Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Reproduction (2004) 127 151-157
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00006
Copyright © 2004 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, W.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, W.-H.

RESEARCH

Localization of CD9 in pig oocytes and its effects on sperm–egg interaction

Yong-Hai Li, Yi Hou, Wei Ma, Jin-Xiang Yuan, Dong Zhang, Qing-Yuan Sun and Wei-Hua Wang

State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China

Correspondence should be addressed to W-H Wang who is now at Houston Fertility Institute, 13414 Medical Complex Dr, Tomball, Texas 77375, USA; Email: wangweihua11{at}yahoo.com


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
CD9 is a cell surface protein that participates in many cellular processes, such as cell adhesion. Fertilization involves sperm and oocyte interactions including sperm binding to oocytes and sperm–oocyte fusion. Thus CD9 may play an essential role during fertilization in mammals. The present study was conducted to examine whether CD9 is present in porcine gametes and whether it participates in the regulation of sperm–oocyte interactions. The presence of CD9 in ovarian tissues, oocytes and spermatozoa was examined by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Sperm binding and penetration of oocytes treated with CD9 antibody were examined by in vitro fertilization. The results showed that CD9 was present on the plasma membrane of oocytes at different developmental stages. A 24 kDa protein was found in oocytes during in vitro maturation by immunoblotting and its quantity was significantly (P < 0.001) increased as oocytes underwent maturation and reached the highest level after the oocytes had been cultured for 44 h. No positive CD9 staining was found in the spermatozoa. Both sperm binding to ooplasma and sperm penetration into oocytes were significantly (P < 0.01) reduced in anti-CD9 antibody-treated oocytes (1.2 ± 0.2 per oocyte and 16.6% respectively) as compared with oocytes in the controls (2.5 ± 0.4 per oocyte and 70.3% respectively). These results indicated that CD9 is expressed in pig oocytes during early growth and meiotic maturation and that it participates in sperm–oocyte interactions during fertilization.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
CD9 is a member of the tetraspanin family and is widely present on cell membranes in animals (Berditchevski 2001, Boucheix & Rubinstein 2001, Hemler 2001). Some tetraspanins participate in many physiological processes, such as cell adhesion, motility, proliferation and differentiation (Boucheix & Rubinstein 2001, Hemler 2001). Tetraspanins do not appear to function as receptors for extracellular ligands, but they do associate in the plane of the lipid bilayer with other membrane proteins, including other tetraspanins, integrins, immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) members, proteoglycans, complementary regulatory proteins, growth factor receptors and others (Hemler 1998, Berditchevski & Odintsova 1999, Woods & Couchman 2000). It has been found that CD9 also plays an important role in gamete membrane interactions. For example, oocytes from CD9 knockout mice were rarely fertilized (Kaji et al. 2000) although ovulation and maturation were normal. Further evidence has indicated that sperm were able to adhere to the plasma membrane of zona pellucida (ZP)-free oocytes from CD9 knockout mice; however, very few sperm could fuse with the oocyte membrane (Le Naour et al. 2000, Miyado et al. 2000). Reduced sperm binding was also found in ZP-free mouse oocytes treated with anti-CD9 monoclonal antibodies (Chen et al. 1999, Takhashi et al. 2001, Wong et al. 2001, Zhu & Evans 2002). Sperm–oocyte fusion was also decreased when the oocytes treated with anti-CD9 antibody were inseminated (Miller et al. 2000). These results indicate that CD9 participates in regulating fertilization in the mice. However, its role(s) in other mammals is still unknown. In the present study, experiments were conducted to examine: (1) whether CD9 is located in porcine ovarian tissues, oocytes and spermatozoa and (2) whether CD9 regulates sperm–oocyte interaction during fertilization in pigs.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Media and chemicals
Chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA) unless stated otherwise. The basic medium, designated TCM-199B (pH 7.4), used for the maturation of oocytes was tissue culture medium (TCM)-199 (with Earle’s salts; Gibco; Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 3.05 mmol D-glucose/l, 0.91 mmol sodium pyruvate/l, 75 µg potassium penicillin G/ml and 50 µg streptomycin sulfate/ml. This medium was essentially the same as that used by Wang et al. (1994, 1997a) except that calcium lactate was not included in the present study. Insemination medium was modified Brakett and Oliphant (mBO) medium which was exactly the same as that used in our previous report (Wang & Niwa 1997).

Immunohistochemical staining of CD9 on pig ovarian histological sections
Porcine ovaries from prepubertal gilts were cut into two to four pieces and then immersed in 10% formalin for 24 h at 4 °C. The tissues were washed in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 3 days (replaced every 8 h), and then dehydrated and hyalinized in different concentrations of ethanol and dimethylbenzene. Finally, they were embedded in paraffin and sliced into 5–6 µm serial sections. The sections were placed on the slides, placed on copper shelves in an oven for 4 h at 50 °C and then deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohol.

Immunohischemical staining was carried out according to the labeled avidin–biotin (LAB-SA) method with Histostain-SP kits (Beijing Zhongshan Biochemical Co., Beijing, China) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as a peroxidase substrate. Sections were placed in 3.8% citrate acid solution and heated to 95 °C for 15 min to recover the antigens. After being cooled down to room temperature (RT), the sections were covered with blocking solution (5% of goat serum in 0.01 M PBS and incubated in a moist chamber for 15 min at 37 °C. After three washes in PBS, slides were treated with 3% H2O2 for 15 min to block the endogenous peroxidase reactivity. After another three washes in PBS, the slides were covered with the primary antibody of CD9 (mouse anti-human CD9 monoclonal antibody (mAb) from Monosan, Uden, The Netherlands) overnight at 4 °C, in a concentration of 1:50. After removing the superfluous primary antibody solution by spilling (with no washing), the second antibody conjugated with biotin (Beijing Zhongshan Biochemical Co.) was added for 15 min at 37 °C. After three washes in PBS, the slides were then covered with streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase for 15 min. After three washes, slides were stained by DAB containing 0.1% H2O2 for about 10 min. After being thoroughly washed with distilled water, the slides were dehydrated in graded alcohol baths, hyalinized in xylene, mounted and examined by phase contrast microscope at x 400. Positive staining of CD9 by DAB showed brown. To test the specificity of the immunohistochemical staining, control slides were also stained with 0.1 M PBS, instead of the primary antibody of CD9.

Oocyte maturation in vitro
Ovaries were collected from prepubertal gilts at a local slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory within 2 h in 0.9% (w/w) NaCl solution containing 75 µg potassium penicillin G/ml and 50 µg streptomycin sulfate/ml at 30–35 °C. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated from antral follicles of 3–5 mm in diameter with an 18 gauge needle fixed to a 10 ml disposable syringe. The COCs were washed three times with Hepes-buffered Tyrodes medium containing 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (Sigma), and three times with maturation medium. Each set of 60 COCs was transferred into maturation medium into which 10 ng epidermal growth factor/ml, 10 IU human chorionic gonadotropin/ml and 10 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin/ml had been added. The medium had been previously covered with warm paraffin oil in a polystyrene culture dish 35 x 10 mm, Nunc; Roskilde, Denmark and equilibrated in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air for at least 6 h. These COCs were cultured at 39 °C for 44 h under the same conditions. After culturing, oocytes were freed of cumulus cells in the maturation medium containing 0.1% (w/w) hyaluronidase obtained from bovine testis (Type I-S, H-3506; Sigma), and then washed three times before being used in the following experiments.

Immunostaining of CD9 in the oocytes
ZP in oocytes was removed by putting oocytes into M2 medium (pH 2.5; Sigma) for ~2 min. The ZP-free oocytes were washed three times in TCM-199B and then treated for 45 min in the same medium containing anti-CD9 mAb (1:40). After being washed three times in PBS–0.01% PVA, the oocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS–0.01% PVA (pH 7.4) for at least 15 min at RT. After another three washes, oocytes were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody in a 100 µl drop (1:40) for 45 min. Stained oocytes were further washed three times in PBS–0.1% PVA, each for 5 min, before nuclear staining with 10 µg propidium iodide/ml in PBS for 2 min. Finally, the oocytes were mounted on slides with antifade solution and examined by a laser scanning confocal microscope.

Immunostaining of CD9 in sperm
Spermatozoa were obtained from three boars and were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen according to the method reported previously (Wang et al. 1991). For the experiment, sperm pellets were thawed at 39 °C and washed three times in PBS–PVA solution. Two different immunostaining procedures were used to identify CD9 in the sperm. The first was the same as that for oocyte immunostaining except that all procedures were conducted in a 0.5 ml Eppendoff tube and the washing was also in the Eppendoff tube by centrifuging at 1000 g for 3 min. In the second immunostaining procedure, spermatozoa were first fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min (RT) before primary CD9 antibody treatment. All other procedures were the same as the oocyte staining procedures.

Immunoblotting analysis of CD9 in oocytes during maturation
A total of 100 oocytes cultured for 0, 22 and 44 h was collected in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer and heated to 100 °C for 4.5 min. After being cooled on ice and centrifuged at 12 000 g for 5 min, samples were frozen at -80 °C until use. The total proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE with a 4% stacking gel and a 10% separating gel for 2.5 h at 120 V and then electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane for 2 h at 200 mA at 4 °C. After blocking for 1 h in TBST buffer (20 mmol Tris/l, 137 mmol NaCl/l, 0.1% Tween 20, pH, 7.4) containing 1% low-fat milk, the membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C in TBST containing 1:2000 CD9 antibody. After three washes, each for 10 min in TBST, the membrane was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with alkaline phosphatase-labeled rabbit anti-mouse IgG diluted 1:3000 in TBST. The membrane was washed three times in TBST and then processed using the NBT/BCIP detection system (Sigma). Specificity was confirmed by preincubating the antibodies with their blocking peptide before immunoblotting. Immunoblot density was determined by the system of Personal Densitometer SI and FragmeNT Analysis software produced by Molecular Dynamics Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

In vitro fertilization (IVF)
ZP in oocytes were removed by putting oocytes into M2 medium (pH 2.5) for less than 2 min. Thereafter, oocytes were washed three times and each 40 oocytes treated or not treated with anti-CD9 antibody (1:40, 45 min) were transferred into a 50 µl droplet of mBO medium covered with paraffin oil. The dishes were kept in a CO2 incubator until spermatozoa were added for insemination. For IVF, one 0.1 ml frozen semen pellet was thawed at 39 °C in Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS) containing 1 mg bovine serum albumin/ml (fraction V, A-8022; Sigma) and antibiotics. After washing three times, spermatozoa were resuspended with mBO medium containing 2 mmol caffeine/l to give a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml, and 50 µl of the sample was added to 50 µl of the fertilization drop containing the oocytes. The oocytes and sperm were co-cultured for 6 or 16 h at 39 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air until examination of sperm binding and fertilization.

Assessment of sperm–oocyte binding
At 6 h after insemination, oocytes were removed from the microdrops, and the loosely binding spermatozoa were removed completely by pipetting. After being washed three to four times in PBS–0.1% PVA, oocytes were stained with 10 µg bis-benzamide (Hoechst 33342; Sigma)/ml in PBS–0.1% PVA for 5 min, mounted on slides and then examined under a fluorescence microscope. The number of sperm bound to oocyte membrane was then counted.

Assessment of sperm penetration
Sperm penetration was assessed 16 h after insemination. Oocytes from each group were fixed in acetic acid:alcohol (1:3) for 48 h, stained with 1% (w/v) orcein for 5 min and examined for evidence of sperm penetration under a phase contrast microscope at a x 400 magnification.

Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated four times except immunoblotting which was repeated only three times. All percentage data were subjected to arc sine transformation before statistical analysis. Data were analyzed by ANOVA.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Localization of CD9 in pig ovarian tissues, oocytes and spermatozoa
As shown in Fig. 1Go, CD9 was present on the membrane of many kinds of ovarian cells by immunocytochemistry. The immunostaining was stronger on granulosa cell membrane than that on oocyte plasma membrane in preantral follicles (Fig. 1AGo), but the staining on oocyte plasma membrane was almost the same as that on granulosa cell membrane in the fully grown follicles (Fig. 1BGo). No staining was observed in the control section (Fig. 1CGo).



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1 Localization of CD9 in pig ovarian tissues, oocytes during in vitro maturation and spermatozoa. Immunohistochemical staining of CD9 in (A) a preantral follicle, (B) a fully grown follicle and (C) a control section (x100). CD9 was distributed evenly on the membrane of oocytes at (D) GV, (E) M-I and (F) M-II stages. The insert in (F) indicates CD9 distribution on the oocyte surface, scanned by confocal microscopy. (G and H) Negative staining of CD9 was observed in boar spermatozoa by two different immunofluorescent staining procedures. The green images represent CD9 and the red images represent the nucleus from images D–H. This experiment was repeated four times.

 
When the immature oocytes were isolated from antral follicles (3–5 mm in diameter) and cultured in vitro for various times, as shown in Fig. 1DGo–F, CD9 staining was observed on the membrane of oocytes at various stages including germinal vesicle (GV, 0 h), metaphase I (M-I, 22 h) and metaphase II (M-II, 44 h). The staining was stronger as the oocyte nuclear stage proceeded to M-II than at earlier stages. The staining was evenly distributed on the membrane of oocytes when oocytes were scanned on the surface (insert in Fig. 1FGo).

As shown in Fig. 1G and HGo, there was no immunostaining of CD9 on the membrane of the sperm when the sperm were stained by two different immunofluorescent procedures.

By immunoblotting, a 24 kDa protein was found in the oocytes at GV, M-I and M-II stages, and the density was increased significantly (P < 0.001) during oocyte maturation (Fig. 2Go) and it was ~2.5 times greater in the oocytes at the M-II stage than the oocytes at the GV stage. These results were consistent with those obtained by immunofluorescent staining.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2 Quantification of CD9 in porcine oocytes during maturation. Immunoblots of CD9 in maturing oocytes at 0, 22, and 44 h of in vitro maturation. A 24 kDa protein was detected in the oocytes and its density was increased significantly during maturation. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). This experiment was repeated three times.

 
Effect of anti-CD9 antibody on sperm–egg binding and sperm penetration
The rate of oocytes reaching the M-II stage after 44 h of in vitro maturation was 85.1 ± 2.3% (n = 4). When ZP-free oocytes were co-cultured for 45 min with anti-CD9 antibody and then co-cultured with frozen–thawed spermatozoa for 6 h, it was found that the number of spermatozoa bound to the oocytes was 1.2 ± 0.2 per oocyte, which was significantly (P < 0.01) fewer than that in the controls (2.5 ± 0.4 per oocyte). When the oocytes were co-cultured (for IVF) with spermatozoa for 16 h, as shown in Fig. 3Go, CD9 antibody treatment significantly (P < 0.001) reduced the rates of penetration (16.6 ± 3.3%) as compared with control oocytes (70.3% ± 6.2; n = 4).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3 Effect of anti-CD9 mAb on sperm–egg binding at 6 h after insemination and sperm penetration in ZP-free oocytes. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). This experiment was repeated four times.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Acknowledgements
 References
 
As a member of the tetraspanin family, CD9 is extensively localized on the membrane of a variety of cells. CD9 is closely related to other tetraspanin proteins, integrins, IgSF members, glycoproteins, growth factor and other membrane proteins (Hemler, 1998, 2001, Berditchevski & Odintsova 1999, Woods & Couchman 2000, Boucheix & Rubinstein 2001). Some proteins in this network participate in many different cellular functions, such as adhesion, migration, differentiation, proliferation and signal transduction (Boucheix & Rubinstein 2001, Hemler 2001). In the present study, we found that CD9 was also located on the plasma membrane of porcine oocytes and other cells in preantral follicles and fully grown follicles. CD9 was significantly increased during the final oocyte maturation, indicating that it is associated with the competence of the oocyte to be fertilized. Our data indicated that the presence of CD9 is important for sperm to bind and fuse (penetration) with the oocytes, blocking CD9 by its antibody inhibits both sperm binding and penetration of oocytes. Our results also indicated that CD9 is not present on sperm membrane.

It has been found that there was a strong CD9 expression on the membrane of oocytes in developing follicles in the mouse and the strongest expression was on the membrane of oocytes in fully grown (developed) follicles (Chen et al. 1999). CD9 was also detected on some cells in the theca layer at the periphery of the immature (small) and mature (big) follicles, but not in surrounding ovarian tissue (Chen et al. 1999). Miller et al.(2000) reported that there was immunostaining of CD9 on both membrane of oocytes and membrane of cumulus cells in the mouse but there was no staining on ZP. Houle et al.(2002) also found that CD9 expression was in early but not late corpora lutea in the human ovary. In the present study, we found that CD9 was extensively expressed in porcine ovarian cells including oocytes, granulosa cells and theca cells. These results indicated that CD9 protein was already synthesized from early follicle development until oocyte maturation.

Most researchers have examined CD9 expression on the membrane of matured mouse oocytes (Chen et al. 1999, Le Naour et al. 2000, Miyado et al. 2000, Houle et al. 2002). Zhu et al.(2002) found that if CD9 mRNA was injected into CD9 knockout mouse oocytes CD9 could be expressed again on the egg membrane as revealed by immunofluorescent staining with anti-mouse CD9 mAb KMC8 or the anti-human CD9 mAb ALB6. Their results indicated that the localization of CD9 was not different from that in normal eggs: CD9 was present on the ooplasma where there were microvilli but was absent on the ooplasma over the metaphase plate. However, in the present study, we found that CD9 was distributed evenly on the membrane of the oocyte at M-II. There was no CD9-absent region. These differences in CD9 distribution between mouse and pig oocytes were the same as cortical granule (CG) distribution. There is a CG-free domain in mature mouse oocytes (Nicosia et al. 1977) but not in mature porcine oocytes (Wang et al. 1997b). It has been found that the adhesion, binding and fusion of the sperm with the egg only occur on the microvillus region not on the microvillus-free region (CG-free domain) in mouse oocytes (Ducibella 1991). However, it seems that boar spermatozoa can bind oocytes at any area on the ooplasma. The localization of CD9 in accordance with the microvillus region in both the mouse and the pig provided further evidence that CD9 is involved in the process of fertilization.

Recently, it has been found that CD9 participates in sperm binding and sperm–egg fusion in the mouse (Kaji et al. 2000, Le Naour et al. 2000, Miyado et al. 2000). CD9 knockout female mice ovulate normally, and the ovulated oocytes mature to the M-II stage, but they are rarely fertilized (Kaji et al. 2000, Le Naour et al. 2000, Miyado et al. 2000). Further studies indicated that sperm were able to adhere to the plasma membrane of ZP-free oocytes from CD9 knockout mouse, but sperm could not fuse with the oocyte membrane (Miyado et al. 2000). These findings indicate that the CD9 on the membrane of oocytes has an important effect on fertilization. In the present study, we found that both sperm binding and sperm–oocyte fusion were significantly reduced in the ZP-free porcine oocytes when the CD9 was blocked by its antibody. These results are the same as those previously obtained in mice and they suggest that a similar mechanism may exist for CD9 to regulate fertilization in mammals. So far, however, evidence has only been obtained in mice (Le Naour et al. 2000, Miyado et al. 2000, Zhu et al. 2002, Zhu & Evans 2002) and pigs (present study); whether such a regulation by CD9 during fertilization is present in other mammals remains to be investigated.

The mechanisms by which CD9 participates in the sperm–oocyte interaction are not fully understood. Immunoprecipitation and other studies suggest that tetraspanins in the plasma membrane are associated with each other and with several other cell surface molecules, including a subunit of ß1 integrins and IgSF members, to form a tetraspanin web (Nakamura et al. 1995, Berditchevski et al. 1996, Rubinstein et al. 1996, Maecker et al. 1997, Serru et al. 1999, Boucheix & Rubinstein 2001, Charrin et al. 2001, Stipp et al. 2001). They may organize specific cell-surface molecules to form functional macromolecular complexes on the surface of the cells that express the tetraspanin (Maeker et al. 1997, Boucheix & Rubinstein 2001). Zhu et al.(2002) found that CD9 acts by interaction with other proteins in the egg membrane. In addition, oocytes from CD9 knockout mice could be fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection and these embryos developed to term (Miyado et al. 2000). These results suggested that CD9 might just function through extracellular loops not cytoplasmic elements. So Zhu et al.(2002) concluded that the residues S-F-Q in the CD9 large extracellular loop might be an active site that regulates the egg fusion machinery in mice (Zhu et al. 2002). Thus, the inhibition of fertilization by anti-CD9 mAb may be due to the blocking of sperm–egg adhesion and fusion during IVF of porcine oocytes.

It has been reported that another protein integrin ({alpha}6ß1) may be the receptor of sperm on the mouse egg surface (Almeida et al. 1995). The binding of sperm to egg was achieved by the binding of integrin {alpha}6ß1 with the disintegrin domain of fertilin ßon the sperm surface in mice (Chen & Sampson 1999, Chen et al. 1999, Evans 2001). The receptors for sperm on oocytes in the pig are integrin subunits {alpha}v and ß1 (Linfor & Berger 2000). Several anti-integrin antibodies could inhibit sperm–egg binding in mice, humans and pigs. For example, anti-ß1 subunit antibody had a medium inhibitory effect on sperm–egg binding during fertilization and it could also inhibit the binding of recombinant fertilin ßwith mouse oocytes (Evans et al. 1997, Ji et al. 1998, Linfor & Berger 2000). However, more recent studies indicate that integrins {alpha}v, {alpha}3, {alpha}6, ß1 and ß3 on the mouse oocyte surface are not necessary proteins for sperm–egg fusion and fertilization (He et al. 2003). They might participate in sperm–egg adhesion, binding and fusion through forming complexes with CD9 or other tetraspanins (Gutierrez-Lopez et al. 2003).

In conclusion, our findings indicate that CD9 already exists on pig oocytes in preantral follicles and the oocytes continue to synthesize the CD9 until fully grown. CD9 synthesis was also observed during oocyte in vitro maturation and its quantity was significantly increased from the GV to the M-II stage. Fertilization can be blocked by anti-CD9 mAb. These results indicate that CD9 plays an important role in boar sperm–oocyte binding, fusion and fertilization.


   Acknowledgements
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
References
 
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 30125007 and 30225010), and the ‘973’ project (G1999055902).


   Footnotes
 
Received 15 September 2003
First decision 7 November 2003
Accepted 7 November 2003


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

Almeida EAC, Huovila APJ, Sutherland AE, Stephens LE, Calarco PG, Shaw LM, Mercurio AM, Sonnenberg A, Primakoff P, Myles DG & White JM 1995 Mouse egg integrin {alpha}6ß1 functions as a sperm receptor. Cell 81 1095–1104.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Berditchevski F 2001 Complexes of tetraspanins with integrins: more than meets the eye. Journal of Cell Science 114 4143–4151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berditchevski F & Odintsova E 1999 Characterization of integrin-tetraspanin adhesion complexes: role of tetraspanin in integrin signaling. Journal of Cell Science 146 477–492.

Berditchevski F, Zutter MM & Hemler ME 1996 Characterization of novel complexes on the cell surface between integrins and proteins with 4 tetramembrane domains (TM4 proteins). Molecular Biology of the Cell 7 193–207.[Abstract]

Boucheix C & Rubinstein E 2001 Tetraspanins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 58 1189–1205.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Charrin S, Le Naour F, Oualid M, Billard M, Faure G, Hanash SM, Boucheix C & Rubinstein E 2001 The major CD9 and CD81 molecular partner. Identification and characterization of the complexes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 14329–14337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen H & Sampson NS 1999 Mediation of sperm–egg fusion: evidence that mouse egg {alpha}6ß1 integrin is the receptor for sperm fertilin ß. Chemical Biology 6 1–10.

Chen MS, Tung KSK, Coonrod SA, Takahashi Y, Bigler D, Chang A, Tamashita Y, Kincade PW, Herr JC & White JM 1999 Role of the integrin associated protein CD9 in binding between sperm ADAM 2 and the egg integrin {alpha}6ß1: implications for murine fetilization. PNAS 96 11830–11835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ducibella T 1991 Mammalian egg cortical granules and the cortical reaction. In Elements of Mammalian Fertilization, pp 205–230. Ed. PM Wasserman. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Evans JP 2001 Fertilin ßand other ADAMs as integrin ligands: insights into cell adhesion and fertilization. BioEssays 23 628–639.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Evans JP, Kopf GS & Schultz RM 1997 Characterization of the binding of recombinant mouse sperm fertilin ßsubunit to mouse eggs: evidence for adhesive activity via an egg ß1 integrin-mediated interaction. Developmental Biology 187 94–106.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Gutierrez-Lopez MD, Ovalle S, Yanez-Mo M, Sanchez-Sanchez N, Rubinstein E, Olmo N, Lizarbe MA, Sanchez-Madrid F & Cabanas C 2003 A functionally relevant conformational epitope on the CD9 tetraspanin depends on the association with activated beta 1 integrin. Journal of Biochemistry 278 208–218.

He ZY, Brakebusch C, Fassler R, Kreidberg JA, Primakoff P & Myles DG 2003 None of the integrins known to be present on the mouse egg or to be ADAM receptors are essential for sperm–egg binding and fusion. Developmental Biology 254 226–237.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hemler ME 1998 Integrin associated proteins. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 10 578–585.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hemler ME 2001 Specific tetraspanin functions. Journal of Cell Biology 155 1103–1107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Houle CD, Ding XY, Foley JF, Afshari CA, Barrett JC & Davis BJ 2002 Loss of expression and altered localization of KA1 and CD9 protein are associated with epithelial ovarian cancer progression. Gynecology and Oncology 86 69–78.

Ji YZ, Wolf JP, Jouannet P & Bomsel M 1998 Human gamete fusion can bypass ß1 integrin requirement. Human Reproduction 13 682–689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kaji K, Oda S, Shikano T, Ohnuki T, Uematsu Y, Sakagami J, Tada N, Miyazaki S & Kudo A 2000 The gamete fusion process is defective in eggs of CD9-deficient mice. Nature Genetics 24 279–282.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Le Naour F, Rubinstein E, Jasmin C, Prenant M & Boucheix C 2000 Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287 319–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Linfor J & Berger T 2000 Potential role of {alpha}V and ß1 integrins as oocyte adhesion molecules during fertilization in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 120 65–72.[Abstract]

Maecker HT, Todd SC & Levy S 1997 The tetraspanin superfamily: molecular facilitators. The FASEB Journal 11 428–442.[Abstract]

Miller BJ, Georges-Labouesse E, Primakoff P & Myles DG 2000 Normal fertilization occurs with eggs lacking the integrin {alpha}6ß1 and is CD9-dependent. Journal of Cell Biology 149 1289–1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miyado K, Ymada G, Yamada S, Hasuwa H, Nakamura Y, Ryu F, Suzuki K, Kosai K, Inoue K & Ogura A 2000 Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science 287 321–324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nakamura K, Iwamoto R & Mekada E 1995 Membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) and diphtheria toxin receptor-associated protein (DRAP27)/CD9 form a complex with integrin alpha 3 beta 1 at cell–cell contact sites. Journal of Cell Biology 129 1691–1705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nicosia SV, Wolf DP & Inoune M 1977 Cortical granule distribution and cell surface characteristics in mouse eggs. Developmental Biology 57 56–74.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rubinstein E, Le Naour F, Lagaudriere-Gesbert C, Billard M, Conjeaud H & Boacheix C 1996 CD9, CD63, CD81, and CD82 are components of a surface tetraspan network connected to HLA-DR and VLA integrins. European Journal of Immunology 26 2657–2665.[ISI][Medline]

Serru V, Le Naour F, Billard M, Azorsa DO, Lanza F, Boucheix C & Rubinstein E 1999 Selective tetraspan-integrin complexes (CD81/alpha4beta1, CD151/alpha3beta1, CD151/alpha6beta1) under conditions disrupting tetraspan interactions. Journal of Biochemistry 340 103–111.

Stipp CS, Orlicky D & Hemler ME 2001 FPRP, a major highly stoichiometric, highly specific CD81- and CD9-associated protein. Journal of Biochemistry 276 4853–4862.

Takhashi Y, Bigler D, Ito Y & White JM 2001 Sequence-specific interaction between the disintegrin domain of mouse ADAM 3 and murine eggs: role of the ß1 integrin-associated proteins CD9, CD81, and CD98. Molecular Biology of Cell 12 809–820.

Wang WH & Niwa K 1997 Transformation of sperm nuclear into metaphase chromosomes in maturing pig oocytes penetrated in vitro. Zygote 5 183–191.[ISI][Medline]

Wang WH, Niwa K & Okuda K 1991 In vitro penetration of pig oocytes matured in culture by froze–thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 93 491–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Okuda K & Niwa K 1994 Penetration of porcine oocytes during maturation in vitro by cryopreserved, ejaculated spermatozoa. Biology of Reproduction 50 510–515.[Abstract]

Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Cantley TC & Day BN 1997a Effects of oocyte maturation media on development of pig embryos produced by in vitro fertilization. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 111 101–108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang WH, Sun QY, Hosoe M, Shioya Y & Day BN 1997b Quantified analysis of cortical granule distribution and exocytosis of porcine oocytes during meiotic maturation and activation. Biology of Reproduction 56 1376–1382.[Abstract]

Wong GE, Zhu X, Prater CE, Oh E & Evans JP 2001 Analysis of fertilin (ADAM 1)-mediated sperm–egg cell adhesion during fertilization and identification of an adhesion-mediating sequence in the disintegrin-like domain. Journal of Biochemistry 276 24937–24945.

Woods A & Couchman JR 2000 Integrin modulation by lateral association. Journal of Biochemistry 275 24233–24236.

Zhu GZ, Miller BJ, Boucheix C, Rubinstein E, Liu CC, Hynes RO, Myles DG & Primakoff P 2002 Residues SFQ (173–175) in the large extra-cellular loop of CD9 are required for gamete fusion. Development 129 1995–2002.

Zhu X & Evans JP 2002 Analysis of the roles of RGD-binding integrins, {alpha}4/{alpha}9 integrins, {alpha}6 integrins, and CD9 in the interaction of the fertilin ß (ADAM) disintegrin domain with the mouse egg membrane. Biology of Reproduction 66 1193–1202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. Sekiguchi, J. Kwon, E. Yoshida, H. Hamasaki, S. Ichinose, M. Hideshima, M. Kuraoka, A. Takahashi, Y. Ishii, S. Kyuwa, et al.
Localization of Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 in Mouse Ova and Its Function in the Plasma Membrane to Block Polyspermy
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2006; 169(5): 1722 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, W.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, W.-H.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS