Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2005) 130 29-39
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00550
Copyright © 2005 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gioia, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mattioli, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gioia, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mattioli, M.

RESEARCH

The capability of reprogramming the male chromatin after fertilization is dependent on the quality of oocyte maturation

Luisa Gioia, Barbara Barboni, Maura Turriani, Giulia Capacchietti, Maria Gabriella Pistilli, Paolo Berardinelli and Mauro Mattioli

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Comparate, Fisiologia Veterinaria, Università di Teramo, Piazza Aldo Moro 45, Teramo 64100, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to L Gioia; Email: lgioia{at}unite.it

The present experiments compared the ability of pig oocytes matured either in vivo or in vitro to structurally reorganize the penetrated sperm chromatin into male pronucleus (PN) and to carry out, in parallel, the epigenetic processes of global chromatin methylation and acetylation, 12–14 h after in vitro fertilization (IVF). In addition, PN distribution of histone deacetylase (HDAC), a major enzyme interfacing DNA methylation and histone acetylation, was investigated. The ability of the oocyte to operate an efficient block to polyspermy was markedly affected by maturation. The monospermic fertilization rate was significantly higher for in vivo than for in vitro matured (IVM) oocytes (P < 0.01) which, furthermore, showed a reduced ability to transform the chromatin of penetrated sperm into male PN (P < 0.01). Indirect immunofluorescence analysis of global DNA methylation, histone acetylation and HDAC distribution (HDAC-1, -2 and -3), carried out in monospermic zygotes that reached the late PN stage, showed that IVM oocytes also had a reduced epigenetic competence. In fact, while in about 80% of in vivo matured and IVF oocytes the male PN underwent a process of active demethylation and showed a condition of histone H4 hyperacetylation, only 40% of IVM/IVF zygotes displayed a similar PN remodelling asymmetry. Oocytes that carried out the first part of maturation in vivo (up to germinal vesicle breakdown; GVBD) and then completed the process in vitro, displayed the same PN asymmetry as oocytes matured entirely in vivo. A crucial role of HDAC in the establishment of PN acetylation asymmetry seems to be confirmed by the use of HDAC inhibitors as well as by the abnormal distribution of the enzyme between the two PN in IVM zygotes. Collectively, these data demonstrated that some pig IVM oocytes fail to acquire full remodelling competence which is independent from their ooplasmic ability to morphologically reorganize the sperm nucleus into PN.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H.-T. Bui, N. Van Thuan, T. Wakayama, and T. Miyano
Chromatin remodeling in somatic cells injected into mature pig oocytes.
Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1037 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Skrzyszowska, Z. Smorag, R. Slomski, L. Katska-Ksiazkiewicz, R. Kalak, E. Michalak, K. Wielgus, J. Lehmann, D. Lipinski, M. Szalata, et al.
Generation of Transgenic Rabbits by the Novel Technique of Chimeric Somatic Cell Cloning
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 1114 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. E. Boklage
Embryogenesis of chimeras, twins and anterior midline asymmetries
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 579 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.