This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 136/6/681    most recent REP-08-0097v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, R A Articles by Baird, D T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Anderson, R A Articles by Baird, D T

Ovarian cryopreservation for fertility preservation: indications and outcomes

The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to R A Anderson; Email: richard.anderson{at}ed.ac.uk

Female fertility preservation provides significantly different challenges to that for the male, with the only established method being cryopreservation of embryos thus necessitating the involvement of a male. Other, experimental, options include oocyte or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. The latter has been regarded as a potential method for more than a decade, but has resulted in the birth of only five babies. It is not possible to be certain how many women have had ovarian tissue cryopreserved. Oocyte cryopreservation also remains experimental, but 100-fold more babies have been born through this technique over the last two decades. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has the potential advantages of preservation of a large number of oocytes within primordial follicles, it does not require hormonal stimulation when time is short and indeed may be appropriate for the pre-pubertal. Disadvantages include the need for an invasive procedure, and the uncertain risk of ovarian contamination in haematological and other malignancies. We here review this approach in the context of our own experience of 36 women, highlighting issues of patient selection especially in the young, and uncertainties over the effects of cancer treatments on subsequent fertility. Of these 36 women, 11 have died but 5 have had spontaneous pregnancies. So far, none have requested reimplantation of their stored ovarian tissue. Ovarian cryopreservation appears to be a potentially valuable method for fertility preservation, but the indications and approaches best used remain unclear.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Dipietromaria, B. A. Benayoun, A.-L. Todeschini, I. Rivals, C. Bazin, and R. A. Veitia Towards a functional classification of pathogenic FOXL2 mutations using transactivation reporter systems Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2009; 18(17): 3324 - 3333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R A Anderson Fertility preservation techniques: laboratory and clinical progress and current issues Reproduction, December 1, 2008; 136(6): 667 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]