Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1983) 69 41-48
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0690041
Copyright © 1983 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worthy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Haresign, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Worthy, K.
Right arrow Articles by Haresign, W.

Evidence that the onset of seasonal anoestrus in the ewe may be independent of increasing prolactin concentrations and daylength

Karen Worthy and W. Haresign

Summary. Nine ewes of each of two breeds, Dorset Horn (long breeding season) and Welsh Mountain (short breeding season), were ovariectomized after insertion of subcutaneous implants containing oestradiol-17β. A further 9 ewes of each breed were left entire. All of the ewes were placed in an artificial photoperiod of 8L: 16D on 12 December 1980. After 5 weeks half of the ewes of each breed and physiological state were abruptly changed into a long-day photoperiod (16L:8D) while the rest remained in short days. The time of onset of seasonal anoestrus in entire animals was significantly advanced in ewes changed to long days, with the end of the breeding season coming at the normal time of year in ewes maintained in short days. These differences in oestrous cycle activity were reflected by differences in the time at which LH concentrations in ovariectomized, oestrogen-treated ewes on the two light treatments fell to basal values. Prolactin concentrations showed an immediate and sustained rise in ewes changed to long days, but remained low in ewes maintained in short days. Since the onset of seasonal anoestrus occurred in the absence of high levels of prolactin (in short-day ewes), it is concluded that prolactin is not the major vehicle by which seasonal changes in hypothalamic responsiveness to the negative feedback effects of oestradiol are produced. The results suggest that anoestrus may be due to photorefractoriness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Sweeney, G. Kelly, and D. O'Callaghan
Seasonal Variation in Long-Day Stimulation of Prolactin Secretion in Ewes
Biol Reprod, January 1, 1999; 60(1): 128 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
M.H. Hastings, A.P. Walker, J.B. Powers, J. Hutchison, E.A. Steel, and J. Herbert
Differential Effects of Photoperiodic History on the Responses of Gonadotrophins and Prolactin to Intermediate Daylengths in the Male Syrian Hamster
J Biol Rhythms, September 1, 1989; 4(3): 335 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
F. J. P. Ebling, G. A. Lincoln, F. Wollnik, and N. Anderson
Effects of Constant Darkness and Constant Light on Circadian Organization and Reproductive Responses in the Ram
J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1988; 3(4): 365 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.