Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2006) 132 709-720
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01077
Copyright © 2006 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alberio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alberio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. D

REVIEW

Reprogramming somatic cells into stem cells

Ramiro Alberio, Keith H Campbell and Andrew D Johnson1

School of Biosciences and 1 Institute of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, NG2 5RD, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to R Alberio; Email: ramiro.alberio{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Recent scientific achievements in cell and developmental biology have provided unprecedented opportunities for advances in biomedical research. The demonstration that fully differentiated cells can reverse their gene expression profile to that of a pluripotent cell, and the successful derivation and culture of human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have fuelled hopes for applications in regenerative medicine. These advances have been put to public scrutiny raising legal, moral and ethical issues which have resulted in different levels of acceptance. Ethical issues concerning the use of cloned human embryos for the derivation of stem cells have stimulated the search for alternative methods for reversing differentiated cells into multi/pluripotent cells. In this article, we will review the present state of these reprogramming technologies and discuss their relative success. We also overview reprogramming events after somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), as they may further instruct ex ovo strategies for cellular manipulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Luo, W. Hu, S. Chen, Y. Xiao, Y. Sun, and Z. Zhu
Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes Between Cloned and Zygote-Developing Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos at the Dome Stage Using Suppression Subtractive Hybridization
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 674 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Gall, D. Le Bourhis, S. Ruffini, C. Boulesteix, and X. Vignon
Unexpected nuclear localization of Cdc25C in bovine oocytes, early embryos, and nuclear-transferred embryos
Reproduction, April 1, 2008; 135(4): 431 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. E Young
Focus on stem cells in reproduction.
Reproduction, November 1, 2006; 132(5): 671 - 672.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.