Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2007) 134 137-145
DOI: 10.1530/REP-06-0333
Copyright © 2007 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McManus, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, R. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McManus, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, R. L

RESEARCH

Does nitric oxide act in the ventromedial preoptic area to mediate oestrogen negative feedback in the seasonally anoestrous ewe?

Christina J McManus, Miroslav Valent, Steven L Hardy and Robert L Goodman

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University, PO Box 9229, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9229, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to R L Goodman; Email: bgoodman{at}hsc.wvu.edu

Seasonal anoestrus in the ewe results from enhanced oestrogen negative feedback. Recent data have implicated the ventromedial preoptic area (vmPOA) as an important site of oestrogen action. This study addressed whether NO acts within the vmPOA to inhibit LH during seasonal anoestrus. In Experiment 1, microimplants containing N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, NOS inhibitor), S-methyl thiocitrulline (SMTC, neural NOS (nNOS) inhibitor) or empty implants (control) were administered during mid-anoestrus to the vmPOA. L-NAME, but not SMTC, significantly increased LH pulse frequency. For Experiment 2, ewes in late anoestrus were administered 7-nitroindazole (7NI; nNOS inhibitor), L-NAME, SMTC, or empty implants. 7NI, but not L-NAME or SMTC, increased LH pulse frequency. In Experiment 3, the effects of microimplants and microinjections of L-NAME were compared in mid-anoestrus. Microinjections of L-NAME (300 nl at 10 µg/µl) increased LH pulse frequency, but microimplants did not. In late anoestrus, similar microinjections were ineffective. Taken together, the results of Experiments 1–3 suggested that NO inhibition may be stronger during the middle than at the end of seasonal anoestrus. To test this hypothesis, ewes in Experiment 4 received microinjection of L-NAME or vehicle thrice during the non-breeding season; none of the treatments increased LH pulse frequency. These results indicate that NO plays a role in the vmPOA in suppressing LH secretion during seasonal anoestrus because NOS inhibitors were consistently stimulatory when LH pulse frequency was low. However, the inconsistent and modest effects of these inhibitors suggest that NO actions in this area cannot completely account for the effects of inhibitory photoperiod.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. L. Bogusz, S. L. Hardy, M. N. Lehman, J. M. Connors, S. M. Hileman, J. H. Sliwowska, H. J. Billings, C. J. McManus, M. Valent, S. R. Singh, et al.
Evidence that {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid Is Part of the Neural Circuit Mediating Estradiol Negative Feedback in Anestrous Ewes
Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 2762 - 2772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.