Reproduction  
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2006) 131 311-318
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00814
Copyright © 2006 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waberski, D
Right arrow Articles by Töpfer-Petersen, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waberski, D
Right arrow Articles by Töpfer-Petersen, E

RESEARCH

Binding of boar spermatozoa to oviductal epithelium in vitro in relation to sperm morphology and storage time

D Waberski, F Magnus, F Ardón, A M Petrunkina, K F Weitze and E Töpfer-Petersen

Institute for Reproductive Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Buenteweg 15, D-30559 Hannover, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to D Waberski; Email: Dagmar.Waberski{at}tiho-hannover.de

In vitro short-term storage of boar semen for up to 72 h before insemination negatively affects fertility, but this often remains undetected during semen quality assessment. One important sperm function is the ability to form the functional sperm reservoir in the oviduct. In the present study, we used the modified oviductal explant assay to study sperm binding to oviductal epithelium in vitro in diluted boar semen stored for 24 or 72 h. First, we determined the kinetics of in vitro sperm binding to oviductal epithelium in relation to co-incubation time of sperm and oviductal tissue pieces. Then, we studied how the binding of sperm to oviductal epithelium was affected by in vitro semen storage and by differences among individual boars. Sperm binding after different incubation times was significantly higher when semen was stored 24 h than after 72-h storage (P < 0.05), and peaked at 30–90 min of incubation. Sperm binding differed between boars (n = 44), and was negatively correlated to the percentage of sperm with cytoplasmic droplets (R = –0.51, P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in motility, acrosome integrity and propidium iodide stainability during the 72-h storage period. However, sperm-binding indices were significantly lower after 72 h in vitro storage than after 24-h storage in sperm from boars with normal semen quality (P < 0.05); in contrast, the binding capacity of sperm from boars with higher percentages of morphologically altered sperm remained at a low level. The sperm-binding capacity of sperm from four of the five boars with known subfertility was lower than the mean binding index minus one standard deviation of the boar population studied here. It is concluded that changes in the plasma membrane associated with in vitro ageing reduce the ability of stored boar sperm to bind to the oviductal epithelium. This study shows the potential of sperm–oviduct binding as a tool to assess both male fertility and changes in sperm function associated with in vitro ageing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F. Ardon, D. Helms, E. Sahin, H. Bollwein, E. Topfer-Petersen, and D. Waberski
Chromatin-unstable boar spermatozoa have little chance of reaching oocytes in vivo
Reproduction, April 1, 2008; 135(4): 461 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A M Petrunkina, D Waberski, A R Gunzel-Apel, and E Topfer-Petersen
Determinants of sperm quality and fertility in domestic species
Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 3 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. A. Y. Khalil, A. M. Petrunkina, E. Sahin, D. Waberski, and E. Topfer-Petersen
Enhanced Binding of Sperm With Superior Volume Regulation to Oviductal Epithelium
J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 754 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.