Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1986) 78 673-678
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0780673
Copyright © 1986 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fleetham, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fleetham, J.

Chromosomal analysis of unfertilized human oocytes

R. H. Martin, M. M. Mahadevan, P. J. Taylor, K. Hildebrand, L. Long-Simpson, D. Peterson, J. Yamamoto and J. Fleetham

Summary. Unfertilized human oocytes were obtained from women in an in-vitro fertilization programme. The women had a mean age of 29·4 years (range 24–35 years). Chromosomal complements could be analysed in 50 oocytes. Q-banding of the chromosomes facilitated identification of individual chromosomes: 34 oocytes (68%) had the normal haploid chromosomal complement, 14 complements were hypohaploid (28%), 1 complement was hyperhaploid (2%) and 2 had structural abnormalities (4%). (One oocyte had numerical and structural abnormalities.) The 16 abnormal oocytes were obtained from 15 different women. A conservative estimate of aneuploidy in this sample is 4%; however, the frequency of aneuploidy may be higher if there is a predisposition to chromosome loss during oogenesis. This study provides information on the largest series of karyotyped unfertilized human oocytes published to date.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. Pellestor, T. Anahory, and S. Hamamah
The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, J. C.M. Dumoulin, L. C.P. van Wissen, M. Bras, M. Janssen, J. L.H. Evers, and J. P.M. Geraedts
Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 316 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Pellestor, B. Andreo, F. Arnal, C. Humeau, and J. Demaille
Mechanisms of non-disjunction in human female meiosis: the co-existence of two modes of malsegregation evidenced by the karyotyping of 1397 in-vitro unfertilized oocytes
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2134 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sandalinas, C. Marquez, and S. Munne
Spectral karyotyping of fresh, non-inseminated oocytes
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 8(6): 580 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
J. Van Blerkom
The Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on the Developmental Potential and Chromosomal Normality of the Human Oocyte
Reproductive Sciences, January 1, 1996; 3(1): 3 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1986 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.