, animals were injected with 0.2 ml Rompun (Bayer, Australia Ltd., Botany, NSW, Australia) and 0.1 ml Ketamine (Parke-Davis, Caringbah, NSW, Australia) 5 min prior to surgery. Gas anaesthesia was induced using oxygen and 4% halothane to the animal. When the ewe had reached a satisfactory depth of anaesthesia and had stabilized, this state was maintained by reducing the halothane to 2.5% gas mixture. The uterine horns and ovaries were then exteriorized and an 18-gauge needle was inserted in the uterus at the utero-tubule junction and approximately 10 ml of Dulbeccos phosphate buffered solution (Horizon Pty Ltd, Australia) containing 3% BSA (v/v) was flushed through the oviduct into a tube (1.5 mm in diameter optical density, OD), which had been introduced via the fimbrae. Flushing fluids were collected in 5 cm Petri dishes and embryos were recovered. The flushing medium and dishes were pre-warmed in an incubator at 37 °C.
All the animal experimentation in this study was approved by the University of New England Animal Ethics Committee and in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia guidelines for animal experimentation.
Embryo culture in vitro
Human tubal fluid (HTF) medium (Quinn et al. 1985) was prepared in advance using chemicals from Sigma. Mouse embryos at the two-cell stage were collected by flushing the oviducts of mated animals 42 h after hCG injection. Embryos were collected and then washed in three changes of M2 (Sigma) media. The embryos were randomly divided into groups of 1825 and transferred into a 25 µl drop of HTF medium. Drops of culture medium were placed in a culture dish (Nunclon, Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and covered with mineral oil (Sigma) and pre-incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 30 min. In each experiment, 4560 embryos were employed and the experiment was repeated five times. Media and leptin were replaced every 24 h by removing 20 µl of media and replacing it with 20 µl media supplemented with fresh leptin.
Sheep embryos at the two-cell stage were collected surgically and washed in three changes of synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF) medium supplemented with 8 mg/ml BSA (Steeves & Gardner 1999). Embryos were cultured in 25 µl droplets of culture medium in a 24-well plate covered with mineral oil in groups of 35. All media were equilibrated in the culture dishes in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in air at 39 °C for 30 min. For the first 48 h of culture, SOF + 1 mM Glu + 1% non-essential amino acids was used, and for the last 72 h of culture, SOF + 1 mM Glu + 1% non-essential amino acids + 1% Eagles minimum essential medium essential amino acids without Glu was used.
Determination of cell numbers in embryo
Embryo cell numbers were determined by the air-drying method. Briefly, embryos were put into a hypotonic solution 1 and 0.5% sodium citrate for 20 and 10 min respectively. They were then transferred to a methanol: acetic acid (3:1, v:v) solution for a further 510 min. Embryos were transferred to a microscope slide in a minimal amount of mixture of methanol and acetic acid. Before drying of fixative was complete, 12 drops 60% acetic acid was added to facilitate embryo spreading. After staining with 5% Giemsa (Currs R66 Improved; BDH Chemical, Poole, Dorset, UK) solution for 5 min, the total cell numbers were counted under a microscope.
RNA extraction and RT-PCR
Mice embryos at the two-, four- and eight-cell stages were collected by flushing the oviducts of mated animals at 42, 52 and 66 h after hCG injection with M2 medium. The blastocysts were collected from the uterus at 90 h of hCG injection. Fifty to 100 embryos were washed in three changes of the medium and then transferred into 0.8 ml of TRIzol reagent containing 50 µg of carrier RNA (yeast tRNA; Sigma). Samples were then homogenized by vigorous shaking by hand (Stojanov & ONeill 1999). The detection of mRNA for leptin and leptin receptor in embryos was subjected to 45 cycles of PCR condition. The primers for leptin, Ob-Ra and Ob-Rb, were made based on published sequences as shown in Table 1
and all PCR conditions were listed in Table 2
. Experiments were repeated three times on three separate pools of embryos at each stage and the tissues from three different animals. All PCR products were sequenced to confirm their identity and negative controls were run with water substituted for cDNA and PCR performed prior to RT (data not shown).
|
|
Experiment 2: determination of the sensitivity of mouse embryos to leptin
The aim of this experiment was to determine the stage of embryo development, which was affected by leptin. Embryos at the two-cell stage were cultured in HTF medium in vitro for 0, 24, or 48 h to obtain two-, four-, or eight-cell embryos respectively. Embryos at each developmental stage were then cultured in HTF-containing leptin at concentrations of 0, 10 or 100 ng/ml. The numbers of embryos that developed to four-cell stage embryos, eight-cell stage embryos, blastocysts and hatched blastocysts were counted at 72, 96, 120, and 144 h post-hCG respectively. A preliminary experiment showed that leptin treatment at the eight-cell stage tended to accelerate blastocyst formation, so the percentages of eight-cell stage embryos that developed to blastocysts were assessed at 116 and 120 h post-hCG and hatched blastocysts were counted at 138 and 144 h post-hCG respectively. A sub-sample of the blastocysts (n=5) that developed in each treatment was collected at 120 h post-hCG and their total number of cells counted, as previously described.
Experiment 3: effect of leptin on sheep embryo
Experiment 3 was conducted to determine the effect of leptin on early sheep embryonic development. Two-cell stage sheep embryos were cultured in SOF medium containing leptin at concentrations of 0, 1, 10 and 100 ng/ml. The percentage of two-cell stage embryos that developed to four-, eight-cell embryo, morula, blastocysts and hatched blastocyst was assessed at 24, 48, 96, 120 and 144 h of culture respectively.
Statistical analysis
Overall effects of treatments were evaluated by the General Linear Model procedure and followed by StudentNewmanKeals test for multiple comparisons using the SAS statistical software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Differences of P < 0.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Sensitivity of embryos to leptin
To determine whether the sensitivity to leptin varied at different stages of development, embryos at two-, four-and eight-cell stages were treated with leptin at concentrations of 10 and 100 ng/ml. When embryos were exposed to leptin treatment at the two-cell stage, results similar to those observed in Experiment 1 were obtained (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 2A
, the addition of 10 ng/ml leptin at the four-cell stage had no effect on the eight-cell stage embryo formation compared with the control. However, leptin stimulated the development rate of the blastocyst and hatched blastocyst and the corresponding rates were 85 and 69% respectively, which differed significantly (P< 0.05) from the control. A leptin concentration of 100 ng/ml inhibited the formation of eight-cell embryos although this was not significant. The development into the blastocyst as well as blastocyst hatching was significantly impaired compared with the control.
|
Preliminary experimental results showed that leptin treatment at the eight-cell stage tended to accelerate blastocyst formation, the percentage of eight-cell stage embryos that developed to blastocysts were assessed at 116 and 120 h post-hCG and hatched blastocysts were counted at 138 and 144 h post-hCG respectively. As shown in Fig. 3
, 10 ng/ml leptin treatment significantly accelerated the formation of blastocysts (P< 0.05), with 35% of total blastocyst formed by 116 h post-hCG, while only 10% developed to blastocyst in the control group. Treatment with 100 ng/ml leptin tended to promote cell proliferation and advance blastocyst formation, with 16% of blastocyst formed by this time, which was not significantly (P> 0.05) different from the control.
|
The total numbers of cells in blastocysts obtained by cultures containing 10 or 100 ng/ml leptin, when supplemented at the two-, four- and eight-cell stages are shown in Table 3
. The supplementation of 10 ng/ml leptin at all three stages significantly increased (P< 0.05) the total cell number of blastocysts in the treatment group when compared with the control. In contrast, the supplementation of 100 ng/ml leptin at the two- and four-cell stages significantly reduced (P< 0.05) the total cell number of blastocysts when compared with the control; however, this concentration had no effect on the total cell number of blastocysts when added at the eight-cell stage.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Contradictory findings have been reported with respect to leptins effects on embryo development in the in vitro culture. In agreement with our observations, it has been reported that the 10 ng/ml leptin significantly increased the development rate of two-cell stage embryos into blastocysts and hatched blastocysts (Kawamura et al. 2002, 2003). In the present study, the 100 ng/ml leptin treatment exhibited an inhibitory effect on two-cell embryos, while Kawamura and co-workers (2002, 2003) found that leptin, at concentrations of 100 and 1000 ng/ml, produced a further stimulatory effect on embryo development. One possible explanation for the difference is that the Kawamura et al. (2002, 2003) studies used the IVCS strain of mouse, in contrast to the Swiss random-bred strain used in our study. Serum leptin concentrations are reported to differ between various strains of rats, with the variation up to two times, suggesting that different genetic background can affect the circulating leptin levels (Landt et al. 1998). If this was the case in the mouse, it is possible that there are different thresholds existing in tissues and cells with respect to leptin sensitivity in various strains of mice. Another possible explanation is that the different types of leptin used in the two experiments, since exogenous recombinant human leptin has a half-life period of 1 h in the circulation of mice (Chehab et al. 1997), whereas injected mouse recombinant leptin in fasted mice had a half-life period of 3 h (Ahima et al. 1996). Interestingly, in complete contrast to the findings of Kawamura et al. (2002, 2003) and present study, two recent studies showed that leptin treatment neither influences embryo development or degeneration (Swain et al. 2004), nor inhibited the proportion of embryos reaching the hatched blastocyst stage through increased apoptosis (Fedorcsak & Storeng 2003). Therefore, the discrepancies of results in those studies could not be simply interpreted by the above explanations as these utilized mouse embryos and mouse recombinant leptin (Fedorcsak & Storeng 2003, Swain et al. 2004). Particularly puzzling are the results by Fedorcsak & Storeng (2003), who showed that leptin concentrations of 1.6 to 160 ng/ml exhibited an inhibitory effect on embryo development, which cover the range of physiological levels of leptin in mice. These are in contrast with the concept that there is a timely requirement of leptin for a successful pregnancy in mice (Malik et al. 2001).
This study demonstrated that, while leptin may have a regulatory role in pre-implantation embryo development, it also modulates cell proliferation in mouse embryos. Blastocysts cultured with 10 ng/ml of leptin at two-, four-, and eight-cell stages had a significantly higher total cell number as compared with blastocysts cultured in the control group. Furthermore, we also observed that the 10 ng/ml leptin treatment advanced the formation of blastocysts when leptin was added at the eight-cell stage. This may be due to the effect of leptin in promoting cell proliferation throughout the early development of mouse embryos. These results are consistent with the observations in this study that leptin influences the development rates, suggesting that leptin regulates embryo development via cell proliferation. It has also been reported that leptin increased the total cell number of blastocysts, especially the trophectoderm cells, which are necessary for implantation and form the placenta and extrayyembryonic membranes (Kawamura et al. 2002, Craig et al. 2005). Collectively, these results provide the evidence for the mechanism by which leptin regulates implantation.
The developmental period during which the addition of leptin to culture medium affected mouse embryo development in vitro in the present study (prior to the blastocyst) seems to coincide with the period during which mouse embryos are present in the oviduct in vivo. Previous studies (Gonzalez et al. 2000, Kawamura et al. 2002) have shown that leptin is produced by oviduct epithelial cells in mice, so the addition of leptin to embryo culture in vitro may reproduce the environment of the cleavage-stage embryos in the oviduct in vivo. The requirement of leptin for embryo development changes during the gestational period, with lower levels being beneficial in the early embryogenesis and higher levels in the later stages. This concentration and stage-specific effect of leptin may explain, at least in part, why women with a low leptin body mass index ratio had significantly more superior quality embryos on day 3 post-retrieval (Brannian et al. 2001), while the patients with higher leptin concentrations at 12 days after embryo transfer had a higher potential for pregnancy (Unkila-Kallio et al. 2001). This may also explain in part why the pre-implantation uterine environment is normally hostile to pre-morula-stage embryos and blastocysts fail to survive in the non-receptive uterine environment (Paria et al. 1993).
Sheep embryos
The time of embryonic genome activation differs among rodents and ruminant embryos and it is believed that this is associated with the in vitro culture-induced developmental block (Thompson 2000). In addition, leptin and the leptin receptor system in rodent pregnancy differ significantly from that in both human, non-human primates (Henson & Castracane 2005) and ruminants (Chilliard et al. 2005). Therefore, we examined the leptin effect on sheep embryo development in vitro and obtained similar results as that seen in the mouse embryo culture experiment. The leptin treatment (10 ng/ml) was found to be more effective in stimulating the two-cell stage sheep embryos developing into morula, blastocyst and hatched blastocyst. The treatment of 1 ng/ml leptin also significantly increased the percentage of blastocyst and hatched blastocyst formation in sheep embryo culture, which was not observed in mouse embryo, suggesting that there may be a different sensitivity to leptin existing among embryos from different species.
Considerable information is available concerning the effect of nutrition on ovulation and embryo development in the sheep. Increased dietary intake for a relatively short time prior to mating increased the ovulation rate and oocyte quality, and consequently produced good quality embryos in sheep. However, high nutrition resulted in a negative effect on oocyte quality and resulted in decreased pregnancy rates (Boland & OCallaghan 1999, 1999). in vivo leptin levels are influenced by energy balance with an elevation in plasma leptin following an increase in the plane of nutrition of ewes (Blache et al. 2000b). The nutritional switch-over study in sheep also revealed that maternal leptin levels increased 65% within 48 h after the dietary switch, and is independent of the changes in adipose tissue mass (Thomas et al. 2001). These data suggest that leptin may be an important factor in regulating early pregnancy and the requirement of this hormone appears to be within a limited range, with too much or too little being detrimental to oocyte quality and embryo development. Similar to mouse embryo, our results of leptin effects on sheep embryo development provide evidence for this concept by showing that physiological levels of leptin promote early embryo development, whereas high concentrations of leptin inhibit this process.
Leptin and leptin receptors in the embryo
In the present study, leptin mRNA was not detected in the two-, four-, eight-cell stages and blastocyst stage mouse embryos by RT-PCR. Using in situ hybridisation and immunohisto chemistry, a study on the ontogeny of leptin expression in murine foetus has shown that leptin mRNA and protein are expressed in bone, liver and hair follicles as early as day 13.5 post-coitus, indicating that leptin expression in the foetus starts from mid-gestation (Hoggard et al. 1997). However, leptin mRNA expression was detected in the mouse blastocyst and hatched blastocyst stage embryos (Kawamura et al. 2002).
We have detected both Ob-Ra and Ob-Rb mRNA expressions in the two-cell to blastocyst stage embryos. Similarly, mRNA for Ob-Ra and Ob-Rb was reported in mouse oocytes, one-, two-cell, morula, blastocyst and hatched blastocyst stages but not four- and eight-cell stage embryos (Kawamura et al. 2002, 2003). However, we were able to detect the expression of mRNAs for Ob-Ra and Ob-Rb in the four- and eight-cell stage mouse embryos in the present study. Several lines of evidence from mouse and cattle data indicate that gene expression patterns in the embryo are affected by in vitro culture conditions, especially by the presence or absence of serum in the culture medium (Niemann & Wrenzycki 2000). We employed embryos developed in vivo, whilst these authors collected in vivo two-cell stage embryos and cultured them to four- and eight-cell stages in vitro, from which embryo mRNA was extracted. Therefore, it is likely that the environment which the embryos find themselves in, may modulate leptin receptor expression and have contributed to the differing results where there was approximately a 30% blastocyst formation rate in their study (Kawamura et al. 2002), compared with 65% in our experiment. This is supported in part by the observation that improved media such as KSOM yield higher blastocyst formation rates (Erbach et al. 1994).
The secreted form of the leptin receptor, Ob-Re, circulates in plasma and is capable of binding to leptin (Gavrilova et al. 1997). Leptin binds to Ob-Re with a high affinity thereby delaying the clearance of leptin from circulation and increasing the half-life period of leptin. Consequently, hyperleptinemia is generally observed in late pregnancy in the mouse (Gavrilova et al. 1997). To our knowledge, the results of this study show for the first time that mRNA for the leptin-soluble form receptor (Ob-Re) is present in the two-, four-, eight-and blastocyst stage mouse embryos. Considering the presence of leptin protein in both mouse and human oocytes and embryos, which is suggested to be critical for the establishment of inner cell mass and trophoblast development, in conjunction with the absent expression of leptin mRNA in embryos during this period (Antczak & Vanblerkom 1997, present study), the availability and transportation of leptin seems to be important for embryo development before the blastocyst stage. Therefore, our results present the possibility that leptin modulates embryo development via a paracrine signalling system, with the assistance of Ob-Re to delay the clearance of leptin, or indeed increase the local concentration of leptin in these cells.
Signal transducers and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins, known to be involved in transcriptional regulation, are implicated in the mechanism of leptin signal transduction (Antczak & Vanblerkom 1997). Leptin may influence tissue- and cell-specific gene expression within the reproductive systems through the JAK/STAT pathway (Baumann et al. 1996, Bendinelli et al. 2000). Leptin and STAT-3 are differentially distributed within the cells of pre-implantation stage embryos (Antczak & Vanblerkom 1997, Fedorcsak & Storeng 2003), hence leptin may regulate embryo development by influencing the activity of STAT-3 to control DNA-directed mRNA synthesis or DNA fragmentation.
Since the mRNA expression for Ob-Ra, Ob-Rb and Ob-Re in two-, four-, eight-cell and blastocyst stage embryos was observed consistently, we could not provide a satisfactory explanation, in the context of leptin and leptin receptor interaction, for the mechanism by which leptin affects embryo development in a concentration and stage-dependent manner. Unfortunately, we were unable to measure quantitative change in the mRNA expression for these different isoforms. It is important to acknowledge, however, that the changes in the number of mRNA copies for these different isoforms of leptin receptor in embryo during pre-implantation developmental stages, may contribute to the concentration and stage-dependent leptin effect on the embryos growth. However, a similar stimulatory and inhibitory response to leptin was observed by Yu et al.(1997) in a study on the release of gonadotrophins from pituitary cultures. Finally, Wang et al.(2004) and Hamatani et al.(2004) using microarray analysis of RNA amplified from one-cell mouse embryos through to blastocysts have demonstrated the expression of leptin and its receptor in these samples. However, confirmation of the expression of leptin and its receptor by real-time PCR or in situ hybridisation assays were not reported in these studies.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ahima RS, Prabakaran D, Mantzoros C, Qu DQ, Lowell B, Maratosflier E & Flier JS 1996 Role of leptin in the neuroendocrine response to fasting. Nature 382 250252.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ahima RS & Flier JS 2000 Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 11 327332.[CrossRef]
Ahmed ML, Ong KKL, Watts AP, Morrell DJ, Preece MA & Bunger DB 2001 Elevated leptin levels are associated with excess gains in fat mass in girls, but not boys, with type 1 diabetes: Longitudinal study during adolescence. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 11881193.
Antczak M & Van Blerkom J 1997 Oocyte Influences on early developmentthe regulatory proteins leptin and Stat3 are polarized in mouse and human oocytes and differentially distributed within the cells of the preimplantation stage embryo. Molecular Human Reproduction 3 10671086.
Arslanian S, Suprasongsin C, Kalhan SC, Drash AL, Brna R & Janosky JE 1998 Plasma leptin in childrenrelationship to puberty, gender, body composition, insulin sensitivity, and energy expenditure. Metabolism: Clinical & Experimental 47 309312.
Baumann H, Morella KK, White DW, Dembski M, Bailon PS, Kim HK, Lai CF & Tartaglia LA 1996 The full-length leptin receptor has signalling capabilities of interleukin 6-type cytokine receptors. PNAS 93 83748378.
Bennett BD, Solar GP, Yuan JQ, Mathias J, Thomas GR & Matthews W 1996 A role for leptin and its cognate receptor in hematopoiesis. Current Biology 6 11701180.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Blache D, Tellam RL, Chagas LM, Blackberry MA, Vercoe PE & Martin GB 2000 Level of nutrition affects leptin concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in sheep. Journal of Endocrinology 165 625637.[Abstract]
Boland MP & OCallaghan D 1999 Nutrition and early embryonic development. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 34 127132.[Web of Science]
Brannian JD, Schmidt SM, Kreger DO & Hansen KA 2001 Baseline non-fasting serum leptin concentration to body mass index ratio is predictive of IVF outcomes. Human Reproduction 16 18191826.
Cervero A, Horcajadas JA, Dominguez F, Pellicer A & Simon C 2005 Leptin system in embryo development and implantation: a protein in search of a function. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10 217223.[Web of Science][Medline]
Chehab FF, Lim ME & Lu RH 1996 Correction of the sterility defect in homozygous obese female mice by treatment with the human recombinant leptin. Nature Genetics 12 318320.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Chehab FF 1997 The reproductive side of leptin. Nature Medicine 3 952953.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Chilliard Y, Delavaud C & Bonnet M 2005 Leptin expression in ruminants: Nutritional and physiological regulations in relation with energy metabolism. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 29 322.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cioffi JA, Vanblerkom J, Antczak M, Shafer A, Wittmer S & Snodgrass HR 1997 The Expression of Leptin and Its Receptors in Pre-Ovulatory Human Follicles. Molecular Human Reproduction 3 467472.
Craig JA, Zhu H, Dyce PW, Wen L & Li J 2005 Leptin enhances porcine preimplantation embryo devolvement in vitro. Molecular and Cell Endocrinology 229 141147.[CrossRef]
Cunningham MJ, Clifton DK, Robert A & Steiner RA 1999 Leptins actions on the reproductive axis: perspectives and mechanisms. Biology of Reproduction 60 216222.
Devaskar SU, Ollesch C, Rajakumar RA & Rajakumar PA 1997 Developmental changes in ob gene expression and circulating leptin peptide concentrations. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications 238 4447.[CrossRef]
Erbach GT, Lawitts JA, Papaioannou VE & Biggers JD 1994 Differential growth of the mouse preimplantation embryo in chemically defined media. Biology of Reproduction 50 10271033.[Abstract]
Fedorcsák P & Storeng R 2003 Effects of leptin and leukemia inhibitory factor on preimplantation development and STAT3 signaling of mouse embryos in vitro. Biology of Reproduction 69 15311538.
Gavrilova O, Barr V, Marcus-Samuels B & Reitman M 1997 Hyperleptinemia of pregnancy associated with the appearance of a circulating form of the leptin receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272 3054630551.
Gonzalez RR, Caballero-Campo P, Jasper M, Mercader A, Devoto L, Pellicer A & Simon C 2000 Leptin and leptin receptor are expressed in the human endometrium and endometrial leptin secretion is regulated by the human blastocysts. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 85 48834888.
Hamatani T, Daikoku T, Wang H, Matsumoto H, Carter CM, Ko SHM & Dey KS 2004 Global gene expression analysis identifies molecular pathways distinguishing blastocyst dormancy and activation. PNAS 101 1032610331.
Hardie L, Trayhurn P, Abramovich D & Fowler P 1997 Circulating leptin in womena longitudinal study in the menstrual cycle and during pregnancy. Clinical Endocrinology 47 101106.[CrossRef][Medline]
Henson MC & Castracane VD 2005 Leptin in pregnancy: an update. Biology of Reproduction 2005 (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.105. 045120).
Hoggard N, Mercer JG, Rayner DV, Moar K, Trayhurn P & Williams LM 1997 Localization of leptin receptor mRNA splice variants in murine peripheral tissues by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications 232 383387.[CrossRef]
Holness M, Munns MJ & Sugden MC 1999 Current concepts concerning the role of leptin in reproductive function. Molecular & Cellular Endocrinology 157 1120.[CrossRef]
Jones N & Ainsworth-Harrisson G 1957 Genetically determined obesity and sterility in the mouse. Study of Fertility 9 5164.
Kawamura K, Sato N, Fukuda J, Kodama H, Kumagai J, Tanikawa H, Nakamura A & Tanaka T 2002 Leptin promotes the development of mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro. Endocrinology 143 19221931.
Kawamura K, Sato N, Fukuda J, Kodama H, Kumagai J, Tanikawa H, Nakamura A & Tanaka T 2003 The role of leptin during the development of mouse preimplantation embryos. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 202 185189.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kim HS, Lee GS, Kim JH, Kang SK, Lee BC & Hwang WS 2005 Expression of leptin ligand and receptor and effect of exogenous leptin supplementation on in vitro development of porcine in vitro fertilized and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Reproduction Fertility and Development 17 220221.
Landt M, Gingerich RL, Havel PJ, Mueller WM, Schoner B, Hale JE & Heiman ML 1998 Radioimmunoassay of rat leptinsexual dimorphism reversed from humans. Clinical Chemistry 44 565570.
Lukaszuk K, Liss J, Kusiak E & Wojcikowski C 1998 Serum leptin concentration increase during luteal phase in healthy premenopausal women. Hormone & Metabolic Research 30 172173.
Madeja Z, Lechniak D, Peippo J & Switonski M 2005 The distribution of the leptin protein within bovine oocytes and pre-implantation embryos mature and fertilized in vitro. Reproduction Fertility and Development 17 207.
Malik NM, Carter ND, Murray JF, Scaramuzzi RJ, Wilson CA & Stock MJ 2001 Leptin requirement for conception, implantation, and gestation in the mouse. Endocrinology 142 51985202.
Mistry AM, Swick A & Romsos DR 1999 Leptin alters metabolic rates before acquisition of its anorectic effect in developing neonatal mice. American Journal of PhysiologyRegulatory Integrative & Comparative Physiology 46 R742R747.
Mounzih K, Lu RH & Chehab FF 1997 Leptin treatment rescues the sterility of genetically obese ob/ob males. Endocrinology 138 11901193.
Niemann H & Wrenzycki C 2000 Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development. Theriogenology 53 2134.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Paria BC, Huet-Hudson YM & Dey SK 1993 Blastocysts state of activity determines the window of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus. PNAS 90 1015910162.
Quinn P, Kerin JF & Waners GM 1985 Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertility and Sterility 44 493498.[Web of Science][Medline]
Steeves TE & Gardner DK 1999 Temporal and differential effects of amino acids on bovine embryo development in culture. Biology of Reproduction 61 731740.
Swain JE, Dunn RL, McConnell D, Gonzalez-Martinez J & Smith GD 2004 Direct effects of leptin on mouse reproductive function: regulation of follicular, oocyte, and embryo development. Biology of Reproduction 71 14461452.
Thompson JGE, Simpson AC, Pugh PA, Wright RW Jr & Tervit HR 1991 Glucose utilization by sheep embryos derived in vivo and in vitro. Reproduction Fertility and Development 3 571576.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thompson JG 2000 In vitro culture and embryo metabolism of cattle and sheep embryoa decade of achievement. Animal Reproduction Science 6061 263275.
Tomimatsu T, Yamaguchi M, Murakami T, Ogura K, Sakata M, Mitsuda N, Kanzaki T, Kurachi H, Irahara M, Miyake A, Shima K, Aono T & Murata Y 1997 Increase of mouse leptin production by adipose tissue after midpregnancygestational profile of serum leptin concentration. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 240 213215.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Unkila-Kallio L, Andersson S, Koistinen HA, Karonen SL, Ylikorkala O & Tiitinen A 2001 Leptin during assisted reproductive cycles: the effect of ovarian stimulation and of very early pregnancy. Human Reproduction 16 657662.
Urbanski HF 2001 Leptin and puberty. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 12 428429.[CrossRef]
Wang QT, Piotrowska K, Ciemerych MA, Milenkovic L, Scott MP, Davis RW & Zernicka-Goetz M 2004 A genome-wide study of gene activity reveals developmental signaling pathways in the preim-plantation mouse embryo. Developmental Cell 6 133144.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yu WH, Kimura M, Walczewska A, Karanth S & McCann SM 1997 Role of leptin in hypothalamic-pituitary function. PNAS 94 10231028.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. M. van Mourik, N. S. Macklon, and C. J. Heijnen Embryonic implantation: cytokines, adhesion molecules, and immune cells in establishing an implantation environment J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2009; 85(1): 4 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Nath, R. M. Brown, M. Michaud, M. R. Sierra-Honigmann, M. Snyder, and J. A. Madri Leptin affects endocardial cushion formation by modulating EMT and migration via Akt signaling cascades J. Cell Biol., April 21, 2008; 181(2): 367 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |