Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2006) 131 175-182
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00857
Copyright © 2006 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arcuri, F
Right arrow Articles by Viganò, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arcuri, F
Right arrow Articles by Viganò, P

RESEARCH

Human decidual natural killer cells as a source and target of macrophage migration inhibitory factor

F Arcuri1, M Cintorino1, A Carducci1, S Papa1, M G Riparbelli2, S Mangioni3, A M Di Blasio4, P Tosi1 and P Viganò3

1 Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, Section of Pathology, University of Siena - School of Medicine, Via delle Scotte 6, 53100 Siena, Italy, 2 Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy, 3 II Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy and 4 Molecular Biology Laboratory Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20100 Milan, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to F Arcuri; Email: arcuri{at}unisi.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The human uterine mucosa of early pregnancy is largely populated by CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells (uterine (u) NK cells). The specific functions of these cells are still unknown, but their interaction and response to foetal trophoblasts are thought to be important for the establishment of a successful pregnancy. The study reported herein shows that uNK cells respond to, and produce, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a cytokine highly expressed in the human placenta and in the cyclic and pregnant endometrium. Recombinant human MIF reduced in a dose-dependent manner the cytolytic activity of purified uNK cells against K562 cells. RT-PCR, Western blot analysis and ELISA demonstrated the synthesis and secretion of the cytokine by uNK cells. Double immunofluorescence staining showed the presence of MIF in uterine CD56 + cells. Finally, neutralization of the endogenous cytokine by a polyclonal antibody resulted in a sharp increase in the cytolytic activity of uNK cells. These findings indicate the existence of a previously unrevealed paracrine and autocrine action of MIF on uNK cells and support its contribution to the immune privilege at the maternal–foetal interface.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The human uterine mucosa of the pregnant and cyclic uterus is largely populated by CD56bright granulated natural killer (NK) cells. These uterine NK cells (uNK) are phenotypically and functionally distinct from the predominant subset of NK cells of peripheral blood (CD56dim CD16bright) as they do not express CD16 or membrane CD3, have a lower cytolytic activity against K562 cells, and show a distinct pattern of gene expression (Trundley & Moffett 2004). In early pregnancy, uNK cells represent the most abundant leukocyte population of the uterine mucosa, accounting for 70% of bone marrow-derived cells, the largest number being in the decidua basalis, the region of trophoblast invasion of maternal tissues. In the non-pregnant endometrium the number of NK cells varies with the menstrual cycle, being low in the follicular phase, increasing after ovulation, and reaching a peak in the late luteal phase. Following the decrease in progesterone levels, and before the menstrual shedding of the endometrium, uNK cells undergo extensive apoptosis. However, if pregnancy occurs, uNK cells will expand at the implantation site until mid-gestation, and then they will gradually disappear, to be virtually absent in term decidua (Trundley & Moffett 2004).

A great effort has been directed in laboratories worldwide towards the understanding of the physiopathological functions of uNK cells. The cyclic variation in the non-pregnant endometrium has been interpreted as an involvement of these cells in the cyclic renewal and menstrual breakdown of the mucosa. On the other hand, the observation that uNK cells are highly represented in the uterus at the time of implantation, and their intimate contact with invading placental trophoblast cells, have suggested they can be important for successful pregnancy by down-regulating the maternal immune response against the hemiallogenic foetal allograft or by limiting trophoblast invasion of the decidua (Trundley & Moffett 2004).

Several studies have addressed the question concerning the mechanisms underlying uNK cell activity in the cyclic and pregnant endometrium, and it is generally accepted that cytokines play a critical role. It has been shown that short-term exposure to interleukin (IL)-2, stimulates proliferation and activates uNK cells to kill first trimester cytotrophoblast cells (Saito et al. 1993). Verma and colleagues (2000) have demonstrated that in vitro cytotoxicity and proliferative activity of these cells are both enhanced by IL-15. Besides, uNK cells express a number of cytokines thought to affect uterine mucosal functions as well as trophoblast invasion and differentiation; among these are leukaemia inhibitory factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, colony stimulating factor 1 and tumour necrosis factor (Moffett-King 2002).

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was the first cytokine to be discovered (Bloom & Bennett 1966, David 1966), although most of our knowledge about this molecule comes from recent studies. It is now established that, besides its first identified immunological function -i.e. the inhibition of the random migration of macrophages in vitro - this cytokine plays a multifaceted role in the immune response. Thus, MIF affects several biological functions of macrophages such as phagocytosis, killing of intracellular parasites and tumour cells, and it is released by monocytes/macrophages in response to physiological levels of glucocorticoids (Calandra & Roger 2003). It has been proposed that MIF may counteract the immunosuppressive effects of these hormones on the production of other inflammatory cytokines, thus acting as a glucocorticoid-induced immunomodulator (Calandra et al. 1995). MIF is also produced by activated T lymphocytes and can influence the cytotoxic T cell response in vitro (Abe et al. 2001). Finally, this cytokine has been reported to modulate NK cell activity. Apte and co-workers (1998) identified MIF as the aqueous humour factor able to inhibit murine NK cell-mediated cytolysis of corneal endothelial cells, therefore contributing to the preservation of the immune privilege in the eye. Furthermore, MIF-induced inhibition of NK cell activity has recently been suggested as a mechanism involved in tumour progression (Repp et al. 2000).

High steady-state levels of MIF protein and mRNA have been detected in human reproductive tissues. MIF expression has been reported in the human ovary, both in the follicular fluid and in the granulosa cells (Nishihira 1998). Moreover, its presence in embryonic and maternal tissues has been documented by previous studies from our group. In the first trimester human placenta, MIF has been detected in the cytotrophoblasts of both the inner layer of villi and in the trophoblastic cell islands (Arcuri et al. 1999). More recently, we have shown that this cytokine is expressed in the glandular and stromal compartment of cyclic endometrium, as well as in first trimester decidua (Arcuri et al. 2001). Because of this, and in keeping with its immunomodulatory functions, we have suggested a role for MIF in modulating uNK cell activity (Arcuri et al. 2001). The study reported herein was undertaken to test this hypothesis. Thus, the effect of recombinant human MIF on uNK cell-mediated cytolysis was evaluated in vitro. Gene expression and protein synthesis of MIF by purified uNK cells, as well as the influence of the endogenous cytokine on their cytolytic activity, were assessed. The results indicate that uNK cells are both a source and a target of MIF, further supporting an involvement of this cytokine in key aspects of human reproduction.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Anti-human MIF goat anti-MIF antibody (<1 pg endotoxin per µg protein) was obtained from R&D Systems (Abingdon, Oxon, UK). Goat immunoglobulins were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-goat antibody was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Collagenase A and hyaluronidase were from Worthington Biochemical Corp. (Freehold, NJ, USA). All the chemicals were of analytical grade (Sigma Chemical Co.).

Specimen collection
Decidual tissues were obtained from healthy women undergoing elective termination of a normal pregnancy between 8 and 13 weeks of gestation. Specimens were rinsed several times in PBS and then processed immediately. Approval for this study was granted by the local Human Institutional Investigation Committee. An informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Recombinant human MIF
Recombinant human MIF (rhMIF) was prepared in Escherichia coli as described by Hudson and colleagues (1999). The level of endotoxin in MIF preparations was lower than 1 pg per µg protein as determined by Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay.

Isolation of decidual NK cells (uNK)
Uterine NK cells were purified as previously described (Vigano et al. 2001). Fragments of decidua compacta were macroscopically identified, extensively washed with PBS, trimmed, minced and digested for 1 h at 37 °C under gentle agitation with 0.1% (w/v) collagenase A and 0.2% (w/v) hyaluronidase in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma Chemical Co.). The cell suspension was layered over a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient and centrifuged at 800 x g for 20 min at room temperature. Cells at the interface were washed in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics. After incubation for 20 min at 4 °C with anti-CD56 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec Ltd., Bisley, Surrey, UK) and human {gamma}-globulin, cells were washed in washing buffer (PBS, EDTA 2 mM, BSA 0.5% (w/v)) and then loaded onto a VS column in a VarioMACS magnet (Miltenyi Biotec Ltd.). After flushing the column with washing buffer, CD56 + cells were eluted as indicated by the manufacturer. More than 97% of the cells prepared with this procedure were CD45 +, CD3 –, CD14 – and CD56 +, as determined by flow cytometric analysis. Cells for the cytotoxicity assay were washed with sterile PBS, resuspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and antibiotics and maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. For RNA and protein extraction, cells were snap-frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. Aliquots for immunofluorescence analysis were centrifuged on slides, fixed with ice-cold methanol for 10 min, permeabilized with ice-cold acetone for 5 min, air-dried and stored at –20 °C.

51Chromium release cytotoxicity assay
Decidual NK cells were incubated in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 1% FCS in the presence of the indicated concentration of rhMIF or anti-MIF antibody. After 18 h incubation at 37 °C, cells were washed and incubated with 1 x 104 K562 target cells labelled with 51Cr. Plates were centrifuged for 3 min at 200 x g and incubated for an additional 4 h at 37 °C. After centrifugation, the supernatants were harvested and counted in a gamma counter to determine the isotope release. Minimum and maximum levels of 51Cr release were determined in 1% FCS and 1% NP-40 respectively. Specific lysis was determined as previously described (Mazzeo et al. 1998).

Detection of MIF mRNA
MIF mRNA was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as described (Arcuri et al. 1999). Total RNA was extracted using the SV total RNA extraction kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) following the procedure indicated by the manufacturer. PCR product identity was confirmed by restriction analysis (Arcuri et al. 1999).

Protein analysis
Cell pellets were thawed, suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 0.2% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 (pH 7.5) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail containing 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulphonyl fluoride, pepstatinA, E-64, bestatin, leupeptin, and aprotinin (Sigma Chemical Co.)), and sonicated for 15 s on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 750 x g for 10 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was assayed for total protein content (Bradford 1976) and used for MIF detection.

Western blot analysis was carried out as previously described (Arcuri et al. 1999). The blot was incubated overnight at 4 °C with a 1:1000 solution of the anti-MIF antibody and then for 1 h with a rabbit anti-goat antibody labelled with peroxidase at a dilution of 1:3000. For detection, a chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences Corp.) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

MIF was measured by a colorimetric sandwich ELISA as described (Arcuri et al. 2001). Ninety-six-well ELISA plates were coated with 100 µl/well anti-human MIF monoclonal antibody (2.0 µg/ml) and incubated overnight at room temperature. The plates were washed three times with washing solution (10 mM PBS (pH 7.4), 0.05% (vol/-vol) Tween 20), blocked by adding 300 µl blocking solution (10 mM PBS (pH 7.4), 1% (wt/vol) BSA and 5% (wt/vol) sucrose), and incubated at room temperature for 1.5 h. After washing three times, cell lysate supernatant and the standard, appropriately diluted in Tris-buffered saline-BSA (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.3), 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA, 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 20), were added in duplicate (100 µl/well) and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Plates were then washed three times and 100 µl biotinylated goat anti-human MIF antibody (200 ng/ml) were added to each well and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA) was added to each well and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The plates were washed and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (Zymed) was added. After 20 min, the reaction was stopped by adding H2SO4. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using an ELISA microplate reader (Celbio, Milan, Italy). MIF concentration was expressed as ng per ml of medium.

Immunofluorescence staining
Cells were then rehydrated in PBS and incubated for 1 h in blocking solution (BSA (Sigma Chemical Co.) 0.1% (w/v) in PBS). For double labelling, coverslips were incubated overnight at 4 °C with an anti-MIF polyclonal antibody diluted 1:300 in PBS and an anti-CD56 monoclonal antibody (Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), diluted 1:50 in PBS. Coverslips were washed three times with PBS and then incubated with a rabbit anti-mouse IgG coupled to rhodamine (Cappel, Westchester, PA, USA) and a rabbit anti-goat IgG coupled to fluorescein (Sigma Chemical Co.) diluted 1: 400 in PBS. Samples were extensively rinsed in PBS and mounted with a mounting medium (90% glycerol in PBS, n-propylgallate (Fluka Chemie GmbH, Buchs, Switzerland) 2.5% (w/v)). For each case, negative controls were obtained by using the antibody pre-adsorbed with the recombinant MIF at the concentration of 20 µg per ml diluted antibody or by omitting the primary antibody. Fluorescence microscopy was carried out on a Leica TCS 4-D Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope equipped with a Krypton/Argon laser (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany).

Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Differences between groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Student’s t-test, as appropriate. The Fisher Least Significant Difference test was used as post-test to determine significant differences between groups. A probability <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Inhibition of uNK cell-mediated cytolysis by rhMIF
The first part of the study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of MIF on the cytolytic activity of purified uNK cells. Uterine NK cells were isolated as previously described (Vigano et al. 2001) through a magnetic separation with anti-CD56 microbeads that resulted in very highly purified cell preparations. Phenotypic analysis was performed on each culture prepared and only those with more than 97% CD56 + cells were used in the study. Typically, these cell populations were more than 98% pure, lacking contaminating CD3 + (Fig. 1Go) and CD14 + cells (data not shown).



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Flow cytometric analysis of isolated uterine NK cells stained with anti-CD3FITC and anti-CD56PE. CD56-positive cells were isolated from the decidual tissue through a magnetic separation with anti-CD56 microbeads.

 
Uterine NK cells were incubated in the presence of different concentrations of the recombinant human cytokine, and the NK-mediated cytolysis was tested in a 51Cr release assay with K562 as the target cells. As presented in Table 1Go, in agreement with a previous study (Vigano et al. 2001), killing of K562 cells by untreated uNK cells was about 15% at an effector:target ratio of 15:1. However, MIF-treated uNK cells showed a clear, although limited, decrease in cytolytic activity. This effect was dose-dependent, with a statistically significant inhibition achieved at a concentration of 10 µg/ml. The effect of rhMIF on the cytolytic activity of IL-2-activated uNK cells was also tested in a different set of experiments. As expected, IL-2 (10 ng/ml) was able markedly to increase uNK cell-mediated lysis (34.4% ± 5.8 vs. 20.2 ± 5.7 of control cultures (mean ± S.E.; n = 5)). In a similar manner to that observed for unstimulated cells, preincubation of IL-2-activated uNK cells with different concentrations of rhMIF (1 and 10 µg/ml) resulted in a consistent decrease in the cytolytic activity (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Dose-dependent effect of recombinant human MIF (rhMIF) on the cytolytic activity expressed as a percentage ± S.E.M. of unstimulated and IL-2-activated uNK. n = 10 (unstimulated); n = 5 (IL-2-activated).
 
Expression and synthesis of MIF by purified uNK cells
In order to ascertain whether the limited response of uNK cells to rhMIF could reflect an endogenous synthesis of the cytokine, preparations of purified uNK cells were analyzed by Western blot, ELISA, RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. The presence of MIF was initially determined in uNK cell lysates. Western blot analysis revealed the presence of a single band with the apparent molecular mass of 12 kDa, co-migrating with recombinant human MIF in both unstimulated (Fig. 2AGo) and IL-2-activated uNK cells (Fig. 2BGo). Binding specificity was confirmed by probing identical blots with the anti-MIF antibody preabsorbed with the recombinant cytokine. To test whether uNK cells secrete MIF, conditioned medium derived from unstimulated and IL-2-activated uNK cells was assessed by ELISA. The cytokine was detected in all the media examined, with an equivalent concentration in unstimulated and IL-2-activated uNK cells (Table 2Go). To demonstrate that MIF in the culture medium was not a component of the FCS used, complete RPMI-1640 was tested and found not to contain detectable levels of the cytokine.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Western blot profile of total homogenate of purified uNK cells. Twenty micrograms total protein of six cell preparations were loaded onto a 14% polyacrylamide gel, blotted onto nitrocellulose and exposed to an anti-MIF antibody. (A) Lanes 1 to 6, samples of unstimulated uNK cells. (B) Lanes 1 to 3, samples of IL-2-activated uNK cells. PC, positive control (recombinant human MIF). The position of molecular mass markers, expressed in kDa, is indicated.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 MIF secretion (ng/ml) by unstimulated and IL-2-activated uNK cells. Results are means± S.E.M.
 
To determine whether the presence of MIF protein is reflected in the steady-state levels of mRNA, total RNA of purified uNK cells was examined by RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 3Go, when amplification was carried out in the presence of human MIF primers, an intense band corresponding in size to the MIF product was obtained from the cDNA of each cell preparation examined. The identity of the PCR product was confirmed by restriction analysis with RsaI, which demonstrated, in the 255-bp fragment, the presence of a restriction site yielding products of the expected size (not shown). As a last step, cellular distribution of MIF in CD56 + cells was analyzed by a double immunofluorescence staining procedure. Purified uNK cells were centrifuged on slides and probed with anti-CD56 and an anti-MIF antibody. As shown in Fig. 4Go, CD56 + cells, marked by a red fluorescence on the cell membrane, were highly positive for MIF, represented as a green fluorescence, which was essentially localized in the cell cytoplasm and, to a minor extent, in the nucleus.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 RT-PCR analysis of MIF mRNA levels in purified uNK cells. One microgram total RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified in the presence of MIF primers. The size of the molecular mass makers (M) is indicated. Lanes 1 to 6, samples of uNK cells. PC, positive control (human placenta); B, blank.

 


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Immunostaining of purified uNK cells. Immunocytochemistry was performed with an indirect immunofluorescence procedure. Cells were centrifuged on slides, fixed and stained for MIF (green colour) and CD56 (red colour). Magnification: 400 x original magnification. Inset: double stained uNK cells (100 x original magnification).

 
Increase in NK cell cytolytic activity by an anti-MIF antibody
To evaluate the effect of the endogenous MIF on uNK cells, purified cultures were incubated in the presence of increasing concentrations of anti-MIF antibody or corresponding amounts of goat IgG, and the NK cell-mediated cytolysis was tested in a 51Cr release assay. In uNK cells treated with the anti-MIF antibody the cytolytic activity increased in a dose-dependent manner, while it was unaffected by the control antibody. Statistical significance was achieved for both the concentrations of anti-MIF antibody tested (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Effect of an anti-MIF antibody ({alpha}-MIF) on the cytolytic activity (expressed as percentage ± S.E.M.) of uNK cells. n = 14 (10 µg/ml); n = 6 (100 µg/ml).
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
During decidualization, progesterone acts on the oestrogen-primed human endometrium to transform stromal cells into decidua cells, initially around spiral arteries and subsequently throughout the endometrium. This process is associated with the appearance of a large number of leukocytes, mainly CD56bright NK cells, together with macrophages and a small number of B and T cells (Trundley & Moffett 2004). The specific functions of these uNK cells are still debated. The main unsolved question is the outcome of the interaction between uNK class I receptors and trophoblast MHC class I molecules. Initially it was proposed that the expression of trophoblast HLA molecules (HLA-G, HLA-E, HLA-C) could lead to the inhibition of NK cell lysis (Trundley & Moffett 2004). However, recent experimental data have shown no reversal of the inhibition of lysis in the presence of antibodies against trophoblast MHC class I antigens, suggesting that these molecules are probably less relevant for placental cell survival than previously supposed (Avril et al. 1999, King et al. 2000). An alternative hypothesis is that the interaction with trophoblast can result in changes in the uNK cell cytokine repertoire, with important consequences on trophoblast behaviour (Trundley & Moffett 2004). It is well known that CD56bright NK cells have an intrinsic capacity for high-level production of type-1 and type-2 cytokines, whereas CD56dim cells produce substantially less (Cooper et al. 2001). Indeed, the major function of CD56bright NK cells during the innate immune response in vivo is thought to provide macrophages and other antigen presenting cells with interferon-{gamma} and other cytokines, thus promoting a positive cytokine feedback loop. Interestingly, uNK cells are also known to produce cytokines that normally are not produced by blood NK cells, such as leukaemia inhibitory factor (Sharkey et al. 1999) and angiogenic growth factors (Li et al. 2001), which lends further support to the concept that uNK cell-derived cytokines might have important functions in the uterus.

The present study identified uNK cells as a source of MIF, a cytokine that has emerged as an important regulator of inflammation, influencing both the innate and antigen-specific functions of the immune system (Calandra & Roger 2003). First described as a T cell-derived protein, MIF has recently been shown to be produced by a variety of cell types, including monocytes, endothelial cells, keratinocytes and anterior pituitary cells, suggesting multifunctional physiological effects (Nishihira 2000). A critical role for this factor in the mechanisms underlying the establishment of pregnancy has also been supposed. MIF has been demonstrated to be expressed in the glandular epithelium and stroma of the cyclic endometrium as well as in the decidua and trophoblasts (Arcuri et al. 1999, 2001). Serum concentrations of the cytokine are much higher in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy than in the non-pregnant status and, more importantly, these concentrations were found to be decreased in women with recurrent miscarriage. In particular, serum MIF levels were lower in abortion-prone women with a normal foetal chromosome karyotype than in those with an abnormal foetal chromosome karyotype, thus suggesting a role for the cytokine in the aetiology of abortion (Yamada et al. 2003). Notwithstanding these observations, the precise significance of MIF in the context of gestation remains poorly defined. The results reported herein clearly indicate that MIF is synthesized and released in significant concentrations by uNK cells. These findings are in agreement with recent data obtained by Koopman and colleagues (2003) comparing the gene expression profiles of uterine and peripheral NK cells using microarray analysis. These authors identified MIF mRNA in all the cell preparations tested and reported higher levels of transcript in uNK cells compared with both CD56bright and CD56dim peripheral NK cells.

Results from the present study also showed that a neutralizing anti-MIF antibody is able to significantly increase uNK cell cytolytic activity, thus supporting the concept that the cytokine exerts an immunomodulatory function on this lymphoid population. These results are supported by the significant, although slight, inhibition of the cytolytic activity observed with rhMIF. The limited effect of the exogenously administered cytokine suggests uNK MIF levels are probably sufficient to trigger a response. A similar phenomenon has already been reported by Bacher and colleagues (1996) who found that, in T cells, although a neutralizing anti-MIF antibody inhibited cell proliferation and IL-2 production - indicating that MIF was a required participant to these effects – purified rMIF was not mitogenic by itself. The limited effect of rhMIF on uNK cells could also be explained by a reduced biological activity of the recombinant cytokine. In the present study, rhMIF was expressed as a maltose binding protein fusion protein in BL21 E. coli cells. An identical procedure was recently applied by Baumann and colleagues (2003). These authors, evaluating the antiapoptotic effect of MIF on neutrophils and eosinophils, reported that microgram concentrations of rhMIF were necessary to obtain maximum response. Interestingly, when the biological activity of the recombinant cytokine was tested by assessing its capacity to block monocyte migration in an in vitro assay, similar high MIF concentrations were needed. These results were interpreted as an indication that the recombinant protein was not fully functionally active. In view of the strict similarities between the procedures used, it is hypothesized that the reduced effect of rhMIF on uNK cytolytic activity was due to the limited biological activity of the recombinant protein.

It is becoming clear that the immune privilege of the uterine environment results from multiple mechanisms that selectively down-regulate immune effectors with the potential to damage the conceptus (Thellin & Heinen 2003). Based on the present data, it is speculated that MIF, exerting both an autocrine and a paracrine modulatory action on uNK cell activity, may contribute to the immune privilege at the maternal–foetal interface. In this context it is noteworthy that MIF is produced in both the brain and the eye (Nishihira 1998), two classic immune-privileged sites that, similar to cytotrophoblasts, have a very peculiar expression of MHC class I determinants. On the other hand, it is possible that MIF may influence normal gestation through modification of the maternal arterial physiology and endothelial cell proliferation. Uterine NK cells are involved in the vascular remodelling that occurs during human implantation as demonstrated by the presence of vessel abnormalities at implantation sites in mice deficient in NK cells (Guimond et al. 1997, 1999). Two strains of mice, the tg{varepsilon}26 and the IL-2Rß null X RAG-2 null hybrid, that lack both NK and T cells, demonstrate abnormal decidual vessels in the mesometrial segment of the uterus on days 7 and 8 of gestation. Endothelial cells become tall and columnar with evidence of cell death and separation from the basement membrane. Arterioles demonstrate increased thickness and do not undergo the thinning of the vascular smooth muscle cells characteristic of the vessel adaptation to pregnancy. Mice lacking T cells, but not NK cells, have a normal phenotype (Guimond et al. 1997). These observations underline the importance of uNK cell-mediated production of angiogenic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor-C and angiopoietin 2. In this context, MIF could play a relevant role as a mediator of the process of neovascularization. Indeed, this cytokine has been implicated in tumour growth-associated angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro (Chesney et al. 1999, Shimizu et al. 1999) and in the regulation of vascular endothelial cell proliferation in vitro (Ogawa et al. 2000, Amin et al. 2003). This possibility needs to be further investigated in relation to specific pathologies involving both an immune and a vascular maladaptation to pregnancy such as pre-eclampsia (Norwitz et al. 2001).

In conclusion, our data support a role for MIF as a component of the uNK cell mediator repertoire, which is thought to have a strong impact on embryo development and trophoblast invasion. Studies are in progress to evaluate the molecular basis of MIF-mediated inhibition of uNK cell activity and the potential cytokine network underlying MIF production by this uterine lymphoid population.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors thank Dr David Beach (Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College, London, UK) for his generosity in making available the pMal-c2/MIF plasmid. This work was supported by a grant from the University of Siena (to M C). The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.


    Footnotes
 
Received 25 June 2005
First decision 2 August 2005
Revised manuscript received 28 September 2005
Accepted 4 October 2005


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

Abe R, Peng T, Sailors J, Bucala R & Metz CN 2001 Regulation of the CTL response by macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Journal of Immunology 166 747–753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Amin MA, Volpert OV, Woods JM, Kumar P, Harlow LA & Koch AE 2003 Migration inhibitory factor mediates angiogenesis via mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol kinase. Circulation Research 93 321–329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Apte RS, Sinha D, Mayhew E, Wistow GJ & Niederkorn JY 1998 Cutting edge: role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in inhibiting NK cell activity and preserving immune privilege. Journal of Immunology 160 5693–5696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arcuri F, Cintorino M, Vatti R, Carducci A, Liberatori S & Paulesu L 1999 Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor transcript and protein by first-trimester human trophoblasts. Biology of Reproduction 60 1299–1303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arcuri F, Ricci C, Ietta F, Cintorino M, Tripodi SA, Cetin I, Garzia E, Schatz F, Klemi P & Santopietro R et al. 2001 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the human endometrium: expression and localization during the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 64 1200–1205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Avril T, Jarousseau AC, Watier H, Boucraut J, Le Bouteiller P, Bardos P & Thibault G 1999 Trophoblast cell line resistance to NK lysis mainly involves an HLA class I-independent mechanism. Journal of Immunology 162 5902–5909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bacher M, Metz CN, Calandra T, Mayer K, Chesney J, Lohoff M, Gemsa D, Donnelly T & Bucala R 1996 An essential regulatory role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor in T-cell activation. PNAS 93 7849–7854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baumann R, Casaulta C, Simon D, Conus S, Yousefi S & Simon HU 2003 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor delays apoptosis in neutrophils by inhibiting the mitochondria-dependent death pathway. FASEB Journal 17 2221–2230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bloom BR & Bennett B 1966 Mechanism of a reaction in vitro associated with delayed-type hypersensitivity. Science 153 80–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bradford MM 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72 248–254.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Calandra T & Roger T 2003 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology 3 791–800.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Metz CN, Spiegel LA, Bacher M, Donnelly T, Cerami A & Bucala R 1995 MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature 377 68–71.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chesney J, Metz C, Bacher M, Peng T, Meinhardt A & Bucala R 1999 An essential role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in angiogenesis and the growth of a murine lymphoma. Molecular Medicine 5 181–191.[ISI][Medline]

Cooper MA, Fehniger TA & Caligiuri MA 2001 The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends in Immunology 22 633–640.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

David JR 1966 Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro: its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell-antigen interaction. PNAS 56 72–77.[Free Full Text]

Guimond MJ, Luross JA, Wang B, Terhorst C, Danial S & Croy BA 1997 Absence of natural killer cells during murine pregnancy is associated with reproductive compromise in TgE26 mice. Biology of Reproduction 56 169–179.[Abstract]

Guimond M, Wang B & Croy BA 1999 Immune competence involving the natural killer cell lineage promotes placental growth. Placenta 20 441–450.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hudson JD, Shoaibi MA, Maestro R, Carnero A, Hannon GJ & Beach DH 1999 A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits p53 tumor suppressor activity. Journal of Experimental Medicine 190 1375–1382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

King A, Allan DS, Bowen M, Powis SJ, Joseph S, Verma S, Hiby SE, McMichael AJ, Loke YW & Braud VM 2000 HLA-E is expressed on trophoblast and interacts with CD94/NKG2 receptors on decidual NK cells. European Journal of Immunology 30 1623–1631.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Koopman LA, Kopcow HD, Rybalov B, Boyson JE, Orange JS, Schatz F, Masch R, Lockwood CJ, Schachter AD, Park PJ et al. 2003 Human decidual natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with immunomodulatory potential. Journal of Experimental Medicine 198 1201–1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li XF, Charnock-Jones DS, Zhang E, Hiby S, Malik S, Day K, Licence D, Bowen JM, Gardner L, King A et al. 2001 Angiogenic growth factor messenger ribonucleic acids in uterine natural killer cells. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 1823–1834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mazzeo D, Vigano P, Di Blasio AM, Sinigaglia F, Vignali M & Panina-Bordignon P 1998 Interleukin-12 and its free p40 subunit regulate immune recognition of endometrial cells: potential role in endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 83 911–916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moffett-King A 2002 Natural killer cells and pregnancy. Nature Reviews Immunology 2 656–663.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Nishihira J 1998 Novel pathophysiological aspects of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine 2 17–28.[ISI][Medline]

Nishihira J 2000 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): its essential role in the immune system and cell growth. Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research 20 751–762.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Norwitz ER, Schust DJ & Fisher SJ 2001 Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine 345 1400–1408.[Free Full Text]

Ogawa H, Nishihira J, Sato Y, Kondo M, Takahashi N, Oshima T & Todo S 2000 An antibody for macrophage migration inhibitory factor suppresses tumour growth and inhibits tumour-associated angiogenesis. Cytokine 12 309–314.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Repp AC, Mayhew ES, Apte S & Niederkorn JY 2000 Human uveal melanoma cells produce macrophage migration-inhibitory factor to prevent lysis by NK cells. Journal of Immunology 165 710–715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saito S, Morii T, Enomoto M, Sakakura S, Nishikawa K, Narita N & Ichijo M 1993 The effect of interleukin 2 and transforming growth factor-beta 2 (TGF-beta 2) on the proliferation and natural killer activity of decidual CD16– CD56bright natural killer cells. Cellular Immunology 152 605–613.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Sharkey AM, King A, Clark DE, Burrows TD, Jokhi PP, Charnock-Jones DS, Loke YW & Smith SK 1999 Localization of leukemia inhibitory factor and its receptor in human placenta throughout pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 60 355–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shimizu T, Abe R, Nakamura H, Ohkawara A, Suzuki M & Nishihira J 1999 High expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human melanoma cells and its role in tumor cell growth and angiogenesis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 264 751–758.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Thellin O & Heinen E 2003 Pregnancy and the immune system: between tolerance and rejection. Toxicology 185 179–184.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Trundley A & Moffett A 2004 Human uterine leukocytes and pregnancy. Tissue Antigens 63 1–12.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Verma S, Hiby SE, Loke YW & King A 2000 Human decidual natural killer cells express the receptor for and respond to the cytokine interleukin 15. Biology of Reproduction 62 959–968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vigano P, Gaffuri B, Somigliana E, Infantino M, Vignali M & Di Blasio AM 2001 Interleukin-10 is produced by human uterine natural killer cells but does not affect their production of interferon-gamma. Molecular Human Reproduction 7 971–977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada H, Kato EH, Morikawa M, Shimada S, Saito H, Watari M, Minakami H & Nishihira J 2003 Decreased serum levels of macrophage migration inhibition factor in miscarriages with normal chromosome karyotype. Human Reproduction 18 616–620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arcuri, F
Right arrow Articles by Viganò, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arcuri, F
Right arrow Articles by Viganò, P


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS