Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2009) 138 561-570
DOI: 10.1530/REP-09-0091
Copyright © 2009 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
138/3/561    most recent
REP-09-0091v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palhao, M P
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palhao, M P
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O J

RESEARCH

Follicle and hormone dynamics in single versus double ovulating heifers

M P Palhao1,2, M A Beg3, M T Rodrigues2 and O J Ginther1,3

1 Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, Wisconsin 53528, USA2 Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570 Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil3 Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1656 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to O J Ginther at Eutheria Foundation, Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Email: ginther{at}vetmed.wisc.edu

Follicles ≥5 mm were ablated at 4 day post-ovulation in heifers to induce a follicular wave, and prostaglandin F2{alpha} was given at day 6 to increase the incidence of double ovulations. Follicle diameters and plasma hormone concentrations were compared between single ovulators (n=12) and double ovulators (n=8). In double ovulators, the interval from follicle deviation to the peak of the pre-ovulatory LH surge was shorter (1.9±0.2 vs 2.5±0.2 days; P<0.02) and diameter of the largest pre-ovulatory follicle was smaller (12.2±0.5 vs 13.3±0.3 mm; P<0.02). The LH concentrations of the pre-ovulatory surge did not differ between single and double ovulators for 24 h on each side of the peak. When data were normalised to LH peak, the peak of the pre-ovulatory FSH and oestradiol (E2) surges occurred in synchrony with the peak of LH surge for both groups. Concentration of FSH for 24 h on each side of the peak showed a group effect (P<0.0001) from lower concentration in the double ovulators. A group-by-hour interaction (P<0.008) for E2 reflected greater concentration in the double ovulators before and at the peak. Results indicated that two pre-ovulatory follicles resulted in an earlier and greater E2 increase, leading to lower FSH concentration, an earlier LH surge, and ovulation at a smaller diameter. In conclusion, the difference in hormone concentrations during the pre-ovulatory period was an effect rather than a cause of double ovulations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2009 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.