Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2008) 136 671-680
DOI: 10.1530/REP-08-0099
Copyright © 2008 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
136/6/671    most recent
REP-08-0099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gosden, R. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gosden, R. G

REVIEW

Ovary and uterus transplantation

Roger G Gosden

Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1305 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to R G Gosden; Email: rgg2004{at}med.cornell.edu

Ovarian and uterine transplantation are procedures gaining more attention again because of potential applications in respectively fertility preservation for cancer and other patients and, more tentatively, women with uterine agenesis or hysterectomy. Cryopreservation of tissue slices, and possibly whole organs, is providing opportunities for banking ovaries for indefinite periods before transplanting them back to restore fertility. The natural plasticity of this organ facilitates grafting to different sites where they can be revascularized and rapidly restore the normal physiology of secretion and ovulation. Ischemic damage is a chief limitation because many follicles are lost, at least in avascular grafts, and functional longevity is reduced. Nevertheless, grafts of young ovarian tissue, even after cryopreservation, can be highly fertile in laboratory rodents and, in humans, autografts have functioned for up to 3 years before needing replacement. Transplantation by vascular anastomosis provides potentially longer function but it is technically much more demanding and riskier for the recipient. It is the only practicable method with the uterus, and has enabled successful pregnancies in several species, but not yet in humans. Contrary to claims made many years ago, neither organ is privileged immunologically, and allografts become rapidly rejected except in hosts whose immune system is deficient or suppressed pharmacologically. All in all, transplantation of these organs, especially the ovary, provides a broad platform of opportunities for research and new applications in reproductive medicine and conservation biology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
C. Agca, M. C Lucy, and Y. Agca
Gene expression profile of rat ovarian tissue following xenotransplantation into immune-deficient mice
Reproduction, June 1, 2009; 137(6): 957 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R A Anderson
Fertility preservation techniques: laboratory and clinical progress and current issues
Reproduction, December 1, 2008; 136(6): 667 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.