| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
RESEARCH |
Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to P F Rinaudo who is now at Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Francisco, 2356 Sutter Street, San Francisco, California 94115, USA; Email: rinaudop{at}obgyn.ucsf.edu
In vitro culture (IVC) of preimplantation mouse embryos is associated with changes in gene expression. It is however, not known if the method of fertilization affects the global pattern of gene expression. We compared gene expression and development of mouse blastocysts produced by in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus blastocysts fertilized in vivo and cultured in vitro from the zygote stage (IVC) versus control blastocysts flushed out of the uterus on post coital day 3.5. The global pattern of gene expression was assessed using the Affymetrix 430 2.0 chip. It appears that each method of fertilization has a unique pattern of gene expression and development. Embryos cultured in vitro had a reduction in the number of trophoblastic cells (IVF 33.5 cells, IVC 39.9 cells, and 49.6 cells in the in vivo group) and, to a lesser degree, of inner cell mass cells (12.8, 11.7, and 13.8 respectively). The inner cell mass nuclei were larger after culture in vitro (140 µm2, 113 µm2, and 86 µm2 respectively). Although a high number of genes (1912) was statistically different in the IVF cohort when compared with the in vivo control embryos, the magnitude of the changes in gene expression were low and only a minority of genes (29 genes) was changed more than fourfold. Surprisingly, IVF embryos were different from IVC embryos (3058 genes were statistically different, but only three changed more than fourfold). Proliferation, apoptosis, and morphogenetic pathways are the most common pathways altered after IVC. Overall, IVF and embryo culture have a profound effect on gene expression pattern and phenotype of mouse preimplantation embryos.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Forde, F. Carter, T. Fair, M.A. Crowe, A.C.O. Evans, T.E. Spencer, F.W. Bazer, R. McBride, M.P. Boland, P. O'Gaora, et al. Progesterone-Regulated Changes in Endometrial Gene Expression Contribute to Advanced Conceptus Development in Cattle Biol Reprod, October 1, 2009; 81(4): 784 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-L. Miao, K. Kikuchi, Q.-Y. Sun, and H. Schatten Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2009; 15(5): 573 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Gong, H. Kim, E. J. Lee, S. T. Lee, S. Moon, H.-J. Lee, and J. M. Lim Change in gene expression of mouse embryonic stem cells derived from parthenogenetic activation Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 805 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E Lloyd, R. Romar, C. Matas, A. Gutierrez-Adan, W. V Holt, and P. Coy Effects of oviductal fluid on the development, quality, and gene expression of porcine blastocysts produced in vitro Reproduction, April 1, 2009; 137(4): 679 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fernandez-Gonzalez, J. de Dios Hourcade, I. Lopez-Vidriero, A. Benguria, F. R. De Fonseca, and A. Gutierrez-Adan Analysis of gene transcription alterations at the blastocyst stage related to the long-term consequences of in vitro culture in mice Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 271 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Bell, M. D. Calder, and A. J. Watson Genomic RNA profiling and the programme controlling preimplantation mammalian development Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 691 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Everts, P. Chavatte-Palmer, A. Razzak, I. Hue, C. A. Green, R. Oliveira, X. Vignon, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, X. C. Tian, X. Yang, et al. Aberrant gene expression patterns in placentomes are associated with phenotypically normal and abnormal cattle cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer Physiol Genomics, October 8, 2008; 33(1): 65 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |