| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
It is established that male proximity can influence the oestrous cycle of the underfed rat even when physical contact between the sexes is prevented; the lengthened cycles characteristic of underfeeding becoming significantly shorter (Cooper & Haynes, 1967; McNeilly, Cooper & Crighton, 1970). More recently, it has been shown that exposure for 15 hr/day to different male rats can elicit a greater and more sustained response from the female than continuous exposure to the same male partner (Purvis, Cooper & Haynes, 1971). This work, however, did not distinguish between two possibilities, namely, whether the stimulating effect of discontinuous association was a result of periodic removal and reintroduction of the stimulus or of regular alteration of the stimulus by the use of different males. The object of the
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |