Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2007) 133 675-684
DOI: 10.1530/REP-06-0332
Copyright © 2007 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lefièvre, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barratt, C. L R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lefièvre, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barratt, C. L R

REVIEW

Counting sperm does not add up any more: time for a new equation?

Linda Lefièvre1, Kweku Bedu-Addo2, Sarah J Conner1, Gisela S M Machado-Oliveira3, Yongjian Chen4, Jackson C Kirkman-Brown5, Masoud A Afnan5, Stephen J Publicover3, W Christopher L Ford1 and Christopher L R Barratt1

1 Reproductive Biology and Genetics Group, Division of Reproductive and Child Health, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK, 2 Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 3 School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK, 4 The Center of Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100083, China and 5 Assisted Conception Unit, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to C L R Barratt who is now at Division of Reproductive and Child Health, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Room WX 1.30, West Wing, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Email: c.l.barratt{at}bham.ac.uk

Although sperm dysfunction is the single most common cause of infertility, we have poor methods of diagnosis and surprisingly no effective treatment (excluding assisted reproductive technology). In this review, we challenge the usefulness of a basic semen analysis and argue that a new paradigm is required immediately. We discuss the use of at-home screening to potentially improve the diagnosis of the male and to streamline the management of the sub-fertile couple. Additionally, we outline the recent progress in the field, for example, in proteomics, which will allow the development of new biomarkers of sperm function. This new knowledge will transform our understanding of the spermatozoon as a machine and is likely to lead to non-ART treatments for men with sperm dysfunction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR)
Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
T. F. Wu and D. S. Chu
Sperm Chromatin: Fertile Grounds for Proteomic Discovery of Clinical Tools
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1876 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. L.R. Barratt
The human sperm proteome: the potential for new biomarkers of male fertility and a transformation in our understanding of the spermatozoon as a machine: Commentary on the article 'Identification of proteomic differences in asthenozoospermic sperm samples' by Martinez et al.
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1240 - 1241.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E R S Roldan
Focus on determinants of male fertility
Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.