This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kennaway, D. J. Articles by Royles, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kennaway, D. J. Articles by Royles, P.

Pituitary response to LHRH, LH pulsatility and plasma melatonin and prolactin changes in ewe lambs treated with melatonin implants to delay puberty

Summary. Prepubertal ewe lambs were treated with empty or filled melatonin implants. The implants were placed s.c. at birth and pituitary responsiveness to various doses of LHRH, LH/FSH pulsatility and prolactin and melatonin secretion were examined at 10, 19, 28, 36 and 45 weeks of age. Control animals (N = 10) showed no consistent alteration in pituitary responsiveness to LHRH during development. Ewes treated with melatonin (N = 10) had puberty onset delayed by 4 weeks (P < 0·03) but no effect of melatonin on LH or FSH response to LHRH injection was observed at any stage of development. In the control and melatonin-treated ewe lambs the responses to LHRH injection were lower during darkness than during the day at all stages of development. No consistent differences in LH or FSH pulsatility were observed between treatment groups or during development. Prolactin concentrations, however, failed to decrease at the time of puberty (autumn) in the melatonin-treated group. Melatonin-treated ewe lambs maintained normal rhythmic melatonin production which was superimposed on a higher basal concentration and showed the same increase in melatonin output with age as the control ewes. These results indicate that the delayed puberty caused by melatonin implants is not due to decreased pituitary responsiveness to LHRH or to dramatic changes in basal LH or FSH secretion.