Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2004) 127 557-568
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00049
Copyright © 2004 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollinshead, F K
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, J K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollinshead, F K
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, J K

RESEARCH

Birth of lambs of a pre-determined sex after in vitro production of embryos using frozen–thawed sex-sorted and re-frozen–thawed ram spermatozoa

F K Hollinshead, G Evans, K M Evans1, S L Catt2, W M C Maxwell and J K O'Brien

Centre for Advanced Technologies in Animal Genetics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia, 1 XY, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado, USA and 2 Sydney IVF, 4 O’Connell Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to J K O’Brien; Email: justineo{at}vetsci.usyd.edu.au

The characteristics and functional capacity of ram spermatozoa frozen–thawed prior to and after flow cytometric sorting was assessed after incubation (37 °C; 6 h), in vitro fertilisation (IVF), and transfer of fresh and vitrified in vitro produced embryos. Frozen-thawed spermatozoa from two rams were allocated to four treatment groups: (i) non-sorted (Control); (ii) sorted (FS); (iii) sorted then re-frozen (FSF) and (iv) re-frozen control (FCF). Frozen-thawed samples were separated into X- and Y-chromosome bearing spermatozoa using a high-speed sperm sorter after density gradient centrifugation (X: 88 ± 1.5% and Y: 87 ± 1.1% purity). After 6 h incubation (37 °C), the percentage of motile spermatozoa was higher (P < 0.001) for FS (84 ± 2.0%) compared with all other treatments (Control: 36 ± 3.3%, FSF: 28 ± 3.1%, FCF: 20 ± 2.0%). In a sperm migration test greater numbers of FS spermatozoa penetrated 5 mm into the artificial cervical mucus compared with spermatozoa from all other treatments (152 ± 39.4 vs 31 ± 9.2 spermatozoa respectively; P < 0.05). Fertilisation and cleavage rates were higher (P < 0.05) for in vitro matured oocytes inseminated with Control compared with FSF spermatozoa. However, the Day 7 blastocyst development rate was higher for oocytes inseminated with FSF (62.2%) than FS and Control spermatozoa (52.7 and 50.0%; P < 0.05). The number of ewes pregnant (Day 60), lambing and the in vivo embryo survival rate was greater (P < 0.01) after the transfer of fresh embryos rather than vitrified embryos derived from X- and Y-spermatozoa (67.6, 64.7 and 41.2% vs 29.6, 25.9 and 14.8% respectively). Twenty-six of the 30 (86.7%) lambs derived from sex-sorted spermatozoa were of the correct sex. These results demonstrate that frozen–thawed ram spermatozoa can be sex-sorted for immediate or future use after re-cryopreservation and, in conjunction with IVF and embryo transfer, can be used to efficiently produce offspring of pre-determined sex.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
V. J. Grant and L. W. Chamley
Sex-Sorted Sperm and Fertility: An Alternative View
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 184 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. Puglisi, R. Vanni, A. Galli, D. Balduzzi, K. Parati, G. Bongioni, G. Crotti, R. Duchi, C. Galli, G. Lazzari, et al.
In vitro fertilisation with frozen-thawed bovine sperm sexed by flow cytometry and validated for accuracy by real-time PCR.
Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 519 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.