Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1988) 84 179-186
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0840179
Copyright © 1988 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rademaker, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rademaker, A.

Human sperm chromosome complements after microinjection of hamster eggs

R. H. Martin, E. Ko and A. Rademaker

Summary. A technique was developed for microinjection of human spermatozoa into golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) eggs to obtain human pronuclear chromosome complements. Before microinjection the spermatozoa were treated by brief sonication or incubation in TEST–yolk buffer to reduce motility. Very few sperm chromosome complements developed after sperm treatment with sonication and the frequency of spermatozoa with structural chromosomal abnormalities was exceedingly high (91%). The majority of sperm chromosome complements analysed had multiple breaks and rearrangements. Sperm incubation in TEST–yolk buffer before microinjection provided more analysable sperm karyotypes with a significantly lower frequency of structural chromosomal abnormalities (39%, P < 0·001). Our results therefore suggest that sonication induces structural chromosomal abnormalities in spermatozoa. Since the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities after microinjection was higher than after sperm fertilization of hamster eggs, it appears that microinjection per se may also increase the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in spermatozoa. These results are based on small numbers and must be confirmed on larger sample sizes, but our study suggests that microinjection of spermatozoa into eggs should not be recommended for clinical use until fully evaluated.

Keywords: human sperm chromosomes; microinjected hamster eggs; pronuclear chromosomes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Watanabe
A detailed cytogenetic analysis of large numbers of fresh and frozen-thawed human sperm after ICSI into mouse oocytes
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1150 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Mizuno, K. Hoshi, and T. Huang
Fertilization and embryo development in a mouse ICSI model using human and mouse sperm after immobilization in polyvinylpyrrolidone
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2350 - 2355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Tateno, Y. Kimura, and R. Yanagimachi
Sonication Per Se Is Not as Deleterious to Sperm Chromosomes as Previously Inferred
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 341 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
P.T. Goud, A.P. Goud, H. Laverge, P. De Sutter, and M. Dhont
Effect of post-ovulatory age and calcium in the injection medium on the male pronucleus formation and metaphase entry following injection of human spermatozoa into golden hamster oocytes
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 5(3): 227 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Kusakabe, M. A. Szczygiel, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Inaugural Article: Maintenance of genetic integrity in frozen and freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa
PNAS, November 20, 2001; 98(24): 13501 - 13506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1988 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.