Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1986) 76 349-363
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0760349
Copyright © 1986 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Haresign, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Haresign, W.

Progesterone pretreatment has a direct effect on GnRHinduced preovulatory follicles to determine their ability to develop into normal corpora lutea in anoestrous ewes

M. G. Hunter, J. A. Southee, B. J. McLeod and W. Haresign

Summary. In two experiments carried out during seasonal anoestrus, Romney Marsh ewes were treated with small-dose (250 ng) multiple injections of GnRH at 2-h intervals with and without progesterone pretreatment. In Exp. 1, 8/8 progesterone-primed ewes ovulated and produced functionally normal corpora lutea compared with 2/9 non-primed ewes.

Follicles were recovered from similarly treated animals 18 or 28 h after the start of GnRH treatment (at least 14 h before the estimated time of the LH peak) and assessed in terms of diameter, granulosa cell number, oestradiol, testosterone and progesterone concentrations in the follicular fluid, oestradiol production in vitro and binding of 125I-labelled hCG to granulosa and theca. There were no significant differences in any of these measures in 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the progesterone-pretreated compared to non-pretreated animals.

In Exp. 2, follicles were removed from similar treatment groups just before and 2 h after the start of the LH surge. Unlike 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the nonpretreated ewes, those recovered from progesterone-pretreated ewes responded to the LH surge by significantly increasing oestradiol secretion (P < 0·01) and binding of 125I-labelled hCG (P < 0·05) to granulosa cells. Overall there was also more (P < 0·05) hCG binding to granulosa and theca cells from progesterone-pretreated animals. Non-ovulatory follicles recovered from progesterone-primed ewes had more (P < 0·05) binding of 125I-labelled hCG to theca and a higher testosterone concentration in follicular fluid (P < 0·05) than did those from non-primed ewes.

These results suggest that inadequate luteal function after repeated injections of GnRH may be due to a poor response to the LH surge indicative of a deficiency in the final maturational stages of the follicle.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E M Ferguson, J Slevin, M G Hunter, S A Edwards, and C J Ashworth
Beneficial effects of a high fibre diet on oocyte maturity and embryo survival in gilts
Reproduction, February 1, 2007; 133(2): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T A Bramley, D Stirling, G S Menzies, and D T Baird
Corpora lutea induced by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone treatment of anoestrous Welsh Mountain ewes: reduced sensitivity to luteinizing hormone in vivo and to chorionic gonadotrophin in vitro
Reproduction, January 1, 2005; 129(1): 61 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T A Bramley, D Stirling, G S Menzies, and D T Baird
Reduced LH sensitivity in vivo and in vitro of corpora lutea induced during anoestrus by GnRH, and during the late breeding season, in Scottish Blackface ewes
J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 183(3): 517 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
I. Bossis, R.P. Wettemann, S.D. Welty, J. Vizcarra, and L.J. Spicer
Nutritionally Induced Anovulation in Beef Heifers: Ovarian and Endocrine Function During Realimentation and Resumption of Ovulation
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2000; 62(5): 1436 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1986 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.