Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1977) 49 323-329
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0490323
Copyright © 1977 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dziuk, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dziuk, P. J.

Assessment of relative fertility of males (cockerels and boars) by competitive mating

P. A. Martin and P. J. Dziuk

Summary. When hens were inseminated with an equal number of spermatozoa from one of 3 Leghorn (L) and one of 3 Columbian (C) cocks in the 9 possible L and C combinations, a hierarchy of fertility was established based on the proportion of chicks sired by each cock. A similar hierarchy was established for 3 Duroc (D) and 3 Yorkshire (Y) boars by mating gilts in rapid succession to one D and one Y boar. A second hierarchy of fertility was established by inseminating hens with 40 x 106 spermatozoa from only one cock or by mating gilts to only one of the boars. The hierarchies for the cocks and boars were essentially the same for each method. Minor discrepancies were observed for males which appeared to be nearly equally fertile when used alone or in combination with another male. After homospermic insemination, the hierarchy of cocks was identical whether the ranking was based on the percentage of eggs fertilized or on hatchability of fertilized eggs. Similarly, the boars ranked highest in fertility by double mating had higher conception rates, higher embryonic survival rates and larger litter sizes when used alone. Heterospermic insemination and double mating appear to be more efficient and sensitive than methods of estimating fertility which depend on homospermic insemination of high or low numbers of spermatozoa, single matings or the examination of various characteristics of semen. The method of heterospermic insemination or double mating offers a simple and effective method of assessing the relative fertility of males.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. F. Flint, P. L. Chapman, and G. E. Seidel Jr.
Fertility assessment through heterospermic insemination of flow-sorted sperm in cattle
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2003; 81(7): 1814 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. A. Skau and I. Folstad
Do bacterial infections cause reduced ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis of antibiotic treatment of male infertility
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 40 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1977 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.