Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1968) 15 135-138
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0150135
Copyright © 1968 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MATHUR, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by CHAUDHURY, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MATHUR, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by CHAUDHURY, R. R.

THE EFFECT OF AN INTRA-UTERINE PLASTIC DEVICE ON THE MAST CELL COUNT IN THE RAT UTERUS

V. S. MATHUR and R. R. CHAUDHURY

The mechanism by which an intra-uterine device in one horn of the rat uterus prevents implantation in that horn is not known. It has been suggested that histamine has a role to play in the implantation of the fertilized ovum (Shelesnyak, 1952). Shelesnyak, Kraicer & Zeilmaker (1963) have indicated that on the latter part of the 3rd day after successful mating in rats there is an oestrogenic upsurge which triggers off histamine release and this is essential for successful implantation. It has been known for a long time that there is a correlation between the histamine content of a tissue and the mast cell count (Riley & West, 1953). Mast cells have been demonstrated in the uterine tissue of golden hamsters (Harvey, 1964), guinea-pigs (Iversen, 1962), ferrets (Buchanan, 1966) and







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1968 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.