Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1972) 28 473-475
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0280473
Copyright © 1972 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by HAYNES, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by HAYNES, N. B.

FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE ABILITY OF THE MALE TO INFLUENCE THE OESTROUS CYCLE OF THE UNDERFED RAT

K. J. COOPER, K. PURVIS and N. B. HAYNES

It is established that male proximity can influence the oestrous cycle of the underfed rat even when physical contact between the sexes is prevented; the lengthened cycles characteristic of underfeeding becoming significantly shorter (Cooper & Haynes, 1967; McNeilly, Cooper & Crighton, 1970). More recently, it has been shown that exposure for 15 hr/day to different male rats can elicit a greater and more sustained response from the female than continuous exposure to the same male partner (Purvis, Cooper & Haynes, 1971). This work, however, did not distinguish between two possibilities, namely, whether the stimulating effect of discontinuous association was a result of periodic removal and reintroduction of the stimulus or of regular alteration of the stimulus by the use of different males. The object of the







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1972 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.