Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2009) 138 195-209
DOI: 10.1530/REP-09-0158
Copyright © 2009 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
138/2/195    most recent
REP-09-0158v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W
Right arrow Articles by Wu, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W
Right arrow Articles by Wu, G.

REVIEW

Comparative aspects of implantation

Fuller W Bazer1, Thomas E Spencer1, Greg A Johnson2, Robert C Burghardt2 and Guoyao Wu1

Departments of1 , Animal Science2 Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2471, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to F W Bazer; Email: fbazer{at}cvm.tamu.edu

Uterine receptivity to implantation of blastocysts in mammals includes hatching from zona pellucida, precontact with uterine luminal (LE) and superficial glandular (sGE) epithelia and orientation of blastocyst, apposition between trophectoderm and uterine LE and sGE, adhesion of trophectoderm to uterine LE/sGE, and, in some species, limited or extensive invasion into the endometrial stroma and induction of decidualization of stromal cells. These peri-implantation events are prerequisites for pregnancy recognition signaling, implantation, and placentation required for fetal–placental growth and development through the remainder of pregnancy. Although there is a range of strategies for implantation in mammals, a common feature is the requirement for progesterone (P4) to downregulate expression of its receptors in uterine epithelia and P4 prior to implantation events. P4 then mediates its effects via growth factors expressed by stromal cells in most species; however, uterine luminal epithelium may express a growth factor in response to P4 and/or estrogens in species with a true epitheliochorial placenta. There is also compelling evidence that uterine receptivity to implantation involves temporal and cell-specific expression of interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes that may be induced directly by an IFN or induced by P4 and stimulated by an IFN. These genes have many roles including nutrient transport, cellular remodeling, angiogenesis and relaxation of vascular tissues, cell proliferation and migration, establishment of an antiviral state, and protection of conceptus tissues from challenges by the maternal immune cells.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
F. W. Bazer, G. Wu, T. E. Spencer, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, and K. Bayless
Novel pathways for implantation and establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in mammals
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2010; 16(3): 135 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2009 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.