| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
1 Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, Section of Pathology, University of Siena - School of Medicine, Via delle Scotte 6, 53100 Siena, Italy, 2 Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy, 3 II Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy and 4 Molecular Biology Laboratory Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20100 Milan, Italy
Correspondence should be addressed to F Arcuri; Email: arcuri{at}unisi.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A great effort has been directed in laboratories worldwide towards the understanding of the physiopathological functions of uNK cells. The cyclic variation in the non-pregnant endometrium has been interpreted as an involvement of these cells in the cyclic renewal and menstrual breakdown of the mucosa. On the other hand, the observation that uNK cells are highly represented in the uterus at the time of implantation, and their intimate contact with invading placental trophoblast cells, have suggested they can be important for successful pregnancy by down-regulating the maternal immune response against the hemiallogenic foetal allograft or by limiting trophoblast invasion of the decidua (Trundley & Moffett 2004).
Several studies have addressed the question concerning the mechanisms underlying uNK cell activity in the cyclic and pregnant endometrium, and it is generally accepted that cytokines play a critical role. It has been shown that short-term exposure to interleukin (IL)-2, stimulates proliferation and activates uNK cells to kill first trimester cytotrophoblast cells (Saito et al. 1993). Verma and colleagues (2000) have demonstrated that in vitro cytotoxicity and proliferative activity of these cells are both enhanced by IL-15. Besides, uNK cells express a number of cytokines thought to affect uterine mucosal functions as well as trophoblast invasion and differentiation; among these are leukaemia inhibitory factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, colony stimulating factor 1 and tumour necrosis factor (Moffett-King 2002).
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was the first cytokine to be discovered (Bloom & Bennett 1966, David 1966), although most of our knowledge about this molecule comes from recent studies. It is now established that, besides its first identified immunological function -i.e. the inhibition of the random migration of macrophages in vitro - this cytokine plays a multifaceted role in the immune response. Thus, MIF affects several biological functions of macrophages such as phagocytosis, killing of intracellular parasites and tumour cells, and it is released by monocytes/macrophages in response to physiological levels of glucocorticoids (Calandra & Roger 2003). It has been proposed that MIF may counteract the immunosuppressive effects of these hormones on the production of other inflammatory cytokines, thus acting as a glucocorticoid-induced immunomodulator (Calandra et al. 1995). MIF is also produced by activated T lymphocytes and can influence the cytotoxic T cell response in vitro (Abe et al. 2001). Finally, this cytokine has been reported to modulate NK cell activity. Apte and co-workers (1998) identified MIF as the aqueous humour factor able to inhibit murine NK cell-mediated cytolysis of corneal endothelial cells, therefore contributing to the preservation of the immune privilege in the eye. Furthermore, MIF-induced inhibition of NK cell activity has recently been suggested as a mechanism involved in tumour progression (Repp et al. 2000).
High steady-state levels of MIF protein and mRNA have been detected in human reproductive tissues. MIF expression has been reported in the human ovary, both in the follicular fluid and in the granulosa cells (Nishihira 1998). Moreover, its presence in embryonic and maternal tissues has been documented by previous studies from our group. In the first trimester human placenta, MIF has been detected in the cytotrophoblasts of both the inner layer of villi and in the trophoblastic cell islands (Arcuri et al. 1999). More recently, we have shown that this cytokine is expressed in the glandular and stromal compartment of cyclic endometrium, as well as in first trimester decidua (Arcuri et al. 2001). Because of this, and in keeping with its immunomodulatory functions, we have suggested a role for MIF in modulating uNK cell activity (Arcuri et al. 2001). The study reported herein was undertaken to test this hypothesis. Thus, the effect of recombinant human MIF on uNK cell-mediated cytolysis was evaluated in vitro. Gene expression and protein synthesis of MIF by purified uNK cells, as well as the influence of the endogenous cytokine on their cytolytic activity, were assessed. The results indicate that uNK cells are both a source and a target of MIF, further supporting an involvement of this cytokine in key aspects of human reproduction.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Specimen collection
Decidual tissues were obtained from healthy women undergoing elective termination of a normal pregnancy between 8 and 13 weeks of gestation. Specimens were rinsed several times in PBS and then processed immediately. Approval for this study was granted by the local Human Institutional Investigation Committee. An informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Recombinant human MIF
Recombinant human MIF (rhMIF) was prepared in Escherichia coli as described by Hudson and colleagues (1999). The level of endotoxin in MIF preparations was lower than 1 pg per µg protein as determined by Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay.
Isolation of decidual NK cells (uNK)
Uterine NK cells were purified as previously described (Vigano et al. 2001). Fragments of decidua compacta were macroscopically identified, extensively washed with PBS, trimmed, minced and digested for 1 h at 37 °C under gentle agitation with 0.1% (w/v) collagenase A and 0.2% (w/v) hyaluronidase in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma Chemical Co.). The cell suspension was layered over a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient and centrifuged at 800 x g for 20 min at room temperature. Cells at the interface were washed in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics. After incubation for 20 min at 4 °C with anti-CD56 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec Ltd., Bisley, Surrey, UK) and human
-globulin, cells were washed in washing buffer (PBS, EDTA 2 mM, BSA 0.5% (w/v)) and then loaded onto a VS column in a VarioMACS magnet (Miltenyi Biotec Ltd.). After flushing the column with washing buffer, CD56 + cells were eluted as indicated by the manufacturer. More than 97% of the cells prepared with this procedure were CD45 +, CD3 , CD14 and CD56 +, as determined by flow cytometric analysis. Cells for the cytotoxicity assay were washed with sterile PBS, resuspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and antibiotics and maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. For RNA and protein extraction, cells were snap-frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. Aliquots for immunofluorescence analysis were centrifuged on slides, fixed with ice-cold methanol for 10 min, permeabilized with ice-cold acetone for 5 min, air-dried and stored at 20 °C.
51Chromium release cytotoxicity assay
Decidual NK cells were incubated in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 1% FCS in the presence of the indicated concentration of rhMIF or anti-MIF antibody. After 18 h incubation at 37 °C, cells were washed and incubated with 1 x 104 K562 target cells labelled with 51Cr. Plates were centrifuged for 3 min at 200 x g and incubated for an additional 4 h at 37 °C. After centrifugation, the supernatants were harvested and counted in a gamma counter to determine the isotope release. Minimum and maximum levels of 51Cr release were determined in 1% FCS and 1% NP-40 respectively. Specific lysis was determined as previously described (Mazzeo et al. 1998).
Detection of MIF mRNA
MIF mRNA was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as described (Arcuri et al. 1999). Total RNA was extracted using the SV total RNA extraction kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) following the procedure indicated by the manufacturer. PCR product identity was confirmed by restriction analysis (Arcuri et al. 1999).
Protein analysis
Cell pellets were thawed, suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 0.2% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 (pH 7.5) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail containing 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulphonyl fluoride, pepstatinA, E-64, bestatin, leupeptin, and aprotinin (Sigma Chemical Co.)), and sonicated for 15 s on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 750 x g for 10 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was assayed for total protein content (Bradford 1976) and used for MIF detection.
Western blot analysis was carried out as previously described (Arcuri et al. 1999). The blot was incubated overnight at 4 °C with a 1:1000 solution of the anti-MIF antibody and then for 1 h with a rabbit anti-goat antibody labelled with peroxidase at a dilution of 1:3000. For detection, a chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences Corp.) was used according to the manufacturers instructions.
MIF was measured by a colorimetric sandwich ELISA as described (Arcuri et al. 2001). Ninety-six-well ELISA plates were coated with 100 µl/well anti-human MIF monoclonal antibody (2.0 µg/ml) and incubated overnight at room temperature. The plates were washed three times with washing solution (10 mM PBS (pH 7.4), 0.05% (vol/-vol) Tween 20), blocked by adding 300 µl blocking solution (10 mM PBS (pH 7.4), 1% (wt/vol) BSA and 5% (wt/vol) sucrose), and incubated at room temperature for 1.5 h. After washing three times, cell lysate supernatant and the standard, appropriately diluted in Tris-buffered saline-BSA (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.3), 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA, 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 20), were added in duplicate (100 µl/well) and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Plates were then washed three times and 100 µl biotinylated goat anti-human MIF antibody (200 ng/ml) were added to each well and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA) was added to each well and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The plates were washed and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (Zymed) was added. After 20 min, the reaction was stopped by adding H2SO4. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using an ELISA microplate reader (Celbio, Milan, Italy). MIF concentration was expressed as ng per ml of medium.
Immunofluorescence staining
Cells were then rehydrated in PBS and incubated for 1 h in blocking solution (BSA (Sigma Chemical Co.) 0.1% (w/v) in PBS). For double labelling, coverslips were incubated overnight at 4 °C with an anti-MIF polyclonal antibody diluted 1:300 in PBS and an anti-CD56 monoclonal antibody (Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), diluted 1:50 in PBS. Coverslips were washed three times with PBS and then incubated with a rabbit anti-mouse IgG coupled to rhodamine (Cappel, Westchester, PA, USA) and a rabbit anti-goat IgG coupled to fluorescein (Sigma Chemical Co.) diluted 1: 400 in PBS. Samples were extensively rinsed in PBS and mounted with a mounting medium (90% glycerol in PBS, n-propylgallate (Fluka Chemie GmbH, Buchs, Switzerland) 2.5% (w/v)). For each case, negative controls were obtained by using the antibody pre-adsorbed with the recombinant MIF at the concentration of 20 µg per ml diluted antibody or by omitting the primary antibody. Fluorescence microscopy was carried out on a Leica TCS 4-D Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope equipped with a Krypton/Argon laser (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Differences between groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Students t-test, as appropriate. The Fisher Least Significant Difference test was used as post-test to determine significant differences between groups. A probability <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and other cytokines, thus promoting a positive cytokine feedback loop. Interestingly, uNK cells are also known to produce cytokines that normally are not produced by blood NK cells, such as leukaemia inhibitory factor (Sharkey et al. 1999) and angiogenic growth factors (Li et al. 2001), which lends further support to the concept that uNK cell-derived cytokines might have important functions in the uterus. The present study identified uNK cells as a source of MIF, a cytokine that has emerged as an important regulator of inflammation, influencing both the innate and antigen-specific functions of the immune system (Calandra & Roger 2003). First described as a T cell-derived protein, MIF has recently been shown to be produced by a variety of cell types, including monocytes, endothelial cells, keratinocytes and anterior pituitary cells, suggesting multifunctional physiological effects (Nishihira 2000). A critical role for this factor in the mechanisms underlying the establishment of pregnancy has also been supposed. MIF has been demonstrated to be expressed in the glandular epithelium and stroma of the cyclic endometrium as well as in the decidua and trophoblasts (Arcuri et al. 1999, 2001). Serum concentrations of the cytokine are much higher in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy than in the non-pregnant status and, more importantly, these concentrations were found to be decreased in women with recurrent miscarriage. In particular, serum MIF levels were lower in abortion-prone women with a normal foetal chromosome karyotype than in those with an abnormal foetal chromosome karyotype, thus suggesting a role for the cytokine in the aetiology of abortion (Yamada et al. 2003). Notwithstanding these observations, the precise significance of MIF in the context of gestation remains poorly defined. The results reported herein clearly indicate that MIF is synthesized and released in significant concentrations by uNK cells. These findings are in agreement with recent data obtained by Koopman and colleagues (2003) comparing the gene expression profiles of uterine and peripheral NK cells using microarray analysis. These authors identified MIF mRNA in all the cell preparations tested and reported higher levels of transcript in uNK cells compared with both CD56bright and CD56dim peripheral NK cells.
Results from the present study also showed that a neutralizing anti-MIF antibody is able to significantly increase uNK cell cytolytic activity, thus supporting the concept that the cytokine exerts an immunomodulatory function on this lymphoid population. These results are supported by the significant, although slight, inhibition of the cytolytic activity observed with rhMIF. The limited effect of the exogenously administered cytokine suggests uNK MIF levels are probably sufficient to trigger a response. A similar phenomenon has already been reported by Bacher and colleagues (1996) who found that, in T cells, although a neutralizing anti-MIF antibody inhibited cell proliferation and IL-2 production - indicating that MIF was a required participant to these effects purified rMIF was not mitogenic by itself. The limited effect of rhMIF on uNK cells could also be explained by a reduced biological activity of the recombinant cytokine. In the present study, rhMIF was expressed as a maltose binding protein fusion protein in BL21 E. coli cells. An identical procedure was recently applied by Baumann and colleagues (2003). These authors, evaluating the antiapoptotic effect of MIF on neutrophils and eosinophils, reported that microgram concentrations of rhMIF were necessary to obtain maximum response. Interestingly, when the biological activity of the recombinant cytokine was tested by assessing its capacity to block monocyte migration in an in vitro assay, similar high MIF concentrations were needed. These results were interpreted as an indication that the recombinant protein was not fully functionally active. In view of the strict similarities between the procedures used, it is hypothesized that the reduced effect of rhMIF on uNK cytolytic activity was due to the limited biological activity of the recombinant protein.
It is becoming clear that the immune privilege of the uterine environment results from multiple mechanisms that selectively down-regulate immune effectors with the potential to damage the conceptus (Thellin & Heinen 2003). Based on the present data, it is speculated that MIF, exerting both an autocrine and a paracrine modulatory action on uNK cell activity, may contribute to the immune privilege at the maternalfoetal interface. In this context it is noteworthy that MIF is produced in both the brain and the eye (Nishihira 1998), two classic immune-privileged sites that, similar to cytotrophoblasts, have a very peculiar expression of MHC class I determinants. On the other hand, it is possible that MIF may influence normal gestation through modification of the maternal arterial physiology and endothelial cell proliferation. Uterine NK cells are involved in the vascular remodelling that occurs during human implantation as demonstrated by the presence of vessel abnormalities at implantation sites in mice deficient in NK cells (Guimond et al. 1997, 1999). Two strains of mice, the tg
26 and the IL-2Rß null X RAG-2 null hybrid, that lack both NK and T cells, demonstrate abnormal decidual vessels in the mesometrial segment of the uterus on days 7 and 8 of gestation. Endothelial cells become tall and columnar with evidence of cell death and separation from the basement membrane. Arterioles demonstrate increased thickness and do not undergo the thinning of the vascular smooth muscle cells characteristic of the vessel adaptation to pregnancy. Mice lacking T cells, but not NK cells, have a normal phenotype (Guimond et al. 1997). These observations underline the importance of uNK cell-mediated production of angiogenic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor-C and angiopoietin 2. In this context, MIF could play a relevant role as a mediator of the process of neovascularization. Indeed, this cytokine has been implicated in tumour growth-associated angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro (Chesney et al. 1999, Shimizu et al. 1999) and in the regulation of vascular endothelial cell proliferation in vitro (Ogawa et al. 2000, Amin et al. 2003). This possibility needs to be further investigated in relation to specific pathologies involving both an immune and a vascular maladaptation to pregnancy such as pre-eclampsia (Norwitz et al. 2001).
In conclusion, our data support a role for MIF as a component of the uNK cell mediator repertoire, which is thought to have a strong impact on embryo development and trophoblast invasion. Studies are in progress to evaluate the molecular basis of MIF-mediated inhibition of uNK cell activity and the potential cytokine network underlying MIF production by this uterine lymphoid population.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abe R, Peng T, Sailors J, Bucala R & Metz CN 2001 Regulation of the CTL response by macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Journal of Immunology 166 747753.
Amin MA, Volpert OV, Woods JM, Kumar P, Harlow LA & Koch AE 2003 Migration inhibitory factor mediates angiogenesis via mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol kinase. Circulation Research 93 321329.
Apte RS, Sinha D, Mayhew E, Wistow GJ & Niederkorn JY 1998 Cutting edge: role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in inhibiting NK cell activity and preserving immune privilege. Journal of Immunology 160 56935696.
Arcuri F, Cintorino M, Vatti R, Carducci A, Liberatori S & Paulesu L 1999 Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor transcript and protein by first-trimester human trophoblasts. Biology of Reproduction 60 12991303.
Arcuri F, Ricci C, Ietta F, Cintorino M, Tripodi SA, Cetin I, Garzia E, Schatz F, Klemi P & Santopietro R et al. 2001 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the human endometrium: expression and localization during the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 64 12001205.
Avril T, Jarousseau AC, Watier H, Boucraut J, Le Bouteiller P, Bardos P & Thibault G 1999 Trophoblast cell line resistance to NK lysis mainly involves an HLA class I-independent mechanism. Journal of Immunology 162 59025909.
Bacher M, Metz CN, Calandra T, Mayer K, Chesney J, Lohoff M, Gemsa D, Donnelly T & Bucala R 1996 An essential regulatory role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor in T-cell activation. PNAS 93 78497854.
Baumann R, Casaulta C, Simon D, Conus S, Yousefi S & Simon HU 2003 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor delays apoptosis in neutrophils by inhibiting the mitochondria-dependent death pathway. FASEB Journal 17 22212230.
Bloom BR & Bennett B 1966 Mechanism of a reaction in vitro associated with delayed-type hypersensitivity. Science 153 8082.
Bradford MM 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72 248254.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Calandra T & Roger T 2003 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology 3 791800.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Metz CN, Spiegel LA, Bacher M, Donnelly T, Cerami A & Bucala R 1995 MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature 377 6871.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chesney J, Metz C, Bacher M, Peng T, Meinhardt A & Bucala R 1999 An essential role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in angiogenesis and the growth of a murine lymphoma. Molecular Medicine 5 181191.[ISI][Medline]
Cooper MA, Fehniger TA & Caligiuri MA 2001 The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends in Immunology 22 633640.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
David JR 1966 Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro: its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell-antigen interaction. PNAS 56 7277.
Guimond MJ, Luross JA, Wang B, Terhorst C, Danial S & Croy BA 1997 Absence of natural killer cells during murine pregnancy is associated with reproductive compromise in TgE26 mice. Biology of Reproduction 56 169179.[Abstract]
Guimond M, Wang B & Croy BA 1999 Immune competence involving the natural killer cell lineage promotes placental growth. Placenta 20 441450.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hudson JD, Shoaibi MA, Maestro R, Carnero A, Hannon GJ & Beach DH 1999 A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits p53 tumor suppressor activity. Journal of Experimental Medicine 190 13751382.
King A, Allan DS, Bowen M, Powis SJ, Joseph S, Verma S, Hiby SE, McMichael AJ, Loke YW & Braud VM 2000 HLA-E is expressed on trophoblast and interacts with CD94/NKG2 receptors on decidual NK cells. European Journal of Immunology 30 16231631.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Koopman LA, Kopcow HD, Rybalov B, Boyson JE, Orange JS, Schatz F, Masch R, Lockwood CJ, Schachter AD, Park PJ et al. 2003 Human decidual natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with immunomodulatory potential. Journal of Experimental Medicine 198 12011212.
Li XF, Charnock-Jones DS, Zhang E, Hiby S, Malik S, Day K, Licence D, Bowen JM, Gardner L, King A et al. 2001 Angiogenic growth factor messenger ribonucleic acids in uterine natural killer cells. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 18231834.
Mazzeo D, Vigano P, Di Blasio AM, Sinigaglia F, Vignali M & Panina-Bordignon P 1998 Interleukin-12 and its free p40 subunit regulate immune recognition of endometrial cells: potential role in endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 83 911916.
Moffett-King A 2002 Natural killer cells and pregnancy. Nature Reviews Immunology 2 656663.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Nishihira J 1998 Novel pathophysiological aspects of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine 2 1728.[ISI][Medline]
Nishihira J 2000 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): its essential role in the immune system and cell growth. Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research 20 751762.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Norwitz ER, Schust DJ & Fisher SJ 2001 Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine 345 14001408.
Ogawa H, Nishihira J, Sato Y, Kondo M, Takahashi N, Oshima T & Todo S 2000 An antibody for macrophage migration inhibitory factor suppresses tumour growth and inhibits tumour-associated angiogenesis. Cytokine 12 309314.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Repp AC, Mayhew ES, Apte S & Niederkorn JY 2000 Human uveal melanoma cells produce macrophage migration-inhibitory factor to prevent lysis by NK cells. Journal of Immunology 165 710715.
Saito S, Morii T, Enomoto M, Sakakura S, Nishikawa K, Narita N & Ichijo M 1993 The effect of interleukin 2 and transforming growth factor-beta 2 (TGF-beta 2) on the proliferation and natural killer activity of decidual CD16 CD56bright natural killer cells. Cellular Immunology 152 605613.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sharkey AM, King A, Clark DE, Burrows TD, Jokhi PP, Charnock-Jones DS, Loke YW & Smith SK 1999 Localization of leukemia inhibitory factor and its receptor in human placenta throughout pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 60 355364.
Shimizu T, Abe R, Nakamura H, Ohkawara A, Suzuki M & Nishihira J 1999 High expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human melanoma cells and its role in tumor cell growth and angiogenesis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 264 751758.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Thellin O & Heinen E 2003 Pregnancy and the immune system: between tolerance and rejection. Toxicology 185 179184.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Trundley A & Moffett A 2004 Human uterine leukocytes and pregnancy. Tissue Antigens 63 112.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Verma S, Hiby SE, Loke YW & King A 2000 Human decidual natural killer cells express the receptor for and respond to the cytokine interleukin 15. Biology of Reproduction 62 959968.
Vigano P, Gaffuri B, Somigliana E, Infantino M, Vignali M & Di Blasio AM 2001 Interleukin-10 is produced by human uterine natural killer cells but does not affect their production of interferon-gamma. Molecular Human Reproduction 7 971977.
Yamada H, Kato EH, Morikawa M, Shimada S, Saito H, Watari M, Minakami H & Nishihira J 2003 Decreased serum levels of macrophage migration inhibition factor in miscarriages with normal chromosome karyotype. Human Reproduction 18 616620.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |