Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1980) 58 443-448
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0580443
Copyright © 1980 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flint, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ensor, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flint, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ensor, D. M.

Effects of prolactin and the suckling stimulus on implantation and LH secretion in rats

D. J. Flint and D. M. Ensor

Summary. Litter removal during lactation led to an increase in serum LH concentration, an effect which was completely reversed by prolactin injections. Lactating rats receiving ergocryptine also showed increased serum LH but not to the extent found during litter removal, suggesting that both prolactin and suckling are important factors in the maintenance of lactational anoestrus. The early implantation induced by removal of the litter from rats concurrently lactating and pregnant was not prevented by prolactin. Implantation occurred early in similar rats with serum prolactin levels reduced by ergocryptine treatment and the effect was reversed by prolactin. However, early implantation led to failure of the pregnancy to reach term. These results show that, although prolactin is involved, the suckling stimulus is also essential to prevent implantation in rats with concurrent lactation and pregnancy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1980 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.