This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cooper, D. W Articles by Larsen, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cooper, D. W Articles by Larsen, E.

Immunocontraception of mammalian wildlife: ecological and immunogenetic issues

Australian and New Zealand Conservation Laboratories, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to D W Cooper; Email: des.cooper{at}unsw.edu.au

Immunocontraception involves stimulating immune responses against gametes or reproductive hormones thus preventing conception. The method is being developed for the humane control of pest and overabundant populations of mammalian wildlife. This paper examines three fundamental issues associated with its use: (1) the difficulties of obtaining responses to self-antigens, (2) the likely evolution of genetically based non-response to immunocontraceptive agents, and (3) the possible changes in the array of pathogens possessed by the target species after generations of immunocontraception. Our review of the literature demonstrates that the barriers to an effective immunocontraceptive are at present very basic. Should they be overcome, the effects of immunocontraception on the immunogenetic constitution of wildlife populations through the selection for non-responders must be examined. We suggest that the attempt to use the animal’s own immune system to modulate reproduction may be incompatible with the basic biological function of protection against infectious disease. Research programs on mammalian immunocontraception should involve measurement of the heritability of non-response and an assessment of the likely change in the response of the contracepted population to possible pathogens.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E Gray and E. Z Cameron Does contraceptive treatment in wildlife result in side effects? A review of quantitative and anecdotal evidence Reproduction, January 1, 2010; 139(1): 45 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Nation, S Cui, and L Selwood Vesicle-associated protein 1: a novel ovarian immunocontraceptive target in the common brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula Reproduction, November 1, 2008; 136(5): 657 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]