Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1981) 62 105-109
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0620105
Copyright © 1981 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoversland, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weitlauf, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoversland, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weitlauf, H. M.

The volume of uterine fluid in 'implanting' and 'delayed implanting' mice

R. C. Hoversland and H. M. Weitlauf

Summary. A variation of the dye dilution technique was used to determine the volume of uterine fluid in 'implanting' and 'delayed implanting' mice. The method involves rinsing Krebs—Ringer—bicarbonate buffer containing [methyl-14C]methylated-BSA through the uterine lumen and using the resulting decrease in concentration of the BSA to calculate the volume of uterine fluid. The results indicated that the volume of uterine fluid was essentially the same in 'implanting' and 'delayed implanting' mice (i.e. 300–400 nl/pair of uterine horns). The total amounts of a substance recovered by rinsing the uteri would therefore provide an estimate of relative concentrations in situ.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1981 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.