Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1993) (1993) 98 643-648
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0980643
Copyright © 1993 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szafranska, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tilton, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szafranska, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tilton, J. E.

Prolactin as a luteotrophin during late pregnancy in pigs

B. Szafranska and J. E. Tilton

The effect of prolonged hyperprolactinaemia on the secretion of LH, progesterone and oestradiol, and its relationship to the maintenance of pregnancy was examined in pigs. Twelve crossbred, pregnant gilts were injected i.m. with 1.5 mg haloperidol kg–1 body weight (n = 6) or vehicle (n = 6) once a day from day 60 to day 66 of pregnancy. Blood samples were collected at 08:00, 12:00, 16:00, 20:00, 24:00 h from day 60 to day 67 and every 15 min for 4 h (08:00–12:00 h) h) on days 60, 63 and 66. Plasma concentrations of prolactin were higher (P < 0.001) in haloperidol-treated gilts than in control gilts (121.3 ± 4.3 ng ml–1 and 13.6 ± 0.4 ng ml–1, respectively). Hyperprolactinaemia completely inhibited the pulsatile secretion of LH and diminished (P < 0.001) basal peripheral concentrations of LH (hyperprolactinaemia, 0.3 ± 0.04 ng ml–1 and control, 0.6 ± 0.005 ng ml–1). Despite the inhibition of LH release in hyperprolactinaemic gilts, plasma concentrations of progesterone were higher (P < 0.001) than in the control group (20.8 ± 0.6 and 12.6 ± 0.2 ng ml–1, respectively). Oestradiol concentrations were not different between groups, although oestradiol tended to be higher in hyperprolactinaemic gilts than in the control group throughout the sampling period (29.1 ± 1.9 versus 23.7 ± 1.6 pg ml–1, respectively). Abortion did not occur in any of the gilts. These results are the first to demonstrate that induced hyperprolactinaemia during the second half of pregnancy (days 60–66) will drastically suppress the major porcine luteotrophin but not affect pregnancy maintenance in pigs. It is possible that prolactin has a more important function in the luteotrophic complex as an additional protectant associated with the regulatory mechanism of late pregnancy maintenance than was previously reported.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp Biol MedHome page
M. Zaleska, A. Waclawik, G. Bodek, A. Zezula-Szpyra, X. Li, T. Janowski, W. H. Hansel, N. A. Rahman, and A. J. Ziecik
Growth Repression in Diethylstilbestrol/Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-Induced Rat Mammary Gland Tumor Using Hecate-CG{beta} Conjugate
Exp Biol Med, April 1, 2004; 229(4): 335 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1993 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.