| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh Chancellors Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK and 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany
Correspondence should be addressed to H M Fraser; Email: h.fraser{at}hrsu.mrc.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The marmoset is widely used in reproduction research and has the advantage of an extremely high rate of reproductive efficiency, 90% of ovulated follicles giving rise to healthy offspring (Nubbemeyer et al. 1997). Implantation in the marmoset occurs on day 12 after ovulation and previous studies have described the morphological and ultra-structural changes involved (Enders & Lopata 1999, Enders 2000, Niklaus et al. 2001). We have recently described the changes in gene expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin families and their receptors during early pregnancy in this species (Rowe et al. 2002, 2003). We have also shown how changes in angiogenesis in the ovary of the marmoset can be monitored using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) to identify proliferating cells, CD31 to label endothelial cells and dual staining to identify proliferating endothelial cells (Fraser et al. 2000). In the current study, we employed this approach to describe the changes in angiogenesis, cell proliferation and the microvasculature during early pregnancy in the marmoset endometrium. Animals from the mid- and late secretory stages of the cycle were compared with pregnant animals at weeks 2 (the time of implantation), 3 and 4 of pregnancy. Qualitative studies were conducted and morphometric analyses of angiogenesis performed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cellular changes were studied by: (1) examining sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin; (2) Quantifying the number of mitotic cells stained for BrdU; (3) dual labelling to record the incidence of co-localisation of BrdU and CD31.
Haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunocytochemistry
Tissue sections (5 µm) were cut onto Super-frost plus slides (Sigma) dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated in descending concentrations of ethanol and washed in water. For morphological evaluation, sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, dehydrated and mounted in pertex. For immunocytochemistry, antigen retrieval was performed in a Tefal Clypso pressure cooker (Tefal, Essex, UK) in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6), for 6 min at high pressure setting 2. Slides were then left in hot buffer for 20 min and washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS: 0.05 mol/l Tris, pH 7.4; 9 g/l NaCl). To reduce non-specific binding, sections were blocked in normal rabbit serum (NRS) (diluted 1:5 in TBS/bovine serum albumin) for 30 min.
To visualise BrdU-stained cells, mouse monoclonal anti-BrdU (Boehringer Mannheim) (diluted 1:30 in NRS block) was applied overnight at 4 °C. Slides were washed 3 times in TBS before the secondary antibody, rabbit anti-mouse (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) (diluted 1:60 in NRS block), was added for 30 min at room temperature. After three TBS washes, slides were incubated with mouse APAAP (alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase; 1:100 in NRS block at room temperature) for 40 min, washed with TBS and transferred to nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT; Sigma) buffer for 10 min at room temperature then stained with NBT. The reaction was stopped in tap water, sections were counterstained with haematoxylin before being dehydrated in graded alcohols and mounted in pertex.
To visualise endothelial cells, the first antibody CD31 (Dako) was diluted 1:20 in NRS, added to slides and incubated overnight at 4 °C. This was then detected the following day by addition of a rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:60 in NRS), followed by mouse APAAP (diluted 1:100 in NRS). TBS washes were performed between each antibody. Visualisation was performed using NBT as described for BrdU.
For detection of proliferating endothelial cells, dual staining was obtained by immuncytochemistry with CD31 and BrdU. For CD31 detection the protocol was followed as described above but visualisation was performed with Fast Red (Sigma). Sections were then washed with TBS before the second primary antibody, sheep antibody to BrdU (Fitzgerald, Concord, MA, USA) was added, diluted 1:500 in NRS, and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After post-incubation washes with TBS, a biotinylated rabbit anti-sheep secondary antibody (Vector, Peterborough, UK) was added, followed by avidinbiotin conjugated alkaline phosphatase (ABC-AP; Dako). After incubation with the ABC-AP complex, slides were transferred to NBT buffer for 10 min before staining with NBT. Reactions were stopped in tap water, then slides were counterstained in ascending concentrations of alcohol, cleared in xylene and mounted in pertex.
Volume fraction measurements
Volume fraction analyses were performed in three directions, from luminal epithelium to myometrium, each perpendicular to the luminal epithelium. The first, at the fundic end of the uterus, the second and third on the right- and left-hand side of the cross-section respectively (see Fig. 1
). In each direction, every field of view was analysed, ensuring no overlap occurred between each. This gave rise to between 30 and 40 grids per animal. The test grid, superimposed on the sections, consisted of 588 points. The number of test points falling on glands (including lumen), proliferating glandular epithelium, uterine lumen, stroma, proliferating stromal cells, myometrium, luminal epithelium, proliferating luminal epithelial cells, endothelial cells and proliferating endothelial cells (characterised by co-localised BrdU and CD31 immunostaining) were counted. The volume fraction occupied by each component was then calculated by expressing the number of points hitting that component as a percentage of the total number of test points applied. If, for example, the volume fraction of proliferating endothelial cells was required, it was expressed as volume fraction of proliferating endothelial cells as a percentage of volume fraction of total endothelial cells.
|
Results were analysed statistically by ANOVA multiple comparison followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test. Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or less.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the late luteal phase of the non-pregnant cycle the endometrium contains abundant glands. By the appearance of the shape of the glands, the endometrium may be divided into three zones (Fig. 2
). (1) The luminal zone is a small strip containing the luminal epithelium with accumulation of larger blood vessels underneath. (2) The upper zone contains cross-sections of glands which are almost round in shape; in between the glands, condensed stroma and a few vessels are found. (3) The lower zone contains more elongated longitudinal glands and densely packed stroma.
|
|
In the following, the description of the results focuses on the luminal and upper zone since the most obvious changes during pregnancy regarding angiogenesis occur herein. By week 2 of pregnancy (Fig. 4a
) maternal vessels, particularly those immediately beneath the implantation site, appear larger than those in the non-pregnant, lateluteal-phase endometrium. Decidualisation begins to take place in the stroma directly under the luminal vasculature. In the glandular epithelium of the upper zone, proliferation was virtually absent while stroma proliferation was apparent, particularly immediately surrounding the glands of this region (Fig. 4b
). By week 3 of pregnancy, the vasculature has expanded containing a higher number of luminal vessels in the further decidualised upper zone (Fig. 4c
). Stroma proliferation is intense especially in decidual cells (Fig. 4d
). By week 4 of pregnancy (Fig. 4e
) stroma decidualisation of the upper zone is complete. Large vessels rest beneath the luminal epithelium around the entire uterine lumen but also pass through the whole width of the decidua. Penetration of the trophoblast beneath the luminal epithelium is becoming more evident (Fig. 4e
). Proliferation appears to be still high but is more evident in the lower parts of the decidua at the border to the lower zone (Fig. 4f
).
|
|
|
|
|
Glandular epithelial proliferation
Proliferation in the upper zone glands was virtually absent in non-pregnant and 2-week pregnant animals (Fig. 3
). At weeks 3 and 4 of pregnancy, proliferation increased to 1.8 ± 0.7 and 1.74 ± 0.06% respectively, being significantly higher than in all other groups. This proliferation was localised to the glands bordering the decidua. Proliferation in the lower zone was present only in the non-pregnant group at week 2 post-ovulation; at 0.8 ± 0.24%, this was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than all other groups, in which proliferation of glands in this area was virtually absent.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After implantation of the blastocyst, the trophoblast remains avascular for a period of time which varies between species (Enders 1993, 2000). It is therefore essential that the mechanisms required to meet the growing metabolic demands of the embryo be in place throughout the early implantation stages. Nutrients and oxygen from the maternal circulation will be supplied to the trophoblast by diffusion, and so a well-developed maternal vascular system is likely to be critical. Increased angiogenesis at this time may be an important mechanism involved in ensuring that an adequate vasculature is available to support the conceptus. Accordingly, we found that angiogenesis was consistently more intense in the upper zone than the lower zone with a significant increase from the late luteal phase to week 3 of pregnancy. The vascular area subsequently increased during early pregnancy. In the luminal zone, the vascular diameter of the maternal vessels beneath the luminal surface increases at as early as 2 weeks of pregnancy as compared with lateluteal-phase controls. It appears that these luminal vessels are the first source from which the very early trophoblast receives nutrients and oxygen, hence their rapid development. With the growing demands of the trophoblast, angiogenesis subsequently increases from 2 weeks to 3 weeks of pregnancy leading to the development and expansion of the decidual vasculature until decidualisation is complete at 4 weeks of pregnancy. It is this decidual vasculature which is the source for maternal blood that fills the placental labyrinth after trophoblast invasion during later stages of pregnancy (Wulff et al. 2002). Similar observations have been made in other species. In the ewe, increased luminal diameter and decreased endometrial thickness, increased abundance of large microvessels and development of a subepithelial capillary plexus were described on days 24 and 30 after mating (Reynolds & Redmer 1992). Thus, early pregnancy is a time of major remodelling in the uterus and this includes development and expansion of the maternal blood vessels.
The endothelial cell proliferation observed is likely to be mediated by angiogenic factors, such as the VEGF and angiopoietin families and their receptors (Ahmed & Perkins 2000). In the specimens studied here, we previously reported increased expression of VEGF and angio-poietin-1 (Ang-1) mRNA in stroma of the upper zone particularly adjacent to the implantation site, during the peri-implantation period. Expression of mRNA for the receptors was detected in endothelial cells immediately surrounding the glands in the upper zone nearest to the luminal epithelium, highest expression being adjacent to the implantation site (Rowe et al. 2003). VEGF is also a potent permeability factor which is likely to have an important role in facilitating the diffusion process through the maternal vessels. The co-expression of VEGF with Ang-1 may enhance angiogenesis and subsequently lead to vessel stability.
Implantation is followed by proliferation and differentiation of stromal cells forming the decidua. This serves to displace the glandular tissue further away from the lumen. Accordingly, volume fraction of the glands decreased. The current study also revealed an increase in proliferation at the junction with the decidua as pregnancy progresses from the time of implantation. Associated with this increased proliferation, the decidual plate is expanding as it is the docking side to the trophoblast.
Understanding of angiogenesis at the time of implantation and in early pregnancy is of fundamental importance. Early miscarriage within the first few weeks after conception is a common phenomenon in women. Genetic and congenital abnormalities account for some early pregnancy loss, but it is also possible that failure of the conceptus and endometrium to establish an effective implantation may be involved; angiogenesis is likely to be a key component in this process (Smith et al. 1987, Reynolds & Redmer 2001). Studies are beginning in rodents to address the role of VEGF in early pregnancy and to show that inhibition of VEGF inhibits implantation by blocking oestrogen-induced oedema (Rabbani & Rogers 2001, Rockwell et al. 2002). Marmosets have a very high fertility rate compared with most other primates (Nubbemeyer et al. 1997), and as such have a practical advantage as a model for early pregnancy where the role of angiogenic events occurring therein can be addressed. Now that we have described and quantified the vascular changes in the endometrium of the pregnant marmoset, future studies should help to elucidate whether an inadequately developed endometrial vasculature results from specific inhibition of angiogenic factors.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ahmed A & Perkins J 2000 Angiogenesis and intrauterine growth restriction. Baillières Best Practice in Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 14 981998.
Enders A 1993 Overview of the morphology of implantation in primates. In In vitro Fertilisation and Embryo Transfer in Primates, pp 145157. Eds D Wolf, R Stouffer & R Brenner. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Enders A 2000 Trophoblastuterine interactions in the first days of implantation: models for the study of implantation events in the human. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 18 255263.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Enders AC & Lopata A 1999 Implantation in the marmoset monkey: expansion of the early implantation site. Anatomical Record 256 279299.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fraser HM & Lunn SF 2001 Regulation and manipulation of angiogenesis in the primate corpus luteum. Reproduction 121 355362.[Abstract]
Fraser HM, Dickson SE, Lunn SF, Wulff C, Morris KD, Carroll VA & Bicknell R 2000 Suppression of luteal angiogenesis in the primate after neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocrinology 141 9951000.
Maynard SE, Min J, Merchan J, Lim K, Li J, Mondal S, Libermann TA, Morgan JP, Sellke FW, Stillman IE, Epstein FH, Sukhatme FW & Karumanchi SA 2003 Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. Journal of Clinical Investigation 111 649658.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Niklaus AL, Murphy CR & Lopata A 2001 Characteristics of the uterine luminal surface epithelium at preovulatory and preimplantation stages in the marmoset monkey. Anatomical Record 264 8292.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nubbemeyer R, Heistermann M, Oerke AK & Hodges JK 1997 Reproductive efficiency in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): a longitudinal study from ovulation to birth monitored by ultrasonography. Journal of Medical Primatology 26 139146.[ISI][Medline]
Rabbani MM & Rogers PA 2001 Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in endometrial vascular events before implantation in rats. Reproduction 122 8590.[Abstract]
Reynolds LP & Redmer DA 1992 Growth and microvascular development of the uterus during early pregnancy in ewes. Biology of Reproduction 47 698708.[Abstract]
Reynolds LP & Redmer DA 2001 Angiogenesis in the placenta. Biology of Reproduction 64 10331040.
Rockwell LC, Pillai S, Olson CE & Koos RD 2002 Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor action blocks estrogen-induced uterine edema and implantation in rodents. Biology of Reproduction 67 18041810.
Rowe AJ, Morris KD, Bicknell R & Fraser HM 2002 Angiogenesis in the corpus luteum of early pregnancy in the marmoset and the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor immunoneutralization on establishment of pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 67 11801188.
Rowe AJ, Wulff C & Fraser HM 2003 Localistion of mRNA for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiopoietins and their receptors during the peri-implantation period and early pregnancy in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Reproduction 126 227238.[Abstract]
Smith CA, Moore HD & Hearn JP 1987 The ultrastructure of early implantation in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Anatomy and Embryology (Berlin) 175 399410.[CrossRef]
Torry DS, Holt VJ, Keenan JA, Harris G, Caudle MR & Torry RJ 1996 Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in cycling human endometrium. Fertility and Sterility 66 7280.[ISI][Medline]
Wulff C, Wilson H, Dickson SE, Wiegand SJ & Fraser HM 2002 Hemochorial placentation in the primate: expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietins, and their receptors throughout pregnancy. Biology of Reproduction 66 802812.
Wulff C, Weigand M, Kreienberg R & Fraser HM 2003 Angiogenesis during primate placentation in health and disease. Reproduction 126 569577.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. M. Fraser, H. Wilson, A. Silvestri, K. D. Morris, and S. J. Wiegand The Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Estradiol in the Regulation of Endometrial Angiogenesis and Cell Proliferation in the Marmoset Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4413 - 4420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Silvestri and H. M Fraser Oestrogen and progesterone receptors in the marmoset endometrium: changes during the ovulatory cycle, early pregnancy and after inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor, GnRH or ovariectomy Reproduction, August 1, 2007; 134(2): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |