| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 236 Animal Science Building, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to M C Wiltbank; Email: wiltbank{at}calshp.cals.wisc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 mm in diameter) anovular structures that persist on the ovary for at least 10 days in the absence of a corpus luteum (CL) (Roberts 1971). In earlier studies, this condition was detected with rectal palpation and was estimated to occur in 619% of dairy cows (Kesler & Garverick 1982, Garverick 1997). In recent studies the incidence of anovulation (detected with either blood samples or ultrasonography) in dairy cattle ranged from 18 to 29% (Cartmill et al. 2001, Pursley et al. 2001, Gümen et al. 2003). Follicular cysts can cause economic loss in dairy operations (Youngquist 1986). The pathophysiology of follicular cysts in any species is incompletely defined. Development of an appropriate model is essential for studies on the underlying physiology of follicular cysts. Several different methods have been used to induce animals into an anovular condition resembling follicular cysts including estradiol (E2) treatment during diestrus (Wiltbank et al. 1961, Nadaraja & Hansel 1976), multiple treatments with high doses of progesterone (P4) and E2 (Erb et al. 1973, Cook et al. 1990, 1991, Hamilton et al. 1995, Calder et al. 1999) and prolonged E2 exposure (Dobson et al. 1996, Özturk et al. 1998). Follicular cysts can also be induced with a single E2 injection if E2 is given at a time when the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)/luteinizing hormone (LH) surge will occur in the absence of a potentially ovulatory follicle (Gümen & Wiltbank 2002, Gümen et al. 2002). Conversely, cows with either induced or naturally occurring follicular cysts return to cyclicity after treatment with P4 (Calder et al. 1999, Gümen & Wiltbank 2002, 2005). Thus, the pathophysiology underlying follicular cysts appears to involve an unresponsiveness of the hypothalamus to increasing E2 due to elevated E2 inducing a GnRH/LH surge that is not followed by an increase in P4. Based on this model we postulated that follicular cysts may be a pathological manifestation of a physiological state that cows, and possibly other species, go through during the normal estrous cycle. However, the results providing support for this model are based on studies using treatments with high doses of exogenous E2. This study was designed to determine whether the normal E2 rise leading to estrus, the GnRH/LH surge and ovulation can produce a similar E2-unresponsive condition if there was no subsequent exposure to luteal-phase P4 concentrations. Specifically, we hypothesized that if the ovary containing the corpus hemorrhagicum was removed soon after ovulation (after natural E2-induced GnRH/LH surge but prior to increased circulating P4), the cow would be left in a physiological condition similar to follicular cysts (i.e. lack of positive feedback by elevated E2, no GnRH/LH surge and development of large anovular follicles).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PGF2
) i.m. (Lutalyse; Pfizer Animal Health, Groton, CT, USA) 7 days after GnRH to regress functional CL and allow a new ovulation. Transrectal ultrasound evaluation to monitor ovarian structures was performed with an ultrasound scanner (Aloka 500V; Corometrics Medical Systems Inc., Walling-ford, CT, USA) equipped with a 7.5 MHz linear-array transducer. Measurements were made on a single frozen image of the apparent maximal area of each follicle, using the average diameter in two directions at right angles. Ovaries from cows were evaluated by ultrasonography daily from day 0 (GnRH injection) to day 9. In order to detect ovulation, ovaries were evaluated by ultrasonography every 8 h, starting from day 9, until ovulation. Ovulation was determined by ultrasound scanning (disappearance of a large follicle followed by appearance of a corresponding CL). Follicular deviation was defined as occurring during the retrospectively identified ultrasound examination in which the beginning of the greatest difference in growth rates between the largest follicle and the second-largest follicle was identified. Co-dominant follicles were defined as two follicles of 10 mm in diameter that had not yet undergone diameter deviation in the first follicular wave after ovariectomy (OVX).
Unilateral OVX was performed using the colpotomy technique described by Drost et al.(1992). After ovulation was detected, each cow was placed in a chute. Following feces removal from the rectum, the vulva was washed with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine antiseptic solution; The Purdue Frederick Co., Stamford, CT, USA). After collection of a blood sample from a tail vein, an i.v. injection of 5 mg acepromazine maleate (Phoenix Pharmaceutical Inc., St Joseph, MO, USA) and 10 mg xylazine (Xyla-ject; Phoenix Pharmaceutical Inc.) was given to tranquilize the cows. Tail hair was trimmed with clippers and epidural anesthesia was then administrated using 4 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injectable-2%; Phoenix Pharmaceutical Inc.). The vagina was scrubbed with 10% povidone-iodine and hemostatic forceps were introduced into the vagina in order to make the initial vaginal incision. The incision was enlarged by forceful introduction of individual fingers and ultimately, the entire hand directly into the peritoneal cavity. An ecraseur (Jorgensen Laboratories Inc., Loveland, CO, USA) was introduced and one ovary was removed. Cows were randomly but unequally assigned to two treatment groups. The ovary containing the newly formed corpus hemorrhagicum was removed in the treatment group (TRT; n = 16), whereas the control group (CON; n = 8) had the ovary that did not contain the corpus hemorrhagicum removed. The remaining ovary was evaluated by daily ultrasound and blood samples were taken every day for the next 25 days or until the next ovulation. All animal handling and care procedures were approved by the Research Animal Resources Center of University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Blood samples and hormone assays
Blood samples for P4, E2, cortisol and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) analyses were collected daily from day 0 to day 9, and then every 8 h until ovulation, from the coccygeal vein into Vacutainer tubes (Becton Dickinson Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Blood samples also were collected daily after surgery until next ovulation as determined by ultrasonography or until 25 days after surgery. Blood was allowed to clot at 4 °C for 24 h and centrifuged at 1500 g for 15 min. Serum was collected and stored at 20 °C until further analysis.
Serum concentrations of FSH were determined using a RIA validated for use in cattle (Bolt & Rollins 1983, Bolt et al. 1990). The FSH assay incorporated bovine FSH (USDA-bFSH-I-2) for iodination and reference standards and NIDDK-anti-o-FSH-I-2 as the primary antiserum. Hormone sensitivity, calculated as two standard deviations below the mean c.p.m. at maximum binding, was 0.05 ng/ml (mean of two different assays). Interassay and intraassay coefficients of variation for FSH were 4.1 and 7.8% respectively using pooled plasma from cows near diestrus and estrus.
Serum concentrations of P4 were determined by a solid-phase RIA kit containing antibody-coated tubes and 125I-labelled progesterone (Coat-A-Count; Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA) as described previously (Gümen & Wiltbank 2005). Hormone sensitivity, calculated as two standard deviations below the mean c.p.m. at maximum binding, was 0.03 ng/ml (mean of six different assays). Interassay and intraassay coefficients of variation for P4 were 5.8 and 6.5% respectively using a quality control sample with 2.0 ng/ml, and 5.5 and 6.1% respectively using a quality control sample with 10 ng/ml P4.
Serum concentrations of E2 were measured using modifications to a commercially available E2 RIA kit (Third Generation Oestradiol Assay Kit; Diagnostics Systems Laboratories Inc., Webster, TX, USA) previously validated for use in cattle (Kulick et al. 1999). Hormone sensitivity, calculated as two standard deviations below the mean c.p.m. at maximum binding, was 0.19 pg/ml (mean of two different assays). A quality control sample was prepared from charcoal-stripped serum containing a known concentration of E2. The quality control sample was evaluated multiple times in each assay and interassay and intraassay coefficients of variation for E2 were 3.2 and 8.6% respectively.
Serum concentrations of cortisol were determined by a competitive ELISA that was previously validated in our laboratory (Reinemann et al. 2003). Hormone sensitivity, calculated as two standard deviations below the mean optical density (OD) of maximal binding wells, was 0.06 ng/ml (mean of five different assays). A quality control sample was prepared from charcoal-stripped serum containing a known concentration of cortisol. The quality control sample was evaluated multiple times in each assay and interassay and intraassay coefficients of variation for cortisol were 2.3 and 4.7% respectively.
Statistical analyses
Analyses of data (serum P4, E2, cortisol and FSH) were conducted using the Mixed Procedure of SAS with repeated measures in time (SAS 1999). The model was:
![]() |
where: Yijk = dependent observations; µ = overall mean; trti = groups (i = anovular, ovular or control cows after OVX (fixed effect)); cowj(trti) = cows ( j = 1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 24 (random effect)); timek = days (k = 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., 25 (fixed effect)); trt*itimek = interaction of groups and time (fixed effect); eijk = residual (random effect). To account for correlated errors due to repeated measures on the same experimental unit, cowj(trti), the Autoregressive (1) covariance error structure was used (Littell et al. 1998). If the treatment was significant in the model, differences between treatments were determined using the PDIFF option (SAS 1999). Students t-test was used to compare hours to ovulation after prostaglandin injection and time to deviation after OVX between treatment and control cows. Students t-test was also used to compare follicle diameter at different stages of the experimental period (ovulatory follicle size, largest follicle after OVX). The data with a binomial distribution were analyzed by Fishers Exact test. All data are presented as means ± S.E.M. or proportions. P values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered to be significant, and trends were discussed for P values between 0.05 and 0.1.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
injection (3.3 ± 0.3 ng/ml). P4 concentration decreased to basal level (0.05 ± 0.001 ng/ml) 3 days after PGF2
in all cows. Ovulation was detected in all cows at an average of 93.7 ± 4.5 h after PGF2
injection.
Serum P4 concentrations were not different between control (CON; 3.3 ± 0.3, 0.04 ± 0.01 ng/ml) and treatment (TRT; 3.3 ± 0.5, 0.05 ± 0.01 ng/ml) groups at the time of PGF2
and OVX respectively. No difference was observed in average interval from PGF2
to ovulation between CON (94.1 ± 10.2 h) and TRT (93.5 ± 4.8 h) groups. The size of the dominant follicle that ovulated after PGF2
injection was not different between CON (15.4 ± 0.5 mm) and TRT (16.0 ± 0.4 mm) cows. A new follicular wave was detected at the time of OVX and diameter of follicles at this time was not different between CON (4.9 ± 0.3 mm) and TRT (4.8 ± 0.2 mm) cows. Days from OVX to deviation tended to be shorter (P < 0.07) in TRT (3.1 ± 0.2 days) than CON (3.9 ± 0.3 days) cows. The incidence of co-dominance was not different in CON (3/8; 37.5%) and TRT (8/16; 50%) cows. At the time of deviation, the diameters of the largest dominant follicle (F1; 10.7 ± 0.6 mm vs 10.3 ± 0.3 mm), the second-largest follicle (F2; in co-dominance; 9.3 ± 0.2 mm vs 9.0 ± 0.3 mm) and the subordinate follicle (SF; 7.6 ± 0.5 mm vs 7.9 ± 0.3 mm) were not different between CON and TRT cows respectively.
Individual follicular profiles for two cows in the CON group are shown in Fig. 1A and B
). None of the CON cows became anovular following OVX. Of the CON cows, six cows had two follicular waves and the other two cows had three follicular waves during the estrous cycle. All CON cows had a normal length estrous cycle (22.0 ± 0.6 days) after OVX.
|
The other half of the TRT cows became anovular (TRT-ANO; n = 8) after OVX. These eight cows remained anovular 25 days after OVX. Individual follicular profiles for four cows in TRT-ANO are shown in Fig. 2
. Three cows had co-dominant follicles and five cows had a single dominant follicle during the first follicular wave after OVX. The maximal size of follicles reached 25.4 ± 1.4 mm (range, 2032 mm) in TRT-ANO cows. Six of eight anovular cows had two follicular waves during the 25-day experimental period and two anovular cows had only one follicular wave during this time (Fig. 2
). The second follicle wave was detected 15.0 ± 2.4 days after OVX in the six anovular cows with two follicular waves.
|
Serum P4 concentrations decreased to basal levels after PGF2
in all cows regardless of treatment (Fig. 3
). Control cows had a normal P4 rise after ovulation. Removal of the newly formed corpus hemorrhagicum prevented the rise in circulating P4 in TRT-ANO cows throughout the 25-day experimental period. However, TRT-OV cows had a delayed increase in circulating P4 but serum P4 concentration was normal in relation to the time of ovulation (Fig. 3
). Serum P4 was greater (P < 0.05) in CON than TRT-ANO cows beginning from day 5 after OVX. Serum P4 was similar between TRT-OV and TRT-ANO cows until day 9 after OVX and began increasing after day 9 in TRT-OV cows. Serum P4 concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) from day 12 to day 20 in TRT-OV cows than in TRT-ANO cows. Also, P4 concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in CON than TRT-OV cows from day 5 to day 15 after OVX (Fig. 3
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was not possible from our results to determine the reason that some cows did not enter this anovular condition even when the P4 increase was eliminated (TRT-OV cows). There were no differences from 3 days before until 7 days after OVX in circulating P4, E2, FSH or cortisol concentrations between treated cows that became anovular versus treated cows that remained ovular. Hamilton et al.(1995) found that the circulating concentrations of E2 and pulsatile LH were greater in anovula cows than in ovular cows. Similarly, we found greater E2 concentrations in anovular cows than in control or treated cows that remained ovular from days 812 after OVX. Thus, at about 7 days after OVX the TRT-OV cows had an E2 increase that induced a GnRH/LH surge and this produced a decrease in follicular E2 production and subsequent ovulation. Conversely, the cows that became anovular (TRT-ANO) had follicles that continued to grow and E2 concentrations remained elevated but there was no GnRH/LH surge or ovulation. As with our results, Yoshioka et al.(1998) found that circulating E2 concentrations increased with greater follicular size in anovular cows. In each of our previous studies using injections of a high dose of E2, we were also able to induce cows into an anovular condition (5962% of cows became anovular) but we also failed to detect any hormonal differences that would explain why treated cows remained ovular or became anovular (Gümen & Wiltbank 2002, 2005).
It is possible that a continuous elevation in E2 is a part of the mechanism that induced follicular cysts in those cows that developed this condition in our experiment. Continuous treatment with follicular-phase levels of E2 blocked a subsequent E2-induced LH surge in ovariectomized ewes (Özturk et al. 1998). Treatment with E2 specifically downregulates hypothalamic estrogen receptor mRNA (Lauber et al. 1990, Simerly & Young 1991) in rats. E2 appears to act on cells in the mediobasal hypothalamus (Blache et al. 1991, Caraty et al. 1998) by activating estrogen receptor-
(ER
) (Couse & Korach 1999). Several studies have shown that ER
knockout mice have very large anovular follicles (Couse et al. 1999, Scully et al. 1997, Schomberg et al. 1998). Thus, the E2 increase near the time of estrus could not only induce a GnRH surge but also could downregulate expression of ER
(or some other aspect of E2 signal transduction) in the lateral mediobasal hypothalamus producing hypothalamic unresponsiveness to E2. Our experimental results are consistent with this downregulation occurring not only during pharmacological treatments with E2, as shown in previous experiments, but also during the physiological rise in E2 that produces the natural GnRH/LH surge. A continuing elevation in circulating E2 from the subsequent follicular waves may prolong this downregulation of ER
and hypothalamic unresponsiveness and may be a critical component in development of persistent anovulation in animals with follicular cysts. However, the differences between TRT-ANO and TRT-OV cows do not appear to be solely explained by E2 concentrations since there were no differences in circulating E2 between these groups until 7 days after OVX when TRT-ANO follicles continue to grow and TRT-OV follicles ovulate.
It appears that a relatively simple model could explain our results in this study (Fig. 6
). In normally cycling cows, an E2 surge due to the final stages of preovulatory follicular growth could not only induce a GnRH surge but also could downregulate expression of ER
in the lateral mediobasal hypothalamus. The GnRH surge would be expected to cause an LH surge from the pituitary and ovulation of a dominant follicle. The subsequent increase in P4 from the CL could reinitiate responsiveness to E2 at the hypothalamus by inducing ER
(Blache et al. 1991, Caraty & Skinner 1999). Removal of the CL after ovulation in the anovular cows prevents the rise in circulating P4, a new follicle wave grows and E2 concentrations increase, so maintaining downregulation of hypothalamic ER
.
|
receptor (Blache et al. 1991, Caraty & Skinner 1999). The results of our study extend these previous observations by indicating that similar P4-mediated mechanisms are needed in normally cycling cows to liberate them from a potentially cystic condition that occurs after estrus during each estrous cycle. Thus, the endogenous increase in circulating E2 that induces the GnRH/LH surge and estrus is sufficient to induce cows into a physiological state that resembles follicular cysts if it is not followed by increased P4. These cows exhibited the hallmarks of cystic cows: large anovular follicles and probably hypothalamic unresponsiveness to E2 (elevated E2 concentrations were not followed by ovulation probably due to lack of a GnRH/LH surge). Under natural conditions the rise in P4 following ovulation would return the hypothalamus to a condition that would respond to elevated E2. It seems likely that the natural development of follicular cysts may also occur due to similar circumstances. This could involve either an inadequate GnRH surge, inadequate pituitary LH or lack of ovulatory capacity in the follicle that would prevent an ovulation after the E2 rise that normally induces estrus. Obviously, testing of this speculative model will require future research.
Other interesting observations on follicular development were also noted in this study. The TRT cows had earlier follicular deviation than CON cows. This could be due to lower circulating P4 concentrations perhaps increasing follicular growth rate. In addition, the interval from emergence to deviation was longer in this study with lactating cows (80.0 ± 4.8 h) than in a previous study in heifers (60.461.0 h) (Kulick et al. 1999). Follicular size was also smaller at deviation (~8.5 mm) in previous studies with heifers (Ginther et al. 1996, Kulick et al. 1999) and lactating cows (9.8 mm, Sartori et al. 2004) than in the present study (10.310.7 mm). Unilateral OVX may have altered deviation due to removal of a large number of ovarian follicles and/or alteration in circulating hormonal concentrations. In addition, there was a high incidence of co-dominant follicles in the first follicular wave after OVX in both treatment (eight of 16; no CL and low P4) and control (three of eight; with CL and increasing P4). Similar to our findings, Mohan & Rajamahendran (1998) reported that unilateral OVX (performed on the day after ovulation) increased the number of ovulatory follicles (two follicles developed and ovulated in six of eight cycles). Also, Matsui et al.(2004) reported that absence of CL induced co-dominant follicles during the first follicular wave in six of eight cows. Thus, OVX appeared to alter a number of aspects of follicular development and selection through mechanisms related or unrelated to the decrease in circulating P4 caused by removal of the corpus hemorrhagicum.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arbeiter K 1993 Anovulatory ovarian cycles in dogs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 47 453456.
Blache D, Fabre-Nys CJ & Venier G 1991 Ventromedial hypothalamus as a target for oestradiol action on proceptivity, receptivity and luteinizing hormone surge of the ewe. Brain Research 546 241249.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bolt DJ & Rollins R 1983 Development and application of a radioimmunoassay for bovine follicle-stimulating hormone. Journal of Animal Science 56 146154.
Bolt DJ, Scott V & Kiracofe GH 1990 Plasma LH and FSH after estradiol, norgestomet and GnRH treatment in ovariectomized beef heifers. Animal Reproduction Science 23 263271.[CrossRef][ISI]
Brawer JR, Munoz M & Farookhi R 1986 Development of the polycystic ovarian condition (PCO) in the estradiol valerate-treated rat. Biology of Reproduction 35 647655.[Abstract]
Brown JL, Hondebrandt TB, Theison W & Neiffer DL 1999 Endocrine and ultrasound evaluation of a non-cycling African Elephant: identification of an ovarian follicular cyst. Zoo Biology 18 223232.[CrossRef]
Calder MD, Salfen BE, Bao B, Youngquist RS & Garverick HA 1999 Administration of progesterone to cows with ovarian follicle cysts results in a reduction in mean LH and LH pulse frequency and initiates ovulatory follicular growth. Journal of Animal Science 77 30373042.
Caraty A & Skinner DC 1999 Progesterone priming is essential for the full expression of the positive feedback effect of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone surge in the ewe. Endocrinology 140 165170.
Caraty A, Fabre-Nys C, Delaleu B, Locatelli A, Bruneau G, Karsch FJ & Herbison A 1998 Evidence that the mediobasal hypothalamus is the primary site of action of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory gonadotropin releasing hormone surge in the ewe. Endocrinology 139 17521760.
Cartmill JA, El-Zarkouny SZ, Hensley BA, Lamb GC & Stevenson JS 2001 Stage of cycle, incidence, and timing of ovulation, and pregnancy rates in dairy cattle after three timed breeding protocols. Journal of Dairy Science 84 10511059.[Abstract]
Christman SA, Bailey MT, Head WA & Wheaton JE 2000 Induction of ovarian cystic follicles in sheep. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 19 133146.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cook DL, Smith CA, Parfet JR, Youngquist RS, Brown EM & Garverick HA 1990 Fate and turnover rate of ovarian follicular cysts in dairy cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 90 3746.[Abstract]
Cook DL, Parfet JR, Smith CA, Moss GE, Youngquist RS & Garverick HA 1991 Secretory patterns of LH and FSH during development and hypothalamic and hypophysial characteristics following development of steroid-induced ovarian follicular cysts in dairy cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 91 1928.[Abstract]
Couse JF & Korach KS 1999 Estrogen receptor null mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocrine Review 20 358417.
Couse JF, Bunch DO, Lindzey J, Schomberg DW & Korach KS 1999 Prevention of the polycystic ovarian phenotype and characterization of ovulatory capacity in the estrogen receptor-[alpha] knockout mouse. Endocrinology 140 58555865.
Dobson H & Alam MGS 1987 Preliminary investigations into the endocrine systems of subfertile cattle: location of a common lesion (rate limiting step). Journal of Endocrinology 113 167171.[Abstract]
Dobson H, Kelly VM, Phogat JB, Deacon SE & Smith RF 1996 Effect of prolonged oestradiol treatment on the LH surge mechanism in ewes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 17 36.
Drost M, Savio JD, Barros CM, Badinga L & Thatcher WW 1992 Ovariectomy by colpotomy in cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association 200 337339.
Erb RE, Monk EL, Callahan CJ & Mollett TA 1973 Endocrinology of induced ovarian follicular cysts. Journal of Animal Science 37 310.
Garverick HA 1997 Ovarian follicular cysts in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80 9951004.[Abstract]
Ginther OJ, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM, Gibbons JR & Kot K 1996 Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 55 11871194.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Gümen A & Wiltbank MC 2002 An alteration in the hypothalamic action of estradiol due to lack of progesterone exposure can cause follicular cysts in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 66 16891695.
Gümen A & Wiltbank MC 2005 Length of progesterone exposure needed to resolve the large follicle anovular condition in dairy cows. Theriogenology 63 202218.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Gümen A, Sartori R, Costa FMJ & Wiltbank MC 2002 A GnRH/LH surge without subsequent progesterone exposure can induce development of follicular cysts. Journal of Dairy Science 85 4350.[Abstract]
Gümen A, Guenther JN & Wiltbank MC 2003 Follicular size and response to Ovsynch versus detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86 31843194.
Hamilton SA, Garverick HA, Keisler DH, Xu ZZ, Loos K, Youngquist RS & Salfen BE 1995 Characterization of ovarian follicular cysts and associated endocrine profiles in dairy cows. Biology of Reproduction 53 890898.[Abstract]
Heinonen M, Leppavuori A & Pyorala S 1998 Evaluation of reproductive failure of female pigs based on slaughterhouse material and herd record survey. Animal Reproduction Science 52 235244.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Johnson AD & Ulberg LC 1967 Influence of exogenous progesterone on follicular cysts in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 50 758761.
Kesler DJ & Garverick HA 1982 Ovarian cysts in dairy cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 55 11471159.
Kulick LJ, Kot K, Wiltbank MC & Ginther OJ 1999 Follicular and hormonal dynamics during the first follicular wave in heifers. Theriogenology 52 913921.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lauber AH, Romano GJ, Mobbs CV & Pfaff DW 1990 Estradiol regulation of estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in rat mediobasal hypothalamus: an in situ hybridization study. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 2 605611.[CrossRef][ISI]
Littell RC, Henry PR & Ammerman CB 1998 Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76 12161231.
Lopez-Bejar MA, Lopez-Gaitus F, Camon J, Rutlant J, Valls X, Labernia J & Santolaria P 1998 Morphological features and effects on reproductive parameters of ovarian cysts of follicular origin in superovulated rabbit does. Reproduction of Domestic Animals 33 369378.
McCue PM & Squires EL 2002 Persistent anovulatory follicles in mares. Theriogenology 58 541543.[CrossRef][ISI]
Matsui M, Hayashi KG, Acosta TJ, Jayawardana BC, Sato A, Ohtani M & Miyamoto A 2004 The absence of corpus luteum induces co-dominant follicle during the first follicular wave in the cow. Biology of Reproduction 1 469.
Mohan M & Rajamahendran R 1998 Effects of unilateral ovariectomy on follicular development and ovulation in cattle. Theriogenology 49 10591070.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Nadaraja R & Hansel W 1976 Hormonal changes associated with experimentally produced cystic ovaries in the cow. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 47 203208.[Abstract]
Nanda AS, Ward WR & Dobson H 1991 Lack of LH response to oestradiol treatment in cows with cystic ovarian disease and effect of progesterone treatment or manual rupture. Research in Veterinary Science 51 180184.[ISI][Medline]
National Research Council 2001 In Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th edn. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Özturk M, Smith RF & Dobson H 1998 Effect of prolonged exposure to oestradiol on subsequent LH secretion in ewes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 114 19.[Abstract]
Pursley JR, Fricke PM, Garverick HA, Kesler DJ, Ottobre JS, Stevenson JS & Wiltbank MC 2001 Improved fertility in noncycling lactating dairy cows treated with exogenous progesterone during Ovsynch. Journal of Dairy Science 83 Suppl 1 1563.
Refsal KR, Jarrin-Maldonado JH & Nachreiner RF 1987 Endocrine profiles in cows with ovarian cysts experimentally induced by treatment with exogenous estradiol or adenocorticotropic hormone. Theriogenology 28 871889.[CrossRef][ISI]
Reinemann DJ, Wiltbank MC, Rasmussen MD, Sheffield LG & LeMire SD 2003 Comparison of behavioral to physiological response of cows exposed to electric shock. Transactions of the ASAE 46 507512.[ISI]
Ribadu AY, Nakada K, Tanaka Y, Moriyoshi M, Zhang WC & Nakao T 1999 Lack of LH response to exogenous estradiol in heifers with ACTH-induced ovarian follicular cysts. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 61 979981.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Roberts SJ 1971 In Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases, 2nd Edn, pp 421433. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers, Inc.
Sartori R, Haughian JM, Shaver RD, Rosa GJM & Wiltbank MC 2004 Comparison of ovarian function and circulating steroids in estrous cycles of Holstein heifers and lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87 905920.
SAS, 1999 In SAS Users Guide: Statistics, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Inst. Inc.
Schomberg DW, Couse JF, Mukherkee A, Sar M, Mayo KE & Korach KS 1998 Targeted disruption of the estrogen receptor-[alpha] (ER[alpha]) gene in mice: characterization of ovarian responses and phenotypes. Endocrinology 140 27332744.
Scully KM, Gleiberman AS, Lindzey J, Lubahn DB, Korach KS & Rosenfeld MG 1997 Role of estrogen receptor [alpha] in the anterior pituitary gland. Molecular Endocrinology 11 674681.
Simerly RB & Young BJ 1991 Regulation of estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in rat hypothalamus by sex steroid hormones. Molecular Endocrinology 5 424432.[Abstract]
Stein IF & Leventhal ML 1935 Amenorrhea associated with bilateral polycystic ovaries. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 29 181186.[ISI]
Wiltbank JN, Ingalls GE & Rowden WW 1961 Effects of various forms and levels of estrogens alone or in combinations with gonadatrophins and the estrous cycle of beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 20 341346.[ISI]
Yoshioka K, Iwamura S & Kamomae H 1998 Changes of ovarian structures, plasma LH, FSH, progesterone and estradiol-17 ß in a cow with ovarian cysts showing spontaneous recovery and relapse. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Science 60 257260.
Youngquist RS 1986 Cystic follicular degeneration in the cow. In Current Therapy in Theriogenology, pp 349354. Ed. DA Morrow. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders WB.
Zaied AA, Garverick HA, Kesler DJ, Bierschwal CJ, Elmore RG & Youngquist RS 1981 Luteinizing hormone response to estradiol benzoate in cows postpartum and cows with ovarian cysts. Theriogenology 16 349358.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Monniaux, N. d. Clemente, J.-L. Touze, C. Belville, C. Rico, M. Bontoux, J.-Y. Picard, and S. Fabre Intrafollicular Steroids and Anti-Mullerian Hormone During Normal and Cystic Ovarian Follicular Development in the Cow Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 387 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |