Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2007) 134 781-787
DOI: 10.1530/REP-07-0338
Copyright © 2007 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wee, G.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wee, G.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.

RESEARCH

Epigenetic alteration of the donor cells does not recapitulate the reprogramming of DNA methylation in cloned embryos

Gabbine Wee1, Jung-Jae Shim1, Deog-Bon Koo3, Jung-Il Chae3, Kyung-Kwang Lee3 and Yong-Mahn Han1,2

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 373-1 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea,2 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Center for Stem Cell Differentiation, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea and3 Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Center for Development and Differentiation, Daejeon 305-806, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Y-M Han; Email: ymhan{at}kaist.ac.kr

Epigenetic reprogramming is a prerequisite process during mammalian development that is aberrant in cloned embryos. However, mechanisms that evolve abnormal epigenetic reprogramming during preimplantation development are unclear. To trace the molecular event of an epigenetic mark such as DNA methylation, bovine fibroblasts were epigeneticallyaltered by treatment with trichostatin A (TSA) and then individually transferred into enucleated bovine oocytes. In the TSA-treated cells, expression levels of histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases were reduced, but the expression level of histone acetyltransferases such as Tip60 and histone acetyltransferase 1 (HAT1) did not change compared with normal cells. DNA methylation levels of non-treated (normal) and TSA-treated cells were 64.0 and 48.9% in the satellite I sequence (P < 0.05) respectively, and 71.6 and 61.9% in the {alpha}-satellite sequence respectively. DNA methylation levels of nuclear transfer (NT) and TSA-NT blastocysts in the satellite I sequence were 67.2 and 42.2% (P < 0.05) respectively, which was approximately similar to those of normal and TSA-treated cells. In the {alpha}-satellite sequence, NT and TSA-NT embryos were substantially demethylated at the blastocyst stage as IVF-derived embryos were demethylated. The in vitro developmental rate (46.6%) of TSA-NT embryos that were individually transferred with TSA-treated cells was higher than that (31.7%) of NT embryos with non-treated cells (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that the chromatin of a donor cell is unyielding to the reprogramming of DNA methylation during preimplantation development, and that alteration of the epigenetic state of donor cells may improve in vitro developmental competence of cloned embryos.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.