Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1968) 15 93-102
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0150093
Copyright © 1968 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAURER, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by FOOTE, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MAURER, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by FOOTE, R. H.

REPEATED SUPEROVULATION FOLLOWING ADMINISTRATION OF EXOGENOUS GONADOTROPHINS IN DUTCH-BELTED RABBITS

R. R. MAURER, W. L. HUNT and R. H. FOOTE

Summary.: Repeated superovulation and in-vivo collection of ova were carried out with thirty does divided into three groups of ten does each. One group received FSHLH, a second group received PMSGHCG and the controls received only LH. Injections of FSHLH at three 16-week intervals followed by one 8-week interval resulted in 46·5, 35·4, 25·2 and 18·0 ovulation points/doe. This decrease with time was significant (P<0·05). Corresponding values for the PMSGHCG group which, however, received FSHLH for the final superovulation were 13·6, 5·7, 6·2 and 20·3. The LH controls averaged 7·8, 7·0, 5·1 and 5·6 ovulation points. Overall treatment differences were highly significant (P<0·005). From the 1920 ovulation points 1593 ova (83%) were recovered, of which 83·1% were cleaved. Young born from unrecovered ova accounted for 3·1%.

Control kindlings by the same does at regular periods resulted in normal litter size but in fewer does kindling as the experiment progressed. Results of two bio-assays for antihormones suggested that this decrease was due to hormonal refractoriness which was most pronounced in the PMSGHCG group.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1968 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.