| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Correspondence should be addressed to R Shalgi; Email: shalgir{at}post.tau.ac.il
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
) prevented both MARCKS translocation and CGE in 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-activated eggs. We have further shown that upon egg activation the amount of phosphorylated MARCKS (p-MARCKS) and the amount of calmodulin bound to MARCKS were increased. MARCKS translocation in ionomycin activated eggs was also inhibited by the calmodulin inhibitor N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-napthalenesulfonamide hydrochloride (W7). These results complement other studies showing MARCKS requirement for exocytosis and imply that upon fertilization, MARCKS translocation is followed by CGE. These findings present a significant contribution to our understanding of CGE in mammalian eggs in particular, as well as cellular exocytosis in general. |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
The observation that myristoylated PKC pseudosubstrate (myrPKC
), which is a specific PKC inhibitor, inhibited TPA-induced CGE, led to the conclusion that exocytosis can be triggered by two independent pathways: either [Ca2+]i increase or PKC (Eliyahu & Shalgi 2002).
Recent studies demonstrate that the PKC activity pattern in Xenopus eggs, imitates closely the pattern of [Ca2+]i transients (Larabell et al. 2004). In the mouse, cPKC translocates to the egg membrane at fertilization in a pattern that is shaped by the amplitude, duration and frequency of the Ca2+ transients (Halet et al. 2004).
PKC is known to associate with cytoskeletal elements and/or to phosphorylate them (Inagaki et al. 1987). In a previous work we have shown that actin is homogenously distributed throughout the cytosol of MII eggs and is also localized at the cortex of the egg, mainly above the meiotic spindle (Eliyahu et al. 2005). Exposure of eggs to TPA caused a time- dependent depolymerization/reorganization of actin. Drugs that cause polymerization or depolymerization of actin (jasplakinolide and cytochalasin D (CD) respectively) neither induce CGE nor prevent it. However, CD but not jasplakinolide in the presence of TPA, doubled the percentage of eggs undergoing complete CGE as compared with TPA alone (Eliyahu et al. 2005). These results suggest that cortical granules are retained at the cortex not solely by actin, but rather by a network of proteins.
Evidence from several cell types suggests that F-actin is associated with myristoylated alanin-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS), thus acting as a barrier for excluding the cortical granules from the plasma membrane, and preventing exocytosis (Rosen et al. 1990, Aderem 1992, Swierczynski & Blackshear 1995, Rossi et al. 1999). MARCKS cross-links actin filaments and anchors the actin network to the plasma membrane (Hartwig et al. 1992, Rossi et al. 1999). It is suggested that phosphorylation of MARCKS by PKC, or that interaction of MARCKS with CaM, causes its translocation from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm and its disassembly from the actin filaments, thus allowing the secretory vesicles to fuse with the plasma membrane (Porumb et al. 1997, Arbuzova et al. 1998, 2002, Danks et al. 1999, Vaaraniemi et al. 1999, Wohnsland et al. 2000). MARCKS was recently demonstrated to be expressed in rat (Eliyahu et al. 2005) and mouse eggs (Michaut et al. 2005), and to be colocalized with actin at the plasma membrane (Eliyahu et al. 2005).
To further study the role of Ca2+ and PKC during egg activation, and to evaluate the significance of MARCKS and CaM during fertilization, we pursued several research avenues, designed to answer the following questions: (1) Does MARCKS translocate during parthenogenetic activation and/or during in vivo fertilization? (2) Is CaM expressed in the rat egg? If so, where is it localized? (3) Does MARCKS associate with CaM during egg activation? (4) Do the inhibitors of PKC or of CaM prevent MARCKS translocation, CGE or RMII? Answering these questions may facilitate the design of a flowchart that depicts various proteins that are involved in egg activation, in general, and in CGE, in particular.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
MII eggs
For induction of ovulation, 25- to 27-day-old immature Wistar-derived female rats were injected with 10 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Sigma), 48–54 h after administration of 10 IU pregnant mares’ serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Syncro-part, France). Rats were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 14 h after hCG admini stration. Cumulus-enclosed MII eggs were isolated from the oviductal ampullae into TH medium (Ben-Yosef et al. 1995), supplemented with 0.4% BSA (Sigma). Cumulus cells were removed by a brief exposure to 400 IU/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma).
In vivo inseminated eggs and embryos
hCG-injected female rats were caged overnight with fertile males. Rats were killed 15 h after hCG administration. Egg collection and cumulus cells removal were performed as described above for MII eggs. The eggs were classified according to the various stages of fertilization: sperm binding (SB), fertilization cone (FC) and PBII stages corresponding to 0–15, 15–60 and 60–180 min after sperm attachment respectively. The time after sperm attachment that these stages were observed is deduced from a previous work on in vitro fertilization (Eliyahu & Shalgi 2002).
Parthenogenetic activation
MII-ovulated eggs were parthenogenetically activated by adding three different activators to the incubation medium, all of which are capable of inducing full CGE in rat eggs (Eliyahu & Shalgi 2002).
Ionomycin activation
A 3-min incubation in the presence of 2 µM calcium ionophore (ionomycin 407950, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) followed by an additional 0-, 2-, 7- or 17-min incubation in fresh medium lacking the activator. A stock solution of 10 mM ionomycin in DMSO was prepared and kept at 4 °C.
TPA activation
A 5-min incubation in the presence of 30–50 ng/ml TPA (Sigma) followed by an additional 0-, 5- or 15-min incubation in fresh medium lacking the activator. A stock solution of 1 mg/ml TPA in DMSO was prepared and kept at –20 °C.
OAG activation
A 3-min incubation in the presence of 20 µg/ml OAG (Sigma) followed by an additional 0-, 2-, 7- or 17-min incubation in fresh medium lacking the activator. A stock solution of 1 mg/ml OAG in DMSO was prepared and kept at –20 °C.
Inhibition of PKC/CaM activity
For inhibiting PKC or CaM, eggs were incubated for 30 min in the presence of either 35 µM myrPKC (amino acid 19–27; Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA), or 25 µM N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide hydrochloride (W7; Sigma) respectively. Eggs were then activated for 5 min by either ionomycin or TPA at the same concentrations and for the same duration as described in the previous paragraph. Stock solutions of 1 mM myrPKC and 5 mM W7 were prepared in distilled, deionized water and stored at –20 or 4 °C respectively.
Antibodies
Primary antibodies
Anti-MARCKS goat polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) (N-19, sc-6454; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA); MARCKS peptide (N-19; Santa Cruz); anti-phosphorylated-MARCKS rabbit polyclonal IgG (Ser159/163-R, sc-12971-R; Santa Cruz); anti-CaM rabbit polyclonal IgG (FL-149, sc-5537; Santa Cruz); anti-actin rabbit polyclonal IgG (A-5060; Sigma).
Secondary antibodies
Goat anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase (sc-2004; Santa Cruz); donkey anti-goat IgG-peroxidase (33254; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA); donkey anti-goat IgG-Cy-2 (52649; Jackson); donkey anti-rabbit IgG-Cy-2 (51782; Jackson).
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
We prepared an immobilized antibody affinity reagent for immunoprecipitation (IP), according to Talmor et al.(1998). Batches of 500–1000 eggs, that had either been or not been subjected to activating agents, were lysed in 100 µl NP-40 lysis buffer (IP buffer; Talmor et al. 1998) and kept at –70 °C. Upon thawing, the eggs lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C in the presence of 10 µl of an immobilized antibody (25% suspension) and then washed by centrifugation with IP buffer. Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions. Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Biotiace NT; Gelman, USA) using a wet blotting apparatus (Hoeffer, San Francisco, CA, USA). For immunoblot analysis, blots were blocked with Tris-buffered saline containing 5% dry milk (Talmor et al. 1998) and incubated for 18 h at 4 °C with either polyclonal antibody to anti p-MARKCS (1:200; Ser159/163-R, sc-12971-R; Santa Cruz) or anti-actin rabbit polyclonal IgG (1:250; A5060; Sigma) or anti-CaM I rabbit polyclonal IgG (1:200; sc-5537; Santa Cruz) in blocking solution. Bound antibodies were recognized by secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Detection was performed by an ECL detection system (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Approximate molecular masses were determined by comparison with the migration of pre-stained protein standards (Amersham). Densitometric analysis was performed utilizing the Fuji film thermal imaging system (FTI-500; Japan). Quantitation analysis was performed by computerized densitometer analysis (TINA version 2).
Immunofluorescence staining and laser-scanning confocal microscopy
Fixation of eggs
Eggs at various developmental stages were fixed for 10 min at room temperature in 3% paraformaldehyde in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), supplemented with 0.01% glutaraldehyde, and then washed in a solution of 3% fetal calf serum (Biological Industries, Beit-Haemek, Israel) in DPBS (DPBS/FCS). Zonae pellucidae (ZP) were removed post-fixation by 0.25% pronase (Sigma) prepared in DPBS/FCS and the ZP-free eggs were washed in DPBS/FCS.
Detection of CGE
Fixed eggs were transferred into DPBS supplemented with 1% BSA (fraction V, Sigma), labeled with 5 µg/ml Lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA)–biotin (B-1045; Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA), which binds specifically to cortical granule exudate (Cherr et al. 1988, Ducibella et al. 1988), washed and labeled with 1 µg/ml Texas Red–streptavidin (SA-5006; Vector). The occurrence of the CGE process was imaged using a laser-scanning confocal microscope. Images were taken at the equatorial plane of the eggs and the percentage of eggs undergoing CGE was calculated. At least three independent experiments (three to four eggs for each group in each experimental day) were performed. The results were statistically analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test.
Permeabilization
The plasma membranes of ZP-free eggs were permeabilized by a 10-min incubation in a solution of 0.05% NP-40 in DPBS/FCS and then washed in 0.005% NP-40 in DPBS/FCS.
Protein labeling
Permeabilized eggs were incubated for 2 h in the presence of anti-MARCKS (1:100). Primary antibodies were detected using a fluorescent-labeled Cy secondary antibody (1:300).
Chromatin labeling and developmental stage assessment
The eggs were incubated for an additional 10 min with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Sigma), as a tool for assessing the chromatin stage. RMII was analyzed by monitoring the separation of the chromosomal dyads and the PBII extrusion. The various stages of fertilization were determined by following the sperm and egg chromatin.
Visualization and photography
Cortical granule exudate, MARCKS and DNA labeling were visualized and photographed by a Zeiss confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (LSM 410; Oberkochen, Germany). The Zeiss LSM 410 is equipped with a 25 mW krypton–argon laser, a 10 mW helium–neon laser (488, 543 and 633 maximum lines) and a u.v. laser (Coherent Inc. Laser Group, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A x 40 numerical aperture/1.2 planapochromat water immersion lens (Axiovert 135 M, Zeiss) was used for all imaging. Eggs were scanned using the CLSM through the Z- axis to visualize a section at the equatorial plane of the egg.
Assessment of protein translocation
For localization of MARCK and CaM, eggs were scanned using the CLSM Z-axis to visualize sections through their equatorial plane and through the cortex. To allow a better observation of the egg cortex, the eggs, already visualized at the equatorial plane, were manually pressed between the slide and the coverslip and rescanned, thus resulting in eggs with larger but variable diameters. Since the slides had to be removed from the confocal microscope stage for pressing, and then put back for rescanning, we were unable to locate the exact prescanned eggs. As a result, the images at the equatorial plane and the cortex are not necessarily of the same egg. Confocal micrographs of three to four eggs from each experimental group were densitometrically analyzed.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
). At the SB stage, MARCKS was observed at the cortical region of the ooplasm, further referred to as ‘egg cortex’ (Fig. 1G and K). MARCKS translocation during the next hour (PBII stage; Fig. 1H and L) was less prominent.
|
). MARCKS translocation was first detected 5 min after exposure to TPA (Fig. 2B and F) or to ionomycin (Fig. 2B' and F') and reached a maximum at 20 min (Fig. 2D and H, and Fig. 2D' and H' respectively), whereas translocation of MARCKS to the cortex of eggs activated by OAG was first detected 3 min after the onset of the activating stimulus (Fig. 2B'' and F'') and reached a maximum at 15 min (Fig. 2D'' and H''). As expected, resumption of the cell cycle was observed after activation by ionomycin (Fig. 2D') or by OAG (Fig. 2D'') but not by TPA (Fig. 2D).
|
). The band of p-MARCKS in TPA-activated eggs appeared stronger than in MII eggs (Fig. 3), thus supporting our hypothesis that MARCKS is phosphorylated by PKC during egg activation.
|
, a PKC inhibitor, prevented both PKC translocation and CGE induced by 30 ng/ml TPA (Eliyahu & Shalgi 2002). To further study the role of PKC in the signal transduction pathways leading to CGE, we stimulated PKC using an experimental design similar to that used in Eliyahy and Shalgi (2002) and followed MARCKS translocation. MII eggs were incubated in the presence of myrPKC, activated by 30 ng/ml TPA in the presence of myrPKC, and then allowed to recover in medium devoid of TPA but containing myrPKC. TPA alone caused a mild translocation of MARCKS (Fig. 4E), which was obliterated by myrPKC (Fig. 4F), thus supporting our hypothesis that PKC activation results in MARCKS translocation. As expected, RMII did not occur in eggs activated by TPA (Fig. 4A–C).
|
Expression and localization of CaM
An important initial step toward understanding the relationship between MARCKS and CaM was the study of CaM expression and localization in the egg. As seen in Fig. 5A, CaM appeared as a strong band with an apparent molecular mass of 17 kDa, which is consistent with the expected molecular mass of CaM protein (Hoeflich & Ikura 2002). The ability of anti-CaM antibody to bind CaM was abolished after 1 h incubation in the presence of 2 µg/ml CaM peptide (not shown). CaM was evenly distributed throughout the cytosol, was present at the plasma membrane and was highly concentrated at the spindle (Fig. 5B).
|
). We performed the following control experiments: (1) immunoprecipitation of IP buffer with the immune complex (Fig. 5C); (2) incubation of the nitrocellulose membrane with any IgG antibody (anti-Src antibody, not shown); (3) incubation of the eggs lysates with any IgG antibody (anti-Src polyclonal antibody) conjugated to protein A sepharose, followed by Western blot analysis using anti-PKC alpha polyclonal antibody (not shown). None of the control groups exhibited MARCKS bands. Our results indicate that, after [Ca2+]i elevation, CaM interacts with MARCKS, either directly or indirectly.
Effect of CaM inhibitor on MARCKS translocation, CGE and RMII
To determine whether CaM activation induces MARCKS translocation, CGE and RMII, we activated the eggs by ionomycin in the presence of a CaM inhibitor (W7), and localized MARCKS by immunohistochemistry.
Ionomycin induced MARCKS translocation from the plasma membrane (Fig. 6D) to the cortex (Fig. 6E) and caused RMII (Fig. 6B). The presence of W7 in the culture medium resulted in inhibition of both MARCKS translocation (Fig. 6F) and RMII (Fig. 6C), possibly indicating the role of CaM activation in triggering both MARCKS translocation and RMII in the eggs.
|
) and RMII (Fig. 8A and B). MII eggs were incubated in the presence of 2.5–25 µM W7, activated by ionomycin in the presence of W7, transferred to TH medium that contained 2.5–25 µM W7 but no ionomycin. Untreated MII eggs served as a negative control for CGE, whereas eggs treated by ionomycin alone served as a positive control (CGE, Fig. 7B; RMII, Fig. 8B). CGE (Fig. 7A) and RMII (Fig. 8A) were inhibited in a dose- dependent manner by W7. Treating eggs with a low concentration of W7 (2.5 µM) inhibited neither CGE nor RMII (CGE, P > 0.6; RMII, P > 0.6). At higher concentrations, W7 had a stronger effect on CGE than on RMII (CGE: P < 0.006 at 5 µM, P < 0.003 at 10 µM; RMII: P > 0.8 at 5 µM, P < 0.036 at 10 µM; Mann–Whitney test). Only at 25 µM W7 were both aspects of egg activation inhibited to the same extend (Figs. 7A and 8A). MII eggs and eggs subjected only to W7 did not undergo CGE (Fig. 7B) or RMII (Fig. 8B). Eggs treated with ionomycin in the presence of W7 presented full inhibition of CGE (Fig. 7B) and of RMII (Fig. 8B), which differed significantly from the positive control eggs (ionomycin activated; CGE, P < 0.006; RMII, P < 0.003).These results lead us to conclude that CGE, RMII and translocation of MARCKS, are processes that depend on activation of PKC and of CaM.
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
MARCKS is highly concentrated at the membrane of MII eggs where it is most probably associated with actin and with the plasma membrane (Eliyahu et al. 2005). During the SB stage, MARCKS migrates to the egg’s cortex, where it remains during the following PBII stage. Our results imply involvement of MARCKS during early events of egg activation, such as CGE, but they do not exclude the possibility of MARCKS involvement during later events, such as PBII formation. To examine the intracellular signaling pathways leading to CGE, eggs were parthenogenetically activated either by PKC activators or via [Ca2+]i rise. OAG triggers [Ca2+]i rise and PKC activation, thus inducing both CGE (Endo et al. 1987, Ducibella et al. 1993) and RMII, whereas TPA – which acts similar to diacylglycerol (DAG; Nishizuka 1986) – activates PKC and thus induces only CGE (Raz et al. 1998a). Ionomycin, which triggers only [Ca2+]i elevation and does not activate PKC, causes both CGE and RMII (Eliyahu & Shalgi 2002). The present study demonstrated translocation of MARCKS during parthenogenetic activation by all three activators: TPA, OAG or ionomycin. OAG triggers faster translocation of MARCKS than TPA or ionomycin. Since OAG causes [Ca2+]i elevation in addition to PKC activation, while TPA does not, and since ionomycin-induced [Ca2+]i elevation does not cause PKC activation (Eliyahu & Shalgi 2002) we may deduce that the OAG-induced [Ca2+]i rise combined with PKC activation, is responsible for the accelerated OAG-induced MARCKS translocation. These results complement our previous study which demonstrated acceleration of PKC alpha translocation when triggered by OAG. Both MARCKS and PKC alpha presented similar kinetics of translocation, although in opposite directions: PKC alpha from the cytosol to the plasma membrane (Eliyahu & Shalgi 2002) and MARCKS from the plasma membrane to the cytosol (current study). Taking these results together, including the observations that MARCKS was phosphorylated after PKC activation and that myrPKC inhibited both MARKCS translocation and CGE in TPA-activated eggs, we suggest that TPA induces CGE by activating PKC via phosphorylation and translocation of MARCKS.
In the current study, we were able to show that, upon egg activation, the amount of p-MARCKS is increased as well as the amount of CaM bound to MARCKS. Recently we have demonstrated that MARCKS is colocalized with actin filaments at the plasma membrane of MII eggs and that actin undergoes reorganization upon egg activation but remains localized at the cortex (Eliyahu et al. 2005). In the current study we demonstrated that upon activation by TPA or ionomycin, MARCKS translocates from the egg membrane to the cortex. Thus, egg activation results in morphological dissociation, between the MARCKS and actin. Co-immunoprecipitation could demonstrate the association between MARCKS and actin at the MII stage and the dissociation between the two upon egg activation. Unfortunately it was not possible to precipitate either MARCKS or actin by any of the available commercial antibodies tested.
In a recent study, Michaut et al.(2005) were unable to detect an increase in the p-MARCKS immunostaining signal of MII eggs treated with TPA, which is known to activate conventional and novel PKCs. Moreover, p-MARCKS was not detected by immunoblot analysis either before or after egg activation by TPA, which led them to suggest that an atypical PKC isoenzyme was responsible for MARCKS phosphorylation. However, we were able to demonstrate, via immunoblot analysis, the expression of p-MARCKS in MII eggs and an increase in its amount during activation by TPA. The discrepancy between the two studies could be attributed to several differences in experimental methodology: number of eggs used for immunoblotting (500 in our study vs 50 in Michaut et al. 2005); use of different antibodies; different species (rat vs mouse) and different protein detection systems (immunoblotting vs immunohistochemistry).
In the current study we demonstrated the expression of CaM, its homogenous distribution throughout the cytoplasm, its localization to the meiotic spindle and the interaction between CaM and MARCKS in MII and in ionomycin-activated eggs. The amount of MARCKS bound to CaM increased after parthenogenetic activation, although, in our previous study (Eliyahu et al. 2005) we demonstrated a decrease in the total amount of MARKCS in eggs activated by ionomycin or TPA, which was not revealed by immunohistochemistry. There might be several putative explanations for this discrepancy. Firstly, it is possible that the decrease in the amount of MARCKS within any particular egg is undetectable by immunohistochemistry, whereas Western blot analysis – performed on lysates of 500 eggs at a time – is sensitive enough to detect a decrease in the amount of MARCKS. Secondly, although we used the same polyclonal antibody for both assays it is possible that binding of CaM to MARCKS, or phosphorylation of MARCKS by PKC, causes conformational changes that affect MARCKS affinity to the antibody during immunohistochemistry, while the denatured protein retains its affinity to the antibody during Western blot analysis. Our results indicate that CaM interacts with MARCKS, directly or indirectly, after [Ca2+]i elevation, which raises the possibility that CaM activity is involved in the process of CGE and RMII.
MARCKS translocation from the plasma membrane to the cytosol was inhibited in eggs activated by ionomycin in the presence of W7. This supports our hypothesis that during egg activation, CaM activation is involved in MARCKS translocation, prior to CGE. CGE and RMII were inhibited by W7 in a dose-dependent manner, CGE being more sensitive to the inhibitor concentration than RMII. This difference is in accordance with the suggested segregation of the CGE and RMII pathways, caused by the different sensitivity to [Ca2+]i of the two processes. It had been shown that a relatively low [Ca2+]i rise is sufficient for inducing a partial CGE, whereas a higher elevation is required for completion of CGE and induction of RMII (Raz et al. 1998a). Xu et al.(1996) showed that the use of W7 prior to in vitro insemination delayed the emission of the PBII, but did not block CGE. The difference between the observations of Xu et al. and the current results may be derived from the different methods employed. We activated eggs, in the presence of W7, whereas Xu et al.(1996) inseminated eggs in culture medium devoid of W7. Electrophysiological studies demonstrated that CGE in hamster eggs commenced as early as 4 s after binding of sperm to the egg membrane (Kline & Stewart-Savage 1994), while RMII was observed 20 min after sperm binding. In view of these facts, the presence of an inhibitor during the activation period is necessary, as even a brief absence of the inhibitor from the culture medium during activation can lead to CGE.
The mechanism of CGE in mammalian eggs is not fully understood. As demonstrated in other cell systems, MARCKS translocation, governed either by PKC phosphorylation or by MARCKS binding to CaM, enabled exocytosis; while inhibition of PKC and of CaM prevented exocytosis (Vaaraniemi et al. 1999, Wohnsland et al. 2000). In the present study, we have investigated the underlying mechanisms leading to CGE and were able to demonstrate MARCKS translocation in fertilized as well as in parthenogenetically activated eggs. Similar to other cell systems, we have also demonstrated that phosphorylation of MARCKS by PKC, as well as MARCKS binding to CaM, results in translocation of MARCKS from the plasma membrane to the cortex which is followed by release of cortical granule exudate. These results complement other studies showing MARCKS requirement for exocytosis and imply that CGE, RMII and translocation of MARCKS depend on activation of both PKC and CaM. To establish the hypothesis that MARCKS is a mediator in CGE, further experiments such as using MARCKS-specific peptide inhibitors (Rosé et al. 2001) should be conducted.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Aderem A 1992 The MARCKS brothers: a family of protein kinase C substrates. Cell 71 713–716.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Arbuzova A, Murray S & McLaughlin S 1998 MARCKS, membranes, and calmodulin: kinetics of their interaction. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1376 369–379.[Medline]
Arbuzova A, Schmitz AA & Vergeres G 2002 Cross talk unfolded: MARCKS proteins. Biochemistry Journal 362 1–12.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ben-Yosef D, Oron Y & Shalgi R 1995 Low temperature and fertilization-induced Ca2+ changes in rat eggs. Molecular and Reproductive Development 42 122–129.
Cherr GN, Drobnis EZ & Katz DF 1988 Localization of cortical granule constituents before and after exocytosis in the hamster egg. Journal of Experimental Zoology 246 81–93.
Danks K, Wade JA, Batten TF, Walker JH, Ball SG & Vaughan PF 1999 Redistribution of F-actin and large dense-cored vesicles in the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y in response to secretagogues and protein Kinase C activation. Molecular Brain Research 64 236–245.[Medline]
Ducibella T, Rangarajan S & Anderson S 1988 The development of mouse oocyte cortical reaction competence is accompanied by major changes in cortical vesicles and not cortical granule depth. Developmental Biology 130 789–792.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ducibella T, Kurasawa S, Duffy P, Kopf GS & Schults RM 1993 Regulation of the polyspermy block in the mouse egg: maturation-dependent differences in cortical granules and an activator of protein kinase C. Biology of Reproduction 48 1251–1257.[Abstract]
Eliyahu E & Shalgi R 2002 A role for protein Kinase C during rat egg activation. Biology of Reproduction 67 189–195.
Eliyahu E, Tsaadon A, Shtraizent N & Shalgi R 2005 The involvement of protein kinase C and actin filaments in cortical granules exocytosis in the rat. Reproduction 129 161–170.
Endo Y, Mattei P, Kopf GS & Schultz RM 1987 Effects of a phorbol ester on mouse eggs: dissociation of sperm receptor activity from acrosome reaction-inducing activity of the mouse zona pellucida, ZP3. Developmental Biology 123 574–577.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fan HY, Huo LJ, Meng XQ, Zhong ZS, Hou Y, Chen DY & Sun QY 2003 Involvement of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) in meiotic maturation and activation of pig oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 69 1552–1564.
Gangeswaran R & Jones KT 1997 Unique protein kinase C profile in mouse oocytes: lack of calcium-dependent conventional isoforms suggested by RT-PCR and Western blotting. FEBS Letters 412 309–312.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Halet G, Tunwell R, Parkinson SJ & Carroll J 2004 Conventional PKCs regulate the temporal pattern of Ca2+ oscillations at fertilization in mouse eggs. Journal of Cell Biology 164 1033–1044.
Hartwig JH, Thelen M, Rosen A, Janmay PA, Nairn AC & Aderem A 1992 MARCKS is an actin filament crosslinking protein regulated by protein kinase C and calmodulin. Nature 356 618–622.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hoeflich KP & Ikura M 2002 Calmodulin in action: diversity in target recognition and activation mechanisms. Cell 108 739–742.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hyslop LA, Nixon VL, Levasseur M, Chapman F, Chiba K, McDougall A, Venables JP, Elliott DJ & Jones KT 2004 Ca(2+)-promoted cyclin B1 degradation in mouse oocytes requires the establishment of a metaphase arrest. Developmental Biology 269 206–219.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Inagaki M, Gonda Y, Matsuyama M, Nishizawa K, Nishi Y & Sato C 1987 Intermediate filament reconstitution in vitro. The role of phosphorylation on the assembly–disassembly of desmin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263 5970–5978.[Web of Science]
Ito J, Kawano N, Hirabayashi M & Shimada M 2004 The role of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II on the inactivation of MAP kinase and p34cdc2 kinase during fertilization and activation in pig oocytes. Reproduction 128 409–415.
Johnson J & Capco DG 1997 Progesterone acts through protein kinase C to remodel the cytoplasm, as the amphibian oocyte becomes fertilization-competent egg. Mechanisms of Development 67 215–226.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jones KT 2004 Turning it on and off: M-phase promoting factor during meiotic maturation and fertilization. Molecular and Human Reproduction 10 1–5.
Kinsey WH 1997 Tyrosine kinase signaling at fertilization. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 26 519–522.
Kline D & Stewart-Savage J 1994 The timing of cortical granule fusion, content dispersal, and endocytosis during fertilization of the hamster egg: an electrophysiological and histochemical study. Developmental Biology 162 277–287.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Larabell CA, Rowning BA & Moon RT 2004 A PKC wave follows the calcium wave after activation of Xenopus eggs. Differentiation 72 41–47.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Luria A, Tennenbaum T, Sun QY, Rubinstein S & Breitbart H 2000 Differential localization of conventional protein kinase C isoforms during mouse oocyte development. Biology of Reproduction 62 1564–1570.
Michaut MA, Williams CJ & Schultz RM 2005 Phosphorylated MARCKS: a novel centrosome component that also defines a peripheral subdomain of the cortical actin cap in mouse eggs. Developmental Biology 280 26–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nishizuka Y 1986 Studies and perspective of protein kinase C. Science 233 305–312.
Pauken CM & Capco DG 2000 The expression and stage-specific localization of protein kinase C isotypes during mouse preimplantation development. Developmental Biology 223 411–421.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Porumb T, Crivici A, Blackshear PJ & Ikura M 1997 Calcium binding and conformational properties of calmodulin complexed with peptides derived from Myristoylated Alanine-rich Protein Kinase C Substrate (MARCKS) and MARCKS-related protein (MRP). European Biophysics Journal 25 239–247.
Raz T & Shalgi R 1998 Early events in mammalian egg activation. Human Reproduction 13 133–145.
Raz T, Ben-Yosef D & Shalgi R 1998a Segregation of the pathways leading to the cortical reaction and cell cycle activation in the rat egg. Biology of Reproduction 58 94–102.
Raz T, Eliyahu E, Yesodi V & Shalgi R 1998b Profile of protein kinase C isoenzymes and their possible role in mammalian egg activation. FEBS Letters 431 415–418.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rosé SD, Lejen T, Zhang L & Trifaró JM 2001 Chromaffin cell F-actin disassembly and potentiation of catecholamine release in response to protein kinase C activation by phorbol esters is mediated through myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate phosphorylation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 36757–36763.
Rosen A, Keenan KF, Thelen AM, Nairn C & Aderem A 1990 Activation of protein kinase C results in the displacement of its myristoylated, alanine-rich substrate from punctate structures in macrophage lopodia. Journal of Experimental Medicine 172 1211–1215.
Rossi EA, Li Z, Feng H & Rubin CS 1999 Characterization of the targeting, binding, and phosphorylation site domains of an A kinase anchor protein and a myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate-like analog that are encoded by a single gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274 27201–27210.
Sato K, Tokmakov AA & Fukami Y 2000 Fertilization signaling and protein-tyrosine kinases. Comprehensive Biochemistry, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 126 129–148.
Swann K & Parrington J 1999 Mechanisms of Ca2+ release at fertilization in mammals. Journal of Experimental Zoology 285 267–275.
Swierczynski SL & Blackshear PJ 1995 Membrane association of the myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) protein. Mutational analysis provides evidence for complex interactions. Journal of Biological Chemistry 270 13436–13445.
Talmor A, Kinsey WH & Shalgi R 1998 Expression and immunolocalization of p59c-Fyn tyrosine kinase in rat eggs. Developmental Biology 194 38–46.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vaaraniemi J, Palovuori R, Lehto VP & Eskelinen S 1999 Translocation of MARCKS and reorganization of the cytoskeleton by PMA correlates with the ion selectivity, the confluence, and transformation state of kidney epithelial cell lines. Journal of Cell Physiology 181 83–95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wassarman PM, Jovine L & Litscher ES 2001 A profile of fertilization in mammals. Nature Cell Biology 3 E59–E64.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wohnsland F, Schmitz AA, Steinmetz MO, Aebi U & Vergeheres G 2000 Interaction between actin and the effector peptide of MARCKS-related protein. Identification of functional amino acid segments. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 20873–20879.
Wu WS, Walaas SI, Nairn AC & Greengard P 1982 Calcium/phospholipid regulates phosphorylation of a Mr ‘87k’ substrate protein in brain synaptosomes. PNAS 79 5249–5253.
Xu Z, LeFevre L, Ducibella T, Schultz RM & Kopf GS 1996 Effects of calcium-BAPTA buffers and the calmodulin antagonist W-7 on mouse egg activation. Developmental Biology 180 594–604.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Park, S. Fang, A. L. Crews, K.-W. Lin, and K. B. Adler MARCKS Regulation of Mucin Secretion by Airway Epithelium in Vitro: Interaction with Chaperones Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., July 1, 2008; 39(1): 68 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Tsaadon, R. Kaplan-Kraicer, and R. Shalgi Myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate, but not Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, is the mediator in cortical granules exocytosis Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 613 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
