Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2006) 131 851-859
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00916
Copyright © 2006 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J.

RESEARCH

Graft site and gonadotrophin stimulation influences the number and quality of oocytes from murine ovarian tissue grafts

Hsiao Yun Yang1, Shae-Lee Cox1,2, Graham Jenkin1,2, Jock Findlay3, Alan Trounson2 and Jillian Shaw4

1 Department of Physiology, 2 Monash Immunology and Stem Cell Laboratories, 3 Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical research, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia 3168 and 4 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia 3800

Correspondence should be addressed to H Y Yang; Email: Hsiao.yang{at}med.monash.edu.au

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and subsequent transplantation can restore fertility in cancer patients. This study used a mouse ovarian grafting model to investigate whether the graft site (bursal cavity, the kidney capsule or subcutaneous) influences the number, fertilization rate and developmental potential of oocytes recovered from grafts and whether using a standard gonadotrophin stimulation protocol would increase oocyte yield from the grafts. Mouse ovarian tissue was grafted into four week old mice and collected three weeks later. Graft recipients were treated either with or without exogenous gonadotrophin stimulation prior to graft collection. Grafted ovaries yielded oocytes that were either at the germinal vesicle (GV) stage or mature metaphase II (MII) stage at collection. These GV oocytes were matured before in vitro fertilization (IVF), while the MII oocytes underwent IVF immediately. Oocytes collected from the oviducts of non-grafted superovulated mice of the same age served as controls. Two-cell embryos were transferred to pseudopregnant recipients and recovered at day 15 of gestation or left to go to term. Graft retrieval and the number of oocytes from each graft were lowest from the subcutaneous graft site. The number of two-cell embryos produced was significantly higher for oocytes from the grafts to the bursa as compared with the other sites. All graft sites gave rise to embryos with comparable implantation rates and developmental potential to fetuses and offspring following transfer. However, the oocytes from grafted ovaries had a significantly lower developmental potential when compared with the control group. Stimulation with exogenous gonadotrophins did not significantly increase oocyte yield from grafted ovaries but did enhance oocyte maturation and development. In conclusion, graft site affects the number and quality of oocytes produced from ovarian grafts.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
I. Demeestere, P. Simon, S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, and Y. Englert
Orthotopic and heterotopic ovarian tissue transplantation
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2009; 15(6): 649 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
X. Deng, H. Zheng, X. Yu, H. Yu, C. Zhang, L. Chao, R. Li, and W. Liu
Cryopreserved ovarian tissues can maintain a long-term function after heterotopic autotransplantation in rat
Reproduction, September 1, 2009; 138(3): 519 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Donnez, B. Martinez-Madrid, P. Jadoul, A. Van Langendonckt, D. Demylle, and M.-M. Dolmans
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 519 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.