Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1968) 15 401-407
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0150401
Copyright © 1968 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KISCH, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by SHELESNYAK, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KISCH, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by SHELESNYAK, M. C.

STUDIES ON THE MECHANISM OF NIDATION

E. S. KISCH and M. C. SHELESNYAK

Summary.: A single administration of ergocornine methanesulphonate (ECO) interrupts pregnancy of the rat when given on any day until the 7th after coitus, but not later. The drug also interrupts pseudopregnancy at any time during its course, without temporal limitation. The failure of ECO to interfere with pregnancy is correlated with the presence and endocrine activity of an implanted conceptus.

The factors causing failure of ECO to interfere with gestation after implantation were identified by a series of successive steps : (1) The presence of deciduomata—thought to be analogous to maternal decidual tissue—in the pseudopregnant uterus was shown not to oppose ECO action. (2) Animals, whose foetuses have been removed, leaving only maternal and foetal placenta in situ, were protected against the action of ECO. Thus, this implicated by elimination the foetal placenta as causing failure of ECO action in pregnancy after the 7th day. Indeed, placental grafts from late pregnant donors could be shown to overcome ECO action even in this first 7-day period.

As early as the 10th day, a luteotrophic influence was present in placental extracts, as measured by prevention of ECO action on pregnancy. In the literature, a luteotrophic influence is attributed to (foetal) placental tissue. The failure of ECO to interrupt pregnancy by the 8th day is taken as indication of placental luteotrophic activity at that time, i.e. 3 days before it can be detected when hypophysectomized rats are used for this purpose.

The action of ECO is considered as mediated by pituitary LtH depression. Thus, the use of this drug allows suppression of LtH without performing hypophysectomy. Placental luteotrophin is not affected by ECO.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1968 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.