Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2005) 130 761-781
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00865
Copyright © 2005 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, M. A
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morelli, M. A
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P. E

REVIEW

Not all germ cells are created equal: Aspects of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiosis

Meisha A Morelli and Paula E Cohen

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to P E Cohen; Email: pc242{at}cornell.edu

The study of mammalian meiosis is complicated by the timing of meiotic events in females and by the intermingling of meiotic sub-stages with somatic cells in the gonad of both sexes. In addition, studies of mouse mutants for different meiotic regulators have revealed significant differences in the stringency of meiotic events in males versus females. This sexual dimorphism implies that the processes of recombination and homologous chromosome pairing, while being controlled by similar genetic pathways, are subject to different levels of checkpoint control in males and females. This review is focused on the emerging picture of sexual dimorphism exhibited by mammalian germ cells using evidence from the broad range of meiotic mutants now available in the mouse. Many of these mouse mutants display distinct differences in meiotic progression and/or dysfunction in males versus females, and their continued study will allow us to understand the molecular basis for the sex-specific differences observed during prophase I progression.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. T. Jones
Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 143 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. Alton, M. P. Lau, M. Villemure, and T. Taketo
The behavior of the X- and Y-chromosomes in the oocyte during meiotic prophase in the B6.YTIR sex-reversed mouse ovary
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 241 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P Robles, I Roig, R Garcia, A Ortega, J Egozcue, L L Cabero, and M Garcia
Pairing and synapsis in oocytes from female fetuses with euploid and aneuploid chromosome complements
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 899 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Chuma, M. Hosokawa, K. Kitamura, S. Kasai, M. Fujioka, M. Hiyoshi, K. Takamune, T. Noce, and N. Nakatsuji
Tdrd1/Mtr-1, a tudor-related gene, is essential for male germ-cell differentiation and nuage/germinal granule formation in mice
PNAS, October 24, 2006; 103(43): 15894 - 15899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
P. E. Cohen, S. E. Pollack, and J. W. Pollard
Genetic Analysis of Chromosome Pairing, Recombination, and Cell Cycle Control during First Meiotic Prophase in Mammals
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2006; 27(4): 398 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. Herbert
Focus on Meiosis
Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 759 - 760.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.