Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1975) 44 301-304
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0440301
Copyright © 1975 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILDT, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by DUKELOW, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WILDT, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by DUKELOW, W. R.

LAPAROSCOPIC PREGNANCY DIAGNOSIS AND UTERINE FLUID RECOVERY IN SWINE

D. E. WILDT, C. B. MORCOM and W. R. DUKELOW

Endocrine Research Unit, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, U.S.A.

(Received 17th December 1974)

The technique of laparoscopy has been routinely used for repeated ovarian observation in the gilt (Wildt, Fujimoto, Spencer & Dukelow, 1973) as well as other species (Jewett & Dukelow, 1972; Rawson & Dukelow, 1973; Seeger, 1973; Snyder & Dukelow, 1974). In addition to its advantage for serial observations of ovarian morphology with minimal stress to the animal, laparoscopy has been found to be a practical substitute for laparotomy in other research areas.

There are several reports of the use of pregnancy diagnosis techniques in swine (Walker, 1967; O'Reilly, 1967; Mather, Diehl & Tumbleson, 1970; Lindahl, Martin & Dziuk, 1972; Diehl & Day, 1973), but these procedures are not accurate until 20 days after mating and do not provide an indication of the number of ovulations or of the uterine and ovarian morphology.

Recently, the biochemistry







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1975 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.