Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2005) 130 825-828
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00902
Copyright © 2005 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, R. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, R. M

BRIEF REVIEW

From egg to embryo: a peripatetic journey

Richard M Schultz

Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to R Schultz; Email: rschultz{at}sas.upenn.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Gene expression during oocyte...
 Egg activation
 Gene expression during...
 Long-term effects of embryo...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The recent surge of interest in oocyte development has been spurred in large part by the increasing implementation of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to treat human infertility. What is becoming apparent is that ‘egg quality’ is a primary factor in the success of ART (Sauer 1998), and yet we know virtually nothing about the molecular signature of a ‘high quality’ oocyte, i.e., an oocyte that is capable of maturing, being fertilized and supporting development to term. We are gaining marked insights, however, into how sperm activate eggs and the changes in gene expression that accompany preimplantation development. Nevertheless, embryo culture is known to effect gene expression (Rinaudo & Schultz 2004), the long-term consequences of which are only recently being unmasked. This review will briefly highlight these topics that were presented during the Biennial Joint Meeting of the UK Fertility Societies at Warwick University in April 2005.


    Gene expression during oocyte development
 Top
 Abstract
 Gene expression during oocyte...
 Egg activation
 Gene expression during...
 Long-term effects of embryo...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Oocyte development is characterized by initiation of growth during the primordial to primary follicle transition and the subsequent sequential acquisition of meiotic and developmental competence, i.e., the ability of oocyte to resume and complete meiosis, and the ability of the meta-phase II-arrested egg to be fertilized and support development to term, respectively. We used Affymetrix microarrays to characterize global changes in gene expression that occur in oocytes obtained from primordial to large antral follicles and used Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE) to identify biological and molecular processes that accompany these transitions and likely underpin acquisition of meiotic and developmental competence (Hosack et al. 2003).

Most striking is that greatest degree of change is observed during primordial to primary follicle transition, in which approximately one third of the transcripts exhibit at least a two-fold change in relative abundance (of those transcripts which change, about a half increase and another half decrease; Pan et al. 2005). Changes that occur during subsequent transitions, e.g., primary to secondary follicle, are about ten-fold less. Of particular note is the marked up-regulation of several transcription factors, including Gli3, which is critically involved in the hedgehog signaling pathway that appears ubiquitously involved in cell-cell interactions (Cohen 2003). But also of note was the totally unanticipated finding that accompanying the primordial to primary follicle transition is an increase or decrease in transcriptional activity of specific chromosomes – such changes are not observed at later stages of oocyte development – and that these changes are largely confined to specific regions of these specific chromosomes. It will be interesting to learn if these regional changes in gene expression correlate with local differences in the state of histone modifications that are linked to either transcriptionally permissive or repressive chromatin (Jenuwein & Allis 2001, Fischle et al. 2003).

Oocyte development in vitro results in eggs of reduced developmental competence (Eppig & Schroeder 1989). Remarkably the global pattern of gene expression in oocytes that developed from either the primordial or secondary follicles stage differed from that of oocytes that developed in vivo by only 4% and 2%, respectively. EASE analysis revealed that there is an over-representation of genes involved in transcription of the commonly mis-expressed genes (1%). For example, the increased expression of Ctcf and Dnmt3a, genes involved in establishing the correct pattern of maternal DNA methylation, could result in reduced developmental competence of oocytes (or preimplantation embryos due to maternally-inherited CTCF and DNMT3A).


    Egg activation
 Top
 Abstract
 Gene expression during oocyte...
 Egg activation
 Gene expression during...
 Long-term effects of embryo...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Activation of mammalian eggs is characterized by a series of calcium oscillations that initiate shortly after sperm–egg fusion and terminate with pronucleus formation (Ducibella et al. 2002). The events of egg activation include exit from metaphase II-arrest and entry into interphase, cortical granule exocytosis, and recruitment of maternal mRNAs. Until recently is has not been clear if these oscillations are simply an outcome of the calcium releasing and sequestration machinery or whether information encoded in these oscillations is ‘decoded’ by the egg to generate specific responses of egg activation.

Recently, it has become possible to experimentally manipulate calcium oscillations in mammalian eggs, i.e., one can modulate their frequency, amplitude and duration (Ducibella et al. 2002). By doing so, it has become apparent that the events of egg activation are controlled by the number of calcium oscillations (the eggs in fact seem to be summing the total amount of calcium that is released, (Ozil et al. 2005) such that early events (e.g., cortical granule exocytosis) require only a few oscillations, whereas later events (e.g., cell cycle resumption and recruitment of maternal mRNAs) require many more. This may serve as a mechanism to insure that the events of egg activation occur in a specific temporal fashion that is necessary for successful development. For example, a block to polyspermy needs to be established early and this would occur because cortical granule exocytosis is triggered by only a few calcium oscillations.

The basis for calcium oscillations is IP3-mediated release from intracellular stores (Miyazaki et al. 1992), presumably by a phospholipase C (PLC) hydrolyzing inositol bisphosphate (PIP2). How sperm generate IP3, however, has undergone recently a paradigm shift from a ligand-receptor model to a model in which a sperm-specific PLC, PLC{zeta}, diffuses into the egg following sperm–egg membrane fusion to initiate calcium oscillations in the egg (Swann et al. 2004). Consistent with this model is that expression of PLC{zeta} mRNA in mammalian eggs mimics sperm-induced calcium oscillations and activates eggs, and sperm extracts immunodepleted of PLC{zeta} are no longer capable of initiating calcium oscillations when injected into eggs (Saunders et al. 2002). The best evidence to date that PLC{zeta} is the sperm-derived factor is that a transgenic RNAi approach to target PLC{zeta} mRNA and thereby reduce the amount of PLC{zeta} protein reveals that sperm derived from these transgenic mice trigger patterns of Ca2+ oscillations following fertilization in vitro that terminate prematurely (Knott et al. 2005). But the most compelling observation implicating PLC{zeta} is that no transgenic offspring are found when females are mated to transgenic founder males.


    Gene expression during preimplantation development
 Top
 Abstract
 Gene expression during oocyte...
 Egg activation
 Gene expression during...
 Long-term effects of embryo...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Affymetrix microarrays have also been used to characterize global patterns of gene expression that accompany development of preimplantation mouse embryos (Zeng et al. 2004, Zeng & Schultz 2005). The analysis confirmed previously described processes/events. For example, the expression profiles of oocytes and 1-cell embryos are very similar, presumably because the mRNA complement of the 1-cell embryo is inherited from the oocyte. A major reprogramming of gene expression occurs concomitant with zygotic genome activation during the 2-cell stage and the expression profile of the 2-cell embryo differs markedly from that of oocytes/1-cell embryos and 8-cell/blastocysts. EASE analysis, however, provided several new and unanticipated insights, one being that genome activation, in which 17% of the genes expressed during the 2-cell stage are {alpha}-amanitin sensitive, is not as promiscuous as previously proposed with genes involved in RNA metabolism and transcription, ribosome biogenesis and assembly, and protein synthesis being preferentially over-represented. Of particular note is that Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), which identifies biological pathways and the interrelationships between network genes in the subsets of candidate genes with particularly interesting patterns, revealed a network of focus genes centered around Myc. MYC can regulate expression of many genes including genes involved in ribosome biogenesis, and its ability to stimulate its own expression makes it an ideal candidate to play a central role in genome activation and the associated reprogramming of gene expression that is essential for continued development.

Superimposed on genome activation is the development of a chromatin-mediated transcriptionally repressive state (Schultz 2002). For example, inhibiting histone deacetylases (HDAC) relieves this repression. Many Hdac’s are expressed in the preimplantation mouse embryo, but IPA analysis identified Hdac1 as a critical component in a network centered on repression of gene expression. Thus, we have identified specific candidate genes that may be critical for genome activation.


    Long-term effects of embryo culture
 Top
 Abstract
 Gene expression during oocyte...
 Egg activation
 Gene expression during...
 Long-term effects of embryo...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The number of children conceived by ART is estimated to be between 1–3% in developed countries (Maher 2005). The problem of multiple gestation pregnancies is a clearly perceived and recognized problem by practitioners of ART, who are confronted with the problem of identifying the best embryos for transfer, which is usually performed after 2–3 days of culture. The morphological criteria for identifying such embryos, however, are weak at best. Culturing embryos to the blastocyst stage, which requires 5–6 days of culture, has been proposed as a solution to identify embryos of higher developmental competence within the developing cohort (Gardner et al. 2000). Nevertheless, embryo culture is known to perturb gene expression (Rinaudo & Schultz 2004), especially genes involved in protein synthesis and amino acid and water transport. In addition, embryo culture can perturb the expression imprinted genes such as H19, such that biallelic expression is observed and coupled with loss of DNA methylation of the paternal allele in a region that is essential for repression of the paternal allele (Doherty et al. 2000, Mann et al. 2004). Moreover, biallelic expression of H19 and other imprinted genes persists in extraembryonic tissue following embryo transfer and subtly compromise placental function that would ultimately impact the developing embryo (Mann et al. 2004). It should be noted that loss-of-imprinting is associated with Angelman and Beckwith–Weidemann syndromes, of which a significantly higher incidence is observed in ART-conceived children, and which in most instances this is due to loss of DNA methylation in critical regulatory sequences (see Maher 2005), i.e., the syndrome is due to an epigenetic change.

The Barker hypothesis or Fetal Origins of Adult Disease (FOAD) proposes that fetal adaptations in utero to maternal undernutrition or malnutrition can lead to specific diseases in the adult, including coronary heart disease, high blood pressure, and type II diabetes (Hales & Barker 2001). FOAD has been extrapolated back to preimplantation development using a rat model in which a low protein diet restricted to preimplantation stage led to changes in birth-weight, postnatal growth rate, hypertension and organ/body-weight ratios in either male or female offspring (Kwong et al. 2000). The long-term effects of embryo culture on behavior, however, have not been assessed.

Using a mouse model we found that adults derived from cultured embryos did not exhibit any differences in development to term or early developmental events (e.g., righting response, day of eyelid opening, motor coordination) but did exhibit specific behavioral alterations in anxiety (elevated zero maze) and spatial memory (Morris hidden water maze) (Ecker et al. 2004). Male mice exhibited reduced anxiety, and both males and females displayed reduced retention of spatial information. We also found that although embryo culture had long-term effects on behavior in the offspring it had no effect on longevity (Somovilla et al. 2005).

These results suggest that special effort should be made to minimize the effect of culture on the human preimplantation embryo, especially in light of the recent reports that detected an increased incidence of Angelman and Beckwith–Wiedemann syndromes. They also provide a powerful justification for the careful monitoring of ART-conceived children, in particular with follow-up studies assessing development and behavior over their lifetime. When these suggestions were first offered four years ago they evoked the ire of certain members of the ART community and were viewed as draconian. It is reassuring that these voices are now silent and that the ART community is both sensitive and receptive to these suggestions.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Gene expression during oocyte...
 Egg activation
 Gene expression during...
 Long-term effects of embryo...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The work described in the talk was supported by grants from the NIH to RMS (HD 22681, HD 22732, HD 37034, HD 42026, and HD 44757). RMS also thanks all of his students and colleagues for their contributions and to the Society for Reproduction and Fertility for extending the opportunity to present the studies described here.


    Footnotes
 
Received 20 July 2005
First decision 18 August 2005
Revised manuscript received 28 August 2005
Accepted 19 August 2005


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Gene expression during oocyte...
 Egg activation
 Gene expression during...
 Long-term effects of embryo...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

Cohen MM Jr 2003 The hedgehog signaling network. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A 123 5–28.

Doherty AS, Mann MR, Tremblay KD, Bartolomei MS & Schultz RM 2000 Differential effects of culture on imprinted H19 expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Biology of Reproduction 62 1526–1535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ducibella T, Huneau D, Angelichio E, Xu Z, Schultz RM, Kopf GS, Fissore R, Madoux S & Ozil J-P 2002 Egg to embryo transition is driven by differential responses to Ca2+ oscillation number. Developmental Biology 250 280–291.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ecker DJ, Stein P, Xu Z, Williams CJ, Kopf GS, Bilker WB, Abel T & Schultz RM 2004 Long-term effects of culture of preimplantation mouse embryos on behavior. PNAS 101 1595–1600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eppig JJ & Schroeder AC 1989 Capacity of mouse oocytes from preantral follicles to undergo embryogenesis and development to live young after growth, maturation, and fertilization in vitro. Biology of Reproduction 41 268–276.[Abstract]

Fischle W, Wang Y & Allis CD 2003 Histone and chromatin crosstalk. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 15 172–183.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gardner DK, Lane M & Schoolcraft WB 2000 Culture and transfer of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF. Human Reproduction 15 Supplement 6 9–23.

Hales CN & Barker DJ 2001 The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. British Medical Bulletin 60 5–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hosack DA, Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Lane HC & Lempicki RA 2003 Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE. Genome Biology 4 R70.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jenuwein T & Allis CD 2001 Translating the histone code. Science 293 1074–1080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Knott JG, Kurokawa M, Fissore RA, Schultz RM & Williams CJ 2005 Transgenic RNA interference reveals role for mouse sperm phospholipase Czeta in triggering Ca2+ oscillations during fertilization. Biology of Reproduction 72 992–996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kwong WY, Wild AE, Roberts P, Willis AC & Fleming TP 2000 Maternal undernutrition during the preimplantation period of rat development causes blastocyst abnormalities and programming of postnatal hypertension. Development 127 4195–4202.[Abstract]

Maher ER 2005 Imprinting and assisted reproductive technology. Human Molecular Genetics 14 Supplement 1 R133–R138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mann MR, Lee SS, Doherty AS, Verona RI, Nolen LD, Schultz RM & Bartolomei MS 2004 Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture. Development 131 3727–3735.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miyazaki S, Yuzaki M, Nakada K, Shirakawa H, Nakanishi S, Nakade S & Mikoshiba K 1992 Block of Ca2+ wave and Ca2 ± oscillation by antibody to the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in fertilized hamster eggs. Science 257 251–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ozil JP, Markoulaki S, Toth S, Matson S, Banrezes B, Knott JG, Schultz RM, Huneau D & Ducibella T 2005 Egg activation events are regulated by the duration of a sustained [Ca(2+)](cyt) signal in the mouse. Developmental Biology 282 39–54.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Pan H, O’Brien MJ, Wigglesworth K, Eppig JJ & Schultz RM 2005 Transcript profiling during mouse oocyte development and the effect of gonadotrophin priming and development in vitro. Developmental Biology 286 493–506.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rinaudo P & Schultz RM 2004 Effects of embryo culture on global pattern of gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos. Reproduction 128 301–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sauer MV 1998 The impact of age on reproductive potential: lessons learned from oocyte donation. Maturitas 30 221–225.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Saunders CM, Larman MG, Parrington J, Cox LJ, Royse J, Blayney LM, Swann K & Lai FA 2002 PLC zeta: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca(2+) oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development 129 3533–3544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schultz RM 2002 The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Human Reproduction Update 8 323–331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sommovilla J, Bilker WB, Abel T & Schultz RM 2005 Embryo culture does not affect longevity of offspring in mice. Reproduction [in press].

Swann K, Larman MG, Saunders CM & Lai FA 2004 The cytosolic sperm factor that triggers Ca2+ oscillations and egg activation in mammals is a novel phospholipase C: PLC{zeta}. Reproduction 127 431–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zeng F, Baldwin DA & Schultz RM 2004 Transcript profiling during preimplantation mouse development. Developmental Biology 272 483–496.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zeng F & Schultz RM 2005 RNA transcript profiling during zygotic gene activation in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Developmental Biology 283 40–57.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. E. Bell, M. D. Calder, and A. J. Watson
Genomic RNA profiling and the programme controlling preimplantation mammalian development
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 691 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
V. Duranthon, A. J Watson, and P. Lonergan
Preimplantation embryo programming: transcription, epigenetics, and culture environment
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 141 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Takenaka, T. Horiuchi, and R. Yanagimachi
Effects of light on development of mammalian zygotes
PNAS, September 4, 2007; 104(36): 14289 - 14293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. E. Doornbos, S. M. Maas, J. McDonnell, J. P.W. Vermeiden, and R. C.M. Hennekam
Infertility, assisted reproduction technologies and imprinting disturbances: a Dutch study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2476 - 2480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. L. Stitzel and G. Seydoux
Regulation of the Oocyte-to-Zygote Transition
Science, April 20, 2007; 316(5823): 407 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, R. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, R. M


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS