Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2006) 132 279-290
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01217
Copyright © 2006 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, D. R
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, D. R
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. C

RESEARCH

Somatic cell nuclear transfer alters peri-implantation trophoblast differentiation in bovine embryos

Daniel R Arnold1, Vilceu Bordignon1, Réjean Lefebvre1,2, Bruce D Murphy1 and Lawrence C Smith1

1 Centre de recherche en reproduction animale, and 2 Départment de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada J2S 7C6

Correspondence should be addressed to L C Smith; Email: smithl{at}medvet.umontreal.ca

Abnormal placental development limits success in ruminant pregnancies derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), due to reduction in placentome number and consequently, maternal/fetal exchange. In the primary stages of an epithelial–chorial association, the maternal/fetal interface is characterized by progressive endometrial invasion by specialized trophoblast binucleate/giant cells (TGC). We hypothesized that dysfunctional placentation in SCNT pregnancies results from aberration in expression of genes known to be necessary for trophoblast proliferation (Mash2), differentiation (Hand1), and function (IFN-{tau} and PAG-9). We, therefore, compared the expression of these factors in trophoblast from bovine embryos derived from artificial insemination (AI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and SCNT prior to (day 17) and following (day 40 of gestation) implantation, as well as TGC densities and function. In preimplantation embryos, Mash2 mRNA was more abundant in SCNT embryos compared to AI, while Hand1 was highest in AI and IVF relative to SCNT embryos. IFN-{tau} mRNA abundance did not differ among groups. PAG-9 mRNA was undetectable in SCNT embryos, present in IVF embryos and highest in AI embryos. In postimplantation pregnancies, SCNT fetal cotyledons displayed higher Mash2 and Hand1 than AI and IVF tissues. Allelic expression of Mash2 was not different among the groups, which suggests that elevated mRNA expression was not due to altered imprinting status of Mash2. The day 40 SCNT cotyledons had the fewest number of TGC compared to IVF and AI controls. Thus, expression of genes critical to normal placental development is altered in SCNT bovine embryos, and this is expected to cause abnormal trophoblast differentiation and contribute to pregnancy loss.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S L Rodriguez-Zas, K Schellander, and H A Lewin
Biological interpretations of transcriptomic profiles in mammalian oocytes and embryos
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Blomberg, K. Hashizume, and C. Viebahn
Blastocyst elongation, trophoblastic differentiation, and embryonic pattern formation
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 181 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
R. M. Rivera, P. Stein, J. R. Weaver, J. Mager, R. M. Schultz, and M. S. Bartolomei
Manipulations of mouse embryos prior to implantation result in aberrant expression of imprinted genes on day 9.5 of development
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.