Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1983) 67 309-314
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0670309
Copyright © 1983 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walton, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Walton, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. T.

Oocyte normality after superovulation in immature rats

Elizabeth A. Walton and D. T. Armstrong

Summary. The developmental ability of oocytes recovered from superovulated immature rats (40 i.u. PMSG) was compared with that of oocytes from control rats (4 i.u. PMSG). Oocytes were collected from the oviducts immediately after ovulation or from large follicles, and were transferred to one ovarian bursa of normal adult recipients. Fertilization and subsequent fetal development occurred in the recipients which were killed on Day 20. The proportions of oocytes surviving after transfer from the oviducts of donors which received 4 or 40 i.u. PMSG or from the follicles of those which received 40 i.u. PMSG were not significantly different. However, the proportion of oocytes surviving after recovery from the follicles of donors receiving 4 i.u. PMSG was significantly higher (P < 0·05). These studies suggest that oocytes recovered from superovulated or control rats are equally able to develop, and the failure to maintain pregnancy that has been reported for superovulated rats in previous studies is not attributable to defects in the oocytes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Busso, D. J Cohen, J. A Maldera, A. Dematteis, and P. S Cuasnicu
A Novel Function for CRISP1 in Rodent Fertilization: Involvement in Sperm-Zona Pellucida Interaction
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 848 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Kapiteijn, C.S. de Bruijn, E. de Boer, A.J.M. de Craen, C.W. Burger, F.E. van Leeuwen, and F.M. Helmerhorst
Does subfertility explain the risk of poor perinatal outcome after IVF and ovarian hyperstimulation?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3228 - 3234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D. Zudova, A. J. Wyrobek, J. Bishop, and F. Marchetti
Impaired fertility in T-stock female mice after superovulation
Reproduction, November 1, 2004; 128(5): 573 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ishigame, M. S. Medan, G. Watanabe, Z. Shi, H. Kishi, K. Y. Arai, and K. Taya
A New Alternative Method for Superovulation Using Passive Immunization Against Inhibin in Adult Rats
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 236 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Van der Auwera and T. D'Hooghe
Superovulation of female mice delays embryonic and fetal development
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1237 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ertzeid and R. Storeng
The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 221 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.