Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1977) 49 297-303
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0490297
Copyright © 1977 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Restall, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Restall, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, B. G.

The influence of season of lambing and lactation on reproductive activity and plasma LH concentrations in Merino ewes

B. J. Restall and B. G. Starr

Summary. Groups of Merino ewes which were lactating for 40 days (Group I) or had had their lambs removed at birth (Group II) after lambing in the winter (June) or spring (November) were fed on a high plane of nutrition. Ovarian inspections were carried out at 15 and 30 days after lambing and plasma LH levels were measured at 6-h intervals for 20–30 days.

First ovulation was earlier in ewes lambing in the winter (16·6 days, range 11–26) than in the spring (24·7 days, range 15–30) but there was no difference in the number of ewes ovulating. LH levels were higher in winter-lambing ewes (2·79 ± 3·4 ng/ml) than in those lambing in the spring (1·78 + 0·23 ng/ml). LH peaks were usually associated with an ovulation in spring lambing ewes but were not consistently so in the others.

More ewes ovulated in Group II (72%) than in Group I (40%) but the mean time of first ovulation was similar. In the winter-lambing ewes the mean daily LH concentration was 2·40±0·32 ng/ml in Group I and 3·18±0·31 ng/ml in Group II but there were no differences between the spring-lambing ewes (I, 1·75±0·20 ng/ml; II, 1·80±0·26 ng/ml). There were more elevations in LH levels in Group II ewes (64%) than in Group I ewes (43·8%).

After lambing the LH levels increased slowly, indicating a gradual recovery of pituitary function.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1977 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.