| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
REVIEW |
Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Institute of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
Correspondence should be addressed to L Young; Email: lorraine.young{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Epigenetic processes affect three stages of germline development, namely (1) specification and formation of primordial germ cells and their germline derivatives through lineage-specific epigenetic modifications, in the same manner as other embryonic lineages are formed, (2) a largely genome-wide erasure and re-establishment of germline-specific epigenetic modifications that only occurs in the embryonic primordial germ cell lineage, followed by re-establishment of sex-specific patterns during gametogenesis, and (3) differential epigenetic modifications to the mature male and female gamete genomes shortly after fertilisation. This review will detail current knowledge of these three processes both at the genome-wide level and at specific imprinted loci. The consequences of epigenetic perturbation are discussed and new in vitro models which may allow further understanding of a difficult developmental period to study, especially in the human, are highlighted.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Liu and X. Sun Skewed X chromosome inactivation in diploid and triploid female human embryonic stem cells Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 1834 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Takahashi, A. Okamoto, R. Kobayashi, M. Shirai, Y. Obata, H. Ogawa, Y. Sotomaru, and T. Kono Deletion of Gtl2, imprinted non-coding RNA, with its differentially methylated region induces lethal parent-origin-dependent defects in mice Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2009; 18(10): 1879 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Suzuki and Y. Saga Nanos2 suppresses meiosis and promotes male germ cell differentiation Genes & Dev., February 15, 2008; 22(4): 430 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Thurston, J. Taylor, J. Gardner, K. D Sinclair, and L. E Young Monoallelic expression of nine imprinted genes in the sheep embryo occurs after the blastocyst stage Reproduction, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 29 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Biermann and K. Steger Epigenetics in Male Germ Cells J Androl, July 1, 2007; 28(4): 466 - 480. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Houldsworth, J. E. Korkola, G. J. Bosl, and R. S. K. Chaganti Biology and Genetics of Adult Male Germ Cell Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2006; 24(35): 5512 - 5518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-S. Chang, M. D. Anway, S. S. Rekow, and M. K. Skinner Transgenerational Epigenetic Imprinting of the Male Germline by Endocrine Disruptor Exposure during Gonadal Sex Determination Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5524 - 5541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Aflatoonian and H. Moore Germ cells from mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Reproduction, November 1, 2006; 132(5): 699 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bibikova, E. Chudin, B. Wu, L. Zhou, E. W. Garcia, Y. Liu, S. Shin, T. W. Plaia, J. M. Auerbach, D. E. Arking, et al. Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signature Genome Res., September 1, 2006; 16(9): 1075 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Koslowski, U. Sahin, C. Huber, and O. Tureci The human X chromosome is enriched for germline genes expressed in premeiotic germ cells of both sexes Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2006; 15(15): 2392 - 2399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Anway and M. K. Skinner Epigenetic Transgenerational Actions of Endocrine Disruptors Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): s43 - s49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Sun, A. C. Yang, Y. Feng, Y. J. Sun, Y. f. Zhu, Y. Zhang, H. Jiang, C. L. Li, F. R. Gao, Z. H. Zhang, et al. Temporal and parental-specific expression of imprinted genes in a newly derived Chinese human embryonic stem cell line and embryoid bodies Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 65 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |